If we rule by rule of law, natural law (property), and provide sufficient law to eliminate demand for authority (property in toto), and we build and enforce a market for commons, where all agreements assent, unless countered by dissent, then we have no rule, per se, only natural law.
Other than sheriffs, judges, and generals I do not see the need for rule per say, or government per se, only the need for a market for commons, and rituals and procedures to persist them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 09:03:00 UTC
Leave a Reply