Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • ORIGINATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMON LAW —“Hey Curt, there’s a question I

    ORIGINATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMON LAW

    —“Hey Curt, there’s a question I have been wrestling with for a while regarding your work. It’s about discretion versus judge discovery law. In common law I have understood the idea to be, that judges look at previous cases of decisions in similar incidents of parasitism and make informed judgements based on that history. But how are not the original, “inaugural” decisions with no historical precedence not entirely reliant on that said judge’s discretion? … Thanks in advance!”—Alex, your friend.

    A number of dependencies require clarification to answer this question:

    0 – There is only one law in tort: reciprocity.

    1 – The test of property is investment.

    2 – The court is reluctant to transfer title (possession) and make itself a participant in a crime – which would harm the law, the people, and the profession.

    3 – Because of evolution of our civilization, earlier cases are always more ‘rudimentary’, with law ‘cumulative’ (increasing in complexity with the complexity of the division of knowledge and labor)

    4 – Judges are ‘informed’ by prior decisions so that they don’t have to do all the work all over again of being smarter than all other judges in all other matters (they consult the market for judgements).

    5 – Because of the competition between judges over time in a multitude of similar cases, the market for decisions tends to resolve on constant judgements. (more than tends, actually) just as markets for goods resolve on prices, just as markets for scientific knowledge resolve on theories.

    6 – Original criteria (sovereignty, reciprocity, property etc) developed over time, such that what we understand today (investment, reciprocity, voluntary transfer etc) is the result of the empirically cumulative record of judgements over time rather than design. (See the three books on the law in my reading list which discuss the ‘messy’ evolution of the common law.)

    … – Milsom: Natural History of the Common Law.

    … – Plucknett: A Concise History Of The Common Law.

    … – Hayek’s: The Constitution of Liberty.

    7 – The common law evolved because of ancient western indo european (european) sovereignty, truth, duty, and militia (everyone fights) is the principle difference between civilizations, and because the west consists of kinship and shareholder militias federating into armies.

    HOWEVER

    8 – The state began interfering (disintermediating) in the common law in the late middle ages in order to enforce the king’s policy when unifying territory. this is the primary reason for law codes: consolidation of different groups and territories by producing standard weights and measures of justice (conflict resolution).

    9 – Under both Roman Law, Divine Right, and Democracy, legislatures have sought to corrupt common law (tort) into a single ‘non logical’ law. Rather than that tort always remains, and all legislation and regulation must maintain the law of torh (reciprocity).

    10 – this was exacerbated by the juridical relativists (american) in the 1800’s particularly in response to the suppression of the south after the civil war, and in the 1900’s by the jewish and ne protestant attempt to undermine the constitution in order to bring about socialism.

    11 – Worse, the american constitution would require:

    (a) An explicit declaration of reciprocity as the basis of all law.

    (b) The inviolability of tort and therefore reciprocity.

    (c) The binding of the legislature to tor (contract production not law production.)

    (d) The requirement that such law be strictly constructed (justified as adherent to tort, and reciprocity)

    (e) That any legislation (contract of the commons) pass the court as lawful (in other words, all legislation is immediately subject to suit)

    (f) That the court require legislators revise legislation found faulty, rather than ‘creating’ new legislation from the bench (not law). (Legislation must be returned to the legislature who has only so many days before

    (g) That the monarchy (or ‘president’ or ‘nobility’ or ‘people’ or whatever) possess rights of veto over any and all legislation.

    So, I think I have pretty thoroughly answered the question of the origination and method and means of correction.

    I hope this helps.

    Curt.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 11:27:00 UTC

  • (humor, via a friend) –“How come aliens only abduct white people?”

    (humor, via a friend)

    –“How come aliens only abduct white people?”–

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 10:14:00 UTC

  • “There is more equality of peace with arms than white flags.”—Anne Summers

    —“There is more equality of peace with arms than white flags.”—Anne Summers

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 10:09:00 UTC

  • “And an idiot is the most dangerous thing to any organization.”—Austyn Pember

    —“And an idiot is the most dangerous thing to any organization.”—Austyn Pember

    (from Siege)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 10:08:00 UTC

  • “Hey Curt, a friend and I are going to read Kuhn’s “Structure of Scientific Revo

    —“Hey Curt, a friend and I are going to read Kuhn’s “Structure of Scientific Revolutions” soon. Do you recommend any other work that would expound the most up-to-date and rigorous philosophy of science? Cheers.”—

    The conversion of science from justification to falsification to to market competition, and unifying science and law, where science is but an extension and application of the law of tort, and the testimony required in laws of tort.

    Popper’s Logic of Scientific Discovery,

    Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions,

    Popper’s conjectures and refutations,

    …but first read:

    Hayek’s knowledge in society essay, and his

    Road to Serfdom

    … And if you can manage it:

    Elanor Ostrom (Commons)

    And Amartya Sen (philosophy and economy)

    … And then

    Hayek’s Law, Legislation, and Liberty if you want to take it all the way through to the end.

    Popper is talking about explicit knowledge and hayek about tacit knowledge. And we must possess both. Just as we must possess recipes (transformations/actions) and theories (search algorithms/opportunities). One to search for opportunities and one to exploit them.

    THe rest of the century is basically wasted with poorly articulated arguments attempting to state what is a fairly obvious problem.

    As far as I know my work is most current, and that is that there is no via-positiva scientific method (what to do) only a via-negativa scientific method (due diligence in that your testimony is truthful.) That we must perform due diligence in each of the applicable dimensions of possible human comprehension. And that science consists of the art of attempting to possess the information necessary to testify.

    And therefore that science then is a market for arguments.

    So:

    – Free Association > Hypothesis

    – Hypothesis > Theory

    – Theory > Law

    – Law > Habituation

    – Habituation > Metaphysical assumption.

    Cheers.

    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 10:07:00 UTC

  • “SIEGE can be summed up as follows: – Don’t do protest marches. – Don’t think yo

    —“SIEGE can be summed up as follows:

    – Don’t do protest marches.

    – Don’t think you can achieve anything with a political party.

    – Don’t think voting will change anything that is of true importance.

    – If you’re going to fight, don’t just throw rocks at cops and similar minor targets (including Antifa etc.), but plan your attacks carefully for maximum disruption of the system.”

    —Caduceus Mercurius

    The central problem for an insurrection capable of obtaining state capitulation, is maintaining supplies while denying the urban centers supplies. This turns out to be fairly simple.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 09:48:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51848100_10156983940527264_119311654

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51848100_10156983940527264_119311654

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51848100_10156983940527264_1193116548751949824_o_10156983940522264.jpg John DabbNo truer words have been utteredFeb 13, 2019, 3:34 PMGary KnightSounds like something a Fed would quote…Feb 14, 2019, 12:53 AMPaul TrippI’ve got the first two down, working on #3.Feb 14, 2019, 10:15 PMBill JohnsonThat’s it in a nutshell.Feb 15, 2019, 9:11 PMStephen ThomasHmm 3/4 ain’t bad.. Need to piss off some more sand peopleFeb 15, 2019, 10:22 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 09:41:00 UTC

  • IT IS NOT THE LAW, BUT VIOLENCE THAT SAVES US —“Men in power are always gonna

    IT IS NOT THE LAW, BUT VIOLENCE THAT SAVES US

    —“Men in power are always gonna push the envelope to see what they can get away with; and those who invested in their regime are always going to cover for them – at least until it’s no longer profitable for them to do so – and perhaps after that if they have any loyalty or honour. What’s to be done in those cases? I’m curious what your solution is. It seems to me the problem is that men are corruptible, and any system can, and given enough time, will be corrupted by ignoble dishonest men. You’ll have to forgive me, but I’ve lost faith in legal systems, and higher ideals. It seems that all that matters to men is power. The only people who have seem to have any semblance of honour are military folks, which is why militarized fascistic society, where martial virtue is the civil ethic.”—Richard Heathen

    – Violence

    – Organized Violence

    – Law as a proxy for organized violence

    – Politics as a proxy for organized violence at scale

    – Markets as a proxy for universal violence at scale.

    – Knowledge as a proxy for universal violence at scale.

    – Genetic survival by violence and proxies for violence at every scale.

    If the court is restored to common law independence (tort) then the court is just a proxy for violence between those of different physical abilities, but equal rights to property.

    And if the law says men denied the proxy for violence, and licenses violence where such proxy denied, then men will happily use violence rather than court or politics as proxy.

    The only requirement necessary to do so is to restore the militia – most probably in a reform of the regimental system – such that they always have the power to exert violence in the personal and political scale, at personal.

    IT IS NOT THE LAW THAT PROTECTS US BUT THE PERSISTENT MARKET FOR VIOLENCE SERVED ONLY BY THE MARKETS FOR PROXIES FOR VIOLENCE.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 09:35:00 UTC

  • ITS TIME —“We have a real solution now and a real plan of action, now we just

    ITS TIME

    —“We have a real solution now and a real plan of action, now we just need consensus, which we are reaching. For the past 20 years, talk about civil war has been just that, talk. As long as people are economically comfortable it was always just talk. But we’re rapidly approaching the point where pure environmental and economic conditions will force people into action, talk will no longer be an option.”—Dax Rayner

    …

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 09:26:00 UTC

  • WE CAN’T WE JUST TELL THE LEFT THE TRUTH? 1) Our civilization has succeeded beca

    WE CAN’T WE JUST TELL THE LEFT THE TRUTH?

    1) Our civilization has succeeded because it’s been eugenic in every era – right up until the industrial revolution.

    2) We find you disgusting.

    3) and its because you’re unfit.

    4) and you are unfit because you lack agency.

    5) and you lack agency because you’re still undomesticated.

    6) and as undomesticated still an animal.

    7) and it isn’t any more complicated than that.

    8) we cannot cooperate with you on equal terms any more than we can cooperate with any other animal – you lack the agency.

    9) We don’t grant barn animals equality which is why we don’t grant you equality. And we don’t want barn animals in our homes, business, or our commons.

    10) This is what we mean when we want to separate from you.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 09:21:00 UTC