Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • If we rule by rule of law, natural law (property), and provide sufficient law to

    If we rule by rule of law, natural law (property), and provide sufficient law to eliminate demand for authority (property in toto), and we build and enforce a market for commons, where all agreements assent, unless countered by dissent, then we have no rule, per se, only natural law.

    Other than sheriffs, judges, and generals I do not see the need for rule per say, or government per se, only the need for a market for commons, and rituals and procedures to persist them.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 09:03:00 UTC

  • SO NOW I HAVE COME FULL CIRCLE Now that I understand that the ‘good’ aryan man p

    SO NOW I HAVE COME FULL CIRCLE

    Now that I understand that the ‘good’ aryan man produces is rule, and that we have profited from this rule, and failed when we no longer ruled morally, but commercially, I have come full circle.

    We must rule. It is our chief product. It is our highest art. It is our greatest good.

    We must rule morally, and not commercially, and not exploitatively.

    Tax is our commission on our rule.

    As long as we rule morally, seek to minmize the cost (comission) and maximize the commons – meaning consume as little as possible ourselves, then we rule well.

    Our goal then is to move as many of our people into rule as possible, and rule with small numbers as we have in the past.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 08:59:00 UTC

  • HIERARCHY OF ARGUMENT Religion (conflationary analogy) Mythology, (mythic analog

    HIERARCHY OF ARGUMENT

    Religion (conflationary analogy)

    Mythology, (mythic analogy)

    Literature (narrative analogy)

    Reason (possible)

    Rationalism (internally consistent)

    Science, (physical)

    Testimony. (moral/cooperative)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 08:54:00 UTC

  • No man is fit to rule an anglo saxon, so we must rule ourselves

    No man is fit to rule an anglo saxon, so we must rule ourselves.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 06:51:00 UTC

  • THE METHOD OF SUBVERSION OF THE CONSTITUTION —” the drift away from constituti

    THE METHOD OF SUBVERSION OF THE CONSTITUTION

    —” the drift away from constitutional legitimacy is not just the result of incompetence or confusion. There is a faction which has tended to dominate the federal government, especially during most of the 20th century, which has deliberately sought to extend precedents beyond the bounds of original constitutional understanding. It has done this by carefully selecting cases against weak or inadequately represented defendants, appealing only those cases they are sure they will win, and framing the arguments so that the judges often don’t have a choice that is constitutional, but must choose between two unconstitutional positions. Ordinarily this is supposed to be guarded against by constitutionally protective parties filing amicus curiae briefs to argue a strict constructionist position, but such briefs are not always filed in important cases, or are often ignored by the court.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 06:26:00 UTC

  • CASE AGAINST PRECEDENT: STARE DECISIS (And by implication, the case for strict c

    http://www.constitution.org/col/0610staredrift.htmTHE CASE AGAINST PRECEDENT: STARE DECISIS

    (And by implication, the case for strict construction)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 06:20:00 UTC

  • GOOD. SO BE OPEN ABOUT IT. —Laruelle volume’s collection fills a whole number

    http://krytyka.com/en/reviews/eurasianism-and-european-far-right-reshaping-europe-russia-relationship#sthash.oMdEAt5S.dpufDOING GOOD. SO BE OPEN ABOUT IT.

    —Laruelle volume’s collection fills a whole number of gaps in the mosaic of Russia’s increasing integration into transnational extremely right-wing networks. These well-researched papers provide, with the partial exception of the less detailed chapter on Hungary, by themselves sufficient starting points for more narrow research into this or that episode in neo-Eurasianism’s relationship to the countries covered here.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 02:58:00 UTC

  • PROBLEM: LYING —“In 1981 Russia was denying it invaded Afghanistan”— THERE I

    https://twitter.com/J_Bloodworth/status/724704869148446720RUSSIA’S PROBLEM: LYING

    —“In 1981 Russia was denying it invaded Afghanistan”—

    THERE IS NO NEED TO LIE IF YOU HOLD THE MORAL HIGH GROUND.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 02:54:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://t.co/9CBwHq7BMBhttps://t.co/9CBwHq7BMB

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 02:47:00 UTC

  • “The Russian elite has become European at the level of consumption, but in order

    —“The Russian elite has become European at the level of consumption, but in order to preserve their incomes and consequently their power,” Shevtsova says, “they must isolate ordinary Russians from Europe” and from European values. Thus, “the Kremlin will struggle with Western values inside Russia even as it tries to achieve compromises with European business and elites.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 02:41:00 UTC