You see, you start with the supply side error of ‘fitting’ and tell me what the unicorn of metaphysics ‘is’.
I start with the demand side and ask what problems are you supposedly trying to solve.
The answer is that there exist only the material with potential to know, the experiential, memory of experience, and the products of our actions with the potential to know them.
The rest is just fictionalism.
Why: because the scale of free association is ‘exciting’ just as hallucinogens are exciting, and for the same reasons
So if you mean you want to engage in experiential fictionalism I understand it as a form of entertainment. But that’s all it is.
EPISTEMOLOGY
Experience > Free association > Hypothesis > Theory > Law.
Don’t confuse ‘Philosophy’ with ‘literature’. Fantasy literature exists in every field. It’s just that we are honest about literary fiction and dishonest about literary fictional-ISM (occult, pseudoscience, idealism, sophism.)
My response “It’s hard to get his time!”…Bill JoslinI think you do wellFeb 14, 2019, 9:06 AMCurt Doolittleeli does reach normies better than I do. he is willing to sacrifice precision to move people forward. I am not because I have to fend off the more sophisticated folk as well.Feb 14, 2019, 9:08 AMAlastair BuckwheatCurt is excellent at talking to spergs and writes in a clear and definitive way, but Eli has a better handle on emotion and even writes in a way better suited to oration, he would do well to find someone who can help him with production and aesthetics.Feb 16, 2019, 10:07 PMEli Harman, FYI.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51733963_10156986188277264_7313914329642827776_o_10156986188272264.jpg (author redacted upon request)Noah J RevoyMetaphysics, obfuscating obvious concepts for 3,500 years.Feb 14, 2019, 8:33 AMCurt Doolittlequoted sharedFeb 14, 2019, 8:41 AMRichard HallWell f*ck. Big chunks of Evolas works are largely obfuscation.Feb 14, 2019, 8:44 AMCurt Doolittlesurprise. ;)Feb 14, 2019, 8:47 AMCurt DoolittleIt’s entertaining. it’s inspiring. But it’s obfuscation.Feb 14, 2019, 8:47 AMRainhard PitschkeMetaphysical Philosophy: A game played by Mediterranean fishermen when hunkered down during bad weather, consisting of tying knots in word strings to make nets.Feb 14, 2019, 9:03 AMJim YankowskyRichard Hall honest question; whats the point of writing these tomes for the folks in question? Just to dazzle people with verbal pyrotechnics and appear smarter than the average bear?Feb 14, 2019, 9:05 AMRainhard PitschkeLawyers: Modern fishermen who employ nets made by the above, but with hooks attached. The hooks are baited with revenge and greed offers.Feb 14, 2019, 9:14 AMCurt DoolittleEvola continued the european tradition of continental philosophy and literature, which remains, fundamentally, theological (even today), and quite unlike anglo (legal-scientific). It is meant to inspire more than educate – as if in church. Anglo literature is meant to educate more than inspire – as if in court.Feb 14, 2019, 9:15 AMChris FowlerThis is a great conversation to illustrate the fundamental placement of grammar in critical thinking Curt,great post.Feb 14, 2019, 9:16 AMRainhard PitschkePriests: Fishermen who convince fish that the net is the ocean, so……”c’mon out!”.Feb 14, 2019, 9:20 AMPhilip Clarkcurt honest question:
What are the faults/weaknesses to propertianism?
I am a supporter but no human system is perfect and would like to know that you have thought out how to beat your own plan and what are the counters to slow or stop those from happening. Keep up the good work. Thanks if you respond.Feb 14, 2019, 9:21 AMCurt DoolittleUm. I publish legit criticisms all the time. There are a few. They are all reducible to:
1. its big, complex, deep, and hard to learn. People want something simple-stupid like libertarianism or progressivism.
2. people want a political ideology, religion, or secular religion (philosophy) and prop is simply science and law, with ADVICE on religion and secular religion.
3. jewish, christian, islamic religion do not come off very well, and I have not found a way to accommodate christian mysticism.
4. Everyone wants a monopoly (religion, authoritarianism, fascism, anarchism) when we must use each of these components in every society – we cannot have a monopoly on any of them. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred way of organizing society – i use all of them.
5. I suggest a few methods of governing across various peoples and various conditions with the law being the only constant. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred order. I use what is required.
6. I am an unabashed elitist working in favor of my people, but other than knowing what is good for my people, I do not consider their understanding of the world very valuable. Only the set of demands they have, not their way of satisfying them. ( I do not claim to be a good, a moral, or decent person or anything of the sort, I only claim I am correct. God knows I’ve made the same mistakes everyone else has. )
As far as I know there are no extant criticisms of the work itself and it will be extremely unlikely such things will arise other than in nuances. This is revolutionary and once you understand it your life will be changed forever.
THE COMMON LEGIT CRITS are listed in Section 3 Here:
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156982914672264Feb 14, 2019, 9:50 AMCurt DoolittleYeah but dammit, how do we explain this shit to people without all this damned painful argument?????Feb 14, 2019, 9:51 AMPhilip ClarkCurt Doolittle thanks for responding and in a quick and polite way
Along with sourcing.
I do hope that one day we can actually get propertianism to be enable for all of the of the US or maybe just a part of it that we can call ours.
Thanks againFeb 14, 2019, 9:55 AMChris FowlerCurt http://dontfallacy.me/Feb 14, 2019, 10:27 AMRichard HallJim Yankowsky Seems so. Plus you can get an adulating following that way.Feb 14, 2019, 10:32 AMCurt Doolittle(BTW: that links to a virus installer)Feb 14, 2019, 10:50 AMCurt Doolittleit is not a matter of hope. it is a matter of choice, and violence.Feb 14, 2019, 10:56 AMRustle MoreFeb 14, 2019, 12:13 PMGabriel Schmeiske LaportThis and while we’re on this.
Wasn’t that one of Hiedegger’s points all along, too? Every philosopher after Plato and Aristotle, according to him, had gone in the wromg direction. Into the realm of proof, not truth or as Curt Doolittle said before, into the realm of mathematical operations, which is tautological by virtue.
They called him a Nazi and proceeded to misinterpret and obfuscate his thoughts into the post-modern milieu.
Am I off base here, or what?Feb 14, 2019, 12:39 PMCurt DoolittleGabriel Schmeiske Laport No. Heidegger and Hegel are not wrong in many of their assertions and observations (particularly hegel) they are just trying to solve the wrong problem by retaining german phenomenalism and retaining conflation of experience and existence. Heidegger tries to complete this project by reversing existence and experience. And thus heidegger brought the phenomenalist project to a dead end, just as frege kripke at all brought the anglo analytic project to a dead end. The problem is NOBODY UNDERSTANDS THEY WERE DEAD FUCKING ENDS… lol.
However I am still stuck with the fact that while anglo is superior for the aristocracy and middle class, it cerainly appears that the germans are optimum for pedagogy and the working classes. And it increasingly appears that the christians (italians basically) are optimum for the underclasses. And I cannot (god damn fcuk!!) find a way around this problem other than the traditional ‘teach them what you can and take them to their limits, with the law constraining each’.Feb 14, 2019, 1:04 PMJim CatreThe difference between “I think, therefore I am”, to the subsequent “what am I?”Feb 14, 2019, 1:47 PMBill Joslin(The sorting-label an Arab librarian scrolled across lecture notes of some old writer)Feb 14, 2019, 2:11 PM(author redacted upon request)
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52020644_10156986042482264_5527334077696311296_o_10156986042477264.jpg Singular SpeechI choose tragedy, at least in aesthetics.Feb 14, 2019, 9:04 AMAdam KellyComedies, in the old English/Shakespearean definition, were definened by their happy their happy endings đFeb 14, 2019, 1:15 PMGL SevierOsho was very much a mixed bag, though some of his advice is great for neurosis, but one of the truest things he said was just how much you can enjoy life when you take it as the absurdity that it so often is and learn to laugh more often about it.Feb 14, 2019, 1:31 PMJames StillwellTragedy is part of the great comedy called life.Feb 14, 2019, 4:42 PMNeil A. Bucklewembrace the tragic or become a joke.Feb 14, 2019, 5:12 PMBryan Nova BreySteve Kaplan in the Hidden Tools of Comedy wrote:
âComedy is about an ordinary guy or gal struggling against insurmountable odds without many of the required skills and tools with which to win yet never giving up hope.â
The âALL IS LOSTâ and âDARK NIGHT OF THE SOULâ is always filled with the Character (& Audience) giving up HOPE. This downbeat happens before the âBREAK INTO THREEâ where a new plan is conceived and the theme of the movie is answered and put into action.
HOPE is the switch that changes the tone of a film (and life) from dramatic to comedic.
I think many guys would agree that the efforts of Curt and Propertarians has really boosted our HOPE, which naturally increases our humor.
This explains why Curt laughs so much (especially when interviewed by friends.)
As for Tragedy, if I recall correctly, the defining element is that the main character has a tragic flaw, usually hubris which brings about his demise.
Itâs not a tragedy if the main character doesnât have a tragic flaw, itâs just a bad movie, or a sad ending.Feb 14, 2019, 8:46 PMMicah Pezdirtzcomedy for me, tragedy for my enemiesFeb 16, 2019, 5:17 PMBryan Nova Breyatta boy! đđźFeb 16, 2019, 6:10 PMTyler DuskMy nibbaFeb 17, 2019, 3:54 PM
(BAD HUMOR: Have you seen the prank video where the plastic phalli are glued to the drunk guy’s back, like a penile stagasaurus? Walking into the emergency room? Whoever did that is legendary….)
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52326907_10156985215957264_7751473511721336832_o_10156985215952264.jpg THE MORE THEY SPAZZ THE BETTER WE LOOKBenjamin BakerI thought you were a highly discriminating gigolo?Feb 13, 2019, 9:32 PMJanderson Rexbrb buying tickets to KievFeb 13, 2019, 9:56 PMCJ CarverI think he meant âsexyâ tourist.Feb 13, 2019, 10:47 PMDaniel Roland AndersonI havenât come as far as I think I have sometimes.
Every physical fight Iâve ever been in was over how someone treated one of my friends/brothers.
Personal insults I take pretty well. This kind of thing gets my goat.Feb 13, 2019, 10:56 PMNikolai PetroffWhat’s wrong with sex tourism? It’s just going where you have a higher chance of spreading your genes. Only women are against it as it reduces their monopoly on reproduction.Feb 13, 2019, 11:14 PMNikolai PetroffKiev is great for any CIS red-blooded male.Feb 13, 2019, 11:14 PMSolomon VolodymyrWho’s spreading their genes into hookers??Feb 14, 2019, 12:50 AMNikolai PetroffSubliminally. Your body does not know who you are banging or that you got a condom on.Feb 14, 2019, 1:35 AMChris NuttLeftists: Be sex positive! Support sex workers! Sex work is an important feminist cause!
Also leftists: hurr durr evil disgusting white man misogynist likes sexFeb 14, 2019, 12:50 PMTHE MORE THEY SPAZZ THE BETTER WE LOOK
