—“If you’re nice and lose, you’ll be recorded in history as the worst form of evil. If you’re evil and win, you just write history and make yourself the good guy. Since human perception is the only method of recording reality over time: winning is good, losing is evil.”—Steve Pender
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 15:16:00 UTC
Um. You know. If i asked you “How would you go about creating a value-neutral, cross-disciplinary, fully commensurable language that could survive in court under testimony in all matters of conflict.”, I’ll bet you can’t even begin to imagine where to start and how to go about it.
So yeah, that’s Propertarianism (or that’s the spectrum within Propertarianism, including vitruvianism->metaphysics, acquisitionism->psychology, compatibilism->sociology, propertarianism->ethics, testimonialism->epistemology, and algorithmic natural law->politics). And it includes reformation of every one of the grammars (disciplines).
So of COURSE you aren’t going to understand THAT LANGUAGE off the bat. You aren’t going to understand how to convert from IDEAL language (pretense of knowledge) we use today to REAL language (demonstrating knowledge).
Worse you are not going to understand how to convert your thinking from simple human scale justification, to post human scale via negativa falsification, and finally into well formed statements in operational language.
So please don’t waste my time until you catch up to the people who HAVE done so.
Ok. Yeah. Thanks. sigh…
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 15:16:00 UTC
Why is this complicated? Seriously.
Disapproval, Shaming, Ridiculing in response to an attempted theft or fraud vs. Disapproval Shaming, Ridiculing in response to covering an attempted theft or fraud.
Now, for some reason, it’s floating around, as DSR is a universal vs a particular: in other words, shaming people for a crime rather than for not letting them commit a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 14:51:00 UTC
THIS IS HOW
Mao’s strategy. Collect the rural men, to defeat the coastal urbanites in order to ‘save their civilization’ from ‘decline’.
What? You think it’s gonna require ‘demonstrations in the streets?’
no.
But it’s not novel or difficult
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 12:58:00 UTC
The problem with efficient supply chains is that they lack a supply sufficient for shocks.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 12:46:00 UTC
There are very few large transformers, and fewer large routers in the supply chain.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 12:30:00 UTC
Roman trained groups in the woods in Ukraine on weekends and people paid, around $75 for it. He wrote the training plan for the ukrainian volunteers. It spread across the country in a few weeks. The State Dept asked him to stop.
Men came out of the woodwork to fight. Especially from the western part of the country. They formed militias with different ‘philosophes’ (degrees of aggression really). They raided military depots, banks, hardware stores — everything for supplies. They paid for some of their own supplies. People organized donations to buy them others. Regular Military worked with them and sold arms. The Russians supplied arms, money, and heavy weapons – and intel.
Men need simple basics. Most importantly not to shoot each other. But that said, military trains men to patrol and hold ground and doctrine for guerillas is the OPPOSITE. So it is easier to train the four basic disciplines of riflemen than it is to train groups to select, survey, plan, strike, and retreat as guerillas.
What we saw in ukraine as small groups of men take initiative, without telling others what they were doing, and making those raids and returning with high kill counts, but always at the risk of friendly fire. But that is because the area of conflict in the Donbas is quite small.
America is huge, and “Deplatforming Cities” (ie: ending their supply lines) and removing selected academics, media, public intellectuals, politicians, and bureaucrats, and keeping the cash machines empty, the power out, water off, data down, gasoline out, food out, requires local or roaming groups to operate very differently from foot soldiers. I understand how ISIS, the IRA and the Marxists did it.
American’s wont follow the Arab Spring model. Heterogeneity prevents it. What we CAN count on is filling the streets. but as the IRA(small), marxists (medium), and ISIS (large), with arab spring (masses) all conducted their revolutions fairly consistently by making the territory ungovernable. All that is necessary is to generate demand for settlement on STATED TERMS where the terms burn the state, not the military or the people.
This will happen principally because there are enough men who WANT it to happen.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 12:19:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 08:50:00 UTC
THE COMING CIVIL WAR
The coming civil war will consist of increases in radom violence – just as we are seeing now. Clashes between urban protestors – just as we are seeing now. Stalking and Attacking the Media and Political Class – just as we are seeing now. Assaults on infrastructure including media, data, energy, fuel transport, food transport, road, rail transport – which is likely to start soon after any further escalation by the state. And massive ‘taking to the streets’ (so called ‘chimping out’) with looting, burning, damaging. And finally Mass Conflict in the streets. At which point government, transportation, police, fire, emergency, first responders, the national guard, will be overwhelmed and retreat to their barracks. Once that occurs individuals and groups will be limited to self defense. And at that point the state will meet whatever demands they must in order to obtain order. The problem is, that after 90 days of raiding a large number of males will prefer that occupation to any other.
https://propertarianism.com/2018/08/24/revolution-never-has-an-empire-been-more-fragile/
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 07:59:00 UTC
THE THREE STAGES OF CIVIL WAR
–Well, revolutions are against the government to alter powers, civil wars between factions for control of power, and wars of secession means of separation. In this case we pursue revolution first, then secession second if revolution fails, and civil war third if secession fails.–
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 07:51:00 UTC