Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • THE TRUTH AND THE WHOLE TRUTH: SAFE SPACES SAFE SPACE: A forum free of Truth, Re

    THE TRUTH AND THE WHOLE TRUTH: SAFE SPACES

    SAFE SPACE: A forum free of Truth, Reciprocity, Merit, and Consequential Eugenics, creating demand for denial, social construction, sophism, pseudoscience, and supernaturalism that obscures one’s sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value assisting in reproductive dysgenics despite it’s harm to mankind: The conflict strategy of females: the interpersonal and social super-predators.

    UNSAFE SPACE: A forum free of Ridicule, Shaming, Moralizing, Psychologizing, Rationalizing, Denial, Shouting Down, Rallying, Gossiping, Undermining, and Reputation Destruction in pursuit of Truth, Reciprocity, Merit, and Consequential Eugenics, where we can ignore our differences in sexual social economic political and military market value because Eugenics is in our interest and mankind’s: The conflict strategy of males: political and military super-predators.

    That’s really it you know. Marxism (men, classes) failed, and the left switched to the female conflict strategy of Cultural Marxism (undermining informal institutions reinforcing compromise between genders and classes), Feminism (undermining compromise between the genders), and Postmodernism (undermining truth), and denial (denying differences.)

    Why? Masculine meritocratic eugenic markets (Packs), and female equalitarian dysgenic authoritarianism. (The herd).

    It’s not complicated. It’s just the war on Darwin by the left ( pseudoscience, sophism, and denial) to destroy the family, and the war on Darwin by the formerly left religious( supernaturalism) in pursuit of the family.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 18:15:00 UTC

  • Peter Gabriel. The Police. 1986. Dorm room (hers). Snow. Worried about my car –

    Peter Gabriel. The Police. 1986. Dorm room (hers). Snow. Worried about my car – parked badly. Thick smoke. Very calm. Relaxed. Peace of mind impossible to possess again. Is there really acid in the refrigerator? Roomate comes in. I get up. Guy in the bathroom is covered with blood. His own. Too much up his nose. Waves that he’s ok. Back. Lotsa girls. My “Dangerous” instinct is going off. Knock on the opposite door. Something is definitely wrong. I get her to leave. Bed. Phone call (before cell phones – And we still had dial up modems and monthly compuserve fees.) They arrest almost the entire dorm. I still play rush, gabriel and the police now and then. Not often. Just now and then.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 17:07:00 UTC

  • TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE We focus largely on the law but not on the other

    TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE

    We focus largely on the law but not on the other innovations in the propertarian program:

    Yes, Propertarianism consists of a set of innovations

    1. Grammars (metaphysics)

    2. Testimonialism (epistemology)

    3. Acquisitionism and Propertarianism –

    Together making possible strictly constructed law (ethics)

    But we also have:

    4: Cooperationism, Compatibilism, Cognitive division of labor

    Which means that we specialize, largely along lines of gender cognition and age, in a division of perception, cognition, advocacy and negotiation. And then we ‘calculate’ by discovering opportunities to cooperate across the spectrum of population, time, and space. So we function as a neural network that discovers opportunities despite variations in our division of labor in perceiving and comprehending the world.

    And we also have:

    5. The Ternary Logic of Political Science.

    Let’s look at this a bit

    There are three states of logic, in order:

    1. False

    2. Truth candidate (actionable)

    3. Undecidable (In-actionable)

    There are three options to cooperation

    1. avoidance (ostracization)

    2. exchange (cooperation)

    3. predation-parasitism (conflict)

    There are three means of coercion

    1. Remuneration (deprivation of trade, or benefit from trade) Middle class – Libertarian Meritocratic

    2. Force (imposition of harm, defense from harm) Upper class – Conservative Eugenic

    3. Undermining (ostracizing/inhibiting opportunity, including/generating opportunity) Under Class – Progressive Dysgenic

    There are three axis of elites

    1. Scientific, Technical, Entrepreneurial, Financial, Treasury

    2. Military, juridical, Police, Sheriff, Militia

    3. Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals

    We can organize by three axis of elites (cooperate by)

    1. Production and Evolution (europe)

    2. Administration and Stagnation (strong:china, weak:india)

    3. Parasitism and Degeneration (semitia, gypsies)

    We can rule by three axis of decidability

    1. Science and Law (europe)

    2. Reason and Command (china india)

    3. Sophistry and Propaganda (semitia)

    We can govern by three axis

    1. Markets,Law,Courts, (europe) Middle Class

    2. Bureaucracy (china) Upper class

    3. Priesthood (semitia) Underclass

    The ranking assuming we eradicate the semitic dark ages:

    Europe, China, India, Iran-Assyria-Babylon, Egypt Mesoamerica, Semitia(jewish muslim), S-Pacific, E africa, W africa Africa, S Africa, Austronesia

    The only hard choice being iran vs india and that choice possible only because the Persians were not able to shake off islam and reassert Persian civlization despite efforts just as the germans can’t sake of Christianity despite their efforts and reassert germanic civilization.

    If something had not ‘gone wrong’ in India she would have produced the best culture with time. It may be climate and demographic curse. But I don’t quite understand what went wrong yet but I”ll figure it out. I think we undrestand what went wrong with persia and germania. And russia, germania, and china are our fault for not lettting russia retake orthodoxy, not letting germany retake europe, and not letting macarthur and patton finish the job of the second world war with russia and china.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 16:52:00 UTC

  • TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE We focus largely on the law but not on the other

    TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE

    We focus largely on the law but not on the other innovations in the propertarian program:

    Yes, Propertarianism consists of a set of innovations

    1. Grammars (metaphysics)

    2. Testimonialism (epistemology)

    3. Acquisitionism and Propertarianism –

    Together making possible strictly constructed law (ethics)

    But we also have:

    4: Cooperationism, Compatibilism, Cognitive division of labor

    Which means that we specialize, largely along lines of gender cognition and age, in a division of perception, cognition, advocacy and negotiation. And then we ‘calculate’ by discovering opportunities to cooperate across the spectrum of population, time, and space. So we function as a neural network that discovers opportunities despite variations in our division of labor in perceiving and comprehending the world.

    And we also have:

    5. The Ternary Logic of Political Science.

    Let’s look at this a bit

    There are three states of logic, in order:

    1. False

    2. Truth candidate (actionable)

    3. Undecidable (In-actionable)

    There are three options to cooperation

    1. avoidance (ostracization)

    2. exchange (cooperation)

    3. predation-parasitism (conflict)

    There are three means of coercion

    1. Remuneration (deprivation of trade, or benefit from trade) Middle class – Libertarian Meritocratic

    2. Force (imposition of harm, defense from harm) Upper class – Conservative Eugenic

    3. Undermining (ostracizing/inhibiting opportunity, including/generating opportunity) Under Class – Progressive Dysgenic

    There are three axis of elites

    1. Scientific, Technical, Entrepreneurial, Financial, Treasury

    2. Military, juridical, Police, Sheriff, Militia

    3. Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals

    We can organize by three axis of elites (cooperate by)

    1. Production and Evolution (europe)

    2. Administration and Stagnation (strong:china, weak:india)

    3. Parasitism and Degeneration (semitia, gypsies)

    We can rule by three axis of decidability

    1. Science and Law (europe)

    2. Reason and Command (china india)

    3. Sophistry and Propaganda (semitia)

    We can govern by three axis

    1. Markets,Law,Courts, (europe) Middle Class

    2. Bureaucracy (china) Upper class

    3. Priesthood (semitia) Underclass

    The ranking assuming we eradicate the semitic dark ages:

    Europe, China, India, Iran-Assyria-Babylon, Egypt Mesoamerica, Semitia(jewish muslim), S-Pacific, E africa, W africa Africa, S Africa, Austronesia

    The only hard choice being iran vs india and that choice possible only because the Persians were not able to shake off islam and reassert Persian civlization despite efforts just as the germans can’t sake of Christianity despite their efforts and reassert germanic civilization.

    If something had not ‘gone wrong’ in India she would have produced the best culture with time. It may be climate and demographic curse. But I don’t quite understand what went wrong yet but I”ll figure it out. I think we undrestand what went wrong with persia and germania. And russia, germania, and china are our fault for not lettting russia retake orthodoxy, not letting germany retake europe, and not letting macarthur and patton finish the job of the second world war with russia and china.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 16:39:00 UTC

  • Six guys sitting next to me. Most over sixty. Pizza place. Working class. Young

    Six guys sitting next to me. Most over sixty. Pizza place. Working class. Young guy with them says “Nice, notes of sweetness” eating the pizza. I have a moment of disorientation. I turn around ‘who said that’? Conversation ensues. laughter.

    Incongruity.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 15:58:00 UTC

  • DEFINITINITIONS: A Race, Nation, Tribe, Clan, Family are people. Race: a kin gro

    DEFINITINITIONS:

    A Race, Nation, Tribe, Clan, Family are people.

    Race: a kin group having adapted to local circumstance morphologically distinguishable from other kin groups.

    Tribe: a kin group within a race. Clan: an extended family within a tribe. A family: one or more generations of nuclear to extended family running a household (micro economy).

    Assets: territory, resources, monuments, infrastructure, built capital, portable capital, people, their private property.

    Nation: A kin group sharing institutions, language, tradition, custom, norms, commons (assets).

    Country: A territory, with borders, under the control of a formal (state) or informal (people) group willing to defend those borders and that territory and the assets within it.

    State: A state is a corporation governed (ruled, administered) by a monopoly that secures assets, one of which is the people, either as an asset themselves (possession) or as assets on their behalf.

    Nation-State: A state serving the interests of a Nation (kin group)

    State: A corporation regardless of the nation or nation, serving it’s own interests whether on behalf of kin groups or not.

    Federation or Confederation: A corporation of voluntarily organized states and or nation states with right of exit.

    Empire: A corporation of of involuntarily organized states and or nation-states and or countries and or peoples lacking right of exit.

    Rule: Means of deciding matters of conflict, wither external-military, or internal-political, or internal-juridical.

    Government: Means of administering the production and maintenance of commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 15:29:00 UTC

  • MORE ‘WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM” CRITICISM “Propertarianism is the completion of (

    MORE ‘WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM” CRITICISM

    “Propertarianism is the completion of (the complete) scientific method.”

    That’s it. Period. But it’s a profound thing. Very. It means not only the physical sciences but logics, psychological, social, political, legal, economic sciences.

    Now what do we do with that completed scientific method?

    The scientific method is value neutral, and commensurable regardless of discipline, and universal in application.

    We use that scientific method to produce a value neutral fully commensurable language across all disciplines.

    We use that logic and language to produce a universally commensurable value neutral system of law.

    We used that value neutral system of law to produce a constitution.

    That constitution’s principle innovation is to incrementally suppress the means by which western civlization in the ancient and modern world was undermined by crimes of plausible deniability (which I won’t explain right here), but that’s what you think of when you think of leftism.

    One can create an infinite number of constitutions of infinite variety using that law, as long as one constructs them truthfully and reciprocally (which is a problem for the left).

    The constitution we propose restores the american constitution to its original intent as military and treasury that allows for the concentration of military power sufficient for defense of the continent, devolves all other powers to the states, makes everyone liable for the truth and reciprocity of speech in public to the public about matters public (outlaws leftism), and reforms every single aspect of life so that we restore our civilization from the ((())) harms done to it this past century.

    That constitution is on line and in progress and is a lot to swallow, but then so are the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, Federalist Papers, Constitution, Bill of Rights, The Amendements, History of Supreme Court Rulings, Federal Code, and Individual State constitutions and codes.

    Propertarianism is the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to the totality of human knowledge, creating a universally commensurable value neutral language; its embodiment in the natural common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of [all deceit] from the informational commons.

    See?Updated Dec 28, 2019, 2:57 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 14:57:00 UTC

  • Define liberalism. —“Liberalism is ideology that elevates individual above eve

    Define liberalism.

    —“Liberalism is ideology that elevates individual above everything else by definition (communism – class, fascism – race/nation state). Liberalism seeks to free an individual from any constraints – ethnicity, class, nationality, and as of recent, gender, and eventually, humanity.”—Alex Pryazhnikov

    So you mean jewish cosmopolitanism, marxism, feminism, postmodernism, and christian universalism continuing the abrahamic tradition, and not liberalism or classical liberalism, meaning rule of law that limits the state. You mean ‘liberal’ in the american (jewish, leftist) sense.

    So ok. That’s the postwar definition of the term.

    || liberalism > classical liberalism > libertarianism

    Because the left appropriate the term ‘liberalism’ to mean universalism, cosmopolitanism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, to UNDERMINE western rule of law.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 09:37:00 UTC

  • The EU is france’s attempt to recreate french authoritarian feminine bureaucracy

    The EU is france’s attempt to recreate french authoritarian feminine bureaucracy, and is no different from the napoleonic vision. The reason france has been so far unsuccessful is the germans OWN europe commercially and financially.

    However, france has preserved a serious military – especially air and naval. Germany has none. So either greater germania is going to take charge or germania will be defeated by superior french arrogance from the west, and superior russian arrogance from the east.

    You cannot like anglos and germans fantasize about a christian world.. You must exercise masculine self confidence to survive.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 09:16:00 UTC

  • THOUGHTS ON CONSIOUSNESS Consciousness is deterministic with scale, and biased b

    THOUGHTS ON CONSIOUSNESS

    Consciousness is deterministic with scale, and biased by body form. Any being with sufficient neural capacity will develop similar intuitions and behaviors. Consciousness means modeling recursive future states by grammar of action. And we are programmed by action in reality.

    There is no mystery to consciousness.

    The nervous system is a lovely, profoundly simple thing, and there is trivial difference between a transistor and a soma, and the organization (adaptation) of the nervous system by dendritic wayfinding is indifferent from wiring circuit boards other than the infinite untraceable unmeasurable complexity of any given set of excitements. I am pretty confident of the structure of each major region of the brain and how it processes information, and there is no magic to recursive memory by thalamic preservation of state, and hippocampal production of indexes, and hippocampal rehearsal to store memories during break, rests, sleep. The experience of awareness is just a concert, like the experience of consciousness and it’s all just a constructed spectrum of preservation of networks.

    And anyone who has written an A* search for way-finding a maze can simply relabel variables and functions with brain regions and grasp the concept. Neural networks approximate that complexity, functions abstract that complexity, classes abstract that complexity further, but the underlying process is the same. Software must make address connections between simulated neurons and serially process calculations, while the brain only makes physical dendritic connections in infinite, inexhaustible, complexity and permutation. At present I dont know (maybe no one does) the provisioning of new episodic indices, and whether they are permanent or temporary.

    And the reason we can only produce robots at present is simply one of scale given the problem of serialization. I suspect we will solve that problem as evolution solved vision, which is to break the problem into pieces producing a symbolic input to a hierarchical system of prediction. I don’t see why we can’t do that other than the current cost would be ridiculous although it’s clear google is trying to use pre-processed information (search content) the way the financial business uses pre-processed information ( prices). I don’t know what they’re doing but as far as I know, it requires the development of symmetries (think, metaphysics) and a grammar (think thought, emotion, action) and a vocabulary to do that for the same reason humans needed language to think more deeply (system of measurement).

    Right now all I see is categorization (identification), and prediction and I don’t see anyone producing a metaphysics, grammar, and vocabulary bounded by similar rules to language, which will be necessary for machines to communicate because shared hierarchical memory would be slow (other than for the predator-prey division of labor), and protocols (languages) are necessary to encapsulate patterns such that access to (chaotic) underlying memory structures (neural networks and the training that got them to a given state) is unnecessary.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 09:09:00 UTC