Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 14:23:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45743103_10156766784092264_205906789

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45743103_10156766784092264_2059067893626175488_n_10156766784087264.jpg

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 14:19:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45804827_10156766783512264_134631509

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45804827_10156766783512264_1346315090147672064_n_10156766783507264.jpg

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 14:18:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45769043_10156766782672264_654398735

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45769043_10156766782672264_6543987359606636544_o_10156766782667264.jpg Skye Stewartwhich talk?Nov 9, 2018, 2:28 PMCurt Doolittleits sarcasm….Nov 9, 2018, 2:30 PMMatt Lawlor😂Nov 9, 2018, 2:32 PMTom RamboownedNov 9, 2018, 2:33 PMGreg Hamiltoni love the science denier insult. XX and XY and race don’t exist, unborn babies aren’t human but everyone else is a science denier.Nov 9, 2018, 2:38 PMFawzi M. ChalaCan i share it curt ?Nov 9, 2018, 2:58 PMBryan Nova BreyBrilliant replies, precise execution.Nov 9, 2018, 3:16 PMMaxim V FilimonovTED sucks.Nov 9, 2018, 4:48 PMMaxim V FilimonovWell, not if you like when someone shits into your ears, right.Nov 9, 2018, 4:49 PMSolomon VolodymyrCurt Doolittle: “I believe in rationalism, eugenics and reciprocity”

    Cuck Dontlittle: “wtf stop denying science”Nov 9, 2018, 7:07 PMCorey OvertonI do shit like this a lot. HahahaNov 9, 2018, 7:38 PMCurt DoolittleFawzi M. Chala that’s why I post all this nonsense. I manufacture argumentattive weaponry for free!!!!Nov 9, 2018, 8:13 PMDick Strommcurt needs to do tedNov 9, 2018, 9:55 PMԴավիդ ՎելլաI love how the imbeciles cannot comprehend anything. It’s like watching a sitting duck hunt.Nov 11, 2018, 12:12 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 14:18:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45769043_10156766782672264_654398735

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45769043_10156766782672264_6543987359606636544_o_10156766782667264.jpg Skye Stewartwhich talk?Nov 9, 2018, 2:28 PMCurt Doolittleits sarcasm….Nov 9, 2018, 2:30 PMMatt Lawlor😂Nov 9, 2018, 2:32 PMThomas RambeauownedNov 9, 2018, 2:33 PMGreg Hamiltoni love the science denier insult. XX and XY and race don’t exist, unborn babies aren’t human but everyone else is a science denier.Nov 9, 2018, 2:38 PMFawzi M. ChalaCan i share it curt ?Nov 9, 2018, 2:58 PMBryan Nova BreyBrilliant replies, precise execution.Nov 9, 2018, 3:16 PMMaxim V FilimonovTED sucks.Nov 9, 2018, 4:48 PMMaxim V FilimonovWell, not if you like when someone shits into your ears, right.Nov 9, 2018, 4:49 PMSolomon VolodymyrCurt Doolittle: “I believe in rationalism, eugenics and reciprocity”

    Cuck Dontlittle: “wtf stop denying science”Nov 9, 2018, 7:07 PMCorey OvertonI do shit like this a lot. HahahaNov 9, 2018, 7:38 PMCurt DoolittleFawzi M. Chala that’s why I post all this nonsense. I manufacture argumentattive weaponry for free!!!!Nov 9, 2018, 8:13 PMDick Strommcurt needs to do tedNov 9, 2018, 9:55 PMKevin WuI remember one, long ago, at Drexel university…that was a good oneNov 9, 2018, 11:14 PMDominic DeLucaSam Hyde?Nov 10, 2018, 3:41 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 14:18:00 UTC

  • once males had tools, and particularly spears it was possible for females to ral

    once males had tools, and particularly spears it was possible for females to rally males to constrain alphas – and females could gain some control of reproduction, – and contractualism could improve among males.

    Her argument that females were abused is a moralism – meaningless. evolution doesn’t care.

    groups of males possess territory and females in competition with other males who desire to take both. females can obtain ingroup status and influence more safely than outgroup.

    humans developed pairing off and serial monogamy out of safety since males will kill over access to females (reproduction) more so than any other incentive.

    agrarianism changed everything and gave us marriage and property. as well as customs and laws.

    we are in a post agrarian period and reverting to serial monogamy in lower classes and maintaining monogamy in the upper. this has drastically increased single motherhood, lower male loyalty to offspring, decreased household size and eliminated the middle class.

    women’s intuitions are cumulatively decivilizing (experiential rather than consequential) under monopoly democracy, so without creating separate houses of government for males and females, we should continue to decline into the south american model with women’s entry into the voting pool the cause.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 12:55:00 UTC

  • WHY THE MIDDLE MUST RULE by John Mark The Middle is only population segment with

    WHY THE MIDDLE MUST RULE

    by John Mark

    The Middle is only population segment with natural incentives to succeed honestly. The top likes to steal (corruption) cuz they can (they have the power to do so unless the middle punishes them for it). The bottom wants/tries to steal because they are too low-IQ to succeed much honestly. The middle is capable enough to succeed honestly but not powerful enough to have the opportunity to gain much by stealing/corruption.

    Thus the middle must rule, and restrain the bottom and top.

    Actually the law (natural law of reciprocity, Curt’s work and new constitution) must rule, but it will be primarily enforced by the middle whose incentives line up most with natural law.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 11:57:00 UTC

  • “Social norms, group identity, customs, are ghosts – not quite real until codifi

    —“Social norms, group identity, customs, are ghosts – not quite real until codified in law and law doesn’t exist until there is force to make it real (consequential)…”– Bill Joslin

    (via Alain Dwight)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 11:56:00 UTC

  • THE PROBLEM OF CONSERVATIVE MORALISM by John Mark The comments on this post abou

    THE PROBLEM OF CONSERVATIVE MORALISM

    by John Mark

    The comments on this post about nonwhite voters are a fantastic example of moralistic wishful thinking (by right wingers).

    https://www.facebook.com/218472611857878/posts/718933205145147/

    “I am/know a Hispanic/black who votes Red!” (Anecdotal)

    “The non-whites are learning and abandoning the Left! Polls said Trump’s approval among blacks was up!” (Midterm voting stats say otherwise)

    “Don’t be racist!” (Moralistic *losing* strategy)

    “We can teach them!” (Zero evidence that is true on large scale)

    “We have to retake control of education!” (How, exactly? Not realistic within current system)

    “Whites have to have more babies!” (We are not going to outbreed the hordes. Not realistic.)

    “We have to move into blue areas and turn them purple!” (Literally no one is going to carry out this strategy.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 11:53:00 UTC

  • ON THE MILITARY’S ABILITY TO CONTROL A REVOLUTION (from elsewhere) Of course I’l

    ON THE MILITARY’S ABILITY TO CONTROL A REVOLUTION

    (from elsewhere)

    Of course I’ll disagree with him, and so will anyone who looks a the locations of the troops, their numbers the BIAS of those troops, the numbers of the police, and first responders, the size of the territory, the number of worldwide assets that have to be protected from hostile external factors, the fragility of the system, and the success WORLDWIDE OF EVERY 5GW revolutionary force. Look at Syria, the Arab Spring, Yemen, the problem Iran has, turkey had, the fragility of the american grids, the dependence of urban underclasses on availability of cash, food, and digital transfers. The zero savings of the population…. I mean. the entire american experiment is dependent upon maintaining economic velocity that we currently refer to as just-in-time production and distribution due to plentiful information and extremely low cost transportation. There is very little electricity, heat, food, water, and such in the supply chain. Especially if actors function in winter, entire cities can be depopulated in weeks. I mean. It’s not like it takes millions in the streets. Man-on-man warfare went out with napoleon. Industrial warfare went out with the 1990’s. Today it’s just ‘break some infrastructure’ and let population density and the fragility of the supply chain do the work of turning people into rabid animals the male underclass of which will prey on the rest. As an example, one building can consume the fire departments of multiple cities. What if in the same city someone started 100 of those fires? What if that were done while breaking hydrant heads and losing the water pressure to fight the fire? Everyone thinks of millions in the streets but what I learned in ukraine is that 100 people can do all the fighting and just fall back into those people in the streets, in homes, in workplaces, and the state cannot pursue them. I mean, I am not the only person who has studied enough on this subject to make these statements. The military can ONLY concentrate force. There are only 2m. Of those 2m who will sympathize with the state if we offer a solution that restores military influence in the state, and improves the conditions of the soldiers? So the question is, not whether you have some ‘spastic’ uprising. The question is whether you position demands THAT PEOPLE WANT ANYWAY and drive those demands such that the state resists, but he military and police AGREE WITH THEM.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 11:18:00 UTC