FRIENDS:
Assistance pls. Via PM or email (not public), need mailing address for:
– Jared Howe
– Distribut(ist?)
– NWG(Josh?)
– And my “stalker”
( Just for letters, not immediate action. Don’t do substantial work. Just help us save some time if you can. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 12:30:00 UTC
CROSSING THE LINE INTO LEGALLY ACTIONABLE
Let’s get something straight. Attack my ideas – please. That’s the only purpose of open discourse. Attack my intellectual ability – fine, I err like everyone else. Attack my character, well I don’t claim to be a person of good character – I’ve got my own piles of mistakes and guilt – I just claim I am correct. Attack my personality – well, I incite that behavior on purpose and it’s good marketing. But attack my biz, or make up nonsense about me that could affect my biz, then try to remember that while not a lawyer, I am a student of, theorist of, and teacher of the law, and can hire practicing lawyers, and it costs me very little time and effort to use the courts for their intended purpose.
So far, in the past two weeks, I have a stalker, two actionable claims against the business, and an actionable claim against individuals. At the very least, it will silence you, put you at risk for future silencing, give me and counsel access to your personal life including your digital information, and cost you money. You don’t have to win an action to cost someone money. The process itself is extremely expensive.
I’m a grown up. I’ve lived in the grownup world. I’ve spent unimaginable amounts of time in litigation as a cost of doing business. The online right is full of men who have little such experience or achievement. I understand that this means you’re ignorant of such things. So fair warning. I love litigation more than I love sh-t talking with you, argument, and competing in biz.
So let’s stick to criticizing my ideas, intellect, and personality in good ‘online’ fashion. I enjoy locker room criticism like anyone else. I enjoy the ‘male means of verbal combat sports’. But signals are signals, online sport is online sport, and money is money, and each requires a different means of defense.
So, Zero Tolerance for crossing the line. I don’t do it. Via Reciprocity, don’t do it to me. OK? Good. I’m glad we came to this understanding.
Cheers.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 11:21:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52902784_10157000133672264_1644387718865616896_o_10157000133662264.jpg Very Smart Strategy…. very smart.Bill JoslinYup – doesn’t matter to Sheepdogs what the sheep bay about in the shed.Feb 20, 2019, 11:03 AMJim Catre…. What? Aren’t the most powerful millitaries in the world in primarily Christian nations, or am I missing something?Feb 20, 2019, 1:31 PMBenjamin LloydSomebody is forgetting the crusades? LmaoFeb 20, 2019, 1:38 PMJanderson RexCurrenlyt on active duty. The officer corps is filled with soy boys, pregnant women, various shades of brown and maybe, a few honest warriors. Somewhere, probably in SOCOMFeb 20, 2019, 1:40 PMChristel Rae MasonAryans posing as Christians? something tells me today’s Christians are very different. mostly disappointed with their capacity to see reality clearly – with notable exceptions.Feb 20, 2019, 4:11 PMSteve PrimeY’all have a piss poor attitude twards Christians. Thats gonna prove propertarianisms’s downfall. After we wipe out the Commies in a civil war were gonna end up turning guns on each other because your not going to force shit down our throats. You have to dumb it down so us government educated people can understand like the debates on the Constitution. You have two choices, convince the population or gather an army and force it on us. Then it would be a dictatorship. People want to adhere to our Constitution and bill of rights. If you want to build on that with p ropertarian concepts all ya gotta do is pass the amendments. All your doing is pissing off alot of your own base.Feb 20, 2019, 10:09 PMCurt DoolittleI did my job. My job is truth. There is no compromise.
Therefore there must be explicit tolerance for christian ‘prose’..
I”m done working on religion now. Go away and let me do my thing while the faithful do theirs – which means NOTHING.Feb 20, 2019, 10:11 PMSteve Primegood comeback. How about you address the issues I’ve stated? How are you gonna get the masses to get behind propertarianism while you shit on everyone? How about you go away? I asked good pointed questions in the public commons and you want to shut me up. Is that how the first ammendment under propertarianism is delt with?Feb 20, 2019, 10:26 PMSteve PrimeI liked what I heard from the John Mark videos and he spoke of you so here I am checking you out and holy shit you gotta be kidding me. I really wanna like propertarianism but you gotta convince us and so far your not doing a good job. I’m not trying to fight you I just want to understand.Feb 20, 2019, 10:29 PMCurt DoolittleYou are just … a newbie.
I run tests. I make arguments and I run tests. These tests constitute a king of the hill game. In this game I might be teaching, or I might be conducting research or both. In other words, as any long time follower knows, I use y’all as volunteers in my experiments that test reaction to different approaches.
Over the past few weeks I’ve been running a test to see the reaction of different groups to requirement of truthful speech in religion. And recording the means of argument used, and the intention of those arguments. This allowed me to choose from three different options in the construction of a constitution. And it allowed me to see the goal of christians. And how to find a method of evolving religion over the next few centuries. And I learned absolutely nothing that I didn’t expect going in other than the vehemence of christians in the working and lower classes is very different from those in my life experience at the other end of the scale. This is unimaginable to me but then the problem with supergeeks is an inability to ‘see downward’ into ordinary minds.
Now, you (all) don’t know you’re (all) a test subject. And if you did I couldn’t trust your reactions.
My goal is to write a permanent law of our people. If I fail to make a populist movement then my work will still live on. I am still up and down on whether to make such a movement. My original feeling was that we should create a frankfurt school and take our time. However, the crisis period seems to emerge and so this makes me experiment with more popular options.
So whether I create a book, a school, a movement, a revolution, a successful transformation, are just sets of options. The only way I can fail is not to try.
I move forward.
I thought I knew the answer going in. I do. I’m just frustrated that I was correct.Feb 20, 2019, 10:37 PMSteve PrimeCurt Doolittle I understand so called Christians suck and I agree. They’ve done what the Bible told them not to do, be decieved. They believe in a pre trib rapture because They’re too scared to go through tribulation. That dont believe there were some form of humanoids on earth before Adam. Gen chapter one is God reforming the earth after Satans fall. They dont believe Angels had sex with humans and produced the nephilim like it says in genesis 6. The problem with Christianity is that evil infiltrated the Church. I’m not tolerated in Church because I wont sit down and shut up. Good people cant infiltrate an evil organization and reform it from the inside without becoming evil. However all good organizations get infiltrated by evil wearing a suit and tie with a smile. Jesus said many will come to me in that day and say Lord Lord didnt we prophesy and cast out demons in your name and he will say to them depart from me I never knew you. Most so called Christians are gonna wind up in hell. That being said a lot of those people love America and the Constitution and will fight when the time comes. Like the battle of lexington and concord. Thet will not fight for propertarianism. How do you suppose to get them to support your ideas unless you use the system already in place unless you suppose to do it by force?Feb 20, 2019, 10:53 PMCurt DoolittleI don’t. I have to put it into the constitution explicitly. I dn’t do philosophy. there are no ‘weasel words’. I just have to write a clause that specifically license faith vs law. which I probably said three times at length today.Feb 20, 2019, 10:54 PMSteve PrimeCurt Doolittle I suggest you get John Mark to do a video explaining how Christianity plays into your vision. Like I said you need to dumb it down for us newbie’s and gobermint edumakated folks. Btw you keep saying your done with the religion test but keep posting on religion. Thats why I commented on this post. š goodnight.Feb 20, 2019, 10:59 PMM Shawn Davisand here I am observing Curt and his A/B testing wondering what the hell he thinks he’s going to learn from a small sample size of this FB page?
I question the wisdom of doing this testing, when there are a lot of new people being turned on to the idea of the this ‘philosophy’ from John Mark’s videos. Who have come to learn more not be insulted. I’m not even a Christian and was turned off by some of the framing of these ‘tests’.Feb 20, 2019, 11:14 PMCurt DoolittleYou learn quite a bit really. It only takes a sample size of about a thousand people to identify a pattern in opinion research. And activists simply present a clearer view of the underlying frame.
Christianity is what it is. We have to move forward without reform, so we do what we can do. -cheers.Feb 20, 2019, 11:20 PMVery Smart Strategy…. very smart.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 10:56:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52837017_10157000123762264_8592910879782076416_n_10157000123757264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52997973_10157000124057264_2861754752482410496_n_10157000124052264.jpg Zhenya MirkinTzevyFeb 20, 2019, 4:07 PMSantagata is being cunning again today….
Cant’ show the others. Waaaaaaaaaaayyyyyy over the line. lol
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 10:51:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52331908_10157000103827264_1549927614066458624_o_10157000103822264.jpg “WHAT GOOD WAS IT?”
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=623108144816546&id=100013520984574&hc_location=ufi”WHAT GOOD WAS IT?”
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=623108144816546&id=100013520984574&hc_location=ufi
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 10:40:00 UTC
—“Remember to read “politics” in the first line of Curt Doolittle’s posts as “the silly, irrelevant kayfabe that passes for national politics in the USA today”.—William Frisby
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 10:34:00 UTC
YOU CANNOT APPROPRIATE P OR CLIMB ON P’S BUS IN DEFENSE OF YOUR LYING.
—“I think he is saying that you are gossip rallying yourself in this instance and that it is relatively well placed on the irony scale.”—Jay Thompson
I thought RECIPROCITY was moral.
And that ‘he’ is using pilpul to create a false equivalency between argument vs argument and ridicule vs ridicule. Which is sophistry or dishonesty or ignorance, or stupidity.
THE ARGUMENTATIVE PROCESS
If ridiculed, return it, and then restate the central argument.
If that process doesn’t return to argument, repeat.
If repetition doesn’t work, the return to violence.
Never let GSRRM go unanswered.
Identify it.
Return it.
Restate the central argument. (inform thru repetition)
Repeat.
Hardly requires restating the central argument with Kinsella.
THERE IS NO ROOM ON THE BUS FOR LIES
This is why I don’t see hope for y’all. You are all dependent upon the use of avoidance of the central argument like women, jews, and muslims, which demonstrates that christianity is a vehicle for the deceits of women, jews, and muslims and therefore you cannot ‘earn the franchise’ by reciprocity of truthful speech.
Every time you make one of these childish bits of nonsense all you do is confirm: you are not able to evolve past that level of infantilism we equate to women and children or that level of dishonesty we call abrahamism.
So please stop wasting my time.
We cannot cooperate, because we cannot agree to reciprocity, and we cannot agree to reciprocity because we cannot agree to truthful speech that would end abrahamic deception in supernatural, ideal, sophomoric, and pseudoscientific terms, that gave us judaism, christianity, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism, using the very means of fraudulent discourse you are using with me.
It’s not complicated.
Just not worth talking about.
Xians must find a way on their own.
I can’t help those who are allies of the enemy.
And christians are allies of the enemy of our people.
Because christians are more allied to jews, christians, and muslims than they are to their people, their science and their law and their history.
Solve your own problem. There is no ride on P for christians in alliance with the enemy on the preservation of lying.
Truth is my way and the original way of our people before the dark ages of abrahamic ignorance and submission.
Find your own way.
There is no way of appropriating P in defense of lying.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 10:31:00 UTC
If you go back in my feed, you’ll see I avoided politics as ‘beneath me’ until the summer of trump so to speak. At which time I understood that the civil war i’d been assuming, was closer than I’d expected. I still see politics as beneath me, but Trump’s devolution of the empire and its costs, and his attack on the deep state and globalism is something it’s hard not to rally behind.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 10:05:00 UTC
TRICKS IN MATH, TEXT …. AND LAW
by JWarren Prescott
My wife and I have had this conversation several times. Being both electrical engineers we are used to not just regular college level maths, but engineering maths.
The first thing we say when we see these internet āmath problemsā is they are written either wrongly or purposefully to confuse.
Many times there may be two answers due to this obfuscation and ideally, this is supposed to lead someone to say, āWait, what is really being asked here? What actual or physical problem is trying to be solved?ā
Because if all you have is a disembodied equation with no practical application and the parameters are ill defined, then there is no perceived difference between deception and incompetence.
Think about this and how our current legal system is written.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 09:59:00 UTC
—“Can anyone explain what separates @curtdoolittleās view of Christianity from someone like Jeffersonās? āJesus just wants you to love your neighbor. All the miracle stuff is sugar coating to help the medicine go down.ā Itās the oldest most milquetoast view ever.”— @HHBenedictXVII
It doesn’t matter. I attempted to discover a means of legal tolerance of christianity with intolerance for other religions and it’s not possible because christians really do need their “woo woo”.The founders were Deists, and Jefferson (like me) saw Jesus as primitive philosopher.
Because of demographics, and incentives, Xianity will continue to die off with each generation, resulting in the Benedict Option, leaving around a quarter of the population devout, but politically and economically powerless, while the rest continue with political and material rather than supernatural means of mindfulness.
By demanding their ideal, being unwilling to compromise with secularists, and by being unwilling to use islamic levels of violence, Xians are done. Because it is a philosophy of the weak. Aryanism under the ‘excuse’ of Xianity was how our aristocracy ruled. w/o Aryans, no Xians.
PEOPLE FOLLOW INCENTIVES NOT SHOULDS.
It is possible to license christianity because of its adherence to natural law under the scholastics. It is not possible to license christianity if we tell people the dogma is ‘true’ rather than inspirational mythology. Ergo it is only possible to grant christianity special dispensation under the law.
This is unacceptable for the devout because they cannot and do not hold to their faith in competition with truth, science, and law despite their claims to strong faith. The christian cannot tolerate separation between faith and truth because his faith is not strong enough to carry him. To the contrary. the truthful can tolerate the faithful when it comes to the commons in which they must act, when action in accordance with existential reality is always in their interests.
There is no difference between Propertarian Natural Law, Moral Intuition, and Christian Morality EXCEPT that christians must show their devotion to this morality by lying (belief in nonsense) and the rest of us show our devotion to this morality simply by NOT LYING.
I’m done with the trial run. It’s really, really, obvious that Xians demonstrate addiction responses to threats to their source of mindfulness (medication).
And given the current state of xianity as not sufficiently desperate to compromise, while at the same time we are invaded by aliens, and under increasing rule by parasites, it appears that christians are the limiting factor on reform.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 09:14:00 UTC