WHAT DO TOU REALLY NEED IN LIFE?
A little money. A pretty woman. A fast car. And good friends.
Everything else is making license plates 😉
(drunken commentary)
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-18 15:47:00 UTC
WHAT DO TOU REALLY NEED IN LIFE?
A little money. A pretty woman. A fast car. And good friends.
Everything else is making license plates 😉
(drunken commentary)
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-18 15:47:00 UTC
MORE ON LIBERTARIAN BUSINESS MANAGEMENT: the attention economy
Attention is a resource just like time and money. People calculate what they devote their attention to. People seek to minimize the attention and calculation that they devote to the interests of others.
Although women, because of greater Oxytocin levels, are more so, they also tend to err in favor of consensus while men because of testisterone err on competitive innovation.
The problem then is in creating a social environment in the work place that maintains the focus of their attention on calculating excellences instead of efficiencies by creating incentives that are social rather than remunerative.
If I could distill the libertarian organizational strategy to one lesson I think this would be it.
Efficiency in human organizations is a dirty word. :).
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 22:58:00 UTC
DWEEB ALERT : A COMMISSION SYSTEM THAT COULD EVEN SATISFY JIM BEEBE 🙂
My friend Jim is notorious for concocting elaborate commission schemes in an effort to provide just the right incentives. Unfortunately, human beings have to actually calculate these formula manually. If they cant understand it, then they can’t be incentivized by it. And worse, complexity and lack of transparency create doubt about management’s honesty in the sales organization.
So, twenty years of working with him and I finally got the chance to design something insane enough to accomodate his creativity, while maintaining transparency. It took me all day. And it turns out, it’s pretty easy to use, override, and just plain old play with. It can even call custom rules if there’s something I haven’t thought of.
Maybe the next CEO won’t have to look into the eyes of a sales guy and say “I love to pay commissions. They represent success. And everyone here is honest. I’m pretty sure it’s right. And if it isn’t. We’ll fix it. I promise.” or to your board “I can’t even figure out how to calculate this myself. How the hell will one of the sales guys?”
</Tech Geek Off>
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 14:53:00 UTC
STRANGE COINCIDENCES
My spell checker on Win7/MSOffice recommends “proletariat” as a replacement for “propertarian”.
I think I won’t add propertarian to the dictionary just so that it’ll make me laugh every day.
🙂
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 12:03:00 UTC
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/republicans-mourning-mitt-romney/story?id=17742687FUNNY: POLITICS
Conservatives eat their dead. Progressives resurrect them, and rewrite both memories and history to suit consensus.
Conservatism is aristocracy. Aristocracy is meritocracy. Meritocracy is objective.
Even if its language is allegorical.
There is a difference between arguments and actions. Of the two arguments are less scientific than actions. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 08:36:00 UTC
CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS: (UPSETTING) DIETS AND HUNGER
I have met an absurd number of people here, and it may be the circle of people I’m meeting, that eat only once a day, and compensate with cigarettes and coffee.
Now, I’m pretty thrilled at the physical appearance of men and women here, even if the smoke is brutal on my lungs. But if these random observations are backed by some kind of confirming data (not the BS that we get in the states) then it’s just painfully sad.
I mean, in the states, most of us try to avoid obesity. Our poor especially. But here, they eat less, what they eat is less processed, they walk, and they smoke. It’s no wonder they’re so fit. Seriously.
I heard another story the other day about a couple with a child who only eats once a day so that they can afford clothes for the kid. And if you watch the lunch counter lines even here downtown, it’s suspicious how little food, and how cheap it is, that a lot of people put on their plates.
In the states we see people bring lunch to work. That makes sense. But usually it’s so that they can save up for something like a house or car. Or because it’s just so offensive when you add up what you spend for lunches, compared to your entire food budget for the family. I can understand those things. Or maybe you just want to eat healthy, which is impossible even in the most socially conscious cities.
These people are not so much preyed upon by corruption, as the corrupt ignore them and let them either leave the country or hunger.
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 06:00:00 UTC
FROM ELSEWHERE: BUILDING A LIBERTARIAN COMPANY
(Saved here for future reference on my timeline.)
As someone who built a sizeable company specifically with the intent of experimenting with libertarian management principles, I can argue that not only does it lead to a high growth company because of transparency and meritocracy, but it’s also a more pleasant place to work because people are empowered – they feel sovereign.
HOWEVER HERE ARE SOME OBSERVATIONS
1) CLASS
libertarianism is a meritocratic, and therefore middle and upper middle class philosophy. If you want to have day laborers, it’s going to be less successful than if you have engineers because the former are less comfortable problem solving than the latter because the former are more open to cheating then the latter (this isn’t necessary that’s just how it works out due to class sorting and peer association).
While we libertarians feel that liberty is the desire of all, it is not. It is the desire of those of us who have an intellectual advantage. The vast majority of people want only enough liberty to choose who directs them. They do not want to master the information necessary to be fully directed.
In that sense, liberty is classically defined as consisting of multiple levels:
1) Freedom of life, property and relationships (liberty)
2) Freedom to form organizations (association)
3) Freedom to choose leadership (corporation)
4) Freedom to ostracize (nationalism)
5) Freedom to convert or expand (imperialism)
We libertarians agree with the first three, conservatives and some conservative libertarians with the first four, and neo-conservatives with all five.
So one cannot easily create a libertarian organization across class lines, unless the majority of control is in the hands of those who wish to preserve that libertarian ordere, and its constant state of variation, meritocracy and competition.
2) EXPOSE EVERYONE TO PRICES AND PROFIT
Libertarianism and meritocracy require all people are exposed to the pricing system and its affects. Prices and profit are truths. Opinions are not. Bureaucracy is a synonym for insulation from the pricing system. Engineering this into many companies is extremely difficult. This is because many administrative disciplines are security rather than merit oriented (accounting for example).
3) ELIMINATE ALL DEDICATED MANAGEMENT
Middle management provides little if any value in almost all organizations. Knowledge exists at the bottom, and the knowledge to concentrate scarce capital at the top. Design your company to have no pure management. Everyone is responsible for profit. If they are not then you do not need them, and should organize your people differently. Usually it is better to compensate someone very dedicated to produce less profit and split time between leadership/mentoring and productivity/profitability. But if they are not themselves materially productive it is just a countdown before they become valueless. This is counter to human behavior because we all seek to avoid work and subsist upon rents. Management that does not either sell something or produce something is rent seeking.
4) REORGANIZE YOUR COMPANY FREQUENTLY – EVERY SIX MONTHS
Try to get your top talent to know more of the business by rotating them through different positions in the company. This will prevent your organization from calcifying in an attempt to be ‘efficient’ at delivering a fixed business model rather than ‘responsive’ and therefore efficient at delivering whatever business model is necessary to satisfy the needs of the market. (Note that it is possible to be a market follower and emphasize efficiency, but libertarianism is an effort to spur innovation. Leave it to liberals to live under the illusion that any commercial model represents a steady state.) Liberty is the source of innovation through competition. But competition creates multiple opportunity for loss.
5) TALENT
Marginally competitive companies possess superior talent in key roles. I devote at least a third of my time to recruiting talent.
7) PROCESSES
Processes calcify and compensate for stupidity and ignorance. Processes attempt to be efficient in order to minimize the need for interpersonal problem solving. However, this also means that processes are inhibitors to innovation and collaboration. Therefore all processes in your organization may be overridden if a) increase profitability without negative externalities. b) increase customer customer loyalty. (loyalty is meaningful. satisfaction is not. know the difference. satisfaction is only expressed meaningfully as loyalty.) c) increase the chance of opportunity generation without increasing the cost of opportunity generation. You must instill this culture in people so that the understand. Economics is the study, largely, of externalities, since internal exchanges are trivial, and externalities are complicated.
8) SALES
My experience is that companies under-invest in sales, and over-invest in fear. The people who generate sales are the most valuable people in your company. There are no exceptions. However, people who can generate sales are contextually dependent. Second, the good ones will only come to places where they are adequately rewarded. So when you are small you cannot generally hire talent that is worth what you pay them. Expect a 60-60% failure rate.
9) EVERYONE IS A POTENTIAL CUSTOMER
Every single person you meed is a potential customer. Just like actors and politicians lose their freedom because some paparazzi might catch them at an inopportune moment, an entrepreneur loses the freedom of self expression. (I chose expressly to break this rule because of my intellectual interests, but largely this worked to my advantage as self brand promotion. It turns out that if you will say really controversial things in public and try to defend them, then customers will assume you will give them the same unfiltered advice. It worked for me. In general though, I do not recommend it.)
10) MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
As a CEO, you can act as an investor, accountant, operator, salesman or craftsman. Or some combination. Because of personality differences it is unlikely that you will be even moderately successful at more than two. Know your strengths and hire the people who compensate for your weaknesses, but possess your strengths in some minor capacity. (I am a salesman, investor, and craftsman. I hire people who are operators and accountants to actually run the details of the business. Jack Welsh is different, Steve Jobs was different, Bill Gates is different, and Warren Buffett is different. And the guys who turnaround companies that are in trouble are different still. If you are entrepreneurial you are best off being sales and craftsman, because this means you master your industry and its customers. if you are a talented executive in a larger bureaucracy it is better to be operational and financial.
11) PEER REVIEWS
Conduct stack ranking peer reviews, with written comments at least once per year and exit the bottom ten percent of the company. (I usually was only able to exit the bottom 4% because the community building within the company was so strong that people would fight hard for underperformers if they thought that they could help them improve. This then creates passionate employees out of both the mentors and those people who were given help in succeeding.
12) PITCHING AND DESIGNING
Create some venue where employees suggest new uses for products, or new products, or new services, or pitches for customers. WE were always suprised at how many quiet people from the bottom of the company turned out to be our best idea poeople. It also makes it impossible for others to take credit for someone’s idea.
13) CREATE PARTIES AND AFTER-PARTIES
If you can find an excuse to spend a few hundred dollars taking people to a club, restaurant or entertainment venue where they can play, then do it. Every possible time. Have a big event at least once a year that requires formal dress, and is not in competition with some other holiday, just to celebrate each other. Terminate people who do not participate in social events.
14) HIRE FAMILY AND FRIENDS IF THEY HAVE THE TALENT – NEPOTISM IS THE BEST LOYALTY YOU CAN BUY
Loyalty is the willingness to absorb losses of opportunity for one’s self in order to create opportunity for the group to whom you are a member. Families do this by nature. Never hire ANY family member who cannot perform, or any friend, and never sacrifice your hiring process. But never discount a friend or family. They will work much harder at group cohesion than outsiders.
EXPENSIVE?
If any of this sounds either inefficient or expensive then you should do something other than go into business. People are tribal animals. they calculate all sorts of things with and against one another every day, every hour, every second.
Make sure that they are calculating something that binds them together to create products and services for your company, in the service of customers, that can be delivered to them at a profit. Because profit is our only way of knowing that we have made use of the world’s resources to serve others, in a manner that they demonstrate by their dear actions rather than their cheap words.
CLOSING
I have spent too much time on this post already, but perhaps it will do one person some good. And if so, then I’ve passed it on, and done the moral thing. 🙂
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 05:48:00 UTC
As someone who built a sizeable company specifically with the intent of experimenting with libertarian management principles, I can argue that not only does it lead to a high growth company because of transparency and meritocracy, but it’s also a more pleasant place to work because people are empowered – they feel sovereign.
HOWEVER HERE ARE SOME OBSERVATIONS
1) CLASS
libertarianism is a meritocratic, and therefore middle and upper middle class philosophy. If you want to have day laborers, it’s going to be less successful than if you have engineers because the former are less comfortable problem solving than the latter because the former are more open to cheating then the latter (this isn’t necessary that’s just how it works out due to class sorting and peer association).
While we libertarians feel that liberty is the desire of all, it is not. It is the desire of those of us who have an intellectual advantage. The vast majority of people want only enough liberty to choose who directs them. They do not want to master the information necessary to be fully directed.
In that sense, liberty is classically defined as consisting of multiple levels:
1) Freedom of life, property and relationships (liberty)
2) Freedom to form organizations (association)
3) Freedom to choose leadership (corporation)
4) Freedom to ostracize (nationalism)
5) Freedom to convert or expand (imperialism)
We libertarians agree with the first three, conservatives and some conservative libertarians with the first four, and neo-conservatives with all five.
So one cannot easily create a libertarian organization across class lines, unless the majority of control is in the hands of those who wish to preserve that libertarian ordere, and its constant state of variation, meritocracy and competition.
2) EXPOSE EVERYONE TO PRICES AND PROFIT
Libertarianism and meritocracy require all people are exposed to the pricing system and its affects. Prices and profit are truths. Opinions are not. Bureaucracy is a synonym for insulation from the pricing system. Engineering this into many companies is extremely difficult. This is because many administrative disciplines are security rather than merit oriented (accounting for example).
3) ELIMINATE ALL DEDICATED MANAGEMENT
Middle management provides little if any value in almost all organizations. Knowledge exists at the bottom, and the knowledge to concentrate scarce capital at the top. Design your company to have no pure management. Everyone is responsible for profit. If they are not then you do not need them, and should organize your people differently. Usually it is better to compensate someone very dedicated to produce less profit and split time between leadership/mentoring and productivity/profitability. But if they are not themselves materially productive it is just a countdown before they become valueless. This is counter to human behavior because we all seek to avoid work and subsist upon rents. Management that does not either sell something or produce something is rent seeking.
4) REORGANIZE YOUR COMPANY FREQUENTLY – EVERY SIX MONTHS
Try to get your top talent to know more of the business by rotating them through different positions in the company. This will prevent your organization from calcifying in an attempt to be ‘efficient’ at delivering a fixed business model rather than ‘responsive’ and therefore efficient at delivering whatever business model is necessary to satisfy the needs of the market. (Note that it is possible to be a market follower and emphasize efficiency, but libertarianism is an effort to spur innovation. Leave it to liberals to live under the illusion that any commercial model represents a steady state.) Liberty is the source of innovation through competition. But competition creates multiple opportunity for loss.
5) TALENT
Marginally competitive companies possess superior talent in key roles. I devote at least a third of my time to recruiting talent.
7) PROCESSES
Processes calcify and compensate for stupidity and ignorance. Processes attempt to be efficient in order to minimize the need for interpersonal problem solving. However, this also means that processes are inhibitors to innovation and collaboration. Therefore all processes in your organization may be overridden if a) increase profitability without negative externalities. b) increase customer customer loyalty. (loyalty is meaningful. satisfaction is not. know the difference. satisfaction is only expressed meaningfully as loyalty.) c) increase the chance of opportunity generation without increasing the cost of opportunity generation. You must instill this culture in people so that the understand. Economics is the study, largely, of externalities, since internal exchanges are trivial, and externalities are complicated.
8) SALES
My experience is that companies under-invest in sales, and over-invest in fear. The people who generate sales are the most valuable people in your company. There are no exceptions. However, people who can generate sales are contextually dependent. Second, the good ones will only come to places where they are adequately rewarded. So when you are small you cannot generally hire talent that is worth what you pay them. Expect a 60-60% failure rate.
9) EVERYONE IS A POTENTIAL CUSTOMER
Every single person you meed is a potential customer. Just like actors and politicians lose their freedom because some paparazzi might catch them at an inopportune moment, an entrepreneur loses the freedom of self expression. (I chose expressly to break this rule because of my intellectual interests, but largely this worked to my advantage as self brand promotion. It turns out that if you will say really controversial things in public and try to defend them, then customers will assume you will give them the same unfiltered advice. It worked for me. In general though, I do not recommend it.)
10) MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
As a CEO, you can act as an investor, accountant, operator, salesman or craftsman. Or some combination. Because of personality differences it is unlikely that you will be even moderately successful at more than two. Know your strengths and hire the people who compensate for your weaknesses, but possess your strengths in some minor capacity. (I am a salesman, investor, and craftsman. I hire people who are operators and accountants to actually run the details of the business. Jack Welsh is different, Steve Jobs was different, Bill Gates is different, and Warren Buffett is different. And the guys who turnaround companies that are in trouble are different still. If you are entrepreneurial you are best off being sales and craftsman, because this means you master your industry and its customers. if you are a talented executive in a larger bureaucracy it is better to be operational and financial.
11) PEER REVIEWS
Conduct stack ranking peer reviews, with written comments at least once per year and exit the bottom ten percent of the company. (I usually was only able to exit the bottom 4% because the community building within the company was so strong that people would fight hard for underperformers if they thought that they could help them improve. This then creates passionate employees out of both the mentors and those people who were given help in succeeding.
12) PITCHING AND DESIGNING
Create some venue where employees suggest new uses for products, or new products, or new services, or pitches for customers. WE were always suprised at how many quiet people from the bottom of the company turned out to be our best idea poeople. It also makes it impossible for others to take credit for someone’s idea.
13) CREATE PARTIES AND AFTER-PARTIES
If you can find an excuse to spend a few hundred dollars taking people to a club, restaurant or entertainment venue where they can play, then do it. Every possible time. Have a big event at least once a year that requires formal dress, and is not in competition with some other holiday, just to celebrate each other. Terminate people who do not participate in social events.
14) HIRE FAMILY AND FRIENDS IF THEY HAVE THE TALENT – NEPOTISM IS THE BEST LOYALTY YOU CAN BUY
Loyalty is the willingness to absorb losses of opportunity for one’s self in order to create opportunity for the group to whom you are a member. Families do this by nature. Never hire ANY family member who cannot perform, or any friend, and never sacrifice your hiring process. But never discount a friend or family. They will work much harder at group cohesion than outsiders.
EXPENSIVE?
If any of this sounds either inefficient or expensive then you should do something other than go into business. People are tribal animals. they calculate all sorts of things with and against one another every day, every hour, every second.
Make sure that they are calculating something that binds them together to create products and services for your company, in the service of customers, that can be delivered to them at a profit. Because profit is our only way of knowing that we have made use of the world’s resources to serve others, in a manner that they demonstrate by their dear actions rather than their cheap words.
CLOSING
I have spent too much time on this post already, but perhaps it will do one person some good. And if so, then I’ve passed it on, and done the moral thing. 🙂
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 05:47:00 UTC
CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS : OFFICES WITHOUT PHONES
First, cell phone plans and costs are absurdly cheap here. I think in the states I tend to pay well over a hundred a month, and close to two hundred. During heavy business usage plans run six to fifteen hundred a month. (And yes, I have enough knowledge of the different phone companies to know how much of that is wasted on marketing to customers who are not loyal, and how much poorly our regulators protect us from penalty pricing. In penatlty pricing the profits are made by enticing customers with low prices and setting low limits on account usage and charging absurd penalties for going over those limits. This violates the principle of asymmetry of knowledge. And it ends up sending the lower classes to collection and further charges. So yes, I think it’s a hazard, and yes, I think it violates libertarian property rights.
Second, when you go into an office here, at least the offices that I’ve been into, it’s just not a given that everyone will have a company provided phone, unless they absolutely need one for their work.
Desks, as we know them. are places where you can store clerical equipment. they are workbenches for people who calculate abstractions rather than modify the physical world.
But if you have a laptop and a cell phone (or a laptop and skype) you pretty much can work lying down on a couch, or standing at a bar, or in my favorite repose, sitting in a chair with your feet up. Now the truth is, that comfortable seating inversely proportional the the impact on your health. We need to walk. We compensate by standing at standing-desks. Some of us have discovereed the abdominal value of sitting on an exercise ball at a desk, which works your abs eight ours a day. Most of us sit in chairs at desks, which if we use reasonable posture is bad for our hearts and waistlines, but that’s all. Ohters of us recline in couches and chairs, because all we have to do is talk or write text, and a desk is unnecessary, but this is the worst possible place to put your body if you don’t get up and move around every thirty minutes or so.
All that said, if we don’t need phones, at least some portion of us don’t need desks. But that’s probably bad for our health. So, the next work environment I”m going to put together will have desks at the perimeter, and lots of lounges for working comfortably, and ad-hoc, with the people that you need to.
Now, I realize that technologists are a narrow segment. And that technologists don’t necessarily signal using office spaces. But for some of us, it’s just paradise to sit in a comfy chair and crank out our ideas.
Offices need not be structured around phones.
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 03:37:00 UTC
SMITH BRAND LAUNCH
After more than a decade, Ascentium finally gets a new name, worthy of a digital agency.
My child has graduated from college. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 03:03:00 UTC