METAPHYSICS AS ADDICTION 1. Metaphysics = Language Paradigm = Internal Constant

METAPHYSICS AS ADDICTION

1. Metaphysics = Language Paradigm = Internal Constant relations independent of external correspondence, operational possibility, rational choice, reciprocity, limits, scope, accounting, warrantability, competitive surval.

2. Description = Language Paradigm consisting of Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, internal consistency, external correspondence, operational possibility, rational choice, reciprocity, limits, scope, accounting, warrantability, competitive surval.

3. There is no metaphysical only the imaginary: If unorganized the psychotic (rational ), schizophrenic(social), or psychedelic (experiential). If organized the fictional(fictions). if locally ritualized the cult. If socially constructed the religion. if chemically induced: the drug addiction. These are all imaginary.

4. It cannot capture the experience and associative. It can only EXPLAIN the experiential and associative to prevent ERROR and DECEIT by the experiential and associative.

5. Narratives create imaginary world models that assist us in calculating by the most primitive means available to us: empathy, sympathy, and imitation. Archetypes personify instincts. Plots are formulae which teach us the consequences of following our instincts in in different conditions in the pursuit of ends – and most parables teach us the crime of either hubris or cowardice or laziness.

5. Metaphysics = Addicts. Just addicts. Nothing more. We need only determine the reason for the addiction, and the method of addiction, but these are addictions, and addicts ‘disposable’ at best, and ‘cancer’ at worst.

There is every good reason to either remove addicts from public discourse and influence, on one hand, and to follow Duerte if they get out of hand on the other. This is what houses of government by demonstrated achievement accomplish, and what prohibition on addictions prevents from influencing those houses.

Addicts will stop at nothing to justify their addiction.

At present we need to imitate duterte and clean house.

—

And to cut off the usual sophistry.

Logical positivism is the opposite of falsificationism.

We do not claim to know what is true and good.

We claim only to know what is false and irreciprocal.

And we claim the evidence is that mankind does not build knowledge so much as removes ignorance error bias and deceit, by continuous incremental discovery of the few universal laws of the universe and their few applications, in the most parsimonious logic, vocabulary and paradigm available to man.