Source: Facebook

  • “You come up with these pronouncements (and label them “natural law”) as if they

    —“You come up with these pronouncements (and label them “natural law”) as if they were objective laws of the universe requiring no further debate. Seriously, death by fire?”—Dennis Spain

    Thats because you haven’t walked thru one of my arguments and tried to refute it.

    Everyone tries to make general criticisms. But very few people throw CASES at me. And cases TEST theories. So go ahead and try.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 17:47:00 UTC

  • HOW IT’S DONE WITH ELEGANCE by Ferdinand Pizarro The satisfaction of preferences

    HOW IT’S DONE WITH ELEGANCE

    by Ferdinand Pizarro

    The satisfaction of preferences tend toward equilibrium in that the utility produced by the marginal satisfaction of preferences is never exceeded by the marginal cost of satisfying the preference.

    Markets for goods & services function to ensure equilibrium in private-consumption of consumer-goods & by extension allocative efficiency in capital markets through the production of price signals–via positva satisfaction of preference; whereas the market for rule & commons ensures equilibrium by incrementally suppressing the satisfaction of preference at the expense of peers & commons­–via negativa elimination of externality.

    Ergo, the law performs as a signaling function for the cost of preference to society (commons), allowing for the optimal satisfaction of preference under the constraint of strict-reciprocity.

    — CURTD —

    Curt Doolittle just going to walk thru this carefully because you usually have something very smart to say….

    —“The satisfaction of preferences tend toward equilibrium in that the utility produced by the marginal satisfaction of preferences is never exceeded by the marginal cost of satisfying the preference.”—

    Perfect.

    —Markets for goods & services function to ensure equilibrium in private-consumption of consumer-goods & by extension allocative efficiency in capital markets through the production of price signals–via positva satisfaction of preference; whereas the market for rule & commons ensures equilibrium by incrementally suppressing the satisfaction of preference at the expense of peers & commons­–via negativa elimination of externality. “—

    That’s perfect. I use “goods, services, and information” now rather than just “goods and services”.

    —“Ergo, the law performs as a signaling function for the cost of preference to society (commons), allowing for the optimal satisfaction of preference under the constraint of strict-reciprocity.”—

    Perfect.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 17:25:00 UTC

  • ON REQUEST: THE NATUAL LAW ON PEDOPHELLIA –“I’d like to see you make a post on

    ON REQUEST: THE NATUAL LAW ON PEDOPHELLIA

    –“I’d like to see you make a post on pædophilia. You smash every issue and I think this deserves attention. It’s not a waste of your time if you’re educating the whole following, not just me.”—

    Thanks for asking. This isn’t really a difficult question. And I might have to edit this abit for additional clarity, but here it is:

    –The Judgement of Natural Law on Paedophilla.–

    WHEREAS

    1. Definition

    … a) A paraphilia: Paraphilia is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals. Such attraction may be labeled sexual fetishism. No consensus has been found for any precise border between unusual sexual interests and paraphilic ones. There is debate over which, if any, of the paraphilias should be listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases.

    … b) Pedophillia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for pre-pubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.

    The criteria therefore is:

    … i) obsessive or exclusive interest

    … ii) in those under 13 years of age, and or the degree of development we attribute to those under 13 years of age.

    … iii) by those 16 years of age or older

    … iv) and at least five years older.

    2. Limits

    These are NOT evidence of pedophilia:

    … a) photos of nude babies or children in one’s own family as documentation of the beauty of life.

    … b) There is a long standing artistic tradition in western civilization of the nude form including that of the young. The difference between beauty, innocence, and virginity (promise of future fertility) and sexuality (opportunity in the present for consumption) is not a difficult one to judge by triangulation with traditional works of art. If there is a question there is no question.

    … b) taking care of one’s own kin’s hygiene or taking one’s own kin to public toilets or changing rooms or other private places as is required of all of us. The conflation of male and female responsibilities in these matters has not helped us because it exposes ordinary men to unwarranted risk of false accusation.

    … c) protecting, disciplining, educating, praising, talking to, amusing, or playing with children – which may include physical contact.

    … d) incest – incest is a different crime – one of availability.

    … e) natural experimentation between pubescents.

    … f) natural aesthetic attraction to the beauty of those who are fertile if not yet fully mature enough to make rational decisions regarding the commitments of reproduction and offspring.

    … g) As a general rule male female ratio of Male Age, then divided by two, then add seven, produces limits to non-coercieve relationships from 14 onward. Below 14, more than one year of difference is outside the limit.

    3. Evidence

    … a) consumption of child pornography

    … b) obsession in attention, speech, collection

    … b) molestation

    … c) co-morbidity

    … … deficits in response inhibition,

    … … smaller stature, left handedness, frontal development.

    … … failed lateralization (ie: the’re feminine)

    … … personality disorders (increase risk of acting)

    4. Causes

    “Brain Damage.” Current understanding is an in-utero attack on fetus and fetal proteins – particularly male – which prohibit development, giving more miscarriages, birth to lighter weight and smaller offspring. (CD: future research will undoubtedly show that this process is far more vast in affect than just sexual development. I have seen no and expect to see no, variation on this general theme other than mother’s genetic predisposition to produce this immune response.)

    … a) in-utero developmental defects (Potential)

    … b) developmental trauma (Trigger)

    … c) brain trauma (Trigger)

    5. Incurability

    The defect is incurable because the developmental phase of the brain cannot be recreated. It is possible to use CBT to train certain low risk individuals but even this evidence is limited. (Important:) The individual lacks executive function necessary to suppress the underdeveloped and obsessive urges.

    AND WHEREAS;

    … a) Non-Reciprocal – violates voluntary reciprocity

    … b) Harmful – violates imposition of harm

    … d) Externality – produces vast externalities

    … d) UnRestitutable – restitution is impossible

    … e) Unstoppable – violates demand for cessation, placing the burden on the court:

    … … Because the Law must:

    … … … Provide restitution

    … … … Provide punishment

    … … … Prevent repetition or expansion

    THEREFORE;

    It is the judgment of the law that:

    1. Pedophilia is an incurable defect, not disease.

    2. Pedophiliacs cause harm closed to restitution

    3. To those incapable of self defense,

    4. And unable to engage in reciprocity,

    5. Producing extraordinary (Vast) externalities for parental behavior in defense of children which increases with transportation rates, anonymity, and population density.

    AND THEREFORE;

    Pedophiles who signal risk, by:

    … a) manifesting obsessive risk behaviors (watching, stalking, talking)

    … b) possession of, use of, or creation of, child pornography

    … c) molestation

    … d) association with one another

    … e) conspiracy to engage in any of the above

    Shall be permanently removed from the population by:

    … i) death by burning for molestation

    … i) death by hanging for all other violations

    … ii) permanent, irrevocable isolation in hard labor prisons (camps)

    And;

    Whereas;

    … i) no judge nor jury nor polity may warranty the others in society from this harm;

    Therefore;

    … i) no legislation or regulation of finding of law may circumvent this natural law whether in in act or consequence.

    … ii) and any who speak of, propose, author, or adjudicate such shall be held liable for consequence.

    AND WHEREAS, CONVERSELY ;

    1. false accusation is:

    … a) harmful to the accused

    … b) exposes the accused to risk of death

    … c) produces vast externalities whether or not true

    … d) is closed to restitution

    THEREFORE

    … a) the court shall use harshest possible publishment in the punishment of false accusers, and the highest possible restitution. ensuring that the false accuser’s quality of life is reduced to half that of the falsely accused.

    –This is the Law–

    –March 19, 2019–

    –COMMENTS–

    by James Fox Higgins

    The beauty of this piece of law is that:

    Anyone with a mild perversion but some retention of agency will NOT commit the crime, because the punishment dis-incentivises it so severely.

    So those who DO harm children in this manner are literally doing it because they have NO agency or self-control, which makes them, by definition, an uncontrollable cost to society.

    If they recognise their own lack of agency, they can turn themselves in and serve the community from isolation. If not… feel the flames.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 17:16:00 UTC

  • The rumors of my passing are … rumors. lol. But if it is possible to text from

    The rumors of my passing are … rumors. lol. But if it is possible to text from beyond the grave I’ll manage it somehow. lolz


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 15:58:00 UTC

  • Again. I talk to my god every day. Often. But it is an old god. And sky father,

    Again. I talk to my god every day. Often. But it is an old god. And sky father, and odin are closer to the face of god I know than jupiter, or zeus, and have nothing whatsoever to do with jehova. And these gods give only advice (wisdom). I am a deist in that it is necessary for human cooperation across our peoples to understand deism. I am christian in the sense that science tells me I and others must be to be wise and good. I am not christian in the sense that I submit to anyone, any thing or any falsehood whatsoever. In that sense I am pagan and aryan: a member of the cult of non-submission. I am an aristotelian(truth), a pagan (aryan), a heathen(nature), and a christian (the good). And I can be nothing else.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 15:54:00 UTC

  • “Contact Us Message: I would very much like to interview a representative of the

    —“Contact Us Message: I would very much like to interview a representative of the institute. I will be interviewing John Mark in early April. Keep up the good work.”—

    (Strategy)

    If your question is political and strategic then best to ask John Mark.

    (Methodology)

    If your question is about our methodology, it’s best to ask Brandon Hayes. I think he will do the best job. I can give a dozen other names but at present I like to give Brandon some worthy attention. I doubt you can ask a question that requires my response that will survive on air.

    (Christianity)

    If your question is about our relationship to christianity it’s best to ask James Fox Higgins. I don’t know anyone who understand my position better than he does. Aristotelianism (science), Christianity, Paganism (our old gods) and Heathenism(our germanic myths and tales) are inseparable from our civilization. They must stay. My concern is providing a reformed version of christianity going forward that eliminates marxism, postmodernism, and feminism, and provides a european church for each segment of our peoples. My problem has been an inability to restore the christian church to its central position in opposition to the state. I can find no means of doing so. This was the reason for my many attacks on the church. I was looking for a way to do so. But it’s just not possible.Christian wisdom is insufficient a replacement for christian faith because faith is too necessary to too many for reasons of genetics we cannot escape.

    (For transparency: I may be ‘christian’ in the scientific sense, a deist in the jeffersonian sense, but I am christian last among science(truth), heathen (nature), Pagan(heroes), and Christianity (love).)

    ===


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 15:47:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 15:25:00 UTC

  • WE CARRY OUR HERITAGE IN OUR ARGUMENTS Doolittle: Scandinavian (English) Nation

    WE CARRY OUR HERITAGE IN OUR ARGUMENTS

    Doolittle: Scandinavian (English) Nation States. (Law)

    Hoppe: German Free Cities (Philosophy)

    Yarvin: Jewish Diasporic Professionals. (Critique)

    Rothbard: Jewish Pale’s Diasporic Ghettos. (Pilpul)

    OF THESE MODELS WHO IS ACTUALLY FREE????

    Only the anglos.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 15:24:00 UTC

  • by Moritz Bierling First massive gain in dealing with your environment comes fro

    by Moritz Bierling

    First massive gain in dealing with your environment comes from making any distinction at all, hence the incredible power of binaries (positive = ideal, negative = inverted ideal).

    After that, increasing precision becomes important, especially when scale and iteration enter the picture.

    Undecidable —> Ideals (Binaries) —> Reals (Spectra)

    —CURTD—

    See Relation to:

    … Virtue Ethics > Imitation

    … … Rule Ethics > General Rules

    … … … Outcome Ethics > Knowledge


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 15:16:00 UTC

  • PILL CLARITY. 😉 by Greg Hamilton Blue (BP) is narrative, … Red(RP) is reality

    PILL CLARITY. 😉

    by Greg Hamilton

    Blue (BP) is narrative,

    … Red(RP) is reality,

    … … Black(BP) is nihilism,

    … … … White(WP) is hope.

    Hope for the future: WP.

    Being realistic about the situation: RP.

    If you’re pointing out the reality: RP

    Selling nihilism: BP

    Acknowledging the system will fail is just RP.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 15:12:00 UTC