Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51654181_10156975381842264_735405901

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51654181_10156975381842264_735405901

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51654181_10156975381842264_7354059015296385024_o_10156975381832264.jpg Nick DahlheimCalling Mark Brahmin…. I love anthropolgy….and, GA is just not up to snuff…Feb 9, 2019, 3:36 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:11:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51562061_10156975381357264_641516412

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51562061_10156975381357264_641516412

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51562061_10156975381357264_6415164127710281728_o_10156975381352264.jpg Steven KolpekReals and Materials over Feels and Ideals?Feb 9, 2019, 3:22 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:11:00 UTC

  • SHOW PREP – J.F. Gariepy WHY OPEN DISCOURSE IN PUBLIC? THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVAN

    SHOW PREP – J.F. Gariepy

    WHY OPEN DISCOURSE IN PUBLIC?

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975600062264

    THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975353527264

    TOTAL MENTIONS OF SPENCER

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975165307264

    THE LANGUAGES OF MALE PACKS

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975183877264

    WHY TALK OF REVOLT, REVOLUTION, CIVIL WAR?

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975175932264

    LEGIT CRITICISM OF PROP

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975105752264

    ANOTHER LEGIT CRITICISM OF PROP

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156971446347264

    MOST LEGIT CRITICISMS OF PROP

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156811437002264

    ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS FOR SUPREMACY?

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155415610782264


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:05:00 UTC

  • THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE I’m not listed anywhere by anyone

    THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE

    I’m not listed anywhere by anyone in any canon, registry, article, or map as ‘alt right’. I didn’t want to be associated with the alt right. I tried the moniker New Right but Paul Joseph Watson started using it, and I hadn’t TM’d it so I lost that one.

    I can sympathize with the alt right as a movement of justifiably dissatisfied young men, copying Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals and making use of new technology to achieve against the left with the interet what the left achieved with media against the rest of us.

    And I’m “On The Right” in the sense that I’m a conservative libertarian (sovereignty, and private property) – which makes me a rule-of-law rightist rather than an authoritarian or religious rightist. In my ideal world we have a rule of law by natural law, an independent judiciary, an hereditary monarchy, professional ministers, some set of class based houses of veto allocated by random selection, and something that would look very much like intolerant nationalism in the interwar french and german model. If that sounds like fascism, it’s simply extremely intolerant anglo monarchy under rule of law.

    John Mark has made us very popular very fast. Faster than we had ever imagined. Because his message sells, and he’s a hell of a smart guy, with media ready personality, and quality writer and producer.

    People of good character sell by their nature. People of poor character do not sell because of their nature. John is a man of good character and his message sells accordingly.

    ATTENTION DEFICIT DESPERATION DISORDER

    The current round of criticism is driven by Josh Jeppeson (Imperius) > Dylan Thomas (TruDilTom) and Dylan’s cohost (I won’t name) > Richard (Dicky) Spencer.

    Josh recruited Moritz Bierling, [name removed] and Joel Davis from my followers. Young smart guys with great promise but lacking skin in the game (family, career, biz) a need for aesthetics – which means “secular religious zeal”.

    And some of these folks attempted to stir conflict with me and those people who work with me.

    GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ABOUT YOUNG SMART MEN

    Those without agency or responsibility in a sphere of influence(family, social, economic, political, military) generate demand for authority whether intelligent or dim, knowledgeable or ignorant. And they do so by means that they can participate in: sophism, supernatural sophism, economic sophism and pseudoscience and political pseudoscience and sophism. Because passion (emotion), persuasion(sophism), and pretense of knowledge, is all that they have to work with. And as with any market product ‘there is a sucker born every minute’ for every grammar of advocacy and persuasion.

    Each of us demonstrates a moral intuition a grammar of advocacy, argument, and resistance, and these demonstrations reflect our sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value. In other words, our moral intuitions reflect our reproductive strategies; our method of argument reflect those reproductive strategies. Each of us demonstrates at every single moment our sexual social economic, political, and military value with every expression gesture, display, dress, word, and deed – with humans working very hard to signal falsehoods: children their value in association, and women notoriously their youth, and men notoriously their future potential to the pack.

    So as a result we see the dim pursue religion, the less dim secular spiritualism or the occult, the less dim framing and sophism, the less dim pseudoscience. But those with agency, in a sphere of influence, with assets, relations, knowledge, and experience, simply use truth and utility, and rather than inspire, or persuade, they provide rational incentives for possible practical means of operating the familial, social, economic, political, and military order.

    Everything you want to know about an individual can be determined by his means of advocacy, argument, and resistance. Grammars of argument, just like vocabulary, are insights into the operations of the human mind. And there exist a limited number of NON CORRESPONDENT grammars to work with just as there are a limited number of personality traits.

    Megan Usui was an insider advising and promoting me. Unfortunately she was backchannel working with Jeppeson – I love her but good intentioned people are easily fooled. I think they concocted some idea of uniting the hard right. Of “bringing us all together”. Something ‘undesirable’.

    But Jeppeson is a sociopath and coat-tail rider. He tried to do something himself and couldn’t’. Tried to ride my coattails. And yes, I’m too tolerant of human pound puppies, but you know, after the tenth rage-quit and death threat, even the most tolerant of people disconnect and keep you at arm’s length.

    Megan worked up the meeting in NY with me Duchesne and Macdonald. Jeppeson spent the entire summer trying to convince megan that I couldn’t do it for some reason and that he should instead. (laughable.) Then another death threat, this time in public, on voice chat. I threatened to turn him into cops. It worked and he got quiet for a bit.

    Spencer is desperate for relevance, and the rest of the ‘leadership’ so to speak has simply ignored him. However, we are the rising stars and will be able to reach far larger numbers than the ‘alt right’, because we are selling a portfolio of solutions that will produce right, libertarian, and centrist ends, at the sole expense of the very bottom and very top – and natural incentives and pressures will do the rest. The secret to collapsing a dam or a fortress wall, is to weaken it and let the natural gravity of the environment do the work for you as a consequence.

    A good way of capturing attention is to undermine the competition. This is the strategy of female proxy for violence: undermining. Women gossip, shame, ridicule, rally,moralize (“GSRRM”), and they do so to hold back competitors rather than to to provide opportunities superior to those of competitors. Evidence suggests that the origin of language has as much to do with GSSRM to control alphas and redistribute control of reproduction as it does for hunters to communicate – when hunting is an almost entirely silent occupation. (The counter is that whenever GSSRM is used against you, retaliate with it, then repeat the central point. Use each volley GSSRM as a means of promoting your central point and thesis, and simply wear out the other party’s reliance on GSSRM. Over time people learn that GSSRM “hats are empty” so to speak. This takes patience but it always succeeds.)

    Dylan seemed interested in P, but I’m guessing was pursued Jeppson, who then rode Dylan’s coattails and rage crashed their group at some point but I don’t know if he still does.

    He’s riding Richards coattails now, and Jeppeson’s a lot smarter than Spencer. (God knows Spencer’s not smart enough to comprehend my work. What did he accomplish other than being the poster child for what NOT to do?) So Richard makes a good sock puppet for Jeppeson who is hoping to make Spencer relevant again. Despite the fact that Richard is selling inspiration to empty halls and was only relevant as a whipping boy for the press.

    Jeppeson and Dylan were pitching a somewhat novel version authoritarian postmodernism by combining a bit of pseudoscience and sophism. (Like Derrida, social construction, and therefore authoritarianism.) And it’s going nowhere for obvious reasons. But there are suckers born every minute and suckers for sophism are everywhere, just as suckers for passion, supernaturalism and pseudoscience are everywhere.

    So these guys, who have never accomplished anything in life – not even so much as a family, career, or small business but have grandiose visions of themselves and their understanding of the world (despite lack of evidence) are merely pursuing self interest – not our group interests. In this sense, in hindsight I almost wish the deplatforming was more successful so that bad I deas could not be funded so easily by donations from those susceptible to each non-correspondent grammar of persuasion.

    And so between two sock puppets and a sociopath we undrestand the scramble for relevance – the desperate cries for attention.

    GOING MAINSTREAM

    We (our folks) have tried the direct message (constitutional change desirable by the majority of our people) with the only method anyone thinks will work (mass resistance, uprising, or conflict) and given that the people are frustrated, they are buying the message because of it.

    They’re buying it because It isn’t a message about ‘follow me’. Or a message of handwaving. It’s a message that we have the power to alter the course of events if we choose, and we have an actionable plan of change that will restore our laboring working and middle classes at the expense of the financial, media, and political classes, and end the redistribution of our reproduction to invaders.

    Now this might not work. But it is the only deal on the table at the moment that isn’t evangelism, hand waving, woo, or unmarketable – and it’s certainly open to improvement and revision.

    LEAVE THEM BEHIND

    The irrelevant get left behind, because they deserve to be. But we should not expect the irrelevant to continue to disappear without desperately trying to preserve the attention they garner.

    One bad apple spoils the whole movement. Richard is irrelevant and poisonous to our success, and Jeppeson is just sociopath and cancer and always has been. The rest are probably well intentioned cerebral young men without any agency or experience seeking ideals as substitute for sphere of influence (family, business etc).

    “CLEAN OUR HOUSE FIRST” (so to speak)

    -Curt Doolittle

    -The Propertarian Institute

    ——-

    People Mentioned in this post:

    – Richard Spencer

    – Josh Jeppeson (alias Josh Jeppson, “imperius”)

    – Dylan Thomas (TruDilTom)

    – Joel Davis ( Joel Davis )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 14:54:00 UTC

  • OUR LANGUAGES DETERMINE OUR ORGANIZATIONS OF RESISTANCE AND REBELLION Western pe

    OUR LANGUAGES DETERMINE OUR ORGANIZATIONS OF RESISTANCE AND REBELLION

    Western people have always been tripartite: Fight (rule), Pray (administer), Work (produce), and never developed semitic monopoly (submission to an abstraction).

    In our past we had celtic, anglo-saxon, and anglo-saxon-nordic of the common people, anglo-saxon (norman) french of the political class, and the latin and greek of the educated classes.

    We had the hearth religion of the common people, the christianity, aryanism and law of the political class, and the law, christianity and philosophy of the educated classes.

    When we developed the middle classes, we had the hearth religion of the common people, upward migration of participation into christianity and the law, upward participation participation of the middle and upper classes into law and philosophy, and the gradual exit of classes from christianity, leaving the academy as the survivor of the church, and the church a social group for the lower classes.

    This is because law is and philosophy are rational, and therefore problems calculable, and as division of labor increases, complexity arises, wealth is created, demand for consistent rules that limit bad behavior (risk) is amended by greater demand for adaptation, and needs to reason and calculate the continuous unknown in a world of continuous risk offset by continuously improving returns.

    All language consists of measurements(nouns, names) and operations(verbs, actions) resulting in calculations (statements, promises) which accumulate into transactions (sentences, paragraphs, arguments), that produce a contract for reciprocal consistency (meaning).

    Today we have islam and judaism for the enemy, christianity for those indoctrinated, a range of subjective moralizing for those not so (Gossiping, Shaming, Ridicule, Rallying), the combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and deceit in marxism,socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and anarchic denialism, for those indoctrinated by the academy, the allegorical use of literature by the academy, the archaic remnants of philosophical rationalism (the academic version of religion), the law in natural(right), limited(classical), and unlimited(left) forms, the pseudosciences (social) and sciences (physical.)

    We have many grammatical paradigms (vocabulary, rules of disambiguation into transactions that I call the ‘grammars’) for use across and within our classes, and with greater or less frequency in different regions, because of origins of regional peoples, and consequent internal migrations.

    THE HERD ALL SPEAKS THE SAME LANGUAGE. THE PACKS DON’T.

    JULY 22, 2018

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack.

    Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary.

    And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant

    But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass.

    And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism.

    So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight.

    So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all.

    The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 13:11:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 13:10:00 UTC

  • THE CRIME HAS BEEN DONE. THE BOOMER PUNISHMENT AWAITS —“Sorry boomer prophets,

    THE CRIME HAS BEEN DONE. THE BOOMER PUNISHMENT AWAITS

    —“Sorry boomer prophets, in order to fix our society after you wrecked it we had to use all your retirement money and take all your second homes and 3rd cars and boats to afford it. The rest will still have retirement though.”—James Knowles

    😉 relish the opportunity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 13:09:00 UTC

  • WHY CALLS FOR REVOLUTION AND CIVIL WAR —“Can you explain this call to violence

    WHY CALLS FOR REVOLUTION AND CIVIL WAR

    —“Can you explain this call to violence, revolution, or civil war?”—Justin Ptak

    If enough people talk about it the general discourse changes sufficiently to discuss alternatives to the status quo.)

    Same as ‘the best way to prevent a war is to be ready to crush any opponent easily at all times”.

    The best way to bring an opponent to the negotiating table is the certainty (lower risk) that it is better than the alternative.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 13:07:00 UTC

  • TOTAL NUMBER OF SPENCER MENTIONS IN MY DB (there is one more I remember doing a

    TOTAL NUMBER OF SPENCER MENTIONS IN MY DB

    (there is one more I remember doing a grid of alt right classes)

    I don’t punch right unless a punch is thrown first. But start a fight with me and my position is ‘defeat an enemy completely and permanently’

    Here is my position and it has been my position since at least 2016. And before 2016 I thought politics wasn’t worth my time.

    — EXCERPT OF POSITIONING STATEMENT 01.29.2017–

    Here. Look how many ‘languages’ we are speaking in now:

    Spencer is working on WN, (wn)

    The green frog crew is working on ridicule. (alt)

    RamzPaul is working on pop criticism (alt)

    PJW is working on media criticism. (new)

    Moly is working on pure education. (lagging but getting there)

    Mike is working “within the system” (new)

    I’m working on ‘the next system’. (new)

    This movement covers the spectrum from separatism, to ridicule, to criticism, to education, to reformation, to revolution. And covers the classes from lower working to intellectuals.

    And that’ exactly what we NEED to do. No everyone is capable of the full spectrum of understanding or the full spectrum of arguments.

    The middle will, and the lower middle will, always hold the numbers, and provide the upper middle provide leadership. The bottom provides the soldiers, and the top provides the political solutions.

    THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION.

    We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your believe in what can be accomplished. Some within the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    —-PACK LANGUAGES VS HERD LANGUAGE—

    The Herd All Speaks the Same Language. the Packs Don’t.

    JULY 22, 2018

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack.

    Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary.

    And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant

    But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass.

    And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism.

    So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight.

    So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all.

    The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

    —MENTIONS OF SPENCER—

    Note that in every case it is either respectful or I’m sharing a post by someone else that is general interest that merely mentions him.

    SHARED Feb 3, 2019, IN RESPONSE TO SPENCER

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156961844687264

    SHARED Dec 29, 2018, 12:28 AM RESPONSE TO SPENCER/MARK

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156880177817264

    SHARED: Apr 17, 2018, 7:29 AM

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156293552552264

    SHARED Jan 14, 2018, 9:55 AM

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156039108437264

    SHARED Mar 18, 2017, 2:55 PM

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155141283657264

    SHARED Jan 29, 2017, 8:26 AM

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154982642257264

    JAN 28th 2017 VIA CERNOVICH

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154982642257264


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 13:03:00 UTC

  • A LEGIT CRITICISM THAT IS AN UNREASONABLE CRITICISM —“Instead of saying “prope

    A LEGIT CRITICISM THAT IS AN UNREASONABLE CRITICISM

    —“Instead of saying “propertarianism is a collection of ideas the most fundamental of which is… “ I wish she would just list the ideas in concise, fundamental forms of course including the new form of the scientific method. …. Historical reference is of course important for full understanding but you place more importance on how it fits in with respect to our existing modalities of thought and our history ….. If it’s a complete system you should be able to express it external to all context”— Bill Smith

    It’s like asking aristotle to list aristotelianism in concise format. He was applying legal (juridical) reasoning rather than the traditional normative, moral or supernatural, to the world of knowledge in his time. I’m doing the same with two millennia of additional information to work with – particularly economics, physics, cognitive and computer science – aristotle was working within human scale, and in our age, we can work beyond human scale both micro and macro. So, how do you distill that down more so than “Aristotle developed reason, began the discipline of empiricism, and science and applied his method to all fields of inquiry”. Well I did the same thing.

    Now if you want to see the outline of the set of ideas that came from that insight you can read it since it’s in summary form in the Overview. Or at least most of it is. And if you want to see it implemented you can see the state of the constitution (in continuous development). But it’s a LONG LIST of ideas, just as Aristotle in his era, or hobbes/locke/smith/hume in their era, or a list of a hundred thinkers in the industrial era.

    It’s not that I can’t say it clearly. I just did in the video. It’s that the “…application of the completion of the scientific method to all fields of inquiry…” exposes many ideas.

    So the “Overview” is (was really) my working list of the major ideas. (I do most of my work in the book now.)

    I say them concisely all the time. But that does not mean you will understand them without some rather serious effort, any more than you will undrestand any other technical field conveying counter-intuitive information without serious effort. I mean, how many people don’t understand darwin’s theory today, or einstein’s. once understood they are quite simple. If described they don’t convey much at all.

    Ideologies are simple. That’s their purpose.

    Revolutions in thought are not simple because they touch everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 12:36:00 UTC