Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • PRIVACY Privacy is a legal, normative, and moral construct: we are bound to pay

    https://mobile.twitter.com/narmno/status/595057396638187520ON PRIVACY

    Privacy is a legal, normative, and moral construct: we are bound to pay the cost of morals, norms, and legal codification of them when we enter in to the commons. What occurs in our homes is only relevant if it causes externalities. And what is in our minds is ungovernable. This is a vast subject which I won’t go into further, but privacy exists iff and only if we preserve the objectively moral and the normative and legal observation of if. What has changed is only that with vast increases in our exposure to information about one another, two outcomes are produced: (a) a reduction in the LOCAL influence of any of our actions, and (b) a realization that we are all open to the same errors, make the same errors, and mature out of those errors with experience; and (c) the lowering of the impact of negatives on our reputations if our errors are unselfish and merely ignorant in nature. All three of these factors REDUCE the impact of foolish human actions on the moral, normative, and legal commons. As such privacy is less valuable and useful than it WAS in the past – at least in matters of COGNITION and OPINION, if not crime.

    ON LEANING – IN

    Still thinking about this.

    There is no material value to women’s entry into the work force. The value is in that women are not PROHIBITED from entering the work force, and are therefore less dependent on marriage for sustenance, satisfaction, and reproduction. However, women abused their entry into the franchise by parasitically obtaining through the state, the income of marriage without providing the care-taking, sex, and compromise of marriage. So for men, adding women to the franchise merely expanded the state, made them slaves of the state, decreased the value of taking ownership for and paying the cost of the commons (society), caused rapid expansion of dysgenia, insured their poverty and loneliness in old age, and led a large number to suicide. Women destroyed the compromise. Without women’s votes the left would never obtained power in any country, and used it to destroy western civilization. I see similar effects in Japan. But I have the disadvantage of limited on the ground experience, and must work entirely from data.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-09 03:25:00 UTC

  • (James Santagata corrects me.) My argument was this: that consumers provide an e

    (James Santagata corrects me.)

    My argument was this: that consumers provide an exceptional means of low cost R&D because they make small investments at low transaction costs. However, the ‘big money’ outside of advertising (gambling) is still in the enterprise customer. That is because the switching costs for consumers is low, and the switching cost for the enterprise is high.

    It has taken a long time for hurricane caused by the justice department’s flapping of butterfly wings to dissipate, but it’s clear that it’s dissipating and that massive consolidation will be possible.

    Why? because owning customer relationships and the curatorial influence of brand has been suppressed for a decade. And I see a peak over there on the horizon.

    The accumulated value of prior generatoins anchored past customer-owners. That anchor has dissipated also.

    More later.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-08 09:12:00 UTC

  • MORE ON MY POSITION ON RACE (from elsewhere) Just maybe let me add this: there i

    MORE ON MY POSITION ON RACE

    (from elsewhere)

    Just maybe let me add this: there is no material difference between men. There is a material difference in how groups of men behave because there are material differences in the distributions between groups of men. I feel that evolution via mutation is less impactful than changes in who breeds at what rate. This means that man is very plastic in adaptation, always able to move forward into the cerebral or backward into the physical as necessary. The central problem of any society is the PERCENTAGE of individuals above 125/130 where ideas are created, and how much property is in their hands, and the nearest 20% of people that they influence. This is how institutions and organizations are formed. It is imperative that any group of people achieve the Pareto relationship between order and ability if one wants to exit tyranny. I do not believe there are material differences between people of similar abilities. I believe that there are material differences in the distribution of abilities. If you let your lower classes over-reproduce, you cannot accumulate wealth in the hands of meritocracy. I do not think this is particularly difficult or complex to understand. We are all families at different stages of maturity. I think that we should treat our families, extended families, distant relations, and other races as families who are at different levels of maturity, but that there is no meaningful difference otherwise. This is my position. Racism is stupid. Democracy makes it worse. All families can help other families however.I choose to help all families who wish to improve their lot without doing it at the expense of Others.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-08 09:05:00 UTC

  • Participating in one of Ayelam’s threads with a lot of people from Ghana, and le

    Participating in one of Ayelam’s threads with a lot of people from Ghana, and learning more than I can from any number of books, papers and journals. Sort of like debating online with people from different cultures. Amazing. It is so hard NOT to be clueless. But what’s interesting is the quality of their conversation. I can’t quite put my finger on it, but something is very ‘right’ about it. Lacking knowledge maybe but remarkably free of ‘ancestral error’. Yes….. that’s it. That’s what it is. Interesting..

    I love humans.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-08 08:50:00 UTC

  • (OMG I just figured out what’s happening in tech…)

    (OMG I just figured out what’s happening in tech…)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-08 08:41:00 UTC

  • THE CHOICE: TRIBE OR CORPORATION There exists one species of man remaining that

    THE CHOICE: TRIBE OR CORPORATION

    There exists one species of man remaining that we know of (we have killed and eaten the rest), and of the single species that remains, there are at least major races of man: white, black, and mongoloid, with multiple blending points in areas of contact – the most obvious being the middle eastern high aggression peoples. Any other statement is an unscientific and intentional denial of demonstrated human behavior.

    Races are not artificial constructs no matter how hopeful you might wish them to be (admittedly under the various false consensus biases endemic to the solipsistic female intuition), any more than gender is a false construct, any more than reproductive desirability is a false construct, any more than any reproductive strategy is a false construct, any more than aggression is a false construct.

    People demonstrate in politics (voting) in business(commerce), in friendship, and in mating, in humor, in body language, and in tastes – that they overwhelmingly practice in-group cooperation and affiliation (kinship/kin-selection).

    The market (thankfully) eliminates a great deal of the advantage of kin-selection for consumers even if NOT for workers, and more intensely, not in politics. More so than any other walk of life, in politics, everywhere on earth, humans absolutely favor kin-selection.

    Denialism and pseudoscience change nothing except to increase the severity of conflict by propagating pseudoscience. The only reason race is an issue is democracy, imperialism, and colonialism.

    The south americans and the hindus have successfully integrated races at the cost of creating caste systems. So by and large we get to choose between high trust redistributive tribal-nationalism, and low trust high corruption low-redistribution caste-corporatism.

    You can get away with anything for a while. But not forever.

    We are just gene machines, and all our rationalization is merely an attempt to improve our reproductive strategies.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-08 06:56:00 UTC

  • GENDER BIAS IN EVERYTHING Consensus through Affirmation (Rational – Female – Pro

    GENDER BIAS IN EVERYTHING

    Consensus through Affirmation (Rational – Female – Progressive)

    …………………………….-VS-…………………………….

    Consensus through Criticism (Scientific – Male – Conservative)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-08 01:56:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/04/christianity-and-the-ethnic-suicide-of-the-west/

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-07 14:46:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://theweek.com/articles/551027/how-christianity-invented-children

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-07 14:46:00 UTC

  • and Entrepreneurs. Another Division of Cognitive Labor

    http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-doomsayers-are-right/Doomsayers and Entrepreneurs. Another Division of Cognitive Labor.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-07 14:31:00 UTC