Source: Facebook

  • I mean. you don’t get it. The game is up. The goyim know. And it will take a yea

    —I mean. you don’t get it. The game is up. The goyim know. And it will take a year, but I will popularize this criticism of christians as the enemy of our people just as I have popularized other arguments. And all you can do is provide me with a continuous stream of evidence that I am correct. The ruth is the most devastating weapon. We must only pay the high cost of using it.—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 09:18:00 UTC

  • CONTINUOUS DEMONSTRATION OF THE LIE. —“You claim to have a monopoly on truth.

    CONTINUOUS DEMONSTRATION OF THE LIE.

    —“You claim to have a monopoly on truth. The only honest position here is to admit there is no monopoly on truth.”—Noel Fritsch

    I don’t claim to have a monopoly on truth. I claim only that I can identify false speech, and that you’re lying. Period.

    Like you just did again – by false equivalence.

    And by doing so you demonstrate my point: christians are the vehicle for the propagation of the abrahamic means of lying.

    Like you just did.

    (I mean. you don’t get it. The game is up. The goyim know. and it will take a year but I will popularize this criticism of christians as the enemy of our people just as I have popularized other arguments. And all you can do is provide me with a continuous stream of evidence that I am correct.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 08:56:00 UTC

  • AN EXAMPLE OF COMMON CHRISTIAN DECEIT —“Propertarianism is a cult for people w

    AN EXAMPLE OF COMMON CHRISTIAN DECEIT

    —“Propertarianism is a cult for people who want to sound smart but aren’t.”—Kev Ahimsa

    —“Zero irritation, Jeremy. This is a lie. I ask simple questions.

    Then Curt gets angry and calls names and says (in many more words) “I don’t owe you a response, you’re not smart. My ego is bruised. Good luck in the civil war on your own, loser.”

    I’m open to seeing where I’ve been very irritated.

    If that happened, it’d have been a wrong response, and I’d own it. No reason to get upset over the internet.”— Noel Fritsch

    —“There are 2.2 billion Christians, do not alienate them Curt Doolittle, they could be useful allies”–…. This is almost verbatim from one of his posts. I’ve been following quietly for 2-3 years now, and do not chime in: “Hey Curt. I realize that the majority of American Jews are communists, but I would really like you to alter your philosophy to accommodate my needs. Just ignore the truth, ok? I am ostensibly looking for a better world for my family, but I would rather not upset the status quo, so just work that out for me. Stat. Just leave my religion alone.” What if there are in fact fundamental errors that need to be corrected?— Jeremy Bernstein

    (Thank you Jeremy Bernstein)

    Don’t be dishonest Noel.

    I get frustrated because you are trying to advance supernaturalism and the means of deceit it is communicated with, and I’m trying to end it – plus you engage in GSRM.

    So It doesn’t have anything to do with wit wisdom or quality of your questions, or depth of your criticism, or your character, it has to do with you’re WASTING my time. And you are wasting my time (just as you are now) because there is no ‘TRUTH’ argument for your cult – there is only ‘UTILITY’ argument.

    Well, there is utility argument for every excuse. Same argument EVERY cult, ideology, or philosophical disposition makes. It’s undecidable. Truth provides decidability. Utility only provides preference.

    Truth doesn’t unite into a monopoly (which is what you want – monopoly of lies) it unites on MARKETS under RULE OF LAW, where every little group gets whatever it wants in TRADE, without such horrors as Xian, Muslim, monopolies.

    So stop wasting my time. You and yours are the enemy of our people preventing the restoration of our people from the curse of supernaturalism and deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 08:47:00 UTC

  • RULE(LAW) VS GOVERNMENT (COMMONS) —“Is it ancap? I searched it it looked like

    RULE(LAW) VS GOVERNMENT (COMMONS)

    —“Is it ancap? I searched it it looked like some minarchy stuff.”–Mick Seppala

    It’s strictly constructed rule of law by test of reciprocity – major difference is you can’t ‘lie’ in political speech – which is the hard problem of converting from free speech to free truthful speech. And … You ‘roll your own’ government with it. I recommend various forms of government for various people. but only one rule of law. P is not ideology, philosophy, or religion. It is LAW.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 08:22:00 UTC

  • “WHAT DOES GSRM (or GSRRM, or RRGSM ) STAND FOR?” (core) —“You mention GSRM al

    “WHAT DOES GSRM (or GSRRM, or RRGSM ) STAND FOR?”

    (core)

    —“You mention GSRM all the time, what does it stand for?”–

    The Female (herd) competitive strategy by circumventing argument by undermining, poisoning the well, and reputation destruction by use of (G)ossiping (S)haming, (R)allying, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, and solving for face or consent — Versus the Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” of approval or rejection vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood.

    Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We bear the shame ourselves. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it.

    In western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.

    GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.

    This is why the abrahamic (jewish in particular, or semitic in general) means of countering greco-roman-european argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with european reason science truth testimony.

    Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost.

    Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth.

    Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth.

    Yet it is truth over face that is the reason for the ‘western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest.

    Hence why christians are the vulnerability of western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism.

    Judaism to undermine, Christanity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The middle east uses the female reproductive strategy and the far east and far west use the male, with the far east using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the west using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the middle east today just as in the age of the greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end.

    The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 02:34:00 UTC

  • “reality detached parasite seeks host”—Vince Ree ooh. i like that one

    —“reality detached parasite seeks host”—Vince Ree

    ooh. i like that one.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 01:25:00 UTC

  • SUPREME COURT, 9 TO 0, BANS POLICE FROM ASSET FORFEITURE. But up to 1/3 of polic

    SUPREME COURT, 9 TO 0, BANS POLICE FROM ASSET FORFEITURE.

    But up to 1/3 of police funding is from seizing assets.

    It doesn’t go far enough. It prohibits the egregious violations of the past. But it needs to prohibit it entirely. Either pay from the general fund or forget it.

    With police departments funded from seizures, fines, and tickets we have nothing but licensed corruption by organizations rather than individuals.

    I prefer the shakedowns I got in ukraine and russia thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-22 14:15:00 UTC

  • Equality and peace are simple utilities. They are useful only until they are not

    Equality and peace are simple utilities. They are useful only until they are not.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-22 11:59:00 UTC

  • ALL RELIGION IS PREDICATED ON DEBT, WITH ONLY THE FIRST RELIGION (THE DEAD, NATU

    ALL RELIGION IS PREDICATED ON DEBT, WITH ONLY THE FIRST RELIGION (THE DEAD, NATURE) TRUE.

    THE LIE

    The Xian/Jian/Mian lies: false debt for false crime, with false promise of reward false reward.

    THE TRUTH

    1. The universe is in fact what enabled man.

    2. Ancestors are in fact what got us here.

    3. The only debts we owe are:

    – nature/planet/the universe. (in truth)

    – our ancestors, who made us possible (in truth)

    – exemplary ancestors who made us possible (with truth)

    – our peers who persist the gains of our ancestors. (in truth)

    WHY THE LIE

    All gods are lies by those lacking memory of worthy ancestors or worthy ancestors whatsoever.

    WE NEED NOT LIE

    We are the gods among men.

    And the fake gods were invented to undermine us.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-22 11:55:00 UTC

  • SPINELESS by Eli Harman Due to discounting, an eternal reward or punishment is n

    SPINELESS

    by Eli Harman

    Due to discounting, an eternal reward or punishment is not even infinitely good or bad. Thus, there should be finite bads you would be willing to give up an eternal reward to avoid or finite goods you would be willing to accept an eternal punishment to obtain.

    But Christians are too stupid to defy their god even when he’s just being a malicious, unreasonable, petty, vindictive, dzhou, which is all he ever is.

    Instead they’ll pilpul him into some infallible moral bellwether like spineless, pusillanimous, bootlicking, cowards and try to gaslight you into accepting the same degrading abuse they lap up appreciatively.



    (Curtd: No one does a poetic polemic like Harman. He’s a freaking Cicero of the right. Damn.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-22 11:24:00 UTC