Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52451588_10157003849107264_181755359

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52451588_10157003849107264_181755359

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52451588_10157003849107264_1817553593285214208_o_10157003849092264.jpg Noah J RevoyCode name for the first 100 men “The Inquisitors”.Feb 21, 2019, 6:44 PMCurt Doolittlegonna use thatFeb 21, 2019, 7:39 PMHoward Van Der KlauwI like the aliteration of Propertarian Prosecutors, but maybe we need Inquisitors too.Feb 21, 2019, 9:00 PMNoah J RevoyHoward Van Der Klauw High Inquisitor -> Inquisitor -> Propertarian Prosecutors. The first two are full time judging positions, going after lies wherever they see them. The last are the laymen who assist.Feb 22, 2019, 5:15 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 18:43:00 UTC

  • “The misrepresentations and feigned confusion are not accidental; it’s deliberat

    —“The misrepresentations and feigned confusion are not accidental; it’s deliberate character assassination”—Aubrey Harper

    Of course it is. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 16:22:00 UTC

  • “Elizabeth Warren Claims Two Men In Colonial Outfits Assaulted Her With Smallpox-

    —“Elizabeth Warren Claims Two Men In Colonial Outfits Assaulted Her With Smallpox-Infested Blankets.”—

    Ok. That was funny.

    (via Jack S.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 16:21:00 UTC

  • WE HAVE AN ANSWER. —“…good men are starving for a real solution…”—Aaron

    WE HAVE AN ANSWER.

    —“…good men are starving for a real solution…”—Aaron Byrnes

    And yes, it’s hard to learn. Sorry.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 16:18:00 UTC

  • Young men just like the fact that someone, for maybe the first time, is telling

    Young men just like the fact that someone, for maybe the first time, is telling them the truth that they intuit but can’t put into words. That’s the ‘thrill’ of learning P.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 16:13:00 UTC

  • “The difference between repressing a thought and dismissing It is the level of c

    —“The difference between repressing a thought and dismissing It is the level of confidence in your own agency”—Gunther Traffinstead

    well done.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 16:07:00 UTC

  • PROPERTY – FOR THE 1000TH TIME (Not going to repeat every single refutation here

    PROPERTY – FOR THE 1000TH TIME

    (Not going to repeat every single refutation here. If you encounter one where you think you ‘got me’ it won’t happen. sorry. Just ask how we handle it.)

    ;

    DEMAND FOR POSSESSION, PROPERTY, PROPERTY RIGHTS.

    1) Cooperation provides disproportionate returns necessary for survival

    2) Division of labor multiplies disproportionate returns on cooperation.

    3) Reciprocity incentivizes cooperation. Cheating disincentivizes cooperation.

    4) Humans engage in both retaliation, and altruistic (costly) punishment of cheaters in order to preserve the disproportionate returns on cooperation and cooperation at scale.

    5) Morality consists of reciprocity within the local limits of proportionality. Man is amoral and acts in hist interests it is just nearly always in his better long term interests to act morally.

    6) Law evolved to prevent retaliation cycles, to standardize means of conflict resolution, to maintain maximum returns for the majority of the polity, and to increase the revenues of taxing authorities.

    7) Law uses a single measure: demonstrated investment which we call interests or ‘property’ to resolve conflicts and preserve the peace (returns on cooperation), and a single test: reciprocity. Ths law is called ‘tort’ or ‘natural law’.

    8) Law evolves through the continuous evolutionary suppression of violations of reciprocity, through the continuous discovery of findings of law. It is a purely empirical process.

    9) All social science can be expressed in terms of identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property.

    10) All human cognition can be expressed as reward system responses to that same identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property.

    THEREFORE;

    Ergo PROPERTARIANISM consist of a universal language of linguistic, psychological, and social sciences that makes use of a standard of measure we commonly call property.

    WHEREAS;

    “Property” refers to:

    1) MEASUREMENT: A category of measurements, within that category we call weights and measures, that provides commensurability and therefore decidability, over the use of all possible human interests, in matters of conflict over those interests, where those interests satisfy any demonstrated human demand.

    AND WHERE;

    Property consists in that series:

    1) POSSESSION(IN FACT): That which I have acted to prevent others from consumption or use.

    2) PROPERTY(NORMATIVE: That which you and I agree not to use or consume from one another.

    3) PROPERTY RIGHTS(INSURED): that which a third party will insure we do not use or consume from one another.

    AND WHERE;

    Rights include no less than:

    1) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation.

    2) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space.

    3) Usus – Use: setting up a stall.

    4) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits)

    5) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer)

    6) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo.

    AND WHERE;

    Property includes any INTEREST we observe by:

    1) DEFENSE: Men are willing to defend with violence

    2) INVESTMENT: Have a demonstrable investment in

    3) NON-IMPOSITION: Acquired that investment without imposing a cost on others. (via john Zebley)

    WHERE Interests are demonstrated by:

    EITHER

    … 0) Origination (Homesteading, “Constituo”)

    OR

    … 1) Productive (no blackmail etc)

    … 2) Fully informed (no asymmetric knowledge)

    … 3) Warrantied (responsible fo asymmetric knowledge)

    … 4) Voluntary transfer (non coercive)

    AND IN BOTH CASES, WHERE

    … 5) Such action is free of violation of the same by externality. (unharmful)

    AND WHERE;

    Man demonstrates interest and defends the following categories of his means of production:

    1) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF EXISTENCE

    Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.”

    – Physical Body

    – Actions and Time

    – Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands.

    – Knowledge ties (skills, crafts)

    – Several Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over.

    AND;

    2) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF REPRODUCTION

    Means of Reproduction: “relationships with others and tools of relationships upon which we reciprocally depend.”

    – Mates (access to sex/reproduction)

    – Children (genetic reproduction)

    – Familial Relations (security)

    – Consanguineous Relations (tribal and family ties)

    – Racial property (racial ties)

    – Status and Class (reputation)

    AND;

    3). MEANS OF PRIVATE PRODUCTION

    Relational Property

    – Non-Familial Relations (utility)

    – Organizational ties (work)

    Cooperative Property

    – Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership)

    Artificial Property

    – Monopoly Property such as intellectual property. (grants of limited monopoly within a geography)

    – Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography).

    AND;

    4). MEANS OF COMMONS PRODUCTION

    (Community) Property

    – Institutional Property: “Those objects into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.”

    – Informal (Normative) Institutions: Our norms: manners, ethics and morals. Informal institutional property is nearly impossible to quantify and price. The costs are subjective and consists of forgone opportunities.

    – Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws. Formal institutional property is easy to price. costs are visible. And the productivity of the social order is at least marginally measurable.

    – Territory and attendant resources.

    —-END—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 16:06:00 UTC

  • THE TRADE WITH XIANITY 1 – Look. I have an agreement ‘with management’ to stop h

    THE TRADE WITH XIANITY

    1 – Look. I have an agreement ‘with management’ to stop harshing on Xianity now that my tests are done. You have really good people on the christian side. I recommend a lot of them. James fox Higgins and Vox Day among the obvious. Distributist is good at what he does too. …

    2 – … so given that we are speaking in different grammars, me in via negativa science and law of dispute resolution, and you are speaking in via positiva of theology of organization, it’s not possible to discourse.

    3 – So, if you want your faith I’ll fight for it if you fight for my law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 15:25:00 UTC

  • PRODUCING LEADERS NOT LEADING by Tim Kay To those who don’t get it: Curt’s a lea

    PRODUCING LEADERS NOT LEADING

    by Tim Kay

    To those who don’t get it: Curt’s a leader-producer, not a leader. Which is more crucial but just not the same role. Leaders are those best able to make use of the intellectual weaponry he develops in their respective niches. They emerge from the slush pile that is the audience. It seems to me that there is a core of Propertarian judges (those capable of continuing Curt’s work at his level) who are currently in development, and then a core of leaders (those who can propagate and mobilise), with some overlap between the two.

    It would be incorrect to ask Curt to be the leader because …

    *THE RIGHT ISN”T A MONOLITH*. … Leaders must be discovered in order to fit the demands of the various groups (and their grammars).

    An important consideration is the long-term viability of the work. As such making it about Curt would defeat the purpose; seeding a sufficiently distributed group of leaders is essential.

    To those who are looking for a leader, I would suggest nominating your existing de facto leader to get on board with Propertarianism and so fill one of the niches, or, to keep an eye on the talent produced by the project.



    (

    from CURTD:

    Let me repeat this because it’s the core of it:

    —“Leaders must be discovered in order to fit the demands of the various groups (and their grammars). “—

    I produce political weaponry. One of the weapons is leaders. I am not nor do I want to be a leader. We must act as one, not be led by one.

    Honestly I’m absolutely floored someone made this argument (grammars) instead of me because it is evidence of how far we have come in PRODUCING thought leadership.

    ).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 15:19:00 UTC

  • IT TAKES TWO YEARS by John Mark —“It’s laughable that somebody thinks they can

    IT TAKES TWO YEARS

    by John Mark

    —“It’s laughable that somebody thinks they can just roll up, watch my vid & maybe read a few posts on the website, watch an interview or 2 with Curt, and then dive into a critique. This is why most of these “critiques” make elementary errors & strawman/misrepresent. They don’t really understand what they’re critiquing. … Heck, I followed Curt for close to 2yrs, reading daily, before opening my mouth. And I’m still hyper-aware of trying to make sure I don’t say something incorrect & still learn new things & angles of understanding frequently.

    …. When they’re getting property-in-toto wrong you know they haven’t spent much time.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 15:13:00 UTC