Source: Facebook

  • THE PRINCIPLE PROBLEM SOLVED BY P There is nothing in psychology, sociology, eth

    THE PRINCIPLE PROBLEM SOLVED BY P

    There is nothing in psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, or group strategy that is not readily expressible in economic terms – emotions and intuitions are nothing more than evolution providing us with information on how to acquire some sort of resource discounting our costs.

    Any theory in metaphysics, psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, or group strategy must be constructable from rational incentives to acquire some sort of discount or premium, or the theory is false. It’s no different from any other of the logics: all logic is falsificationary.

    The principle problem facing the transformation of linguistic (metaphysical), psychological,social, legal, political, economic, and military disciplines is a failure to adopt the full accounting in those disciplines using economic equilibration = entropy in the physical sciences.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 10:47:00 UTC

  • THE ECONOMICS OF DATING AFAIK, both women and men want to obtain a premium, but

    THE ECONOMICS OF DATING

    AFAIK, both women and men want to obtain a premium, but a premium they can afford (not lose their investment); Women want to insure they attract the majority of attention in the relationship (are consumers of attention), or that through a relationship they increase their attention. Attention provides discounts on access to social opportunity – particularly for status signaling and verbal coercion.

    So, women seek an equilibrium under which they increase access to in-group social opportunity, have the resources to do so, but are able to control the source of resources, through control of attention. Men with money garner attention, put men in an advantageous position in relation to the woman, and increase women’s competition.

    Women want to buy with attention, words, and affection (low cost). Men want to buy with resources (high cost). The problem is women’s attention is scarce, and desirable, so it’s costly.

    There is nothing in psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, or group strategy that is not readily expressible in economic terms – emotions and intuitions are nothing more than evolution providing us with information on how to acquire some sort of resource discounting our costs.

    Any theory in metaphysics, psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, or group strategy must be constructable from rational incentives to acquire some sort of discount or premium, or the theory is false. It’s no different from any other of the logics: all logic is falsificationary.

    The principle problem facing the transformation of linguistic (metaphysical), psychological,social, legal, political, economic, and military disciplines is a failure to adopt the full accounting in those disciplines using economic equilibration = entropy in the physical sciences.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 10:46:00 UTC

  • IT’S BECAUSE BAD RELIGIONS LIE AND LAG, GOOD RELIGIONS USE TRUTH AND LEAD —“Al

    IT’S BECAUSE BAD RELIGIONS LIE AND LAG, GOOD RELIGIONS USE TRUTH AND LEAD

    —“All religions are made up bullshit to control people”—Joanna

    Hmmm… Let’s look at this:

    PERSONAL DEMAND

    . Demand for personal mindfulness

    . . Demand for interpersonal mindfulness

    . . . Demand for social mindfulness

    . . . . Demand for political mindfulness

    POLITICAL DEMAND

    .. organization (control, conflict suppression)

    .. .. vs educate (helpful system of measurement)

    .. .. .. vs create a polity (helpful system of measurement)

    .. .. .. .. vs create a justification for conquest (not so helpful)

    TECHNOLOGICAL DEMAND

    …Religion (oral parable) is the optimum means of education prior to writing.

    … … Organized religion (written parable) is dependent upon writing and argument, but not literacy

    … … … Natural Law is dependent upon literacy, logic and science.

    CURRENT CONDITION

    So yeah, but they were the only technology available.

    We have

    … Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (Repair)

    … … Self Authoring Virtues (Stoic Method) (improve)

    … … … Self Choice (epicureanism – living well within means)

    … … … … Natural law of Reciprocity, Independent Judiciary

    … … … … … History, Reason, science, technology, prosperity.

    CURRENT TECHNOLOGY

    And we can use:

    … Heroic History of Western (or man’s) Ascent

    … … Stoic Ritual, Hero/Saint ‘worship’ (thanks, counsel)

    … … … Religion: Lesson (history), Play (ritual), Thanks (worship, prayer), Oath(promise), Feast (communal reward), Festival (communal celebration), Sport (community bonding).

    … … … … Civic Participation: Family, Jury, Commons Production, emergency service production; Hospitaliers Production, and Defense (war) production.

    … … … … … The Natural Law of Reciprocity, an independent judiciary, and a jury of our peers.

    REASON

    … Because we have ancestors worthy of our debt to them, and because we can create (easily) our debt to one another.

    STRATEGY

    “Embrace, conquer, and domesticate reality – together – do not cower from it.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 10:33:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/73053596_142590180472477_80386154959

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/73053596_142590180472477_803861549591560192_n_142590177139144.jpg JUDITH CURRY’S GRAPH

    (via @[512155215:2048:Lisa Outhwaite])

    Lisa pointed out that the witch prosecutions occurred during periods of famine.JUDITH CURRY’S GRAPH

    (via Lisa Outhwaite)

    Lisa pointed out that the witch prosecutions occurred during periods of famine.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 10:14:00 UTC

  • Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption – larg

    Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption – largely of virtue signals.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 09:54:00 UTC

  • WITCH TRIALS. WHY? AFAIK the increase in witch trials was an extension of the in

    WITCH TRIALS. WHY?

    AFAIK the increase in witch trials was an extension of the inquisition, then the reformation, as a means of creating examples by suppressing newly enabled social dissent under the decline of the influence of the church and the personalization of the religious experience by disintermediation from the priesthood. There isn’t really a consensus on it, but my rough understanding is that as wealth increased and local agency increased we saw the the protestant reformation put more control in the local hands at all levels – including religious. About 80% of prosecutions were of women, and most in central europe (germanic) countries. And women were uneducated and … uneducated women (as we see in daily videos) .. and as evidenced by asylum populations (mostly women), and current mental health statistics, were as disruptive in the past with psychosis as they are today – just like males -although we control males aggressively and we don’t control anti-social behavior in females. In other words I interpret it as a puritan reaction to the transfer of power of catholic inquisition to protestant hands, and the ‘fashion’ of exercising that power, until it was rather obvious that it was out of hand, and (a) judges would no longer accept testimony obtained under torture, (b) it was increasingly outlawed.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 09:41:00 UTC

  • Aristotle was a Hero. Jesus was a Saint. But Jehovah and Allah are demons at bes

    Aristotle was a Hero. Jesus was a Saint. But Jehovah and Allah are demons at best. Only a demon would claim a monopoly.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 09:24:00 UTC

  • If your God has brought you here, then there are two obvious questions. First, w

    If your God has brought you here, then there are two obvious questions. First, what good is that god. Second, it seems unlikely it is more god than demon. Jehova was a demon, not a god.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 09:23:00 UTC

  • “GSRRM” RESPONSE —“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer It’s genius actually. I

    “GSRRM” RESPONSE

    —“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer

    It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise, baiting in to hazard, profiting from that hazard, and defending it with pilpul, critique, & pretense of innocence under cover of voluntary choice.

    I don’t make errors. Ever. It’s my job not to.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 00:19:00 UTC

  • Doesn’t really matter. Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Chinese Nationalist, or

    Doesn’t really matter. Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Chinese Nationalist, or african revisionist. It’s the same: every people resists testimonial truth or what we call science.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 23:46:00 UTC