Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • EXTERNALITY “Externality” is a technical term and it’s meaning is obvious. If yo

    EXTERNALITY

    “Externality” is a technical term and it’s meaning is obvious. If you do something that *indirectly* and negatively affects a third person, that’s an externality. It means ‘outside of your direct perception’.

    That’s not complicated. At all.

    ie: the ridiculous example of a butterfly flapping its wings in china causes tornado in America. The less ridiculous example of playing your music loud at night keeping up the neighbors.

    “Indirect consequences”.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 23:03:00 UTC

  • THE NATURAL LAW ON PORNOGRAPHY (from twitter) —“Do you believe that banning al

    THE NATURAL LAW ON PORNOGRAPHY

    (from twitter)

    —“Do you believe that banning all porn is ridiculous? If so, how come? What would the laws under the Propertarian constitution be regarding porn?”—@EnlightenedNPC

    This is a deeper question than it appears – a hard topic for twitter. I’ll try:

    a) we must keep it out of the commons, and the internet is a commons, so there must be some ‘gateway’ (opt in) in order to access it.

    b) long term effects are far far worse in every regard than we imagined. And;

    c) there is some very bad behavior at the lower end of the market.

    Under natural law if its out of the commons, it’s voluntary, then it’s not a subject for P-law. The rest is just either a product harm (tort), or baiting into hazard (tort), for the law’s Market to solve.

    I am fairly sure that the legal market would solve it rather quickly under p-law and we would be left with high production value work by studios on one end, and selfies on the other. That’s because baiting into hazard (enticing people in vulnerable positions into such behavior for money) would be prosecutable by anyone – not just the victim. It would be almost impossible to produce anything outside of a studio system with professionals, because it’s almost impossible to avoid baiting into hazard otherwise.

    And beyond that it’s a Political question (“We just don’t want it here”), or an empirical question (“Accumulate evidence and inability to voluntarily or institutionally regulate means we have to ban it.”).

    Personally (not the natural law) I have come to understand that while I’m intuitively libertarian, the experiment with porn has (a surprise to me) demonstrated that it’s a net negative, but that it is better to regulate a net negative than it is to turn it into a black market. I’d ban it in my neck of the woods. But my opinion doesn’t mean anything. it’s just a preference.

    My posts on Pornography are here:

    https://propertarianism.com/?s=pornography

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 22:01:00 UTC

  • I don’t get the derogatory ‘joe’ stuff in the army. Is this a byproduct of all v

    I don’t get the derogatory ‘joe’ stuff in the army. Is this a byproduct of all volunteer military? Because I don’t remember this being so … exasperating before?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 20:31:00 UTC

  • From Twitter —“A necessary prerequisite to any hot civil war is an economic co

    From Twitter

    —“A necessary prerequisite to any hot civil war is an economic collapse. As long as the average person can care for themselves and family, they have too much to lose to take up arms. Now if we have an economic collapse in your timeframe, then anything’s possible.”—

    It’s interesting when people make claims without evidence. How did Mao do it? Your Errors: Because you don’t understand you assume others don’t. Because you don’t know how to “Mao” assumes others don’t. Because you don’t know how to CAUSE the collapse, you assume others don’t.

    Some of us are capable of profound things, and achieve them. Others are not – because they cannot imagine doing them. Why? Because they cannot imagine getting a core of others to follow them. Why? Because they have no strategy, no plan, and lack the knowledge to do so. Study Mao.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 12:48:00 UTC

  • HELP PLS? Need contact info for bitchute owner(s) via PM. 3 TOPICS (BIZ) (a) is

    HELP PLS?

    Need contact info for bitchute owner(s) via PM.

    3 TOPICS (BIZ)

    (a) is deep, long term, integration possible?

    (b) Is tech open to licensing if not deep integration?

    (c) Plans for future Organic or deliberate growth? Investors?

    Thanks for any help.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 09:39:00 UTC

  • Just as the byzantines and Turks of the middle east used higher trust European m

    Just as the byzantines and Turks of the middle east used higher trust European military mercenaries, European kings used lower trust Jews as tax and credit mercenaries. In most of Europe Jews were the property of the monarchy and under its protection.

    Ancestors of all People are criminal and immoral by our present standard, but it is their labor though the suppression of criminality and its replacement with trade industry and technology that made our present privilege possible.

    Read Benjamin Goldberg for Jews allying with the state against the people. Read Solzhenitsyn for Jewish specialization in crimes of baiting into hazard: alcohol, prostitution, gambling on credit, and loans at usurious prices so that land could be seized and resold – and refusal to engage in ‘honest’ work despite regard crown grants of land.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-09 10:52:00 UTC

  • Men evolved for the physical, political and inter-temporal and women the emotion

    Men evolved for the physical, political and inter-temporal and women the emotional interpersonal and temporal, in a division of labor and specialization where differences are solved only by a coincidence of wants and opportunity and incentive for cooperation.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-09 10:36:00 UTC

  • “You can reply with this snarky bulls—t or you can tell me why exactly governm

    —“You can reply with this snarky bulls—t or you can tell me why exactly governments exist if not to advance and protect the common good. Give me a competing theory of government. I’m not saying none exist. I’m just asking what yours is.’–Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog

    1) Governments, in all cases, evolved like all organizations, using force to profit from the revenue generated by incremental domestication of humans, into production, versus having that revenue captured by others. Citizen customers provide higher returns than serfs and slaves.

    2) This ‘voluntary laborer’ versus Socialist Worker, Serf or Slave is why communism, socialism, capitalism and anarchism fail, because the largest number of productive people have traditionally provided one of the resources necessary to conquer others and obtain those revenues.

    3) So the very opposite of Walsh’s OP is true: Governments exist to provide the maximum extraction (rents) at while maintaining the minimum incentives necessary for the strong to take possession of the government by force, and themselves take the proceeds. All else is lies.

    4) We can test this theory in every organization at every scale in every city, state, empire in history. Because all organizations grow to accumulate rent-seeking until lacking sufficient (all) capital reserves to incentivize adaptation to shocks, trade route loss, or conquest.

    5) In the current era the means of holding power is to produce enough undermining of rule of law, undermining of the markets of cooperation between genders classes and tribes, disinformation, especially economic, that conquest by immigration is possible before its perceived.

    6) Which is why I am certain that ‘never again’ will be ‘yes again’ because the people who undermine civilizations as a group strategy never seem to learn from their thousands of years of failure.

    7) I never err. Ever.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-08 20:28:00 UTC

  • PLS REVIEW This is not right. “Economics refers to the study of demonstrated hum

    PLS REVIEW This is not right.

    “Economics refers to the study of demonstrated human behavior, for the purpose of making informed choices, whether personal, familial, organizational, or political, given that the information, causes, and consequences necessary for determining those choices, is beyond our perception, by the discovery of categories, means of measurement, and general rules of cooperation, and the norms, traditions, procedures, rules, laws and institutions, that are necessary for establishment, preservation, and improvement of the returns on the spectrum of individual action to interpersonal and market cooperation, and that are sufficient to preserve incentive to preserve cooperation, within a polity capable of producing the institutions for doing so.”

    or

    “Economics consists in the study of how individuals, Individuals in families, individuals in firms, in organizations, and in governments, make choices; and how these choices determine the way wealth is produced and distributed.”

    or

    “Economics consists in the study of demonstrated human behavior in the pursuit of the means of creating, maintaining, and improving returns on time, effort, and resources.”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-08 15:41:00 UTC

  • HOW TO DESTROY A MAN –VS– SJWs ALWAYS LIE THE FEMINIST LIE: IT WAS NEVER ABOUT

    HOW TO DESTROY A MAN

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/099982032X/

    –VS–

    SJWs ALWAYS LIE

    https://www.amazon.com/SJWs-Always-Lie-Taking-Thought/dp/9527065682/

    THE FEMINIST LIE: IT WAS NEVER ABOUT EQUALITY

    https://www.amazon.com/Feminist-Lie-Never-About-Equality/dp/1546926097/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-08 14:58:00 UTC