Source: Facebook

  • jeez brandon hayes. you got to the heart of it didn’t you. nice

    jeez brandon hayes. you got to the heart of it didn’t you. nice.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 13:16:00 UTC

  • There is only one existentially possible equality and that is reciprocity. The r

    There is only one existentially possible equality and that is reciprocity. The rest is proportionality. And it is an endemic cognitive bias by which we conflate the two.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 13:16:00 UTC

  • “Calculating for reciprocity is superior to intuiting an ideal.”—Brandon Hayes

    —“Calculating for reciprocity is superior to intuiting an ideal.”—Brandon Hayes

    That is one of those sentences you have to contemplate to fully appreciate. Well done.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 13:15:00 UTC

  • “Propertarianism. It’s not removing subjectivity but revealing it.”—Moritz Bie

    —“Propertarianism. It’s not removing subjectivity but revealing it.”—Moritz Bierling


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 13:09:00 UTC

  • ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF NEW EUROPEAN ZONE —“Curt, Can you please write a post

    ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF NEW EUROPEAN ZONE

    —“Curt, Can you please write a post on the economic feasibility of banning imports outside of a New European zone? I want to see what the king of the hill process does to the proposal on page 67 of NZM”— Oliver

    New European Zone? I assume that means Australia, NZ, USA, Canada, Europe, Eastern Europe, Russia, (But South America?, India?).

    (Short version: easy for everyone except aussie/nz who pay the distance cost. But its easy to do, yes.)

    I’m not going to go into world balances of trade between the parties. It would take me all day to write this post. And I’m going to state the obvious that other countries would retaliate. But if you look at the list at the end of this post you will rapidly see that the USA and canada can easily survive it. The outliers are NZ and Aussies who are for all intents and purposes, client states of asia.

    Cutting out africa (minerals), the middle east(oil), and asia(manufacturing capacity) is entirely possible. and the result would largely be transfer of japanese and chinese manufacturing capacity to Germany and the USA, and the strategic transfer of the Japanese relationship to Asia, and an axis of japan and south korea that might perhaps ally with india.

    It is hard to choose whether to exclude or include india and south america, both of which are european admixtures. Russia is also integrated with (northern) Kazakhstan and imports 1/10th of its oil. Russia India and China have large trade relationships. The west would have to subsidize russian military production by buying their equipment as a replacement for the asian and middle eastern markets. China wold be able to build her military technology by finding ready markets middle eastern, african, and asian realms.

    Russia would roughly exchange its role as an asian trade power for the role of the middle east and asia in supplying oil and resources. And so it is russia that is the ‘power position’ in any such negotiation, and putting her in this position of power would tempt russian nature, but restore her to world power status which she desires.

    However russia cannot compete as a world power with her population and economy; asia as an interest in reclaiming russian territory and resources. Her interest given her nature might be swiss neutrality. We would have to buy russian involvement which would require american military exit from europe and a general comfort on the part of eastern europeans that is hard to imagine.

    THE ALTERNATIVE 1

    Limit trade to raw materials and food, and autarky on goods produced by transformation of them. This is the optimum balance of providing world trade in territorial differences but ameliorating differences in degrees of development of human capital by eliminating wage arbitrage (differences in cost of living and purchasing power).

    THE ALTERNATIVE 2

    The Anglosphere Alternative (restoration of the british empire). is somewhat easier to pull off since we are already autarkic with only Australian and NZ the outliers.

    Australia:

    ***China 32.2%,

    ***Japan 15.9%,

    ***South Korea 7.1%,

    US 5.4%,

    ***India 4.2% (2015)

    New Zealand:

    ***China: US$9.6 billion (24.9% of New Zealand’s total exports)

    Australia: $5.7 billion (14.8%)

    United States: $3.7 billion (9.6%)

    ***Japan: $2.4 billion (6.3%)

    ***South Korea: $1.2 billion (3.1%)

    United Kingdom: $1 billion (2.7%)

    ***Singapore: $832.5 million (2.2%)

    ***Taiwan: $831.8 million (2.2%)

    ***Hong Kong: $761.5 million (2%)

    ***Malaysia: $702.5 million (1.8%)

    ***Indonesia: $675.8 million (1.8%)

    ***Thailand: $638.2 million (1.7%)

    Netherlands: $586 million (1.5%)

    Germany: $579 million (1.5%)

    ***United Arab Emirates: $533.8 million (1.4%)

    Canada:

    United States: US$337.8 billion (75.1% of total Canadian exports)

    ***China: $21.3 billion (4.7%)

    United Kingdom: $12.6 billion (2.8%)

    ***Japan: $10 billion (2.2%)

    Mexico: $6.3 billion (1.4%)

    South Korea: $4.5 billion (1%)

    Germany: $3.7 billion (0.8%)

    Netherlands: $3.7 billion (0.8%)

    ***India: $3.2 billion (0.7%)

    ***Hong Kong: $3 billion (0.7%)

    Belgium: $2.8 billion (0.6%)

    France: $2.6 billion (0.6%)

    Italy: $2.3 billion (0.5%)

    Norway: $1.9 billion (0.4%)

    ***Brazil: $1.7 billion (0.4%)

    America:

    Canada: US$298.7 billion (18% of total US exports)

    ***Mexico: $265 billion (15.9%)

    ***China: $120.3 billion (7.2%)

    ***Japan: $75 billion (4.5%)

    United Kingdom: $66.2 billion (4%)

    Germany: $57.7 billion (3.5%)

    ***South Korea: $56.3 billion (3.4%)

    Netherlands: $49.4 billion (3%)

    ***Brazil: $39.5 billion (2.4%)

    Hong Kong: $37.5 billion (2.3%)

    France: $37.4 billion (2.2%)

    ***Singapore: $33.1 billion (2%)

    ***India: $33.1 billion (2%)

    Belgium: $31.4 billion (1.9%)

    ***Taiwan: $30.2 billion (1.8%)

    UK:

    United States: US$64.4 billion (13.3% of total UK exports)

    Germany: $47 billion (9.7%)

    Netherlands: $33.3 billion (6.9%)

    France: $31.8 billion (6.6%)

    Ireland: $28.3 billion (5.9%)

    ***China: $27.5 billion (5.7%)

    Switzerland: $25.4 billion (5.2%)

    Belgium: $19.1 billion (4%)

    Italy: $14.1 billion (2.9%)

    Spain: $13.9 billion (2.9%)

    ***Hong Kong: $10.3 billion (2.1%)

    ***United Arab Emirates: $10 billion (2.1%)

    ***Turkey: $9.5 billion (2%)

    ***Japan: $8.3 billion (1.7%)

    ***South Korea: $7.8 billion (1.6%)

    Ireland:

    United States: US$46 billion (27.9% of total Irish exports)

    Belgium: $21.7 billion (13.2%)

    United Kingdom: $18.7 billion (11.4%)

    Germany: $12.2 billion (7.4%)

    Netherlands: $9 billion (5.4%)

    Switzerland: $7.7 billion (4.6%)

    France: $6.2 billion (3.8%)

    China: $5.4 billion (3.3%)

    Japan: $4.6 billion (2.8%)

    Italy: $4.3 billion (2.6%)

    Spain: $3 billion (1.8%)

    ***Mexico: $1.7 billion (1%)

    Canada: $1.6 billion (1%)

    Poland: $1.4 billion (0.8%)

    Sweden: $1.1 billion (0.7%)

    LATIN BLOCK

    France: (FRANCE IS, LIKE THE USA, AUTARKIC)

    Germany: US$83.3 billion (14.7% of total French exports)

    United States: $45.3 billion (8%)

    Spain: $44.3 billion (7.8%)

    Italy: $42.8 billion (7.5%)

    Belgium: $40.4 billion (7.1%)

    United Kingdom: $38.6 billion (6.8%)

    ***China: $24.5 billion (4.3%)

    Netherlands: $20.9 billion (3.7%)

    Switzerland: $18.9 billion (3.3%)

    Poland: $11.7 billion (2.1%)

    ***Singapore: $9.7 billion (1.7%)

    ***Japan: $7.8 billion (1.4%)

    ***Hong Kong: $7.3 billion (1.3%)

    ***Turkey: $7.1 billion (1.2%)

    ***India: $6.5 billion (1.1%)

    Spain

    France: US$48.5 billion (15.1% of total Spanish exports)

    Germany: $36.1 billion (11.3%)

    Italy: $25.1 billion (7.8%)

    Portugal: $22.6 billion (7.1%)

    United Kingdom: $22 billion (6.9%)

    United States: $14.1 billion (4.4%)

    Netherlands: $10.8 billion (3.4%)

    Belgium: $9.6 billion (3%)

    Morocco: $9 billion (2.8%)

    ***China: $7.1 billion (2.2%)

    Poland: $6.5 billion (2%)

    Turkey: $6.5 billion (2%)

    Mexico: $5.2 billion (1.6%)

    Switzerland: $4.7 billion (1.5%)

    Romania: $3.2 billion (1%)

    Portugal

    Spain: US$17.4 billion (25.3% of total Portuguese exports)

    France: $8.7 billion (12.7%)

    Germany: $7.9 billion (11.5%)

    United Kingdom: $4.3 billion (6.3%)

    United States: $3.4 billion (5%)

    Italy: $2.9 billion (4.3%)

    Netherlands: $2.6 billion (3.8%)

    Angola: $1.8 billion (2.6%)

    Belgium: $1.6 billion (2.3%)

    Brazil: $957.5 million (1.4%)

    Poland: $897.2 million (1.3%)

    ***Morocco: $819.4 million (1.2%)

    China: $777.6 million (1.1%)

    Sweden: $686.8 million (1%)

    Switzerland: $681.6 million (1%)

    ITALY:

    Germany: US$62.9 billion (12.4% of total Italian exports)

    France: $51.9 billion (10.3%)

    United States: $45.8 billion (9%)

    Spain: $26.1 billion (5.2%)

    United Kingdom: $26 billion (5.1%)

    Switzerland: $23.4 billion (4.6%)

    ***China: $15.3 billion (3%)

    Belgium: $15.2 billion (3%)

    Poland: $14.2 billion (2.8%)

    Netherlands: $11.8 billion (2.3%)

    ***Turkey: $11.4 billion (2.3%)

    Austria: $10.7 billion (2.1%)

    Russia: $9 billion (1.8%)

    Romania: $8.2 billion (1.6%)

    ***Japan: $7.4 billion (1.5%)

    GERMAN BLOCK

    Netherlands

    Germany: US$146.8 billion (22.5% of total Dutch exports)

    Belgium: $68.3 billion (10.5%)

    United Kingdom: $56.6 billion (8.7%)

    France: $55.3 billion (8.5%)

    Italy: $25.7 billion (3.9%)

    United States: $22.7 billion (3.5%)

    Spain: $19.9 billion (3.1%)

    Poland: $15.6 billion (2.4%)

    Sweden: $14.7 billion (2.2%)

    ***China: $13.5 billion (2.1%)

    Czech Republic: $11.2 billion (1.7%)

    Austria: $8.6 billion (1.3%)

    Switzerland: $7.9 billion (1.2%)

    Denmark: $7.8 billion (1.2%)

    ***Turkey: $7.2 billion (1.1%)

    Belglum

    Germany: US$70.7 billion (16.5% of total Belgian exports)

    France: $63.8 billion (14.9%)

    Netherlands: $51.4 billion (12%)

    United Kingdom: $36 billion (8.4%)

    Italy: $20.9 billion (4.9%)

    United States: $20.6 billion (4.8%)

    Spain: $11.8 billion (2.8%)

    Poland: $9.2 billion (2.1%)

    ***India: $8.9 billion (2.1%)

    ***China: $8.9 billion (2.1%)

    Sweden: $7.5 billion (1.7%)

    Switzerland: $7 billion (1.6%)

    Luxembourg: $6.4 billion (1.5%)

    ***Turkey: $5.8 billion (1.4%)

    Russia: $4.4 billion (1%)

    Over three-quarters (77.1%) of Belgian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.

    Germany:

    United States: US$134 billion (8.6% of total German exports)

    France: $124.4 billion (8%)

    ***China: $109.9 billion (7.1%)

    Netherlands: $99.8 billion (6.4%)

    United Kingdom: $96.8 billion (6.2%)

    Italy: $82.6 billion (5.3%)

    Austria: $75.2 billion (4.8%)

    Poland: $74.7 billion (4.8%)

    Switzerland: $64.3 billion (4.1%)

    Spain: $52.4 billion (3.4%)

    Belgium: $52.3 billion (3.4%)

    Czech Republic: $51.8 billion (3.3%)

    Sweden: $31.1 billion (2%)

    Hungary: $31 billion (2%)

    Russia: $30.6 billion (2%)

    Austria

    Germany: US$48.7 billion (29.0% of total Austrian exports)

    United States: $10.3 billion (6.1%)

    Italy: $10.2 billion (6.1%)

    Switzerland: $8.5 billion (5.1%)

    Slovakia: $8.1 billion (4.8%)

    France: $7.9 billion (4.7%)

    Czech Republic: $5.9 billion (3.5%)

    Hungary: $5.5 billion (3.3%)

    Poland: $5.2 billion (3.1%)

    ***China: $4.4 billion (2.6%)

    United Kingdom: $4.4 billion (2.6%)

    Slovenia: $3.2 billion (1.9%)

    Netherlands: $2.9 billion (1.7%)

    Romania: $2.7 billion (1.6%)

    Spain: $2.7 billion (1.6%)

    Over three-quarters (77.6%) of Austrian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.

    Denmark:

    Germany: US$15.6 billion (14.5% of total Danish exports)

    Sweden: $11.3 billion (10.5%)

    United Kingdom: $6.7 billion (6.2%)

    Norway: $6.3 billion (5.9%)

    United States: $4.7 billion (4.4%)

    Netherlands: $4.6 billion (4.3%)

    France: $3.3 billion (3.1%)

    ***China: $3.2 billion (2.9%)

    Poland: $3 billion (2.8%)

    Italy: $2.4 billion (2.2%)

    Finland: $2 billion (1.9%)

    Spain: $1.9 billion (1.8%)

    Belgium: $1.7 billion (1.6%)

    ***Japan: $1.5 billion (1.4%)

    Australia: $959.3 million (0.9%)

    Sweden

    Germany: US$16.4 billion (10.7% of total Swedish exports)

    Norway: $15.5 billion (10.1%)

    Finland: $10.5 billion (6.9%)

    Denmark: $10.4 billion (6.8%)

    United States: $10.1 billion (6.6%)

    United Kingdom: $9.3 billion (6.1%)

    Netherlands: $8.3 billion (5.4%)

    ***China: $6.8 billion (4.4%)

    Belgium: $6.5 billion (4.3%)

    France: $6.3 billion (4.1%)

    Poland: $4.6 billion (3%)

    Italy: $4 billion (2.6%)

    Spain: $2.9 billion (1.9%)

    ***Japan: $2.2 billion (1.5%)

    Russia: $2.1 billion (1.4%)

    Norway:

    United Kingdom: US$26.5 billion (21.6% of Norway’s total exports)

    Germany: $19.7 billion (16%)

    Netherlands: $13.1 billion (10.7%)

    Sweden: $8.2 billion (6.7%)

    France: $8.2 billion (6.7%)

    Belgium: $6.4 billion (5.2%)

    Denmark: $5.8 billion (4.7%)

    United States: $5.7 billion (4.7%)

    Poland: $2.8 billion (2.3%)

    ***China: $2.6 billion (2.1%)

    Spain: $2.2 billion (1.8%)

    Finland: $2 billion (1.6%)

    Italy: $1.6 billion (1.3%)

    ***Japan: $1.4 billion (1.2%)

    ***South Korea: $1.4 billion (1.1%)

    Finland:

    Germany: US$9.3 billion (13.7% of total Finnish exports)

    Sweden: $6.3 billion (9.3%)

    Netherlands: $4.4 billion (6.5%)

    United States: $4.4 billion (6.4%)

    Russia: $3.7 billion (5.5%)

    ***China: $3.7 billion (5.4%)

    United Kingdom: $2.8 billion (4.2%)

    Belgium: $2.1 billion (3.1%)

    France: $2 billion (3%)

    Estonia: $1.9 billion (2.8%)

    Norway: $1.6 billion (2.4%)

    Poland: $1.6 billion (2.4%)

    Italy: $1.5 billion (2.2%)

    ***Japan: $1.1 billion (1.7%)

    Spain: $1.1 billion (1.6%)

    Lithuania

    Russia: US$4.7 billion (14% of total Lithuanian exports)

    Latvia: $3.2 billion (9.7%)

    Poland: $2.7 billion (8.2%)

    Germany: $2.5 billion (7.4%)

    United States: $1.7 billion (5.2%)

    Estonia: $1.7 billion (5%)

    Sweden: $1.6 billion (4.9%)

    Belarus: $1.3 billion (3.8%)

    United Kingdom: $1.3 billion (3.8%)

    Netherlands: $1.1 billion (3.3%)

    Ukraine: $1 billion (3.1%)

    Norway: $933.8 million (2.8%)

    France: $837 million (2.5%)

    Denmark: $833.9 million (2.5%)

    Italy: $727.3 million (2.2%)

    INTERMARIUM BLOCK

    Poland:

    Germany: US$63.3 billion (27.4% of total Polish exports)

    Czech Republic: $14.8 billion (6.4%)

    United Kingdom: $14.7 billion (6.4%)

    France: $12.9 billion (5.6%)

    Italy: $11.3 billion (4.9%)

    Netherlands: $10.1 billion (4.4%)

    Russia: $7 billion (3%)

    Sweden: $6.4 billion (2.8%)

    Spain: $6.2 billion (2.7%)

    United States: $6.2 billion (2.7%)

    Hungary: $6.1 billion (2.6%)

    Slovakia: $5.8 billion (2.5%)

    Belgium: $5.1 billion (2.2%)

    Ukraine: $4.8 billion (2.1%)

    Austria: $4.4 billion (1.9%)

    Ukraine

    Russia: US$3.9 billion (9.1% of total Ukrainian exports)

    Poland: $2.7 billion (6.3%)

    ***Turkey: $2.5 billion (5.8%)

    Italy: $2.5 billion (5.7%)

    ***India: $2.2 billion (5.1%)

    ***China: $2.1 billion (4.9%)

    ***Egypt: $1.8 billion (4.2%)

    Germany: $1.8 billion (4%)

    Netherlands: $1.7 billion (3.9%)

    Hungary: $1.3 billion (3.1%)

    Spain: $1.3 billion (2.9%)

    Belarus: $1.1 billion (2.6%)

    Romania: $844.2 million (1.94%)

    United States: $834 million (1.92%)

    Czech Republic: $715.4 million (1.6%)

    Almost two-thirds (63.1%) of Ukrainian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trading partners.

    Slovakia

    Germany: US$17.5 billion (20.7% of total Slovak exports)

    Czech Republic: $9.8 billion (11.6%)

    Poland: $6.5 billion (7.7%)

    France: $5.3 billion (6.3%)

    Italy: $5.1 billion (6.1%)

    United Kingdom: $5.1 billion (6%)

    Hungary: $5.1 billion (6%)

    Austria: $5.1 billion (6%)

    Spain: $2.5 billion (2.9%)

    United States: $2.3 billion (2.7%)

    Netherlands: $2.2 billion (2.6%)

    Romania: $2.1 billion (2.5%)

    Russia: $1.8 billion (2.1%)

    China: $1.4 billion (1.6%)

    Switzerland: $1.3 billion (1.6%)

    Romania

    Germany: US$16.2 billion (22.9% of total Romanian exports)

    Italy: $7.9 billion (11.1%)

    France: $4.8 billion (6.7%)

    Hungary: $3.3 billion (4.7%)

    United Kingdom: $2.9 billion (4.1%)

    Bulgaria: $2.34 billion (3.3%)

    Turkey: $2.33 billion (3.3%)

    Poland: $2.2 billion (3.1%)

    Spain: $2.1 billion (3%)

    Czech Republic: $2 billion (2.9%)

    Netherlands: $1.8 billion (2.6%)

    Austria: $1.6 billion (2.3%)

    Belgium: $1.4 billion (2%)

    Russia: $1.25 billion (1.8%)

    Slovakia: $1.21 billion (1.7%)

    Czech Republic:

    Germany: US$65.2 billion (32.2% of total Czechian exports)

    Slovakia: $15.2 billion (7.5%)

    Poland: $12.2 billion (6%)

    France: $10.2 billion (5.1%)

    United Kingdom: $9.5 billion (4.7%)

    Austria: $9 billion (4.4%)

    Italy: $7.8 billion (3.9%)

    Netherlands: $7.5 billion (3.7%)

    Spain: $6 billion (3%)

    Hungary: $6 billion (3%)

    Belgium: $4.3 billion (2.1%)

    Russia: $4.1 billion (2%)

    United States: $4.1 billion (2%)

    Sweden: $3.5 billion (1.7%)

    Romania: $3 billion (1.5%)

    Over four-fifths (82.9%) of Czechian exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.

    RUSSIAN IMPERIAL BLOCK

    Russia:

    ***China: US$56 billion (12.5% of total Russian exports)

    Netherlands: $43.5 billion (9.7%)

    Germany: $34.1 billion (7.6%)

    Belarus: $21.8 billion (4.9%)

    ***Turkey: $21.3 billion (4.8%)

    ***South Korea: $17.8 billion (4%)

    Poland: $16.5 billion (3.7%)

    Italy: $16.4 billion (3.7%)

    Kazakhstan: $12.9 billion (2.9%)

    United States: $12.5 billion (2.8%)

    ***Japan: $12.5 billion (2.8%)

    Finland: $11.4 billion (2.5%)

    United Kingdom: $9.8 billion (2.2%)

    Ukraine: $9.5 billion (2.1%)

    Belgium: $9.2 billion (2%)

    Belarus

    Russia: US$12.9 billion (38.5% of total Belarusian exports)

    Ukraine: $4.1 billion (12.1%)

    United Kingdom: $3.1 billion (9.2%)

    Germany: $1.4 billion (4.3%)

    Netherlands: $1.4 billion (4.3%)

    Poland: $1.3 billion (4%)

    Lithuania: $1.2 billion (3.4%)

    Kazakhstan: $780.1 million (2.3%)

    Brazil: $585.1 million (1.7%)

    Latvia: $471.9 million (1.4%)

    China: $467.9 million (1.4%)

    India: $299 million (0.9%)

    United States: $274.3 million (0.8%)

    Indonesia: $227.4 million (0.7%)

    Azerbaijan: $223.8 million (0.7%)

    Approaching nine-tenths (85.8%) of Belarusian exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.

    Georgia:

    Russia: US$400.8 million (15.8% of Georgia’s total exports)

    Bulgaria: $250 million (9.8%)

    Turkey: $226.3 million (8.9%)

    China: $181.3 million (7.1%)

    Azerbaijan: $165.8 million (6.5%)

    United States: $157.8 million (6.2%)

    Ukraine: $119.1 million (4.7%)

    Armenia: $105.6 million (4.2%)

    Spain: $65.8 million (2.6%)

    Switzerland: $62.5 million (2.5%)

    Iran: $60.6 million (2.4%)

    Uzbekistan: $58.7 million (2.3%)

    Romania: $56.1 million (2.2%)

    Germany: $47 million (1.9%)

    France: $43.3 million (1.7%)

    Almost four-fifths (78.8%) of Georgian exports during 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.

    OLD EUROPE

    Greece

    Italy: US$4.1 billion (10.3% of total Greek exports)

    Germany: $2.5 billion (6.4%)

    Turkey: $2.4 billion (6.1%)

    Cyprus: $2.2 billion (5.7%)

    Bulgaria: $1.8 billion (4.5%)

    Lebanon: $1.8 billion (4.5%)

    United States: $1.6 billion (4.1%)

    United Kingdom: $1.4 billion (3.6%)

    Egypt: $1.4 billion (3.5%)

    Spain: $1.3 billion (3.3%)

    France: $1.2 billion (3%)

    Romania: $1.1 billion (2.9%)

    China: $1.1 billion (2.7%)

    Macedonia: $939.7 million (2.4%)

    Saudi Arabia: $850.4 million (2.2%)

    Almost two-thirds (65.1%) of Greek exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.

    Bulgaria

    Germany: US$3.6 billion (13.6% of total Bulgarian exports)

    Italy: $2.4 billion (9.2%)

    Romania: $2.3 billion (8.8%)

    Turkey: $2.1 billion (8%)

    Greece: $1.8 billion (7%)

    France: $1.2 billion (4.5%)

    Spain: $733.1 million (2.8%)

    Belgium: $715.1 million (2.7%)

    Netherlands: $706.3 million (2.7%)

    United Kingdom: $656.3 million (2.5%)

    Poland: $648.2 million (2.5%)

    Austria: $507.5 million (1.9%)

    Serbia: $494.9 million (1.9%)

    China: $481.2 million (1.8%)

    Czech Republic: $445.3 million (1.7%)

    Almost three-quarters (71.8%) of Bulgarian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.

    (apologies to the rest)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 13:05:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54515904_10157058636912264_599334029

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54515904_10157058636912264_5993340297055043584_o_10157058636907264.jpg Martin ŠtěpánI’ve been telling people accusing us of being ideologs that it’s actually a methodology. I think I’m gonna start calling it an immunulogy instead.Mar 19, 2019, 11:59 AMJoAsia AryanToo funnyMar 19, 2019, 12:24 PMThomas NorgateNANI?!?!Mar 19, 2019, 7:50 PMSteven J. WoronMy eyes!Mar 19, 2019, 11:39 PMEric McGowanMar 20, 2019, 10:16 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 11:37:00 UTC

  • INSIGHT by Brandon Hayes —“Curt, I am in full agreement with your statement: (

    INSIGHT

    by Brandon Hayes

    —“Curt, I am in full agreement with your statement: (quote) “..there are no premises we can claim are true only meaningful, for the purpose of commercial, financial economic, legal, and military discourse.” Then on the basis of positivist epistemology, which you acknowledge has no access to ontological truth, you proceed to contradict yourself by making a whole set of ontological truth claims such as “the universe IS hostile” and “humans are unimportant.” These are your subjective philosophical value judgements. They are not inescapable deductions implied in the premises of science. Thus your reply is a performative simply confirming and illustrating the validity of everything I wrote.”—Prem Prayojan

    I appreciate your insights in these matters; however, I think you have taken Ps position and pushed it a step further than needed (than possible; than we do).

    –“The universe IS hostile” and “humans are unimportant.”–

    Saying these things are true isn’t to posit them as ultimate truth claims [these are half truths] and all truth (half or not) must be coped with. [Curt correct me if I’m off base]

    –CURTD–

    You’re correct in principle, in that 1) Truth Proper (Ideal Truth), is unattainable for other than the reductio and therefore irrelevant. 2) that the best we can do is achieve truthfulness (testimonial truth), and that no matter where we are in a spectrum of achieving sufficient completeness that we might SATISFY the DEMAND for INFALLIBILITY (what we mean when we say something ‘is true’), we must cope with the supply of infallibility (truth) that we have before us.

    Given

    TAUTOLOGICAL TRUTH: That testimony you give when you promising the equality of two statements using different terms: A circular definition, a statement of equality or a statement of identity.

    ANALYTIC TRUTH: The testimony you give promising the internal consistency of one or more statements used in the construction of a proof in an axiomatic(declarative) system. (a Logical Truth).

    IDEAL TRUTH: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. (Ideal Truth = Perfect Parsimony.)

    TRUTHFULNESS: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.

    HONESTY: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.

    INTUITION: (sentimental expression) – an uncritical, uncriticized, response to information that expresses a measure of existing biases (priors).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 11:34:00 UTC

  • BETTER THAN I COULD HAVE SAID IT by Brandon Hayes I’m under the impression and u

    BETTER THAN I COULD HAVE SAID IT

    by Brandon Hayes

    I’m under the impression and understand the beauty of P to be this: by removing personal subjectivity (asymmetric preference) from human interaction [by subjecting it to P law; replacing it with calculation] Emotions and meaning are properly solved for (via the best plausible outcome). This is because P solves for the optimal interaction (cooperation; reciprocity).

    P says (calculates, proves) what’s false (wrong); thus to be avoided OR bad (immoral unethical) to be punished (or left undone). By, removing, punishing and limiting the bad. ALL possibilities to GOOD are opened [and taken more often as we close doors to the “bad”].

    It leaves preference and decisions about pursuits to HUMANS (hence P can’t be done by AI and is resistant to take-over). Only humans can make the calculations P suggests.

    People seem to think P must say more than it does about the way things are or ought to be; but the brilliance of P is its parsimony.

    — CURTD —

    Correct. And this is the problem i face, the law faces, and science faces. We say only that which is false. It is up to those others to decide, from that options remain, what is GOOD and not FALSE. So for those with great psychological, emotional, intellectual, and material, agency for whom adaptation to any given ‘good’ is relatively easy does little for the vast majority for whom movement with a herd of similar interests is their only available means of survival.

    If I must PROPOSE a religious structure (I will do so) as a rough outline for others to create upon, then I will. But even doing that is merely ADVICE. That is different from math (measurement) science (falsification), and law (truth). The narrative will and must forever be a means of unifying behind an hypothesis of the good.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 11:24:00 UTC

  • “Patience implies a delay. Most ‘intellectuals’ are not waiting, they are hiding

    —“Patience implies a delay. Most ‘intellectuals’ are not waiting, they are hiding.”— Vengefül Bobmoran


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 11:13:00 UTC

  • “For the intellectual, to endure politically correct speech is merely to patient

    —“For the intellectual, to endure politically correct speech is merely to patiently suffer the etiquette of degenerates and fools.”— Chris Tangemann


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 10:14:00 UTC