—“Individual differences in achievement motivation were predominantly determined by idiosyncratic experiences (i.e., non-shared environment), with genes coming second, and classical nurture (shared environment) being irrelevant”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 18:44:00 UTC
(Well, I grew up thinking I was going to fight in Vietnam or be nuked by the Russians. Now it’s just fight here at home, or be genocided by The Flood.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 18:31:00 UTC
ECONOMICS OF TRUTH VS LIES, BULLSH-T, AND GSRRM
—“Substantive criticisms are good… Bullsh-t criticisms just impose a tax on everyone’s time to prevent damage to the informational commons, and the brand.”—Bill Joslin
Lies are cheap. Bullsh-t is cheap. GSRRM is cheap.
That’s the whole problem. That’s why free speech doesn’t work. It’s because truth is so much more expensive than lies, bullsh-t, and grrm – and dismissal is cheaper than learning.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 18:29:00 UTC
“CURT: WHAT IS THE ESSENCE OF PROPERTARIANISM?”
—“Can you define the essence of Propertarianism? There’s a saying “I have found the essence of Bushido – To die” Is there something similar in regard to Propertarianism?
So for example: sovereignty and reciprocity?”—
lol… what does ‘essence’ mean?
Propertarianism isn’t ONE thing.
It’s a collection of things.
But let’s use poetic license:
The essence of P-metaphysics is the grammars.
The essence of P-psychology of acquisitionism – all human psychology can be explained as acquisition.
The essence of p-epistemology of testimonialism is the completion of the method.
The essence of p-sociology of compatibilism is the division of perceptual, cognitive, memory, advocacy, negotiation, and labor with cooperation as a test of comparison.
The essence of p-ethics (propertarian ethics) is reciprocity as the test of comparison and property as the system of measurement.
The essence of p-politics (the natural law) is strict construction using all of the above.
The essence of the western group evolutionary strategy is the uniqueness of aristocratic egalitarianism: heroism and excellence, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth before face, and duty before self and family, Rule of law and the Jury, and markets in all aspects of life.
So the essence of propertarianism (the set of all ideas) is that this set of ideas that unifies all disciplines of human thought into a single commensurable system that is contiguous with physical science.
So if you had me make an analogy to the essence of bushido, it’s “The essence of the uniqueness of western civilization” written in logical and scientific terms.
I mean, you guys can ask me to simplify it all ya want but it’s not simple. It’s A LOT OF STUFF
Curt
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 18:26:00 UTC
Someone forgot the label:
“Intellectual Honesty Required.”
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 17:19:00 UTC
The internet provides a forum for the intellectually dishonest and morally culpable to engage in poisoning the well by GSRM, to compensate for their lack of sexual, social, economic, political, military, and intellectual value.
Just like the mainstream media.
But with lower production value.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 17:14:00 UTC
—“Westerners evolved from scarcity and low opportunity, trough a feedback system of effort-related opportunity where cognitive empathy evolved to accommodate the potential of exhaustive tit-for-tat. Affective empathy is just entropy under homogeneity and persistent norms and institutions (hence, Scandinavia).”—Simon Ström
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 15:12:00 UTC
SEE?
One thing that studying Curt Doolittle, but ESPECIALLY Bill Joslin is that the more I try to think along and concentrate along with you as I digest your work—- I find myself becoming BOTH a LOT more open to all sorts of people, but also a HELLUVA lot more unforgiving of bad people.”—Nick Dahlheim
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 15:09:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52647513_10157010566322264_8109264868961419264_o_10157010566307264.jpg Bill JoslinAnd generous tit-for-tat doesn’t imply unbound forgiveness, but rather occasional deviations from tit-for-tat towards generousity (forgiveness). It essentially resets the game for cooperation when cooperation has failed.
Eye-for-an-eye in most things with an occasional “turn the other cheek” to re-establish trust and Cooperation (which would be a second order reciprocal exchange – offering forgiveness now to secure the opportunity to be forgiven in the future if you screw up later) – otherwise known as incremental supression (I see incremental supression as attempting to achieve an optimum between forbearance and prosecution)Feb 24, 2019, 2:39 PMGreg HamiltonI don’t know Freyr is a pretty good role model…Feb 24, 2019, 5:49 PMPaul BardDidn’t Axelrod find the optimal strategy was exhaustive forgiveness, because tit-for-tat may be wrongly triggered by poor or mistaken information about your trading partners?
In other words, we can’t be sure the other isn’t doing their best to reciprocate, but we can definitively use force to oppose the other from doing harm.Feb 24, 2019, 9:52 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 14:11:00 UTC
The Generations of European Thought:
Gen1: Heathen
(ancestral, seasons, nature)
(ALL)
Gen2: Aryan
(exhaustive heroism and excellence)
(UPPER)
Gen3: Aristotelian
(exhaustive naturalism, science, law)
(MIDDLE)
Gen4: Christian
(exhaustive forgiveness and charity)
(LOWER)
I would be Aryan, Aristotelian, Heathen, Christian in my priorities.
Kind of wonder what other priorities others feel.
HEATHEN …………………….CHRISTIAN
|………………………………………………….|
|………………………………………………….|
|………………………………………………….|
|………………………………………………….|
ARYAN…………………….ARISTOTELIAN
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 14:10:00 UTC