Source: Facebook

  • CULT (Religion) VERSUS CULT-LIKE (devotion) Curt Doolittle: Well. I mean, you’re

    CULT (Religion) VERSUS CULT-LIKE (devotion)

    Curt Doolittle:

    Well. I mean, you’re saying I’m a cult leader and the work is religious. I am saying I would like to see if it is possible to produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law. To some degree the law already is a secular priesthood.

    So in essence I am agreeing with you – by analogy.

    Heather Joi:

    [GSRM DELETED]

    So what you’re saying is…..

    … that you acknowledge that you are: (in your own words)

    “searching for a religion of the law”

    “produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law.”

    ”a secular priesthood.”

    Curt Doolittle:

    Well, I’ll just say that you forced me to look at the question from your perspective, and from your perspective, I agreed.

    What I’d assumed you’d meant was that the law was nonsense, and that I am positioning myself as some sort of leader rather than a teacher of leaders who will be the antithesis of the frankfurt school’s defeat of our people.

    (So if you call the frankfurt school a cult then we are talking the same language. if not then we are not.)

    But you are right, I am trying to to build a law, and if possible develop a secular occupation of ‘cult like devotion’, wherein the law is sacred (inviolable regardless of self interest.)

    I think I am pretty clear that I”m trying to separately find a way to convert our set of religions back to something european rather than semitic, and that’s the ‘cult’ (religion) I am looking to produce.

    So if you think I’m being dishonest, I’m just looking for the truth and your general argument helped me do so. And as I have defined it I don’t disagree.

    Cult (reform our religion) vs Cult-like (Sacredness of the law). ANd I agree with both. I just don’t CONFLATE THEM in order to lie.

    So in this sense yes I want to produce a cult (religion without priests) and cult like occupation (secular priesthood of the law).

    (And yes I do understand that you tried to engage in CONFLATION(AMBIGUATION) and that I (as usual) engaged in DEFLATION(DISAMBIGUATION).)

    In other words, you were lying. But within that lie was enough truth that I agree with the truth content.

    One is not guilty by word-association. Sorry.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 10:24:00 UTC

  • THE RETURNS ON INTOLERANCE End Christian Tolerance as cheap Virtue Signaling. Re

    THE RETURNS ON INTOLERANCE

    End Christian Tolerance as cheap Virtue Signaling. Restore The VIrtue of Intolerance – and the high cost of intolerance. The returns on tolerance are suicidal. The returns on intolerance eternal.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 10:07:00 UTC

  • So as in all things, I would prefer ‘the intermarium’ of the polish-lithuanians-

    So as in all things, I would prefer ‘the intermarium’ of the polish-lithuanians-romanians expanded all the way to the Dniper. I would prefer france disappear and german unity in europe especially with northern italy. I would prefer the balkans ‘clean house’. I would prefer the Russians use the black sea to retake constantinople – they have burned themselves in Old Europe for now. I would prefer the secession of the north americans into european-scale countries of similar ethnic interests. But these are just statements of ethnic homogeneity that makes possible the optimum government – with time.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 09:58:00 UTC

  • BEN BAKER ‘GETS IT’ —“I’m trying to understand. … Law is then a summary of n

    BEN BAKER ‘GETS IT’

    —“I’m trying to understand. … Law is then a summary of natural (proper and just) consequences for action/inaction.

    As far as it can be enforced depends on the affordability…this would also determine the willingness of men to administer and enforce the law via Incentives.

    It’s an immovable object, or very nearly.

    Government (governance deferred from the individual to a collective specialising in law and violence, held in common somewhat and funded by citizens) is the flexible part, the expression of that described above but adjusted to each population with their endemic characteristics, abilities etc.

    Holy shit.”—Benjamin Baker

    You just graduated my friend. Welcome to the judiciary. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 09:52:00 UTC

  • FILLING MARKET DEMAND —“Curt: I think one reason you are refreshing is that yo

    FILLING MARKET DEMAND

    —“Curt: I think one reason you are refreshing is that you are an example of older WASP masculinity. We are taught from a young age that to be masculine “cool”, assertive, that we must adopt the identity or manner of Irish or Italians [bravado] to be masculine white men. And most who are not WASPs implicitly support this, as it lowers our SMV relative to theirs, to have a large segment of their competition deemed stiff, uncool and out of style.”— G.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 09:47:00 UTC

  • ANSWERING A COMMON CRITICISM OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION —“Whenever I read somethi

    ANSWERING A COMMON CRITICISM OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    —“Whenever I read something like “disproportionate success of western civilization in the ancient” I think of the cult of Dionysus and their ritualized cannibalism, the Athenians and their practice of choosing -by popular vote! – a human “scapegoat” for their collective sins to banish to certain death, the fact that the Romans only *rarely* performed human sacrifice in situations like the wars with the Carthaginians, the fact that one of the most revered figures from the Ancient Greek philosophical tradition was a man – Diogenes – who masturbated in public and slept in a barrel, that the Spartans used to leave infants to die in the wild of exposure if they weren’t deemed “fit” as future soldiers, that Plato was a proponent of – in his “The Republic” – a totalitarian dystopia as the ideal society, that pederasty was considered a good thing by many of their “greatest” thinkers, and that they – Romans – then deteriorated into a state where the main public pastime was watching slaves murder each other and be eaten alive by animals, it makes me wonder how this could possibly be considered a success.”—-Abu Ayoub

    Someone on my management team defended me once by saying

    —-“Curt fails like the rest of us, the difference is we do a few things and some fail, he does ten thousand things, and some fail.”—

    I do not confuse perfect with THE BEST.

    Meanwhile most civilizations cannot produce anything resembling a western commons or polity, because they cannot cull or rule the underclasses, cannot produce a competitive aristocracy, cannot produce truth, trust, commons, defense of commons, and break the limits of family, clan, and tribe to produce goods. Only japanese and Koreans.

    They applied truth, they created naturalism and reason culminating in roman law, and by archimedes were on the verge of the industrial revolution in just a few hundred years – and we dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, and vicisitudes of nature. Why?

    They preserve competition in all walks of life, and deem it heroic.

    All the great civilizations of the ancient world are lost but east asia. Europe was rebuilt itself from the north. Harappan didn’t make it, but did it’s best from the east. And Judaism, christianity, and islam are a cancer that destroys all before it by reversing eugenic progress.

    The secret to success for a people is shrinking the lower classes until the middle classes are productive enough to carry what remains, without constant decline. the problem is it is preferable for rulers to keep people poor can concentrate wealth – everywhere except for far east and far west.

    China had Reason-lite and order before face but face before truth, the west had Reason, and truth before all and markets. With christianity as the cancer that we are still (some of us) struggling to escape. Africa, the pacific, and america had too little time. The middle east over extended and islam destroyed all the great civilizations as a cancer of uncontrolled underclass growth. ANd we simply see this in the data.

    That said, your criticisms are legit. they are just immaterial in relation to the successes.

    If you were ruled, were you better off under any rule than you are under western? There is no comparison of rule between civilizations even between chinese rule and western rule.

    The the greatest mistake my people made was expanding aristocratic egalitarianism (aristocracy of everyone) beyond the possible. The second greatest mistake my people made was the white man’s burden. It is true. But we should never have tried to carry that burden. The third greatest mistake my people made was trying to preserve the ‘market’ of the balance of powers, rather than letting the russians retake constantinople, and the germans eastern europe. The fourth greatest mistake my people made was the sequence of falure to return the slaves to africa, liberating our ancient enemy the jews, not prosecuting the communists with an inquisition, and the postwar immigration act – these are christian errors.

    All of these are the same mistake – optimism about mankind – and virtue signaling.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 09:37:00 UTC

  • Problems Don’t Take Years To Solve. Unless You Go To A Therapist

    Problems Don’t Take Years To Solve. Unless You Go To A Therapisthttp://www.silicon-edge.com/2/post/2013/12/problems-dont-take-years-to-solve-unless-you-go-to-a-therapist.html


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 06:03:00 UTC

  • Sorry. I slay sacred cows. My own especially. The truth has no mercy. So if you

    Sorry. I slay sacred cows. My own especially. The truth has no mercy. So if you have sacred cows (falsehoods), I will eventually offend you.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 22:57:00 UTC

  • NICEA They consolidated power in the most SEPARATIST religion they could control

    NICEA

    They consolidated power in the most SEPARATIST religion they could control. They had ‘control’ over the jesus character, but not control over the god character. So they chose the most useful storyline: the one with no competitors, and such that they could ‘parasite’ upon existing ‘god’.

    ie: Jesus is a parasitic character on the narrative history of gods, taking his legitimacy from a god, but unbound by the previous (really horrible semitic) god.

    They couldn’t make him a god, but wanted him to have the power of a god. So they made a parasitic character dependent upon these gods.

    This provided the priests with the control they needed to displace not only the previous religions, but through mass militant adoption, the aristocratic peoples (military and law) with a priesthood.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 21:39:00 UTC

  • YES, SALES IS BEST, AND THE EXECUTIVE PATH, BUT… -“CURT (Career Advice): Sales

    YES, SALES IS BEST, AND THE EXECUTIVE PATH, BUT…

    -“CURT (Career Advice): Sales is the upper limit for earning but it is especially NPC heavy, where the better salesman are either NPCs, or front so well as them it is indistinguishable.”-

    This isn’t really true. The more risk you are mitigating with your sale, the less being an NPC (likable) is valuable. Conversely, the less substantial your sale, the more ‘likability’ is what the consumer is purchasing.

    I sold every expensive high risk propositions and delivered greater customer service than the competition, with less concern for profit, and more concern for customer retention. But I am a closer. I don’t ‘originate’ sales. I don’t have the personality for it. I hire people who do.

    So your personality must satisfy the criteria: origination (likability), or winning a competition (skill), or holding an income stream (customer care.).

    You must sell what you are best at selling.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 20:35:00 UTC