–“Do you really have autism?”– A Friend
I have an INTP personality and a ‘touch’ of aspergers. So no. I don’t have autism per se. I am very low on the autism spectrum. And even among aspies I am marginal. I have a tendency to obsessive thinking, a tendency to narrow interest, difficulty changing contexts, limited self and present awareness, and some difficulty empathizing with certain categories of emotion (insecurity and fear).
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 13:51:00 UTC
by Luke Weinhagen
TOLERANCE – (via negativa) the capacity to endure continued subjection to something (my adds: externalizes costs, ignores limits, passive state, imposed externally, waives agency)
FORBEARANCE – (via-positiva) patient self-control; restraint; the action of refraining from exercising a legal right, a response or enforcing the payment of a debt/cost. (my adds: carries costs, imposes limits, active state, self imposed, applies agency)
Above –
“tolerance of the current condition” is a great example of the ambiguity tolerance allows. Who is responsible for the current condition? Who imposed a cost and who is carrying that cost?
Alternative –
“In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their forbearance of your shortcomings.”
Explicit in who is costing and who is covering costs.
The alternative also reminds the men who fight of their responsibility for what is and to reiterate their responsibility in asserting limits upon that forbearance.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 13:45:00 UTC
—“I knew that we must defend societal institutions (commons) but I was unable to advocate it effectively in a Hoppean frame.”—Eric Burkett
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 13:08:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52543518_10156984243572264_7791222102605955072_o_10156984243567264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52609092_10156984243702264_8621245178465746944_o_10156984243657264.jpg PROPERTARIANISM LIVE IN KYIV UKRAINE!!!
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 12:28:00 UTC
—“As of 2014, the VA estimates there were 22 million military veterans in the U.S. population. If you add their figures on veterans to the active personnel numbers mentioned above, 7.3 percent of all living Americans have served in the military at some point in their lives.”—
That’s approximately 25M people, of whom the very vast majority are white males (and are pissed).
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 12:25:00 UTC
WHAT WILL THE REST OF THE WORLD DO?
—“Hmmmmm. So when the dust settles, do you see any outliers doing anything you might not have thought of already?”—Monica Marquez
The world will seek historical equilibrium in their spheres of influence, and the military will have to return to the continent rather than protecting europe, thereby forcing europe and russia and eastern europe into their historical alliance (christendom).
The outlier is the UK, and I do not know how but it would be preferable to restore the british empire as the alliance of english speaking (and british) peoples.
Incentives are relatively obvious at this point. We are the pin that holds the world together. But nuclear arms are what they are.
So I suspect that all it will do is accelerate what everyone in every think tank in the world suggests:
Return to normal across the world.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 12:19:00 UTC
—“Good morning. Thanks for your iron will and determination and for always stepping up your game.”– Friend.
Hey. Aryanism: Test the self. Never stop. And help the men behind you.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 12:15:00 UTC
When we take the states, the aussies will take theirs. When we take the center, and canada falls. All that is left is for spain, italy, eastern europe, russia, and what is left of men in britain if there are any, and what is left of men in germany if there are any, and we will have our national socialism in all our nations, and our extermination under the banner of abrahamism in both ancient supernatural and modern pseudoscientific forms will end forever. We did spain, we did the balkans, and we can do the world.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 12:01:00 UTC
—-“One does not become a Propertarian. One only discovers, sooner or later, that one has always been one — that, by nature, one could not possibly be anything else.” —Savitri Devi (edited posthumously by Matt Lawlor)
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 11:55:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52146446_10156984161447264_5294366130914197504_o_10156984161442264.jpg THOSE WHO GOVERN
The Theologitariat claim you are should be governed by a moral religion.
The Politariat claim you should be governed by their judgement.
The Commentariat market that you should be governed by philosophy.
The Economitariat that you should be governed by consumption.
In practice you are governed by the Law, and all else is an attempt to subvert it.
In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their tolerance of the current condition.
We are the men who Choose.
So Choose.Brandon Hayes*forbearance ;)Feb 13, 2019, 11:37 AMCurt DoolittleI need something of this nature on forbearance.
Do you have anything?Feb 13, 2019, 11:37 AMCurt DoolittleI need a definition and an example, and esp, an example in series if possible.Feb 13, 2019, 11:40 AMBrandon HayesLuke Weinhagen is the forbearance guru.
I make the distinction between tolerance and forbearance where ever I see it because I see it as a crucial point.
I don’t tolerate bad behavior; I forbear for some of it in my presence. Not because I have to but because I appreciate nuance and timing in my tactics.
“In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their tolerance of the current condition.” < We don’t have to tolerate; Propertarianism gives license to persecute those cheating. For now we allow it as to create a more ideal transition [but it is not a must].Feb 13, 2019, 11:40 AMCurt DoolittleLuke Weinhagen ????? please?Feb 13, 2019, 11:41 AMCurt Doolittleah, so, convenience (cheating) > tolerance(discounting) > conviction(forbearance)Feb 13, 2019, 11:43 AMBrandon HayesI have some tags for you; one moment. :)Feb 13, 2019, 11:44 AMJWarren PrescottIn my heart, I just want to be left alone.Feb 13, 2019, 11:46 AMCurt Doolittlewe are never left alone. We must compete. Nature gave us luxuries. but none of us survive defeat by the red queen.Feb 13, 2019, 11:47 AMJWarren PrescottCurt Doolittle – and therein lies the dilemma… One of wanting to not be ruled by anyone and the other by wanting to be part of somethingFeb 13, 2019, 11:51 AMBill JohnsonFrom the Hymnal. Let’s all turn to page 27.Feb 13, 2019, 12:01 PMLuke WeinhagenCatching up…Feb 13, 2019, 1:03 PMLuke Weinhagentolerance – the capacity to endure continued subjection to something (my adds: externalizes costs, ignores limits, passive state, imposed externally, waives agency)
forbearance – patient self-control; restraint; the action of refraining from exercising a legal right, a response or enforcing the payment of a debt/cost. (my adds: carries costs, imposes limits, active state, self imposed, applies agency)
Above –
“tolerance of the current condition” is a great example of the ambiguity tolerance allows. Who is responsible for the current condition? Who imposed a cost and who is carrying that cost?
Alternative –
“In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their forbearance of your shortcomings.”
Explicit in who is costing and who is covering costs.Feb 13, 2019, 1:31 PMLuke WeinhagenThe alternative also reminds the men who fight of their responsibility for what is and to reiterate their responsibility in asserting limits upon that forbearance.Feb 13, 2019, 1:44 PMTHOSE WHO GOVERN
The Theologitariat claim you are should be governed by a moral religion.
The Politariat claim you should be governed by their judgement.
The Commentariat market that you should be governed by philosophy.
The Economitariat that you should be governed by consumption.
In practice you are governed by the Law, and all else is an attempt to subvert it.
In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their tolerance of the current condition.
We are the men who Choose.
So Choose.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 11:34:00 UTC