Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • REPEATING

    http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/10/curt-doolittle-on-evolution-of-our.htmlWORTH REPEATING

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 11:22:00 UTC

  • dammit people. i am writing software here. and you’re killin’ me. lol

    dammit people. i am writing software here. and you’re killin’ me. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 11:16:00 UTC

  • WHY DID THEY KILL KADHAFFI They killed Kadhdafi because he bombed a plane. Plain

    WHY DID THEY KILL KADHAFFI

    They killed Kadhdafi because he bombed a plane. Plain and simple. Why? Because he violated ‘the peace of Westphalia’ and violated its extension ‘the postwar consensus’. He violated 5000 years of western ethics.

    And yes, the disaster caused by killing him despite the fact that the predictable outcome was disproportionately bad. Why? Because Kadhaffi like Saddam were killed in order to prevent more of their kind breaking the peace of Westphalia and its extension the Postwar Consensus. Until Putin came along with Ukraine, no country had done so. And he did not need to break the consensus had he not panic’d and simply made a few phone calls – but russians feel that they cannot ‘educate’ foreign people. It is not in their nature.

    Westerners don’t take threats or actions lightly and don’t forgive. They especially don’t forgive the murder of citizens.

    Kadhaffie like Hussein simply provided a convenient time to kill him.

    THE BROADER ISSUE

    The question isn’t whether any group controls their resources, but whether they sell those resources on the common market (which is what the USA enforces, or whether they will use oil as a military and economic weapon (as Putin threaten to do with Europe), (and as Iran threatens to do if it can obtain enough power in the middle east).

    From the world’s perspective oil is a commons you may benefit from distributing. It is a resource of the earth, like sunlight, air and water. if you interfere with air, water, light, or oil, then you are making an act of war, not selling a domestic resource.

    The reason for western skepticism was the (moral) objective of preventing the Marxists from using territory, resources, and oil as a means of warfare against modernity,

    Just like the Muslims are using oil as a weapon against modernity.

    Frankly, everyone would be happy if African leaders controlled their neighbors and their continent – or at least some part of it. We all just don’t want a world war started over it. And markets prevent wars at the expense of local people taking advantage of profiting from human commons.

    FWIW: Moral equivalency is a very bad tool for making moral judgments. it’s a demonstration of selection bias: finding excuses for doing what you want.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 10:52:00 UTC

  • “secretaries pout and preen like cheap tarts in a red light street.” “boy before

    “secretaries pout and preen like cheap tarts in a red light street.”

    “boy before the mirror, checks his camouflage, polishes his armor, and the charger in the garage.”

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 10:35:00 UTC

  • TWO INSIGHTS: ‘THE PROBLEM OF THINKING IN INVERSE”, AND “THE PROBLEM OF THE FEMA

    TWO INSIGHTS: ‘THE PROBLEM OF THINKING IN INVERSE”, AND “THE PROBLEM OF THE FEMALE’S HEN-STRATEGY”

    Today’s two insights, one beautiful, one horrifying.

    1) spirituality is important and the language of spirituality necessary for the purpose of organizing in groups by means of incentives. But we can write laws and argue cases in Propertarianism and we cannot do that in the language of Nietzche, and Junger.

    When people hear me they do not realize that I do not see the problem of our time as rallying ourselves toward common interests, because in my mind we do not know what to rally in favor of, and we do not know how to stop the opposition by formal and institutional means, nor to maintain our defenses against them over time.

    Just as truth is what remains after we eliminate all error bias and deceit, sovereignty and markets are all that remain, once we eliminate violence, theft, fraud, MISINFORMATION AND DECEIT.

    So of course, I speak in NEGATIVES used to PROSECUTE, whereas most men want POSITIVES with used to RALLY.

    So without this understanding, the ‘right’ which is intuitionistic rather than intellectual,

    2) IT’S DECIVILIZING FEMININE STRATEGY IN GENERAL THAT AILS US: The global battle is against democracy and media under free deceitful speech, which has given women both the distribution mechanism and the proxy violence to overthrow their domestication, rather than simply seek legal parity. We desire equals with whom to cooperate, and are largely happy to hold our positions, because we are men. But women are like hens, in that they will perpetually destroy each other and everyone around them in order to achieve dominance by any means possible. Men are not good. But markets including a market for commons allowed them to conduct exchanges and cooperate while maintaining order. Women are not good. They are never good except to their children. We made them good by denying them alternatives, and democracy let them free.

    If you want to be horrified by uncomfortable scientific truths, then that is the one you should be most horrified by.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 10:28:00 UTC

  • STOP BLAMING THE TRIBE OF JEWISH MEN FOR WHAT IS A UNIVERSAL FEMALE PROBLEM OR Y

    STOP BLAMING THE TRIBE OF JEWISH MEN FOR WHAT IS A UNIVERSAL FEMALE PROBLEM OR YOU WILL SOLVE THE WRONG PROBLEM.

    —“It’s not the +Cathedral+ it’s the (((Synagogue)))”—-Danny Bogdan Polishchuk

    It’s not really true.

    It’s an alliance between the NE/Anglican Puritans, The Cosmopolitans, and the Feminists.

    We can’t blame it all on (((them))).

    Rothbard tried to blame it all on the Puritans.

    Alt-Righters try to blame it all on the jews .

    But the problem is Women and the Jews have the same reproductive strategy, the same intuitions, and employ the same tactics. The major difference being that women tend not to select eugenically, and jews have nearly industrialized eugenic female evolution in their men at least. Just as we have industrialized over millennia the eugenic evolution of ALL of our classes.

    THE PRINCIPLE INSIGHT: NOT OTHERS, BUT WOMEN.

    Why is it we feel the compulsive need to make a war between groups of men, that is instead, a war between women and men made possible by the transformation of the houses of parliament from one-man-one-family-one-vote, to one individual-one-vote, thereby transferring the compromise between individual men and women in a market for sex, reproduction, care and insurance, into a war of organized violence between the sexes.

    Look at Jews as all women (they pretty much are) and stop looking at them as men. Then look at the data. It’s single women, the underclass, and jews as females, that are the problem.

    Basically, it’s women and the underclass against men and families.

    And we let it happen.

    THE PRIMARY REASON

    So I hope you and others take a hard look at the primary reason that we don’t act: that acting means restoring our domestication of women so that they cannot ally with out-group members against us, thereby taking down our genes, our culture, and our civilization.

    Until you understand the material problem, that democracy gave violence by proxy to women, who are, by nature, against us, then you will try to cure the wrong problem. The problem isn’t jews. The problem is that women’s reproductive strategy, of which all jews are members. They are the ultimate expression of the female unleashed from the civilizing influence of the male.

    Spare the rod, spoil the beast.

    Spare the rod, spoil the child.

    Spare the rod spoil the woman.

    Spare the rod spoil the immigrant.

    Spare the rod spoil the opponent.

    Spare the rod spoil the enemy.

    Children do not know what they do any more than women do.

    Women do not know what they do any more than we do.

    Jews do not know what they do any more than women do.

    SCIENCE:

    We capture and herd women, capture territory, capture resources. Then we divide the spoils. Everything else is just good manners to make it easier and more pleasant.

    I am all for good manners and all. But in the end, evolution isn’t kind to us. The red queen keeps running whether we take a break or not. We either dominate and win, or we let others dominate and win.

    UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS

    Science – the pursuit of truth – is not kind to us. The question is whether we out Gun, Germ, Steel, Science, and Govern others or whether they do the same to us.

    The problem we face is not others. It is failing to grasp that the ‘other’ is the female reproductive strategy living among us with unmarried women, undomesticated women, and undomesticated men.

    Women need civilizing more so than men, For the principle reason that violence is far easier to civilize than deception. Women were despised in most of history because of their impulsivity and deceit. WE have tried through education to civilize them in ways we had not civilized them in the past.

    Those who govern can only do so from having domesticated each other through the reciprocal control of marriage.

    Assuming we have any vote at all, then it CAN only come from one marriage one vote.

    Because marriage is the first ‘business’ we enter into.

    Business and industry the second.

    Finance and economy the third

    Commons the fourth

    And rule the fifth.

    Marriage is the first organization that demonstrates your ability to cooperate at high cost for common good. Without this demonstration of your capability, we have no evidence that you should contribute to the commons. We have only your false promise and wishful thinking. And that’s what the evidence of a century has told us: it was false promise and wishful thinking.

    Individuals adhere to rule of law.

    markets demonstrate ability to cooperate with peers.

    Families demonstrate reproductive cooperation between genders.

    Commons demonstrate common investment between families.

    This is why the west invented empiricism.

    BECAUSE WE LIVED IT EVERY DAY.

    “show me, don’t promise me”

    That’s empiricism.

    CLOSING

    Jews are just the expression of the female – the ‘Amazons’ we were searching for have always been among us. But they do not employ violence. They employ rallying, shaming, gossip, mysticism, religion, pseudoscience, and deceit. Which is a much harder form of parasitism to suppress by common law, than violence and theft.

    If we restore rule of law, and we restore truth to the informational commons, then the female strategy of deception, rallying and shaming will again be impossible.

    Testimonial truth, Propertarian ethics, market government: markets in everything.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 10:08:00 UTC

  • IT’S NOT A DEBATE. IT’S A LESSON. —“If you’re still practicing or advocating t

    IT’S NOT A DEBATE. IT’S A LESSON.

    —“If you’re still practicing or advocating the low trust, maximization of efficiency and profits of Rothbardian Ghetto Ethics, then you have to just trust me that you’re wrong. And, “If you don’t like what we tell you to believe in, we’ll kill ya.” It’s not a debate it’s a lesson. A one-way conversation, and that’s how I’m going to carry it forward.”–Sven Sontag

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 09:16:00 UTC

  • THINGS I DIDN’T KNOW: “SH_T POSTING” “sh_it post” The adoption of Marxist/Femini

    THINGS I DIDN’T KNOW: “SH_T POSTING”

    “sh_it post”

    The adoption of Marxist/Feminist propagandism, shouting-down, interference, lying, rallying, shaming in person and in the media, by Conservative/Masculinists and applied to the internet discourse.

    1: Frequent and Numerous

    3: Unconstructive and Unrelated

    6: Antagonistic or Offensive

    8: Sarcastic, Juvenile, Irrational, or Absurd

    10: Text, Image, or Video

    11: That imposes a cost on the existing conversation

    12: As an assertion of disapproval, rebellion, dominance, aggression, or propagandism.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 09:07:00 UTC

  • STUFF I DIDN’T KNOW: “EFFORT POSTING” “effort post” When a poster on an internet

    STUFF I DIDN’T KNOW: “EFFORT POSTING”

    “effort post”

    When a poster on an internet forum writes about their opinion, project, story or otherwise and actually takes the time to properly research, cite sources, and utilize proper diction and grammar, generally as a means to convince, sway, or otherwise argue. Usually the first response is ‘tldr’.

    –comments–

    —“I think that there is an “average post length/effort” that is expected from users on various social networks and comment platforms. These averages depend on the communities inhabiting said platforms. Going over it will be interpreted as effort posting, going under will be interpreted as shitposting.”—

    CD: This may be true, but shitposting is a tactic employed by the alt-right for the same purpose as marxists: increasing transaction costs of alliance building.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 08:54:00 UTC

  • ABOUT THE ALT RIGHT MYSELF. I get sh__t for this but, I see the world through cl

    http://www.dailystormer.com/a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right/LEARNING ABOUT THE ALT RIGHT MYSELF.

    I get sh__t for this but, I see the world through class-glasses, and I see the Alt Right as a largely middle and working class movement. And I see my work as New Right (good for mankind) not just my own people.

    I learned more from this Daily Stormer overview of the Alt-Right (none of which I had any experience with) than I have from a few years of being tangentially aware of it.

    http://www.dailystormer.com/a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right/

    I didn’t know 80% of what’s in the article. And I see class expression in the movement which can easily spread to the other classes. And perhaps that’s my affinity for it. Because I’m benefitting from the momentum that economy, demography, and alt-right angst has made.

    I’m not exactly working or middle class. I’ve been a 1%-er for a long time. Although at the present moment I’m certainly not. lol. I have a definite martial sensibility in that aristocracy, generals, and officers are responsible for the soldiery, the militia, and the citizenry even at cost to ourselves. And that bearing this cost is what we refer to as ‘heroism’. Whether that heroism be demontrated by immediate action and sacrifice, the cost of commons and war, or the constant subtle policing of nature, commons, family, and individual.

    In the early 90’s I simply wanted to give conservatives a language for discussing their ancient civilization in rational and scientific terms. Because I have an autistic dislike of irrational argument, and an autistic near hatred of artificial conflict. So I have been working on this problem since at least 1992, if not back to when I was writing radical right work in the 1980’s.

    So I consider my work the New Right, and global. The fact that we discovered the technology of incremental domestication through truth, science, and natural common law, doesn’t mean that any other people can’t do so, and raise themselves from human-animal, to human, to transcendent man.

    But the fact that the conservative population, the alt-right, the more genteel paleolibertarians, and the more academic New Right, are all moving in the same direction is a beautiful thing.

    And of those classes we must understand that it is the Alt Right classes who will FIGHT. And the rest of us are just members of the intellectual supply chain.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 08:26:00 UTC