Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Freaking youtube algorithms. Recommends video on ukraine. Chick does great walk

    Freaking youtube algorithms. Recommends video on ukraine. Chick does great walk thru of real ‘village life’ which I find adorable, and covers absurdly cheap costs of living in ukraine. Great. But WTH? Her focus is getting men to come to ukraine and she gets millions of views? (Disgusting.) Next thing, YT recommends woman from canada talking about women’s behavior. I watch this because it’s completely true. And honest, and most women who teach dating to men are experts in not lying about it. What happens? My feed is full of fking dating sh-t for losers. I mean, WTF. How can anyone be that freaking clueless? Women are people. They aren’t machines. They have endless choices. And they preserve their market value like their lives depend on it (they do). This sh-t is incomprehensible to me. I have no idea why, but even here in the states, women from every age range express an interest and and act on it. One right now one in her twenties? I mean. Why? it’s bizarre to me. I don’t think I’m a particularly good catch. But you know why? (a) confidence, (b) kindness, (c) “interesting-ness” and (d) ‘engagableness’. That set of attributes means opportunity for gains, and ‘safeness’. Men’s real problem is that they’ve been de-socialized. Damaged by Feminism, Postmodernism, and women in education. Deprived of king of the hill games. Deprives of physical competition. Deprived of dominance play. All so that women could fit into classroom workplace and politics – by lowering standards such that men are infantilized down to women’s levels of competition. Women want something valuable in a man, they want you to be reasonably easy to reach (comprehend and manipulate) while providing some resistance. In part, you provide resources, you provide defense, you limit her need to compete for legitimacy and status, and you’re a toy for her to exercise feminine persuasion on the way the world is a toy for you to exercise physical dominance on. Exercise feels good. Makes you feel competent. Same for her. You need to be competitive. That’s the number one thing you’re not. Be as competitive in everything that you can be. That’s what produces your value, for you, for her, for your people, for mankind. That’s what makes you interesting. Even if ‘competing’ is entertaining her friends. Doesn’t matter. This sh-t creeps me out. Women are a BYPRODUCT of your competitiveness. Go do something hard and beat it. fk. Sorry for the rant. Just not only disgusted me but made me furious.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 22:56:00 UTC

  • Not until it’s time. The value of our side’s understanding in advance is far les

    Not until it’s time. The value of our side’s understanding in advance is far less than the harm of the other side’s preparation in advance.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 22:19:00 UTC

  • Roman error version two. SOLDIERY IS AN UNSUBSTITUTABLE GOOD. Every man a warrio

    Roman error version two.

    SOLDIERY IS AN UNSUBSTITUTABLE GOOD.

    Every man a warrior, soldier, sheriff, judge, and legislature.

    The distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.

    Its the only way to be sure.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 21:14:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) Thank you brother for the honest question. I understand that wh

    (from elsewhere)

    Thank you brother for the honest question.

    I understand that when one cannot comprehend the truth or falsehood of a set of ideas that one must trust that the man who utters them *does* comprehend them – and relays them with his warranty of due diligence in both the truth of the content, and the meaning he conveys when relaying it.

    My position is that I don’t want you to trust me, since truth should stand on its own. The problem then, is overcoming the barrier of complexity.

    There are a lot of you who want me to sound like a preacher selling a moral parable. There are others of you who want me to sound like a politician selling an ideology. There are others of you who want me to sound like a general inspiring the troops. But I am a judge rendering judgements in the law of nature and the natural law of men.

    So we are in a difficult position of you (all of you) one way or another, demanding some impossible test of character.

    Yet the only test is this: why would a man of accomplishment sacrifice everything in his life: time, wealth, business, family, relationships, and risk ostracization, punishment, imprisonment, and even death, to write down in law for the first time a scientific understanding of his people’s strategy, history, in recipe form, to give them moral license, a set of demands, a means of transition, and a plan of execution of a revolution – in order to save them from the second dark age that threatens this time to not only enslave them but to exterminate them?

    Who else would pay that cost but one who was devoted to it? Do you have any idea what I have given up to do this? I’ve bet my entire life that I can give mission to a revolution that restores my people to their historical path, and defeats the enemy forever.

    If you can’t comprehend my words. You can’t sympathize with my thoughts. You can’t empathize with my feelings, you can at least take the evidence of my incentives.

    We must win. I bet more than anyone else so far that I can make us win.

    You must only choose whether you trust your own judgement.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 21:12:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) The first four minutes of this video are nonsense. There is no

    (from elsewhere)

    The first four minutes of this video are nonsense. There is no conflict between the coordinate system (our means of description) and the change in the background (described by that coordinate system), and the motion of the particle (energy, change) through the background. He’s confusing the math with reality given that we don’t know the underlying geometry, so we have to resort to use of aggregates (the wave function). Math is a language (logic, grammar) of positional names ideal for the description of constant relations (patterns). If history is a judge of anything, we are stuck in a problem that Hilbert warned us about, and Einstein and Bohr trapped us into, by using probability (aggregates) instead of solving the problem of the underlying geometry. Whether that geometry is a circular (loops) creating a 3d space, or triangles and tetrahedrons creating 3d space, the resulting pattern of which is loops or strings, is something we don’t know and it’s why quantum mechanics and relativity are seemingly incompatible. They make use of two aggregates describing two different patterns. Both theories are correct. The same way that biology and chemistry are correct. But the geometry underneath quantum mechanics is something we just don’t know yet. Unfortunately mathematical platonism is as infectious a disease in physics as it is in mathematics – and lest not even get started on economics.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 16:12:00 UTC

  • ( 7 Day twitter block for Truthing.) 😉

    ( 7 Day twitter block for Truthing.) 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 14:25:00 UTC

  • NOT ENOUGH DOOLITTLE LATELY? If you follow me here, please also follow “Eric Dan

    NOT ENOUGH DOOLITTLE LATELY?

    If you follow me here, please also follow “Eric Danelaw”.

    Eric Danelaw and The Propertarian Institute

    You also should follow Brandon Hayes who archives posts from ALL the propertarians. This movement is way beyond just me.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 11:38:00 UTC

  • It’s increasingly clear to me that the Grammars are as important an insight as i

    It’s increasingly clear to me that the Grammars are as important an insight as is Testimonial Truth, Propertarian Ethics, The Ternary Logic of Social Science.

    Why? Scientists, philosophers, logicians, mathematicians who don’t understand the foundations (grammars) of their disciplines.

    Scientists: It’s testimony on results after falsification of all available dimensions. The means of falsification are irrelevant.

    Philosophers: avoiding cost, actionability, informational asymmetry, and reciprocity creating unreality. Idealism is merely confession of ignorance. The majority of Philosophical terms and categories are dead because they were WRONG.

    Logicians: there is no closure, and logics are only falsificationary, you can’t prove anything without appeal to reality. Stop treating it as scriptural interpretation (hermeneutics).

    Mathematicians: it’s just a language of positional names limited by the grammar of ratios, meaning that positional names provide both perfect disambiguation by a single constant relation (position) and position can be used to generate endless names, so it is endlessly possible to describe constant relations, where the term pattern refers only to some set of constant relation. It’s not that math is unreasonably effective at describing constant relations it’s that it’s only possible for it to describe constant relations.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 11:35:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/80636130_541874773076084_87002777993

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/80636130_541874773076084_870027779939237888_o_541874769742751.jpg Laugh of the Day “Doolittle doesn’t consistently define his terms”.

    I mean. You gotta be kidding…. lolLaugh of the Day “Doolittle doesn’t consistently define his terms”.

    I mean. You gotta be kidding…. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 03:28:00 UTC

  • Legitimacy like Social Justice is a nonsense word

    Legitimacy like Social Justice is a nonsense word.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-29 21:36:00 UTC