Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • lolz.. welcome back. 😉

    lolz.. welcome back. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 10:45:00 UTC

  • Virtue signal in the mirror. Like all forms of self pleasure, It’s revolting in

    —Virtue signal in the mirror. Like all forms of self pleasure, It’s revolting in public.—

    (that one has legs)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 10:40:00 UTC

  • I mean, if they think they can get an impeachment result (they can’t) then that’

    I mean, if they think they can get an impeachment result (they can’t) then that’s one thing. But a government run by Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein… Well, you know it’s going to end up as Jews and the underclasses of color and single women against the working, middle, entrepreneurial, and married whites. In other words, the end result will be californian and world normal orders of small wealthy upper classes and large poor underclasses. Whereas the USA was founded and intentionally designed as a third way: the working, middle, and entrepreneurial classes, with marginalized lower and upper classes. Not that anyone will care that the reason for our success was that middle class order.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 09:46:00 UTC

  • WE HAVE TO MAKE IT REAL FOR PEOPLE: ACTIONABLE —“People buy into HOPE PORN bec

    WE HAVE TO MAKE IT REAL FOR PEOPLE: ACTIONABLE

    —“People buy into HOPE PORN because they don’t know what to DO about the status quo. Having concrete steps to take promotes realism.”—Jennifer Dean

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 09:03:00 UTC

  • LAUNCH TIME So, my work is ready, I am ready, it seems like enough of the group

    LAUNCH TIME

    So, my work is ready, I am ready, it seems like enough of the group is ready, and the circumstance is ready, and market demand will begin to increase. And as such everything is ready to start ‘teaching’.

    Because we have an explanation, a science, a solution, and a plan, and no one else has anything close.

    The only issue I have is that I need enough ‘participants’ live online at the same time so that we together produce a seminar, rather than me alone producing a lecture.

    If we do that then we can ‘build’ a group of ‘professors’ so to speak, and I can publish our ‘demands’ and we can educate people in the whole spectrum from understanding to demand, to calls to action to tactics in execution.

    So it appears timing is about right.

    And it’s time to launch.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 09:02:00 UTC

  • BECOMING REAL by Bill Joslin (brilliant) You are not real, you don’t exist until

    BECOMING REAL

    by Bill Joslin

    (brilliant)

    You are not real, you don’t exist until you act in the world – until an impact has been catalyzed. Nothing else; morals, hope, intentions, thoughts, feelings; none of it exists, only the acts and consequences of acts exist – you are what you’ve done – realz over feels…

    When assessing the people around you, all that matters is what they’ve done and can do – not how nice they are, how moral they are, how amiable you find them, what they say – they are what they do. If they can’t do – there’s is nothing you can do with or for them- they are not equals and must be led.

    Likewise – if you can’t do (we all have our limits) then best to step aside. Your intentions, thoughts, feels, understanding is useless and pointless until you can act.

    Extrapolate this into larger scales – social norms, group identity, customs, are ghosts – not quite real until codified in law and law doesn’t exist until there is force to make it real (consequential)…

    Therefore – if you want your people to exist – you must rule and many of your people won’t be able to rule, so you must lead them – sheepdog rule or your people , you, aren’t real.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 08:56:00 UTC

  • SEEING THE DICHOTOMY AND TEACHING IT by John Mark Now that I see this dichotomy

    SEEING THE DICHOTOMY AND TEACHING IT

    by John Mark

    Now that I see this dichotomy between hopeful-moral-wishful thinking and resigned-legal-realistic thinking, I see it everywhere.

    Leftists, obviously moral/wishful. Libertardians, “principled conservatives”, classical liberal, and Civnats are still moral/wishful.

    Even my wife, after Dems took the House, was emotionally upset. I said, “I’ve been telling you democracy is false hope for a long time now. Even if we’d won the House it would mean nothing in the long run.” “Yeah, but it’s just so upsetting (moral rant as she works through the emotions).”

    It is hard to have your hopes shattered. High-openness right-wingers have it a bit easier because we immediately probe for outside the box solutions, that’s what we do. Low-openness folks have it harder because change is less comfortable for them in general.

    It’s amazing watching the Right catch up to us slowly in real time. TheConservativeTreehouse (boomer civnat site) comment section on midterms night had many people saying “this was the nonwhites”. A new dynamic for them, normally signal hard against any race talk. The site proprietor said he just wanted to go fishing. (Emotional/wishful/hopeful thinking being shattered into realism.)

    Becoming more aspie/scientific/realistic is emotionally difficult for most people, it usually only happens through the trauma of reality slapping them in the face brutally, and even then humans show a remarkable capacity to resist it. But any individual or group that embraces it (classic example Western Civ) to a greater extent than others has a tremendous advantage.

    So the question is vital: How do we *train* it?

    –John Mark

    (CD: The Law is Easy to Teach)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 08:54:00 UTC

  • lesson of rome. If you’re going to do it. You do it like you did to carthage. Yo

    lesson of rome. If you’re going to do it. You do it like you did to carthage. You do not do it like you did to greece and judea.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 08:49:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45678115_10156766138427264_531208022

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45678115_10156766138427264_5312080229605310464_o_10156766138417264.jpg THE REVOLUTIONARY RECORD

    Hmmmm. Mao racked up 70m, Stalin 20m, Hitler 12m, and Pol Pot at least 2m, Napoleon, Caesar, and Alexander at least 1m, each. I mean, the chinese and the mongols are the world masters of death tolls.

    With the muslim conquest and destruction of every civlization of the ancient world EXCEPT the chinese and to a lesser extent, the Indian. Thy racked up a Billion (yeah, billion), or so close to it, that it’s a rounding error.

    And to make a fair comparison between teh muslim conquest and the jewish conquest under Marxism, the Marxists cumulatively got to 100m. So the semites, between the Jews (100M), and the Muslims (1B) seem to be the most successful at decimation of peoples.

    Again, we learn the lesson of from the chinese: ‘wall off the barbarians, and keep them out’. ergo, wall the Straits of Gibraltar, the Bosphorus, the Caucus Mountains, and the Ural Mountains, and contain the ‘stans, mongolians and chinese to their positions.

    Now, Romans did a sizable job, but the consequence of the dispersal catastrophic. (See image below). The only restitution being restoring the homeland (done) and repatriating the descendents (yet to be done).

    By comparisons, Anglos are lightweights. With the War of the Roses at 40k, 25k in the Revolutionary War. 500K in the Civil War.

    So, you know 30m (10%) is sort of the minimum with 100m a more proportional goal.

    LIST OF WARS BY DEATH TOLL

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_tollEly HarmanTime to set a new world record…Nov 9, 2018, 10:10 AMJeremiah GreasingGuinness here we comeNov 9, 2018, 10:26 AMCharles LamptonSkull pyramids.Nov 9, 2018, 12:12 PMCorbus AureliusBuild the wall out of bones.Nov 9, 2018, 7:27 PMBryan Nova BreyRoman Empire vs Jews was a 3 part Epic!?!Nov 9, 2018, 9:13 PMTHE REVOLUTIONARY RECORD

    Hmmmm. Mao racked up 70m, Stalin 20m, Hitler 12m, and Pol Pot at least 2m, Napoleon, Caesar, and Alexander at least 1m, each. I mean, the chinese and the mongols are the world masters of death tolls.

    With the muslim conquest and destruction of every civlization of the ancient world EXCEPT the chinese and to a lesser extent, the Indian. Thy racked up a Billion (yeah, billion), or so close to it, that it’s a rounding error.

    And to make a fair comparison between teh muslim conquest and the jewish conquest under Marxism, the Marxists cumulatively got to 100m. So the semites, between the Jews (100M), and the Muslims (1B) seem to be the most successful at decimation of peoples.

    Again, we learn the lesson of from the chinese: ‘wall off the barbarians, and keep them out’. ergo, wall the Straits of Gibraltar, the Bosphorus, the Caucus Mountains, and the Ural Mountains, and contain the ‘stans, mongolians and chinese to their positions.

    Now, Romans did a sizable job, but the consequence of the dispersal catastrophic. (See image below). The only restitution being restoring the homeland (done) and repatriating the descendents (yet to be done).

    By comparisons, Anglos are lightweights. With the War of the Roses at 40k, 25k in the Revolutionary War. 500K in the Civil War.

    So, you know 30m (10%) is sort of the minimum with 100m a more proportional goal.

    LIST OF WARS BY DEATH TOLL

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_toll

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 08:30:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 07:52:00 UTC