Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 08:38:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
White boys like Kinsella trying to gossip rally and shame like women and jews wi
White boys like Kinsella trying to gossip rally and shame like women and jews without the creativity is so boring – it’s like bad comedians, or grad-schoolers doing shakespeare. Tolerable for the parents only. Embarrassing for everyone else.
😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 08:36:00 UTC
-
THE REASON THEY ARE REBELLING IS BECAUSE WE ARE SUCCEEDING – AND THEY HAVE FAILE
THE REASON THEY ARE REBELLING IS BECAUSE WE ARE SUCCEEDING – AND THEY HAVE FAILED.
Keep fighting the good fight.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 08:25:00 UTC
-
Rothbard (Jewish Pale) and Hoppe (German Free Cities) via positiva, via rational
Rothbard (Jewish Pale) and Hoppe (German Free Cities) via positiva, via rationalism. Doolittle(Rights of Englishmen) via negativa, via empiricism. Construct a value system by appeal(RH), or prohibit an anti-value system with violence (D). Inspiration and indoctrination (RH) vs prohibition and market for prosecution(D). Unlimited suppression of parasitic behavior that generates retaliation (D), suppression limited to intersubjectively verifiable property (RH). Suppression of blackmail, defamation, public sophism, supernaturalism pseudoscience( marxism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism). Doolittle: existential survivable without imperial protection, vs Rothbard and Hoppe: dependent, non existential without imperial protection. Doolittle: demonstrated, vs Rothbard and Hoppe: not demonstrated, not modelable, not survivable under competition. RH not possible due to praxeological incentives, and D possible because of praxeological testable incentives. No RH community can form or survive market for polities without parasitic dependence upon an empire because of insufficient incentives for defense and production of commons and their resulting multipliers in competition with free riders. vs Any D community can survive in the market for polities because it does not depend upon an external empire because of sufficient incentives for defense and production of commons and their resulting multipliers in competition with free riders. Crusoe’s island depends upon the ‘free’ protection of a vast ocean. The ghetto depends upon the host city or state. And the Free Cities, The Pale (european wildlands), The American/Australian wildlands, and Iceland/Greenland – all depend upon the host empire, and are economically subsidized by lack of political competition, and the availability of cheap and settleable land. The ghetto ethics of the jews and being exterminated for it on a regular basis versus the high trust ethics of the people who dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance superstition poverty starvation disease hard labor early death…. and the quality of life that people seek despite the costs of commons required to do so. ie: RH consists of pretense that ‘children’ polities, subsidized by parents, can compete against adult polities on their own merits in competition by military, political, economic, religious, demographic, warfare that never ends.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 08:21:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 21:19:00 UTC
-
“But given his style of functioning, and his excessive dependence upon a few mem
—“But given his style of functioning, and his excessive dependence upon a few members within his team who lack intellectual depth and political acumen, this was but expected.”—
But that is his strategy. And this is why it succeeds. He is forcing responsibility away from the USA and reducing our management of world affairs. He is demonstrating the political and military weakness of parties, eliminating the political cover previously provided by the USA. He is disempowering the ‘deep state’ (particularly the state department) not only in the USA but in europe, and forcing the weak parties to take responsibility, work together, and produce results, or be exposed as illegitimate, purely symbolic, and useless to their polities.
His mission is to end USA’s need to carry other’s water in a world where we no longer hold 3/4 of the world economy to pay for it. And it is against the allies interests to take that responsibility and be exposed as illegitimate.
The states are now nearly fully autarkic. Time for the world to grow up into adults and take responsibility for reciprocal protection of world patterns of transport, law, finance, and trade. We are still withdrawing the american wing of the british empire, and we will and must continue to. It has no value any longer. It’s a dead weight cost.
Iran has chosen to build an empire rather than a state and no one in the region is going to tolerate it. And the only reason it still exists is the ‘hope’ that the regional powers will mature enough to contain it so that we don’t pay the same price to domesticate the middle east in the next decades as we have in the past, or eurasia in those previous, or the colonial world before that.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 21:10:00 UTC
-
“Q: 5 +1 * 10 = ?”— This category of math ‘tests’, is not a test of intelligen
—“Q: 5 +1 * 10 = ?”—
This category of math ‘tests’, is not a test of intelligence but of a weakness in mathematical grammar that makes the reader fall back to the order of operations when the sentence is malformed. The correct form is (1×10)+5. or 5+(1×10), gracefully failing to 5 + 1 * 10 if malformed.
Almost seemingly complex questions of philosophy are nothing more than a failure to fully expand idiomatic speech into well formed sentence beginning with “I promise that …”.
The lower your patterning the more likely you are to see this trick. The higher your patterning (not discreetly seeing the individual glyphs of the text) the more likely you are to miss it. And that is all.
Tricks don’t test intelligence.
They insult it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 20:54:00 UTC
-
Kinsella still gossips,shames, and rallies like a girl. lolz
Kinsella still gossips,shames, and rallies like a girl. lolz.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 13:05:00 UTC
-
“Is it more wise if you’re seeking long term profit and savings to Invest in “ X
—“Is it more wise if you’re seeking long term profit and savings to Invest in “ X “ business or company and then take profits into savings without touching them OR invest in “ X “ business or company and put profit into business for rapid growth to increase monthly or annual earnings to save more annually. Which strategy is more effective for long term capital growth and saving?”—
The best way to achieve wealth is to run an smb, roll your profits back into growth, and sell the business at peak value to someone larger than you are. I always plan on who I will sell a biz to before I start one.
If you cannot get into a position where you are seeking rents on other people’s money through a continuous stream then just save it in hidden (offshore) or returning (real estate), and let a little bit ride in the market and in bonds.
There is no investment that you have more control over and more likely returns than your own business.
However, this is not a talent everyone has. So reinvest if you can, save if you must.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 12:48:00 UTC
-
What I learned from chatting with Chris Cantwell is to start top down instead of
What I learned from chatting with Chris Cantwell is to start top down instead of bottom up.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 12:25:00 UTC