Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • METAPHYSICS AS ADDICTION 1. Metaphysics = Language Paradigm = Internal Constant

    METAPHYSICS AS ADDICTION

    1. Metaphysics = Language Paradigm = Internal Constant relations independent of external correspondence, operational possibility, rational choice, reciprocity, limits, scope, accounting, warrantability, competitive surval.

    2. Description = Language Paradigm consisting of Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, internal consistency, external correspondence, operational possibility, rational choice, reciprocity, limits, scope, accounting, warrantability, competitive surval.

    3. There is no metaphysical only the imaginary: If unorganized the psychotic (rational ), schizophrenic(social), or psychedelic (experiential). If organized the fictional(fictions). if locally ritualized the cult. If socially constructed the religion. if chemically induced: the drug addiction. These are all imaginary.

    4. It cannot capture the experience and associative. It can only EXPLAIN the experiential and associative to prevent ERROR and DECEIT by the experiential and associative.

    5. Narratives create imaginary world models that assist us in calculating by the most primitive means available to us: empathy, sympathy, and imitation. Archetypes personify instincts. Plots are formulae which teach us the consequences of following our instincts in in different conditions in the pursuit of ends – and most parables teach us the crime of either hubris or cowardice or laziness.

    5. Metaphysics = Addicts. Just addicts. Nothing more. We need only determine the reason for the addiction, and the method of addiction, but these are addictions, and addicts ‘disposable’ at best, and ‘cancer’ at worst.

    There is every good reason to either remove addicts from public discourse and influence, on one hand, and to follow Duerte if they get out of hand on the other. This is what houses of government by demonstrated achievement accomplish, and what prohibition on addictions prevents from influencing those houses.

    Addicts will stop at nothing to justify their addiction.

    At present we need to imitate duterte and clean house.

    —

    And to cut off the usual sophistry.

    Logical positivism is the opposite of falsificationism.

    We do not claim to know what is true and good.

    We claim only to know what is false and irreciprocal.

    And we claim the evidence is that mankind does not build knowledge so much as removes ignorance error bias and deceit, by continuous incremental discovery of the few universal laws of the universe and their few applications, in the most parsimonious logic, vocabulary and paradigm available to man.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 10:43:00 UTC

  • Civilizations express a class strategy. The anglo european is the masculine aris

    Civilizations express a class strategy. The anglo european is the masculine aristocratic. The french european the feminine aristocratic. The german confused. The middle eastern the underclass priestly. The jewish the female elite priesthood.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 10:33:00 UTC

  • THE CURRENT TRANSFORMATION OF FORMAL SCIENCES IN THE CONTEXT OF HISTORY The Four

    THE CURRENT TRANSFORMATION OF FORMAL SCIENCES IN THE CONTEXT OF HISTORY

    The Four Color Problem is an example of the limits of mathematics. A proof is just a test of internal consistency within the limits of mathematics. The point of mandelbrot’s work, and now wolframs, is that we are past the point of linguistic mathematics (‘statistics and sets’) and we are in the domain of computable mathematics(‘operations’).

    Or put differently – we have finally discovered the foundations of mathematics, and are in the process of falsifying the flawed project of the set foundations of mathematics and restoring operational foundations of mathematics.

    Human logical facility >

    … Operations >

    … … Counting -> Arithmetic -> Accounting

    …………………..-> Computations -> Symmetries(equilibria)

    …………………..-> Sets -> Mathematics -> Symmetries

    Or in historical terms we have restored the aristotelian-achimedian basis of mathematics and science that was lost and overtaken by greek platonism and middle eastern verbalism and pseudoscience in mathematics, that was restored to geometry by Descartes and Empiricism by the British, and undermined by the Jewish logicians and mathematicians and german and jewish philosophers, but is in the process of being restored by the present generation which is jewish-german-british-american.

    I’m kind of … sad, wolfram beat me to it. Because I would have loved to work on the problem if I had another lifetime. But I’m happy to stick with the social sciences and explain why he’s right. And to provide perhaps a better explanation of why he’s right.

    We are seeing the end of the ‘jewish century of pseudoscience’ and my argument that we have paid the cost of jewish integration into aristotelianism like we have paid the french, german, russian ,and chinese costs. But that the problem is the jews were among us rather than in their own country, so their undermining was more successful than the french, german, russian, and chinese.

    The question is whether we can correct course in the social sciences before immigration destroys our civilization and it’s ability to restore course in aristotelian-archimedian european realism, naturalism, operationalism, consistency, correspondence, sovereignty, rational choice, reciprocity, and markets in everything as the spectrum of near perfect correspondence with the universe in its physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 10:09:00 UTC

  • YOU WON”T BE ABLE TO CRITICIZE OR FALSIFY P-LOGIC AND LAW Every professional dis

    YOU WON”T BE ABLE TO CRITICIZE OR FALSIFY P-LOGIC AND LAW

    Every professional discipline uses a methodology. P creates a single professional discipline of the metaphysical, psychological, social, political, and group strategy. It is to sentient sciences what physics is to non-sentient physical sciences. P is a methodology that produces a formal grammar (or logic). As such it is what we refer to as a formal science (formal logic of metaphysics, psychology, and sociology).

    We use that science to explain western civlization. We use the explanation of western civilization to explain why it’s the optimum civilization. We explain and advocate our preference for that optimum civilization. We use that understanding and preference of optimum civilization to correct past and present errors in that civilization, and to restore, reform, and, innovate on that optimum civilization.

    It is impossible to criticize the methodology (science). It is very difficult to criticize what we do with it. At best one can argue for preference of different organizations of our or other civilizations given the tactical advantage of circumstances, within that strategic optimum.

    You must be able to criticize P on it’s foundations and it’s propositions. (You won’t be able to). The difference between counting, accounting, mathematics, programming, and P is simply the increasing number of causal dimensions in the domains they describe). You certainly can criticize the choice of continuing the strategy of western civlization or the policy implementations we suggest to do so. But you aren’t going to be able to criticize the logic or science whatsoever. It won’t happen. You don’t know that yet. But I do.

    Hostility to criticism of any of the sciences (logical facility, logic, mathematics, accounting, mathematics, programming, P (P-logic, P-Law) is simply hostility to laziness and ignorance rather than informed debate.

    P is not a theology, philosophy, ideology, or analogy. It’s a (the) formal grammar (logic, vocabulary, paradigm) of sentient life if not all life.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 09:40:00 UTC

  • THE SOCIAL UTILITY OF SH-T TALKING AND SH-T TESTING TRUTH: Sh-t talking provides

    THE SOCIAL UTILITY OF SH-T TALKING AND SH-T TESTING

    TRUTH: Sh-t talking provides mindfulness. It provides safe competitive dominance play while showing respect at the same time. It requires self regulation. It requires cunning. It allows public accusation and admission of truths. It is desensitizing. It builds trust. I can’t say enough good about it. Whereas GSRRM does the opposite. The techniques of GSRRM and Sh-t_Testing as the via-negativa undermining vs Sh-t Talking and Bragging as the via-positiva advocating explain the social utility of each.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 09:18:00 UTC

  • MOST USEFUL HISTORY LECTURE SERIES ON YOUTUBE (very little wrong, very little hi

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JrWYc4pavETHE MOST USEFUL HISTORY LECTURE SERIES ON YOUTUBE

    (very little wrong, very little high-mindedness)

    I was surprised, given the setting, but this is deep-state free, middle-class delivery, by an american guy who can’t dress himself, of middle east from a european point of view, meaning demographic, economic, military, and strategic.

    Why? Because (Military) grownups think strategically, militarily economically, and demographically. Democratic Governments and women think the opposite.

    PART 1

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JrWYc4pavE

    PART 2

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ar41Lte7tsUpdated May 3, 2020, 9:11 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 09:11:00 UTC

  • RELATIONSHIP WISDOM Things I know how to do that seem to work. – Be funny. – Be

    RELATIONSHIP WISDOM

    Things I know how to do that seem to work.

    – Be funny.

    – Be affectionate.

    – Be supportive constantly

    – Listen when necessary

    – Be a gentleman when necessary.

    – Make her look good to her friends.

    – Be tasteful.

    – Make money.

    – Fix things.

    – Lift heavy things.

    – Be scary when necessary.

    – Make her coffee.

    – Rub her feet.

    – Wash her hair.

    – Feed her chocolate

    – Bring flowers.

    – Buy her clothes.

    – Cook (a lot)

    – Do Laundry. Dust. Vacuum. Sew buttons etc now and then.

    Things I know I do that don’t seem to work.

    – Avoid shopping without threats of bodily harm.

    – Forget everything it’s possible to forget. (Everything)

    – Leave my clothes next to the bed.

    – Pile papers and books on my desk.

    – Forget to turn off CEO-Me

    – Forget to turn off Philosopher-Me

    – Pretend I don’t know the answer or how to do it.

    – Ignore all attempts to ‘alter my priorities’

    – Express more frustration at being interrupted.

    – Fail to ignore stupidity

    – Appreciate beautiful women now and then.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 19:01:00 UTC

  • Night Three Chinese flying lanterns. Lay out in triangle. link together with str

    Night

    Three Chinese flying lanterns.

    Lay out in triangle.

    link together with straws and tape.

    Light Lanterns

    Let fly.

    Drink beer.

    High five.

    See how many idiots report triangular UFO in vicinity.

    Marvel at how many suckers are born every minute.

    Underpants gnomes.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 18:25:00 UTC

  • “The dollar is the new form of money. There is relentless demand for dollars. Re

    —“The dollar is the new form of money. There is relentless demand for dollars. Relentless! As populations age the time value of money declines. The preference for money LATER comes to exceed preference for money NOW (because older people need savings). That’s why you have 0% interest rates across the developed world.”—Michael Churchill

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 16:13:00 UTC

  • DOH! —“If I could get you alone in a room tied to a chair (comfortable of cour

    DOH!

    —“If I could get you alone in a room tied to a chair (comfortable of course) and fitted with a shock collar, I could get a lot of good education out of you.”–Daniel Roland Anderson

    I love that man. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 14:52:00 UTC