Source: Facebook

  • OF DEFEATING LIBERAL LIES, ON LIES, AND MORE LIES Jan 1, 2020, 11:47 AM

    https://www.aier.org/article/fact-checking-the-1619-project-and-its-critics/COST OF DEFEATING LIBERAL LIES, ON LIES, AND MORE LIES

    https://www.aier.org/article/fact-checking-the-1619-project-and-its-critics/Updated Jan 1, 2020, 11:47 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-01 11:47:00 UTC

  • MEANINGFUL NEW YEAR DATA DEBTIFICATION #3 Global stocks have increased in value

    MEANINGFUL NEW YEAR DATA

    DEBTIFICATION

    #3 Global stocks have increased in value by more than 25 trillion dollars over the past 10 years.

    #4 In the United States, 84 percent of all stocks are owned by the wealthiest 10 percent of all Americans.

    #5 The U.S. government is now more than 23 trillion dollars in debt.

    #12 Total U.S. household debt is about to cross the 14 trillion dollar mark.

    FINANCIALIZATION

    #13 A study that was recently released found that 70 percent of all Americans are struggling financially right now.

    #14 The average family in the United States cannot afford to buy a home in 71 percent of the country.

    #15 58 million jobs in the United States pay less than $793 a week.

    #16 According to the Social Security Administration, 50 percent of all Americans make less than $33,000 a year.

    #17 63 percent of the jobs that have been created in the United States since 1990 have been low wage jobs.

    #42 Almost one-third of all U.S. Millennials are still living with their parents.

    DESOCIALIZATION

    #27 Over the past decade, the suicide rate among young Americans has risen by 56 percent.

    #28 The suicide rate for the overall population increased by 41 percent between 1999 and 2016.

    IDIOCRACY

    #29 One survey has discovered that 15-year-old students in China are almost four full grade levels ahead of 15-year-old students in the United States in mathematics.

    #30 A different survey discovered that one-third of all American teenagers haven’t read a single book in the past year.

    FORNICATION

    #33 23 percent of all U.S. children live with a single parent. That is the highest rate in the entire world by a wide margin.

    #34 Today, approximately 40 percent of all babies in America are born to unmarried women.

    #35 The U.S. fertility rate has fallen 15 percent since 2007 and is now at the lowest level ever recorded.

    CALIFORNICATED

    #38 Today, almost half of all homeless people in the entire nation live in the state of California.

    #39 Over half of all California voters have considered leaving the state.

    DECIVILIZATION

    #40 According to an American Bar Association survey, only 38 percent of all Americans know that the U.S. Constitution is the highest law in the land.

    #41 58 percent of American adults under the age of 35 agree that some version of socialism “would be good for the country”.

    #43 According to the Pew Research Center, only 65 percent of Americans now consider themselves to be Christians. That is the lowest level ever recorded.

    #49 A survey that was conducted a couple of months ago found that 67 percent of all Americans believe that we are “on the edge of civil war”.

    RESTORATION

    #51 A majority of Propertarians believe they can solve these problems by reorganizing society with their new constitution.

    See what I did there? 😉



    Source: Michael Snyder from The Economic Collapse Blog


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-01 09:19:00 UTC

  • Dec 31, 2019, 11:25 PM

    https://www.studyfinds.org/beauty-on-the-ballot-candidates-attractiveness-plays-role-in-voters-decisions-especially-in-u-s/https://www.studyfinds.org/beauty-on-the-ballot-candidates-attractiveness-plays-role-in-voters-decisions-especially-in-u-s/Updated Dec 31, 2019, 11:25 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 23:25:00 UTC

  • YEAR THOUGHTS ON RAMZPAUL’S PREDICTIONS PLS? Dec 31, 2019, 11:22 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfMdrMFPoi8NEW YEAR THOUGHTS ON RAMZPAUL’S PREDICTIONS PLS?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfMdrMFPoi8Updated Dec 31, 2019, 11:22 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 23:22:00 UTC

  • “Between the US, the EU, Russia, and China, what do you think is the most capita

    —“Between the US, the EU, Russia, and China, what do you think is the most capitalist society?”—

    The Capitalism vs Communism dichotomy is a fabrication of the Marxists to distract from the reality that:

    (a) all states must practice **mixed economies**, with state centralization solving market limitations at the cost of poor capital efficiency and high corruption, until private capital can decentralize production and increase capital efficiency and decrease corruption; Advanced economies must innovate and require markets (private sector) majority production, and backward economies must catch up and create markets by state (public sector) majority production.

    (b) all states capable of collecting revenues either by investment and returns, taxation, interest collection, profiting from direct management, or all of the above, can choose whether to spend the income on **consumption (redistribution) or production( further investment)**. Those states that are unable to collect revenues can militarize the population (as did the soviets) and minimize wages so that the maximum resources can be directed to production of commons.

    (c) the question is whether one operates by **rule of law** that naturally produces markets, **rule by legislation** negotiated between classes, or **rule by regulation** by monopoly bureaucracy, or **rule by command (discretion)** by dictator.

    ANGLOSPHERE countries are by far – without even a close competitor – dependent upon rule of law, rule by legislation, and state funding basic research, but almost no state involvement in production – why? Because judges were always independent professionals and less subject to corruption.

    *Mixed Economy, Favoring Private Sector, and Rule of Law.*

    CONTINENTAL – countries practice the napoleonic law of rule by legislation and rule by regulation. Why? Because french judges were appointed or purchased their positions and napoleon could not trust them to refrain from discretionary rulings (making up law).

    *Mixed Economy, Favoring mixed public private sectors, and Rule of Legislation.*

    POST SOVIET – Countries are cripple by soviet legal codes, but while russia and ukraine have reformed their laws (ukrainian law is quite good really), the problem in both countries has been reducing corruption that was endemic under the soviets in all walks of life. Although we must compliment Putin on tripling the number of cases in in the courts, even if he has not succeeded in preventing coercive thefts of businesses by state members (I could not find a single company to buy in Moscow because they must keep ‘fake’ books in order to prevent people in the government from conspiring to take over the business by confiscatory corruption.)

    *Mixed economy, Both Heavy public and Private sectors, and rule by legislation and rule by Regulation*

    INDIA. Indian law is fine. Like everything else in india, the engine of indian order is not the government but culture, tradition, and the family. Russia crosses eleven time zones but it’s still a country. America is an empire and each state or region a different country. Europe is trying and failing to repeat the american experiment and failing at the same time america is failing. India likewise is a continent and an empire not a country. India is unable to devote sufficient resources (for reasons we do not understand) to either providing speedy (timely) justice, or to producing sufficient infrastructure, given her people’s rates of reproduction. India lacks china’s authoritarianism and remains familialism which is both beautiful on the one hand but slows her rate of adaptation. Long term india will do wonderfully.

    *Mixed Economy, Favoring Private Sector, Rule by Legislation*

    CHINA has never practiced any semblance of law in the western sense, and instead has practiced arbitrary rule: **Rule by Command**, and **Rule by Regulation** and this seems to be the preference of the chinese people. China was a very poor (still is) backward country having made the mistake to reject modernity, then to embrace communism in order to prevent the south from seceding, leaving beijing in the north to rule poverty, and the commercial south to separate and join modernity. Mao would not tolerate this. After the failure of communism China saw the failure of the Soviets, and then the american defeat of the Iraqis, and this combination created today’s Chinese strategy of restoring her traditional position as the central power in east asia – despite all her neighbors fearing that china will also return to violence. Unlike india, china has a long history of monopoly authoritarian rule, and even more so, has the power of the Red Army (which really governs china’s factions). The chinese have a long history of pragmatism and reason – and almost no sense of the value of human life, and nothing approaching indian or european ethics. Secondly the chinese people are rather industrious and hard-working. So between authoritarian hierarchy, a means of enforcing political will with the army, a literate and intelligent hard working workforce, an endless supply of cheap labor, and endless debt capacity, and willingness to have an economic crash, china has been able to maximize state investment, migration of people into the workforce, and expansion of the military, and then to clamp down in response to an end to the boom. There is no question that for china, this is the optimum method of ‘catching up from behind’.

    *Mixed Economy, Heavily Favoring State Sector, Rule by Command*

    The most **capitalist** countries are those with the most rule of law and the most private sector. (*anglosphere*)

    The Most** mixed economies** are those with rule of legislation, a mix of private and state sector, (*continental*)

    The most **command economies **are those with the least rule of law and the most state sector (*china*)

    China has more successfully used debt capacity than any country in the world. This does not mean it is capitalist, since capitalism means bias to the private sector and minimizing the state sector.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 16:52:00 UTC

  • THE SECRET OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION The Secret of European Civilization is our c

    THE SECRET OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION

    The Secret of European Civilization is our common, Natural Law of tort under individual sovereignty, reciprocity, contract, warranty, testimony (truth regardless of face), before judge and jury of our peers, creating no option for survival other than competition in markets in all walks of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war, at the cost of limiting reproduction of the underclasses such that surpluses can be directed to the production of high cost, and high return, normative, cultural, institutional, and physical commons. This is the optimum strategy for defeat of Nature’s Red Queen, Group Competition, and achieves the most rapid transcendence of man, maintaining the optimum condition of man, by institutionalizing the development of agency: human capital. And no other people has, or demonstrably can, or even desires, to do it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 14:49:00 UTC

  • “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?” (important)(core) A grammar has tra

    “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?”

    (important)(core)

    A grammar has traditionally referred to a book containing the rules of a language. But I had to but quite a bit of work into ‘disambiguating’ the terms we use in language.

    The human cognitive facility consists of identification of constant relations between stimuli in time resulting in categorization (identity).

    The human auto association facility consists of discovering relations between categories (identities).

    The human memory facility consists of repetition of stimuli or rehearsal from short term memory, to create, reinforce, change, and eliminate constant relation within and between categories (locations, places, barriers, models, identities)

    The human logical facility consist of tests of constant, inconstant, and unrecognized relations between states (categories, identities).

    The human grammar facility refers to our physical ability to perform continuous recursive disambiguation using a stream of signals, most commonly in the form of sounds.

    The human language facility refers to the use of patterns of symbols or sounds in sequence of continuously recursive attempts at disambiguation.

    A language consists of Phonemes (sounds), Morphemes(meaningful combination of sounds – roots), Vocabulary (words), Phrases (state), Sentences (changes in state – transactions), Stories (collections of transactions), Grammar (rules of organization making possible disambiguation by inference), and Syntax (further disambiguation – specifically when writing).

    A vocabulary consists of Names (Nouns, references to referents), Name Substitutes (pronouns), Properties (Adjective, state), Operations (verbs, actions, state of acting), Properties of Operations (Adverb). and Approval or Rejection (yes no true false agree disagree etc). Note that I’ve clarified some terms here a little differently than we traditionally do.

    However (this is the issue) the collections of permissible dimensions (paradigms) limit the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation: The logic of the paradigm.

    This is why…. Let’s use math because it’s the most simple language we have that all of us share.

    Mathematics consists of names of positions (numbers), variables (pronouns), names of operations ( mathematical operations, verbs), phrases (expressions), statements (functions), sentences (transactions), proofs (stories), and Approval or Rejection (true false). There are no adverbs or adjectives.

    What differs between ordinary language and mathematical language is that mathematics (the language of positional names) and ordinary language (the language of human experience) differ in ‘dimensions of permissible references’ to both Names (nouns) and Operations (verbs).

    And we can do the same analysis for every Grammar (system of rules) in the spectrum of: math, accounting, logics, programming, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, recipes, protocols, laws, testimony, descriptions, ordinary language, narration, storytelling, fictions, fictionalisms, and deceits – and everything in between.

    And we use the term “Deflationary grammar” for the narrowest grammars (math, logics), “ordinary grammar” for ordinary language, and “Inflationary grammar” for the widest grammars (story, fiction, fictionalism, deceits).

    Deflationary < —- Ordinary —-> Inflationary.

    So instead of the traditional hierarchy:

    Human Facilities -> language -> phoneme -> morpheme -> paradigms (metaphysics and resulting semantics) -> vocabulary -> grammar -> syntax.

    Instead we have:

    Human Facilities (see above) -> vocabulary -> paradigms(dimensions) -> grammar of paradigm(rules of story, transaction, function, expression, operation, names: the LOGIC of the paradigm) -> permissible vocabulary -> necessary syntax.

    So a Grammar refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness.

    So in P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Vocabulary, logic, syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum

    And Operational Grammar or Testimony is a Deflationary Grammar: a Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limiting it to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence), and sets of transactions (testimony).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 12:54:00 UTC

  • “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?” (important)(core) A grammar has tra

    “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?”

    (important)(core)

    A grammar has traditionally referred to a book containing the rules of a language. But I had to put quite a bit of work into ‘disambiguating’ the terms we use in language.

    The human cognitive facility consists of identification of constant relations between stimuli in time resulting in categorization (identity).

    The human auto association facility consists of discovering relations between categories (identities).

    The human memory facility consists of repetition of stimuli or rehearsal from short term memory, to create, reinforce, change, and eliminate constant relation within and between categories (locations, places, barriers, models, identities)

    The human logical facility consist of tests of constant, inconstant, and unrecognized relations between states (categories, identities).

    The human grammar facility refers to our physical ability to perform continuous recursive disambiguation using a stream of signals, most commonly in the form of sounds.

    The human language facility refers to the use of patterns of symbols or sounds in sequence of continuously recursive attempts at disambiguation.

    A language consists of Phonemes (sounds), Morphemes(meaningful combination of sounds – roots), Vocabulary (words), Phrases (state), Sentences (changes in state – transactions), Stories (collections of transactions), Grammar (rules of organization making possible disambiguation by inference), and Syntax (further disambiguation – specifically when writing).

    A vocabulary consists of Names (Nouns, references to referents), Name Substitutes (pronouns), Properties (Adjective, state), Operations (verbs, actions, state of acting), Properties of Operations (Adverb). and Approval or Rejection (yes no true false agree disagree etc). Note that I’ve clarified some terms here a little differently than we traditionally do.

    However (this is the issue) the collections of permissible dimensions (paradigms) limit the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation: The logic of the paradigm.

    This is why…. Let’s use math because it’s the most simple language we have that all of us share.

    Mathematics consists of names of positions (numbers), variables (pronouns), names of operations ( mathematical operations, verbs), phrases (expressions), statements (functions), sentences (transactions), proofs (stories), and Approval or Rejection (true false). There are no adverbs or adjectives.

    What differs between ordinary language and mathematical language is that mathematics (the language of positional names) and ordinary language (the language of human experience) differ in ‘dimensions of permissible references’ to both Names (nouns) and Operations (verbs).

    And we can do the same analysis for every Grammar (system of rules) in the spectrum of: math, accounting, logics, programming, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, recipes, protocols, laws, testimony, descriptions, ordinary language, narration, storytelling, fictions, fictionalisms, and deceits – and everything in between.

    And we use the term “Deflationary grammar” for the narrowest grammars (math, logics), “ordinary grammar” for ordinary language, and “Inflationary grammar” for the widest grammars (story, fiction, fictionalism, deceits).

    Deflationary < —- Ordinary —-> Inflationary.

    So instead of the traditional hierarchy:

    Human Facilities -> language -> phoneme -> morpheme -> paradigms (metaphysics) -> vocabulary -> grammar -> syntax.

    Instead we have:

    Human Facilities (see above) -> vocabulary -> paradigms(dimensions) -> grammar of paradigm(rules of story, transaction, function, expression, operation, names: the LOGIC of the paradigm) -> permissible vocabulary -> necessary syntax.

    So a Grammar refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness.

    So in P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Vocabulary, logic, syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum

    And Operational Grammar or Testimony is a Deflationary Grammar: a Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limiting it to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence), and sets of transactions (testimony).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 12:54:00 UTC

  • P is Difficult? Understanding is overrated. Soldiers do their duty. Man up. 😉

    P is Difficult?

    Understanding is overrated.

    Soldiers do their duty.

    Man up. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 09:22:00 UTC

  • “Curt Doolittle is a moron…. Because is talks nonsense, its just waffle which

    —“Curt Doolittle is a moron…. Because is talks nonsense, its just waffle which doesn’t link together. He compared himself to Aristotle in reply to a comment I made on one of his videos. He isn’t very smart and can’t make higher connections to the true. He is similar to Jordan B Peterson or Ben Shapiru…. Because he thinks he has done some genius work by converting political language and idea’s into scientific language, which just makes political stuff much more complex than it actually is. What he’s doing is looking at a cream wall and trying to find the flecks of white in it. Its utterly pointless.”—William Walker

    lol….

    Answer a question: by what system of rules are governments – the largest organizations in the world – operated? (law) What differs between those organization (the body of laws and the limits upon them). By what other means is it possible for them to be operated? (none). Law is the operating system for governments. And if you had sufficient worldly knowledge and experience, you would know that.

    Logistics in war, Law in State, Contract in Commerce, Protocols in Medicine, Norm in commons, Tradition in Family.

    It’s ok if you’re only fit for the soldiery. You don’t need to understand. You either need to fight for your people or stay out of the way.

    As for understanding the work, well, you know, stupidities such as “Calculus is hard so it mustn’t be useful or true” apply to Propertarianism. It’s hard. Its useful. And it’s true. You don’t understand the constitution or the law either. Yet you think you do and you live by the rules put in place by the vast body of the common law, the constitution, the amendements, the findings of the court, the federal code, the state codes, and the regulations that make them possible.

    You don’t understand quantum mechanics and you still can use a cell phone, a computer, the internet, and satellite GPS systems.

    Understanding is overrated.

    Soldiers do their duty.

    That’s why we win.

    Man up.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 09:13:00 UTC