Source: Facebook

  • LIBERALISM IS THE IDEOLOGY OF WESTERN SUICIDE —Burnham’s thesis is straightfor

    LIBERALISM IS THE IDEOLOGY OF WESTERN SUICIDE

    —Burnham’s thesis is straightforward. “.Liberalism,” he writes, “is the ideology of western suicide. When once this initial and final sentence is understood, everything about liberalism-the beliefs, emotions and values associated with it, the nature of its enchantment, its practical record, its future-falls into place. Implicitly, all of this book is merely an amplification of this sentence.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 13:53:00 UTC

  • Burnham was right: progressivism is a syndrome: a mental illness

    Burnham was right: progressivism is a syndrome: a mental illness.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 13:47:00 UTC

  • NEEDS The institutional needs of individuals, families and tribes at different l

    NEEDS

    The institutional needs of individuals, families and tribes at different levels of maturity, differ. We do not mature at the same rates (as individuals) and we have not matured at the same rates as tribes, nations and races. For the simple reason that we encountered different geographic pressures.

    I am not sure why this is so complicated. High attention parenting, high investment parenting and their opposites, produce different results. Western methods of child-raising are a trade off. But we are also born with different impulses, and we can measure them, and have measured them.

    Equal rights to life and property, do not require that we mature at identical rates.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 11:51:00 UTC

  • DEMOGRAPHICS OF GUN OWNERSHIP: A CORRELATIVE ANSWER, THEN THE CAUSAL ANSWER The

    DEMOGRAPHICS OF GUN OWNERSHIP: A CORRELATIVE ANSWER, THEN THE CAUSAL ANSWER

    The Correlative Answer: Part 1: Social Structure

    Northern Europeans above the Hanjal Line (The North Sea Peoples who successfully out-bred) sometimes referred to as the Protestant Peoples) retain an ancient set of traditions requiring all men to obtain legitimacy and honor (equal status) through participation in the militia, and the purpose of the militia is to deny all men power over all other men. This is preserved most strongly in the anglos dutch and less so in the germans, who were anglicized.

    The Causal Answer: Part 2 Tradition

    There are a small number of underlying heroic traditions that carry the western Aristocratic (meritocratic) Egalitarian (enfranchisement to all who fight) tradition – and that tradition is the cause of the rapid rate of western development compared to all other civilizations, both in the ancient, and modern eras. These are:

    1) Heroism (purchase of enfranchisement and status through sacrifice)

    2) All property is private (all property is earned)

    3) Every man is his own legislator over his domain.

    4) The common law and independent judiciary permit the resolution of differences between equals without appeal to authority.

    5) The rule of law, the common law (organic law, natural law) applies to all men equally.

    6) Hierarchy is necessary for decision making in war, the resolution of conflicts, and for the suppression of free riding.

    The value in this structure is that the common law can evolve with the first judicial ruling, and therefore both transaction cost and risk are reduced, and the chance of free riding, parasitism, fraud and predation are eliminated before they can be institutionalized. The market for law suppresses parasitism as fast as innovations in parasitism are created. In turn, innovation in products, services and ideas can progress with the least resistance from predators. Costs: The consequence for the underclasses is that while they benefit from the rapid innovation, they are more aware of the difference between those who are less productive and those who are are more so.

    The Causal Answer: Part 3 : Incentives

    As population destiny increases, all effects increase by approximately 20% for every doubling of the population.

    The incentives for people in rural areas where all men bear a high cost of policing the commons, is more restrictive than the incentives for people in urban areas where few bear the cost of policing the commons.

    In general, people in areas of dense population discount the cost of policing commons and norms because opportunity, transaction and policing costs are lower.

    The Causal Answer Part 4: Diversity.

    Diversity decreases trust, increases political divisiveness and decreases economic velocity. Urban areas can afford immigrating diversity. Rural areas cannot.

    It’s all rational really.

    WHAT IS HAPPENING

    The effort to expand ownership has been successful and once people have limited skill with, and ownership of guns, it tends to transfer like all traditions between families.

    The greater the effort to suppress gun ownership the greater the passion with which gun owners preserve the tradition.

    We have roughly tripled gun sales under this administration. Demographically the argument is over and the pro gun movement has won. (surprisingly)

    The supreme court has learned a tragic lesson from Roe v Wade: that the court should not solve social matters until they are first resolved by the states. That decision has nearly destroyed the court. “The Democratic Process Must Do Its Work” is the phrase we hear from the court.

    The general consensus is that we have a problem controlling mental illness, and urban poverty, and not a problem with firearms.

    So as far as I understand, the matter is settled for at least the next generation.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 11:23:00 UTC

  • suppression of predation and parasitism, the establishment of an allocation of p

    http://www.quora.com/What-is-capitalism-and-capitalist-system-market/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=1The suppression of predation and parasitism, the establishment of an allocation of property, a means of resolving disputes, and the organization of production must be constructed.

    Totalitarian: It can be organized involuntarily: the elimination of private property, planning and slavery in many of its forms.

    Capitalist: It can be organized voluntarily by the use of private property, money, and prices.

    Mixed: It can be organized by a mix of private property, money, and prices, and the totalitarian construction of commons. (Which is what we do today).

    A market forms under any condition in which goods are constructed for the purpose of exchange.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 11:01:00 UTC

  • is an illogical question. How do you “Fast” the color “Green”. It makes no sense

    http://www.quora.com/How-do-you-enterprise-capitalism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=1This is an illogical question. How do you “Fast” the color “Green”. It makes no sense. Capitalism is the voluntary organization of production through the use of private property, contract, law, money, prices, accounting, and interest. And the use of and reward for use of resources is allocated to those who most satisfy the demand for those resources by the information provided by prices.

    An enterprise is voluntary organization of capital (time, people, money, assets) among individuals in order to construct an hypothesis that might produce a profit on the use of that capital – if their hypothesis is correct.

    An enterprise requires capital.

    Aside from that the question is nonsensical.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 10:50:00 UTC

  • GENERAL RULE Centralize rents to reduce transaction costs (and pay for the reduc

    GENERAL RULE

    Centralize rents to reduce transaction costs (and pay for the reduction in transaction costs) then eliminate the centralized rents.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 09:12:00 UTC

  • I am going to have to go after Rogoff now as the poster child of immorality in e

    http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/europe-immigration-inequality-by-kenneth-rogoff-2015-05#5cH0M3HfJZ9AK4fY.01OK. I am going to have to go after Rogoff now as the poster child of immorality in economics.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 08:50:00 UTC

  • THE 13TH MONKEY

    THE 13TH MONKEY


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 07:22:00 UTC

  • IDEOLOGICAL SPECTRUM: ITS DETERMINISTIC SILLY. Agree with the questionable quali

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2593377CHINESE IDEOLOGICAL SPECTRUM: ITS DETERMINISTIC SILLY.

    Agree with the questionable quality of the survey’s numbers – but not with its deterministic results. The results are obvious. China has a problem similar to ours: the Han know that they must preserve order in their favor against hostile border peoples. The west has forgotten that Germany provided this function for us, and we bathed in safety because of it. And took it for granted. And we were wrong.

    As to “Which Comes First”:

    1) Higher Income reduces opportunity costs and risk (liberalism). Lower income increases opportunity cost and risk(conservatism).

    2) Economic velocity is produced by the centralization of rents, which lowers local (productive) transaction costs at the expense of high total cost (taxation).

    3) Once rents are centralized, we seek to obtain or privatize (redistribute) those rents (economic liberalism) through enfranchisement.

    4) In a perfect world we seek to eliminate those rents (anglo classical liberalism).

    5) But the diversity of ability leads to class warfare since meritocracy is valuable only to a minority, and rents, and parasitism are beneficial to the majority..

    6) In a perfect world we pay the less able, parasitic, and rent seeking minority directly for the maintenance of the meritocratic commons, and thereby circumvent the parasitism of the bureaucratic, and political classes. And perhaps more importantly, prevent the misallocation of capital.

    7) To accomplish this perfect world requires we develop institutions that allow us to produce commons, and pay people for producing those commons: meritocracy included.

    X-Axis: Equalitarian/Socialist-Compromise/Social Democracy – Meritocratic/Classical Liberal Monarchy.

    Y-Axis: Totalitarian- Democratic – Anarchic

    Z-Axis: Wealth (elimination of transaction costs by the suppression of free riding)

    Suppression of parasitism comes first. Centralize it to eliminate it locally. Then outlaw it, and eliminate it from the central bureaucracy. Economic velocity is determined by the suppression of free riding in all its forms at all levels in the polity.

    (Read Emmanuel Todd’s Invention of Europe. Ricardo Duchsene’s Uniqueness of the West, Hayek’s Constitution of Liberty, Hoppe’s Democracy the God that Failed, and follow my humble efforts.)

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 07:15:00 UTC