Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51816572_10156975527472264_908346010

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51816572_10156975527472264_908346010

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51816572_10156975527472264_9083460109933215744_o_10156975527467264.jpg HOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS

    (Do not treat all our people as equal in agency.)Christian KalafutI do think that it’s too materialistic – not even the Hellenes were this materialist in pholosophy (depending on who you read)Feb 9, 2019, 4:27 PMCurt Doolittlewell you are a dishonest advocate for supernatural authoritarianism and the continued imprisonment and conquest of our people by our eternal enemy.Feb 9, 2019, 4:29 PMChristian KalafutThis was no denunciation curtFeb 9, 2019, 4:29 PMChristian KalafutBut while in theory its about markets, and often times in practice, I think therr is more to the breath of life then material goods.Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleOnly because you are an addict defending your addiction.Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleChristian Kalafut not an argument. You think many false and foolish things. Why would what you think matter?Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleI mean, youi’re a liar and a carrier of lies. I only don’t block you to mock you.Feb 9, 2019, 4:31 PMChristian KalafutI say things you disagree with but many things I do say you happen to agreeFeb 9, 2019, 4:31 PMChristian KalafutYou’ve shared quotes of mine (earnestly) on your wall.Feb 9, 2019, 4:32 PMChristian KalafutPhilosophers do not always agreeFeb 9, 2019, 4:33 PMChristian KalafutDiedrot had many a skirmish with Voltaire.Feb 9, 2019, 4:33 PMChristian KalafutThe spirit and ethos of ehst your saying is very Voltairian.Feb 9, 2019, 4:34 PMGreg HamiltonI’m not sure how all of reality, your nation and people, and your family is “materialistic”

    I mean if you can’t find inspiration for being in all of that I don’t see how an invisible man is going to help any.Feb 9, 2019, 4:35 PMCurt DoolittleHalf truths are still half lies, and you are nothing but a sophist, supernaturalist, and liar, and a threat to the survival of our people.

    Even a broken clock is right twice a day. I do not care if madmen or my enemy says something useful. The origin of information has no bearing on its truth content. That would be contra falsificationary.

    You are still a dishonest apologist for christianity, and I only call myself a philosopher to avoid confusion. As far as I know what I do is a science of the law (cooperation).

    You are not a philosopher. The requirement to make that claim requires a system of thought. Or publication of an amendment to a system of thought. there are many people who write philosophy or philosophize (rationalise) but that tells us nothing. As far as I know philosophy is dead, and the evidence is it’s inclusion in religion rather than math, logic, science, engineering, economics, law.

    There is nothing ‘voluntarian’ it is simplyr eciprocity under the rule of law of the anglo saxons and their germanic ancestors, and the european IE expansion before them.

    All you do is waste my time and provide vehicles for how others can conduct arguments against others such fictionalists.

    ;)Feb 9, 2019, 4:40 PMCurt Doolittleit’s more that ‘if you can’t find inspiration in that, then you are dead weight and an ongoing threat to our people’s survival.”Feb 9, 2019, 4:44 PMSteven KolpekCoding an Ideal for Propertarianism? [Live up to your forefather’s by defending your future]?Feb 9, 2019, 4:45 PMRichard HeathenGSRRM?Feb 9, 2019, 4:46 PMChristian KalafutI am talking about the 18th century philosopher Voltaire, not “voluntary”Feb 9, 2019, 4:56 PMChristian KalafutYou see I am an historian and a musician/lyricist first and foremost.Feb 9, 2019, 4:58 PMChristian KalafutI think that you dwell too much on my faith rather than the Truth of what I am saying.Feb 9, 2019, 4:59 PMChristian KalafutWhat I am saying is what you believe, is nothing new in Western history; most of the upper classes of West Europe carried views, though less systematized and apportioned, very similar to yours. The view that there was a ‘thousand years of darkness between Julian and the Enlightenment” is an old, tired meme; in terms of Historiography it’s purely a Gibbonian smear and a rejection of History as it actually was.Feb 9, 2019, 5:04 PMGreg HamiltonCurt Doolittle and honestly people can believe in whatever they want in private.Feb 9, 2019, 5:08 PMCurt DoolittleGood point. Thank you . I always assume everyone presumes that and I shouldn’t. sorry.Feb 9, 2019, 5:12 PMGreg HamiltonI think these critics may think you’re saying that. But I’ve never heard that. Just that invisible men in the sky don’t get to be part of the law.Feb 9, 2019, 5:19 PMAlexander ByronNot worth engaging in my opinion. Those comments are just noise, if one keeps listening to them, they will drown in said noise.Feb 9, 2019, 5:27 PMCurt DoolittleWhat’s wrong with materialism is meritocracy. Fictions, Supernaturalism and Sophism, and pseudoscience and their conflations provide an alternative mental model in which one’s lower status and therefore mindfulness is not continuously challenged daily evidence in reality.Feb 9, 2019, 5:34 PMAlain DwightGuilt, shame, rally, ridicule, mock.. something like that.

    What the left does instead of making arguments or developing agency.Feb 9, 2019, 5:37 PMGreg HamiltonCurt Doolittle nice. True. “If only” becomes the excuse for lack of success

    This is where communists, libertarians, objectivists etc all meet. Their beliefs require “if just only everybody would”Feb 9, 2019, 5:39 PMAlain Dwight*G is for gossipFeb 9, 2019, 5:47 PMCurt Doolittlegossip, shaming, ralling, ridiculing, and moralizing.

    in other words, demonstrating female disapproval.Feb 9, 2019, 5:49 PMChristian KalafutMaterialistic outlook is what got the commons into this mess in first place; I am not decrying the benifets that it has given us but such a way of viewing the world leads to ideologies like Marxism or Communism or things like the Party of Davos.Feb 9, 2019, 5:52 PMChristian KalafutRampant materialism and decadence what is killing our civilization the most right now. Remember that the houses of the leading men of Athens during the golden age were sparsley furnished in comparison to the decadent furnishings of the later Roman Republic. In fact, the sparser furnishing of the Athenian household is one of the many measures of brilliance in the history of that period.Feb 9, 2019, 5:56 PMRichard HeathenOk so rallying and shamingFeb 9, 2019, 5:58 PMCJ CarverChristian Kalafut If you could give yourself a smoker, would you do it?Feb 9, 2019, 6:10 PMBryan Nova BreyYour responses are highbrow hilarious.Feb 9, 2019, 6:19 PMAlain DwightMoralizing, that really ties it together.Feb 9, 2019, 6:55 PMEric BurkettI do not view truth as a materialistic desire, but as an idealistic construct to impose with the side effect of creating markets that optimize human interaction, reducing transactional costs and creating the conditions for affluence in many ways, not just resource accumulation.Feb 9, 2019, 7:20 PMSteven KolpekDoesn’t “ridicule” fall under “shame”? I liked the 4-letter acronym better.

    Gossip (slander, libel, defame)

    Shaming (ridicule, humiliate, chastize)

    Rallying (appeal to audience, dogpile)

    Moralizing (good vs. evil)Feb 9, 2019, 7:36 PMThomas NorgateCharlie Eddleston-Haynes Caspian Lipman-England Robert Henke this guy on the money againFeb 11, 2019, 8:41 AMHOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS

    (Do not treat all our people as equal in agency.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 16:25:00 UTC

  • THE GREAT LIE OF THE 20TH CENTURY IT’S NOT CAPITALISM VS SOCIALISM but RULE OF L

    THE GREAT LIE OF THE 20TH CENTURY

    IT’S NOT CAPITALISM VS SOCIALISM but RULE OF LAW, MARKETS FOR CLASSES, and NATIONALISM of EUROPEANS VS RULE BY AUTHORITARIAN DISCRETION, MONOPOLY, and INTERNATIONALISM of MIDDLE EASTERNERS.

    (Simple rules for moral people, and simple rule for immoral people.)

    —“I think the issue could largely be the hierarchy of what we value. Rather than seeing capitalism as the best way to improve the material well-being of people, it became the goal itself. So, whereas before, the focus of life was family, faith, and folk (and the method by which you took care of your family was economic system), capitalism became the goal (“greed is good” rather than the more neutral “everyone operates in their self-interest” of Locke and Smith), and family, faith, and folk became secondary, tertiary, or a non factor. Communism is an evil, possibly the greatest evil to ever gain traction, but it’s not an evil because of the market conditions.”—Ethan Trice

    Yeah. well who invented the term ‘capitalism’ and who advances it rather than rule of law?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 16:12:00 UTC

  • POSITION ON “THE MYTH OF 20TH CENTURY” —“Have you read Alfred Rosenberg’s “The

    POSITION ON “THE MYTH OF 20TH CENTURY”

    —“Have you read Alfred Rosenberg’s “The Myth of the 20th Century”? If so, what’s your opinion?”— A Friend

    It’s in my reading list. I have come to the same conclusion (although I didn’t know of this but until a year or two ago). I agree with it entirely. My understanding of the cycles of history is similar. I consider Mein Kampf and MT20C required reading for this reason. And if I could find someone to teach MK, MT20C, MacDonald, Goldberg (The Fatal Embrace), by emphasis on these cycles of history and the Conflict of Civilizations, then I would do so. I think the war between semites and europeans continues unabated, and that while we held them off for 1500 years, reasonably well, their chances of winning by population replacement are still significant.

    The problem is separating the story of history, the problem itself, from the nazi ideology – which was possible at a certain time and place but such ‘ideology’ no longer has rather ignorant folk one generation from the fields to take root in.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 16:02:00 UTC

  • THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION. (repost) We don’t need ‘one

    THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION.

    (repost)

    We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your believe in what can be accomplished. Some within the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:39:00 UTC

  • “Instead of teaching us to provide for ourselves, boomers gave us a dystopian mu

    —“Instead of teaching us to provide for ourselves, boomers gave us a dystopian multiracial nightmare, crippling debt, crushing anomie, political powerlessness and much more. But hey, we should be grateful because we have i-phones, right?”— Victor Blanc

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:37:00 UTC

  • Savior myths are comforting. But that’s all they are

    Savior myths are comforting. But that’s all they are.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:36:00 UTC

  • @Victor Blanc Well, I mean: —“Lacking better alternatives, I’d become NatSoc/F

    @Victor Blanc

    Well, I mean:

    —“Lacking better alternatives, I’d become NatSoc/Fascist if it meant survival, and with the exception of Propertarianism, not much else is being provided (or at least popularised) in way of solutions.”—Victor Blanc

    That’s my argument as well.

    “Show me something better.”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:35:00 UTC

  • HERE – LET ME HELP YOU: ——> Available Resources ———> Conditions ——

    HERE – LET ME HELP YOU:

    ——> Available Resources

    ———> Conditions

    ————> Strategy

    —————> Logistics

    ——————> Tactics

    ———————> Training and Experience

    ————————> Fitness

    —————————> Kinship Distance.

    😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:33:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51626467_10156975412092264_548784230

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51626467_10156975412092264_548784230

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51626467_10156975412092264_5487842308676124672_o_10156975412087264.jpg THE REAL CRIME OF THE BOOMERS

    —“The real crime they committed was both parents working so hard to give their kids everything they didn’t have. Only to rob them of the only thing they needed. A parent at home to teach them how to provide for themselves.”— Jack Sandusky

    (perfect)Ethan TriceI think the issue could largely be the hierarchy of what we value. Rather than seeing capitalism as the best way to improve the material well-being of people, it became the goal itself. So, whereas before, the focus of life was family, faith, and folk (and the method by which you took care of your family was economic system), capitalism became the goal (“greed is good” rather than the more neutral “everyone operates in their self-interest” of Locke and Smith), and family, faith, and folk became secondary, tertiary, or a non factor. Communism is an evil, possibly the greatest evil to ever gain traction, but it’s not an evil because of the market conditions.Feb 9, 2019, 4:00 PMCurt DoolittleYeah. well who invented the term ‘capitalism’ and who advances it rather than rule of law?Feb 9, 2019, 4:08 PMNeil A. Bucklewexcellent description.Feb 9, 2019, 4:16 PMJack SanduskyMy brain has arrived😁Feb 9, 2019, 4:19 PMEthan TriceI thought the term had been invented by smith, but looks like I was mistaken. regardless of the inventor of the term, it being the centerpiece of all debate by the GOP and other “conservative” parties is definitely troubling.Feb 9, 2019, 4:19 PMErik LukovskyIn my view, capitalism isn’t a “ real “ term

    It’s obfuscated language for free trade and barter, which existed on normal levels in the times of kings and queens all throughout Europe, especially England and Germanic statesFeb 9, 2019, 4:25 PMBenjamin IrelandAnd now you have a generation of adult children who whine that it isn’t fair that the comfortable middle class lifestyle they grew up isn’t just a given.

    Good times created weak men.

    Weak men are creating hard times.Feb 9, 2019, 5:33 PMGeorge CarvlinThe term is laissez-faireFeb 9, 2019, 6:18 PMArnold BrunsonGuilty as charged.Feb 10, 2019, 1:23 AMAnthony MigchelsNot arguing with this obviously correct point, but one of the things that people overlook in the long term war against Family, is that it was first Dad that was wrested from the home: in earlier times, working hours were MUCH shorter, and only with the horrors of Capitalism and the large scale impoverishment of the masses that that brought, including the extremely long working hours, this is what destroyed male standing in the house hold, AND the relationship between the father and his children, AND his wife.

    A man cannot lead his family, when he’s out of the house 60 hours per week.Feb 10, 2019, 5:13 AMWayne WaltonAgreed. Usury wage slavery is a war on the family.Feb 10, 2019, 6:57 AMTHE REAL CRIME OF THE BOOMERS

    —“The real crime they committed was both parents working so hard to give their kids everything they didn’t have. Only to rob them of the only thing they needed. A parent at home to teach them how to provide for themselves.”— Jack Sandusky

    (perfect)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:24:00 UTC

  • THE BRAIN READS FACE – THE HOLY GRAIL Solution will provide demarcation between

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-the-brain-reads-faces/HOW THE BRAIN READS FACE – THE HOLY GRAIL

    Solution will provide demarcation between dependent(by direct physical responsibility), specific (‘pre programmed’), and general(recruitable) neurons.

    Vision is the hard problem. The rest I think I understand pretty clearly. I do not understand how we can be born to recognize, rather than imprint or simply find attraction (stimulation) in the most dense information (facial expressions). Encoding that in genes seems really really hard to me. And solving that problem is huge.

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-the-brain-reads-faces/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:18:00 UTC