Source: Facebook

BETWEEN ONE AND THREE PERCENT OF THE POPULATION.

The bottom is more costly than the top is beneficial.

Those that are unemployable are not unemployable because of intelligence, but because of anti-social-behavior. Much of which is driven by the inability of individuals to tolerate their position in life due to dominance bias.

This unemployability percentage varies from group to group with the higher the intelligence distribution appearing to produce smaller numbers, and the lower the intelligence distribution appearing to produce much higher numbers.

However, in whites, we seem to have a higher distribution of neuroticism, (and high rates of depression) and in jews we seem to have disproportionate psychological problems across the spectrum but particularly in schizophrenia, manic depression, and depression. I have no meaningful data on asians or Hispanics (Mestizos) or their underclass the Carribean’s. But as far as I know blacks and jews carry disproportionate levels of mental illness in their genes.

(There is a bit of data out there on this subject but we are talking about very NOISY stuff here. Mostly because of who uses medical care and who doesn’t varies a great deal. But as far as I’m able to ascertain, schizoprhenia – which is the end result of the depressive spectrum – seems disproportionatly in blacks and jews)

Now the data says about what you would expect if you control for population sizes and access to health care:

Amerindians

Mixed Race.

Whites

Blacks

Hispanics

Asians

But this says nothing more than who has insurance, government insurance, and can benefit from using it.

The only measures I know of that are reliable are cases of hospitalization for schizophrenia, and the genetic markers for it.

There is enough research at this point to show that across a body of research, conclusions are the same.

—“Research showed a clear pattern wherein African Americans continued to display a long-term increased rate of Schizophrenia diagnoses, often three to four times as high compared to Euro-Americans. As speculated by previous researchers, Latino Americans were also disproportionately diagnosed at a more than three times higher rate than Euro-Americans with a Schizophrenia diagnosis. In consideration of a psychotic disorder diagnosis more generally, African Americans were more likely to be diagnosed than Euro-Americans. Latino Americans and African Americans both showed an increased lifetime rate of psychotic symptoms in comparison to Euro-Americans and Asians, as reported by clinicians. Even African American and Latino American minor consumers under the age of 18 were twice as likely to be diagnosed with a psychotic disorder as Euro-American youth.”—

So intelligence distribution is a fairly good proxy except in the case of jews who carry a disproportionate genetic burden which some (jewish) authors have used to explain jewish CULTURAL paranoia mirroring white female MALE paranoia.

Or, from my rather reductivitist position: by selecting for memory, literacy and verbal acuity jews have bred for and adapted to the female reproductive strategy.

(Which I like to remind people is not a cognitive one, but an intuitionistic one. All our tribes do what we bred for. Our genders do what we evolved for. )

ANd that rule of law and market fascism will solve this problem over time.

BACK TO THE TOPIC

the point being that our failure to preserve institutional methods of limiting the intergenerational damage of ‘carriers’ has been detrimental to our society. And that all forms of redistributino that we have engaged in, and all forms of immigration that we have engaged in, have done nothing more than impose costs at the bottom that the top – without 500 years of evolutionary technologica advantage over th e world – will eventually reduce our standard of living for all.