Mar 6, 2020, 10:06 AM I have known about this theory for a few years, because I follow WItten’s work. It is the most believable AND most terrifying explanation of the universe’s ending, because it corresponds to spooky action at a distance, meaning that collapse of the universe would be as rapid as expansion of the universe. It’s the least implausible solution that answers every open question other than the physical construction of the background (higgs field). (Note that the profession doesn’t consider it terribly plausible.)
Source: Original Site Post
-
Collapse of The Universe Would Be as Rapid as Expansion of The Universe
Mar 6, 2020, 10:06 AM I have known about this theory for a few years, because I follow WItten’s work. It is the most believable AND most terrifying explanation of the universe’s ending, because it corresponds to spooky action at a distance, meaning that collapse of the universe would be as rapid as expansion of the universe. It’s the least implausible solution that answers every open question other than the physical construction of the background (higgs field). (Note that the profession doesn’t consider it terribly plausible.)
-
Understandable or Reasonable?
Mar 6, 2020, 10:54 AM Is Faith is understandable(a rational choice) or reasonable (a justifiable choice)? Well, again, three human faculties;
1. intuitionistic(intuitable), 2. reasonable(justifiable, explicable), and; 3. physical-material(action, decidable, true).Agency increases as we move forward in brain dominance.
-
Understandable or Reasonable?
Mar 6, 2020, 10:54 AM Is Faith is understandable(a rational choice) or reasonable (a justifiable choice)? Well, again, three human faculties;
1. intuitionistic(intuitable), 2. reasonable(justifiable, explicable), and; 3. physical-material(action, decidable, true).Agency increases as we move forward in brain dominance.
-
Bottlenecks, Collapses, Dark Ages
Mar 6, 2020, 12:30 PM The Early Bottleneck ~BC2-3M The Toba Bottleneck ~Bc75k The Out Of Africa Bottlneck ~Bc50k The Bering Straight Bottleneck ??? The Paleolithic Collapse Bc25k ??? The Persian Gulf Deluge BC12000-10000 The Neolithic Farmers and Religion Bc7000+ The Black Sea Deluge – Bc5600 The First Early Bronze Age Dark Age – Bc2200 -1900 The Indo European (Bronze) Expansion And The Great Divide Bc2500-1500+ The Bronze Age Collapse – The Dark Age – Bc1177-800 The Bronze Age Revival – The Axial Age – Our Religious Traditions Bc800+ The Semitic Dark Ages – Abrahamism V1 Ad100/400–1200/1600 The Steel Age Revival – Aristotelianism Ad1200/1600 – 1920 The Information Age Collapse – Abrahamism V2 – 1850/Present-???
-
Bottlenecks, Collapses, Dark Ages
Mar 6, 2020, 12:30 PM The Early Bottleneck ~BC2-3M The Toba Bottleneck ~Bc75k The Out Of Africa Bottlneck ~Bc50k The Bering Straight Bottleneck ??? The Paleolithic Collapse Bc25k ??? The Persian Gulf Deluge BC12000-10000 The Neolithic Farmers and Religion Bc7000+ The Black Sea Deluge – Bc5600 The First Early Bronze Age Dark Age – Bc2200 -1900 The Indo European (Bronze) Expansion And The Great Divide Bc2500-1500+ The Bronze Age Collapse – The Dark Age – Bc1177-800 The Bronze Age Revival – The Axial Age – Our Religious Traditions Bc800+ The Semitic Dark Ages – Abrahamism V1 Ad100/400–1200/1600 The Steel Age Revival – Aristotelianism Ad1200/1600 – 1920 The Information Age Collapse – Abrahamism V2 – 1850/Present-???
-
History Solves the Incel Problem with Civil War
Mar 6, 2020, 4:40 PM
—“Curt, How do we solve the incel problem? Do we must accept as a natural fact that 80% of women go to 20% of men?”–
That’s not true. It’s that 30% of men are less desirable b/c they’ve been deprived of necessary male training, education, and fraternity in order to accomodate (the frailties of) women’s intolerance for dominance play. Yes, 1/3 of men are undesirable, but b/c dysgenia – fix both.
—“You mean we have 30% of good quality men who can’t find partner( marriage,children) because of feminist waves( freedom of women and its consequences).”—
I am saying that (a) people in general are having a lot less sex for reasons we understand, (b) women no longer need men for economic support or reproduction, ( c) incentives (education, taxes, immigration pressure) are hostile to marriage, (d) this is producing expected results. And yes, (e) the expected results mean that we have returned to the HISTORICAL NORM where 1/3 under monogamy, 2/3 under poverty, and as few as 1 in 17 men during prehistory have access to sex. These men are de facto, by the evidence, not of sufficient quality that women will defer other consumption in order to consume those men. Claiming they are of sufficient quality is simply demonstrably false. Fix men (product) or fix the incentives (market). Latter is easier. So – if you want to fix the problem fix men (product) fix incentives (markets). I suspect that incels are insufficiently manly to solve the problem as have their ancestors – and therefore are demonstrating the truth of the market condition. In other words, the gene pool is selecting incels out of it, unless incels demonstrate that they are manly enough not to be selected out of it.
-
History Solves the Incel Problem with Civil War
Mar 6, 2020, 4:40 PM
—“Curt, How do we solve the incel problem? Do we must accept as a natural fact that 80% of women go to 20% of men?”–
That’s not true. It’s that 30% of men are less desirable b/c they’ve been deprived of necessary male training, education, and fraternity in order to accomodate (the frailties of) women’s intolerance for dominance play. Yes, 1/3 of men are undesirable, but b/c dysgenia – fix both.
—“You mean we have 30% of good quality men who can’t find partner( marriage,children) because of feminist waves( freedom of women and its consequences).”—
I am saying that (a) people in general are having a lot less sex for reasons we understand, (b) women no longer need men for economic support or reproduction, ( c) incentives (education, taxes, immigration pressure) are hostile to marriage, (d) this is producing expected results. And yes, (e) the expected results mean that we have returned to the HISTORICAL NORM where 1/3 under monogamy, 2/3 under poverty, and as few as 1 in 17 men during prehistory have access to sex. These men are de facto, by the evidence, not of sufficient quality that women will defer other consumption in order to consume those men. Claiming they are of sufficient quality is simply demonstrably false. Fix men (product) or fix the incentives (market). Latter is easier. So – if you want to fix the problem fix men (product) fix incentives (markets). I suspect that incels are insufficiently manly to solve the problem as have their ancestors – and therefore are demonstrating the truth of the market condition. In other words, the gene pool is selecting incels out of it, unless incels demonstrate that they are manly enough not to be selected out of it.
-
Races
Mar 6, 2020, 5:09 PM Races aren’t smarter or dumber. Races, subraces, tribes, and clans have larger or smaller underclasses that shift the distribution downward, producing demand for norms at the median. The three exceptional peoples of modernity have merely culled their underclasses: Ashkenazi, Europeans, and East Asians by climate, farming, land provision, credit provision, war, disease, and prosecution of the undesirable. The question is why europeans are disproportionately more creative despite much smaller numbers, and this appears to be a combination of both genetic and civilizational causes.
-
Races
Mar 6, 2020, 5:09 PM Races aren’t smarter or dumber. Races, subraces, tribes, and clans have larger or smaller underclasses that shift the distribution downward, producing demand for norms at the median. The three exceptional peoples of modernity have merely culled their underclasses: Ashkenazi, Europeans, and East Asians by climate, farming, land provision, credit provision, war, disease, and prosecution of the undesirable. The question is why europeans are disproportionately more creative despite much smaller numbers, and this appears to be a combination of both genetic and civilizational causes.