Source: Facebook

  • WHY DO ANGLO GOVERNMENTS LAST SO LONG? It’s just much easier to reform a contrac

    WHY DO ANGLO GOVERNMENTS LAST SO LONG?

    It’s just much easier to reform a contract (constitution) that is adjudicated by an independent judiciary, than it is to reform a dictatorship, oligarchy, bureaucracy, or theocracy that lacks an independent judiciary and constitutional means of decision making given a division of powers, and fundamental rights especially to property.

    Most of western history is the difficulty in maintaining our rule of law from attempts to usurp it by the aristocracy, the theocracy, the burghers, and now the underclass communists, devoted, and socialists.

    A constitution if well written is an algorithm for the operation of a polity under falsification, tested before judges who are not involved in the operations of whatever function is in conflict.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 18:25:00 UTC

  • ARGUMENTUM AD THEOLOGICUM (yes it’s possible. it’s just almost impossible) We al

    ARGUMENTUM AD THEOLOGICUM

    (yes it’s possible. it’s just almost impossible)

    We all defend our investments. it’s irrational to think we won’t defend our investments. As long as that’s what we’re doing, it’s not ir-reciprocal.

    In my understanding, theology is just one of the grammars. it’s both conflationary, and fictionalist, using the supernatural fictionalism, but that doesn’t mean statements within it can’t be disambiguated, de-fictionalized, operationalized, and converted to statements of physical and natural law.

    We only come into conflcit when the disambiguated, defictionalized, operationalized, and tested for reciprocity exposes an involuntary transfer.

    When disambiguating, defictionalizing, nd operationalizing we take for granted we can test for:

    (a) identity (b) internal consistency, (c) rational choice, (d) and reciprocal rational choice, and possibly (e) full accounting …

    … Even if we cannot test for (f) external correspondence, (g) operational possibility, and (h) parsimony.

    … And within reciprocity we may test for (j) productivity, (k) voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, and (l) involuntary transfer by externality, (m) and whether one has performed that due diligence, and (n ) whether one can perform restitution.

    So it’s not like we can’t largely test theological words. It’s mostly whether any argument demanding deduction that is dependent upon theological terms is possible. In other words, it may be possible to make ethical statements in theology it is however, extremely difficult to make arguments from them. It’s not impossible. It just appears very uncommon.

    There are many true and reciprocal statements in theology.

    There are very few if any true and reciprocal arguments.

    That’s the nature of the problem of fictional premises.

    Not much to do about it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 18:20:00 UTC

  • QUOTES FROM GOOGLE ACHIPELAGO by Daniel Johns p71 – That is, the Google Archipel

    QUOTES FROM GOOGLE ACHIPELAGO

    by Daniel Johns

    p71 – That is, the Google Archipelago is a commercial assemblage that acts increasingly like a state.

    p 73 – …”dangerous” – that is anyone to the right of Joseph Stalin.

    p 89 – Much has been made of Google’s historical ties to the U.S. intelligence community (IC) and military research agencies.

    p 119 – The members of the nebulous socially dangerous elements also included “bourgeois specialists”, who served the Communist regime and accounted for a significant percentage of the 700,000 deaths at the hands of the new Stalinist bureaucracy during this two-year period alone.

    p 125 – Only Google Marxism is capable of creating it, albeit in corporate socialist form. Google Marxism is the first system with the sufficient flexibility, scalability, connectivity and, with the release of 5G, speed to enable the distance-defying, mass, and small-scale niche production and distribution possibilities to enable a truly globalized system.

    p 128 – Imagine two worlds, one with you and one without you. What’s the difference between the two worlds? Maximize that difference. That is the meaning of your life. – Kai-Fu Lee, Making a World of Difference (2011)

    p 131 – In other words, the city of Darwin (Australia) may have traded away its citizen’s privacy, self-determination, and even its intellectual capacities, for economic security.

    p 138 – Diversity, equity and inclusion: this is the new language of totalitarianism.

    p 143 – A minority dictatorship always finds its most powerful support in an obedient army… – The Black Book of Communism

    p 165 – The articles detailed how New Knowledge itself created fake Russian bots as supporters of former Chief Justice Roy S. Moore of Alabama in the 2017 election for the US Senate – in order to give the impression that the Kremlin was behind the candidacy of Roy Moore!

    p 167 – New knowledge must be countered, not only with real knowledge, but with a metaphysics of truth. By this I mean not merely a rejuvenated quest for the truth, but more fundamentally the re-establishment of a framework or frameworks for knowing and approaching the truth. Such projects have generally been confined to philosophers but must now extend to the entire populace.

    p 196 – The rightwing-leftwing axis means nothing to me. Are they totalitarians or not? Totalitarianism is my enemy.

    p 198 – Socialism is just an ideology used by monopolists to eliminate competition.

    p 199 – If I were a preacher, I might say to the catastrophist left: the heat you’re sending is not from global warming, it’s the encroachment of hell.

    p 199 – The U.S. university system has reached such a decrepit state that one cannot but have grave doubts about its worth and justification for existing.

    p 202 – Thus, shortly after a revolution undertaken putatively (supposedly) on behalf of the working class for their control of society, Lenin ordered the first post-revolutionary striking government workers shot dead, and the murders were committed without hesitation.

    *****

    Vocabulary:

    Archipelago – n. A group of many islands in a large body of water

    asymptotic – adj. Relating to or of the nature of an asymptote

    asymptote – n. A straight line that is the limiting value of a curve; can be considered as tangent at infinity

    ableism – n. Discrimination in favor of the able-bodied

    ontology – n. The metaphysical study of the nature of being and existence

    ethos – n. (anthropology) the distinctive spirit of a culture or an era

    pathos – n. A feeling of sympathy and sorrow for the misfortunes of others

    simulacrum – n. An insubstantial or vague semblance

    ideology – n. An orientation that characterizes the thinking of a group or nation 2) Imaginary or visionary theorization

    Luddite – n. One of the 19th century English workmen who destroyed laborsaving machinery that they thought would cause unemployment 2) Any opponent of technological progress

    libidinal – adj. Belonging to the libido

    libido – n. (psychoanalysis) a Freudian term for sexual urge or desire

    elide – v. Leave or strike out

    conterminous – adj. Connecting without a break; within a common boundary

    ubiquitous – adj. Being present everywhere at once

    panoptic – adj. Broad in scope or content 2) Including everything visible in one view

    panopticon – An area where everything is visible

    putatively – adv. Believed or reputed to be the case [purportedly, supposedly]

    cognoscente(i) – n. An expert able to appreciate a field; especially in the fine arts

    cis hetero – n. urban dictionary – A heterosexual person whose gender aligns with what they were assigned at birth.

    cis – adj. Of or relating to people whose gender identity is the same as their birth sex; not transgender

    cisgender – adj. Of or relating to people whose gender identity is the same as their birth sex; not transgender

    Governmentality, approach to the study of power that emphasizes the governing of people’s conduct through positive means rather than the sovereign power to formulate the law. In contrast to a disciplinarian form of power, governmentality is generally associated with the willing participation of the governed.

    plebeian – adj. (disparaging) of or associated with ordinary, common people

    utopian – n. An idealistic (but usually impractical) social reformer

    Marxist Digitalista – Christian Fuchs is Professor at the University of Westminster in London. He is editor of the open access journal triple C – Communication, Capitalism & Critique – http://www.triple-c.at/

    He publishes and speaks on the political economy of communications, digital media & society, media & society, information society theory, and critical theory. http://fuchs.uti.at/ Twitter @fuchschristian

    obstreperous (ob-strep′?r-?s, ?b-) – adj. Noisily and stubbornly defiant 2) Boisterously and noisily aggressive

    massifying – The act of making something massive for the sake of it. Usually in order to inflate one’s ego.

    probity – n. Complete and confirmed integrity; having strong moral principles

    perfervid (p?r-fûr′vid) – adj. Extremely or extravagantly eager; impassioned or zealous.

    nebulous – adj. Lacking definite form or limits

    bourgeois – adj. (according to Marxist thought) being of the property-owning class and exploitive of the working class

    bourgeois – n. A capitalist who engages in industrial commercial enterprise 2) A member of the middle class

    de facto – adj. Existing in fact whether with lawful authority or not

    raison d’être – Reason for being (French)

    collude – v. Act in unison or agreement, and in secret, towards a deceitful or illegal purpose

    niche (nich, nesh) – n. A position particularly well suited to the person who occupies it

    prelapsarian (pre′lap-sâr′e-?n) – adj. Theology Of or relating to the period before the fall of Adam and Eve.

    sentient – adj. Endowed with feeling and unstructured consciousness 2) Consciously perceiving

    epigones (ep′i-gon′) – n. A second-rate imitator or follower, especially of an artist or a philosopher.

    alacrity – n. Cheerful willingness; eagerness. 2) Speed or quickness; celerity.

    celerity – n. A rate that is rapid (archaic)

    jeremiad (jer′?-mi′?d) – A literary work or speech expressing a bitter lament or a righteous prophecy of doom.

    desideratus(a) (di-sid′?-ra′t?m, -rä′-) – Something considered necessary or highly desirable.

    totalitarianism – n. The principle of complete and unrestricted power in government

    digerati (dij′?-rä′te) – pl. n. People who are knowledgeable about digital technologies such as computer programming and design.

    sanguine – adj. Confidently optimistic and cheerful

    alliterative (?-lit′?-ra′tiv, -?r-?-) – adj. Having the same consonant at the beginning of each stressed syllable

    assonance – adj. The repetition of similar vowels in the stressed syllables of successive words

    peccadillos (pek′?-dil′o) – n. pl. A small sin or fault.

    anthropomorphic (an′thro·po·mor′phic) – adj. Suggesting human characteristics for animals or inanimate things

    ersatz (er′zäts′, er-zäts′) – adj. Artificial and inferior

    eugenics – n. The study of methods of improving genetic qualities by selective breeding (especially as applied to human mating)

    simulacrum (sim′y?-la′kr?m, -lak′r?m) – n. pl. An image or representation. 2) An unreal or vague semblance.

    nescience (nesh′?ns) – n. Ignorance (especially of orthodox beliefs)

    metaphysics – n. Philosophy – The branch of philosophy that examines the nature of reality, including the relationship between mind and matter, substance and attribute, possibility and actuality.

    prestidigitation (pres′ti-dij′i-ta′sh?n) – Skill or cleverness, especially in deceiving others.

    pusillanimous (pyo?o′s?-lan′?-m?s) – adj. Lacking in courage and manly strength and resolution; contemptibly fearful

    decrepit – adj. Worn and broken down by hard use

    obscurantism – n. A deliberate act intended to make something obscure

    obscure – adj. Not clearly understood or expressed


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 17:48:00 UTC

  • Europeans dragged humanity – kicking and screaming – out of ignorance, superstit

    Europeans dragged humanity – kicking and screaming – out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, and early death by using every bit of information to competitively adapt as fast as humanly possible in the Ancient and Modern World’ by @curtdoolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 17:45:00 UTC

  • THOSE WHO UNDERMINED. —“The used Marxism to undermine compromise between the c

    THOSE WHO UNDERMINED.

    —“The used Marxism to undermine compromise between the classes, Feminism to undermine compromise between genders, Postmodernism to undermine the compromise between identities, including undermining our families, traditions, eugenics, science, and truth itself – and they evangelized outright denial we call political correctness to suppress debate. … So, there is no debate to be had. No compromise to be had. There is only peaceful separation between the few treasonous cities, and loyal territories, and the grant of limited legal liberty (self government) to the treasonous cities, or their encirclement, siege, starvation, and internal conflict. 100M is a target number. It’s up to them. Because they don’t have a chance.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 17:43:00 UTC

  • THE ONLY TEST IS DEMONSTRATED BEHAVIOR —“Values testing to become a citizen of

    THE ONLY TEST IS DEMONSTRATED BEHAVIOR

    —“Values testing to become a citizen of P-topia?”—Andrew M Gilmour

    The Propertarian Institute We don’t need to do anything except create a law, and universal standing, that prosecutes falsehood and irreciprocity such that we create a market for the prosecution of those who do so.

    The only test is demonstrated behavior.

    Let em in.

    Crucify the violators.

    Until there are no violators.

    In other words, common law is permissive with heavy punishment in order to allow the greatest fastest adaptation to opportunity.

    Continental law is reculatory and restrictive, with limited punishments in order to limit conflicts at the expense of adaptation to opportunity.

    Other law codes only get worse from continanal on down.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 17:36:00 UTC

  • “No compromise. No Debate. Those ships have sailed.”—Griff Draycott

    —“No compromise. No Debate. Those ships have sailed.”—Griff Draycott


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 17:31:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/75341110_491323694797859_40595890479

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/75341110_491323694797859_4059589047931109376_o_491323688131193.jpg ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM

    (Rule by The Best, Open To All Who Demonstrate They Are Best).ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM

    (Rule by The Best, Open To All Who Demonstrate They Are Best).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 17:30:00 UTC

  • LAW AND THE UNIQUENESS OF THE NORTH SEA PEOPLES Oct 23, 2019, 5:30 PM

    https://propertarianism.com/2014/02/15/on-the-north-sea-peoples/THE LAW AND THE UNIQUENESS OF THE NORTH SEA PEOPLES

    https://propertarianism.com/2014/02/15/on-the-north-sea-peoples/Updated Oct 23, 2019, 5:30 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 17:30:00 UTC

  • CIVIL LAW WAS COMMON ACROSS EUROPE —“Originally civil law was one common legal

    CIVIL LAW WAS COMMON ACROSS EUROPE

    —“Originally civil law was one common legal system in much of Europe, but with the rise of nationalism in the 17th century Nordic countries and around the time of the French Revolution, it became fractured into separate national systems. This change was brought about by the development of separate national codes, of which the French Napoleonic Code and the German and Swiss codes were the most influential. Around this time civil law incorporated many ideas associated with the Enlightenment.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 17:28:00 UTC