Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • (diary entry) (You know, I love my god, but sometimes I wish he would use a litt

    (diary entry)

    (You know, I love my god, but sometimes I wish he would use a little less … unpleasant means … of telling me what I need to do next. … Now, I admit that it is very hard to get through my thick skull and past the autism-barrier. And sure, I admit that I get stuck on sidetracks easily. And I admit most of all that I am resistant to changes in context. But given that I have devoted my entire life to his service. And despite the fact that he seems to be very demanding, and not terribly kind, you would think he would drop solutions and encouragement a little more obviously in my lap than the rather circuitous and painful route he almost always chooses. I am not selfish enough to think that he is testing me. I don’t think I have all that much agency anyway – I think I am merely a resource that will serve a purpose or be expended in trying. But the whole whip-the-boy-until-he-does-it kind of thing just seems … less productive than more proactive methods might be. … Now you see, I believe in god, I talk to god every day. I pray to him frequently. It’s a pretty personal relationship. But my god is nothing like the gods of Semites. That is just a stage costume or the masses. If I read history, he is far more like one of the original British, Germanic, Norse, and Greco-roman gods. And about as charming – so to speak. But it works for me. )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 14:19:00 UTC

  • “Until now, we only had tradition and historical analogical and moral argument o

    —“Until now, we only had tradition and historical analogical and moral argument on the conservative side to counter consumptive (parasitic, dysgenic) tendencies in word and deed, in contradistinction to productive (self-sufficient, eugenic) tendencies in word and deed. But we do have now the basis for judging behavior in the DAP (Default Aggression Principle: either productively trade or be conquered and domesticated), the NPP (Non-Parasitism Principle: non-imposition of costs against property-in-toto), and the requirement for productive, voluntary, fully-informed, warrantied exchange limited to externalities of the same criteria, and we have the ratio-scientific language to clearly communicate those judgments in operational language to all, regardless of their various biases and (limited) abilities, and we have the means by which to enforce all of this in the organized application of violence.

    Testimonialism provided the missing middle piece to connect the judgment and the means of enforcement, and moreover it makes experiences and the recipes that produce them commensurate across minds, thereby removing previously crippling limits on individual and group calculation, and thus action.” — Moritz Bierling

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 11:54:00 UTC

  • We had this wonderful Indian guy Vivek Upadayhay for a long time and he’s appare

    We had this wonderful Indian guy Vivek Upadayhay for a long time and he’s apparently dropped off FB (or blocked me?). Anyone know about him?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 09:51:00 UTC

  • THE REASON IT’S HARD TO UNDERSTAND: UNIFYING EXISTING CONCEPTS RATHER THAN EXPLA

    THE REASON IT’S HARD TO UNDERSTAND: UNIFYING EXISTING CONCEPTS RATHER THAN EXPLAINING EACH OF THEM TO YOU.

    My work in Sovereignty, Testimonialism, Propertarianism, Market Government, Competitive Domestication of Man, and Transcendence, has been one of unifying fields that have, for centuries, been separated by different means of decision making – and often different languages.

    If you notice, and you likely will, I use sequences of terms, spectrum diagrams, parallel developments, and evolutionary processes to illustrate that those ideas that seem unrelated are merely subsets of properties of reality that in different fields, we inspect for a specific purpose. But that reality as we can understand it (and it’s pretty accurate it seems), is regular, consistent, and operates by very simple rules.

    So, you can think of normal fields, each of which addresses some subset of reality, as someone who, at best is talking to you with limited experience or understanding (a well-intentioned fool); and at worst, is someone who is deceiving you by overloading you by selectively giving you information in order to dishonestly persuade you to assist him in achieving his unstated ends. In other words – telling only part of the story. (defrauding you.).

    So then I come along and use terms from pretty much EVERY field. Because each field addresses some subset of the properties of reality. And instead of explaining all these terms from all these fields, I expect that you are at least familiar with them enough, that you can see the similarities that I draw between these ideas and the fields they come from, by using sequences of terms, spectrum diagrams, parallel developments and evolutionary processes.

    And then I give a name to the pattern we identified by the similarities across those fields by either more clearly defining a prior term (like truth, ethics and morality and law) or I create a new name (like testimonialism) where I try to capture the ACTIONS rather than the experiences that prior (more mystical) eras relied upon.

    Wherever possible I try to clarify existing terms rather than invent new ones. Or if similar terms exist, I choose the one that is the most accurate rather than the most common or popular. And if nothing exists that isn’t either wrong or deceptive, I will construct one out of near terms. And that is the best that I can do.

    So that is why it is very hard to come into Sovereignty, Testimonialism, Propertarianism, Market Government, Competitive Domestication of Man, and Transcendence, – what I call Propertarianism (which is itself only the ethics in my work ). Becuase it requires a great deal of knowledge to show RELATIONSHIPS that describe the entirety of reality in a common, amoral, demonstrable and observable, language.

    So you find people who have the easiest time, are those with a finance and economics familiarity, but have also some non-trivial experience in the physical sciences.

    It’s not easy. But if you want to be able to save western civilization from the Second Great Lie, and to do so by prosecuting the liars and their useful idiots in all walks of life; or if you are a warrior who wants to implement sustainable change to restore our civilization; or if you are simply someone who wants to understand what the prosecutors and warriors are doing, then you are learning a new language: the language of COMPLETE SCIENCE rather than the various languages of incomplete sciences.

    And learning languages with new concepts is hard.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 09:49:00 UTC

  • PEOPLE DON’T WANT TO PAY THE COST OF TRUTH – BECAUSE WE HAVE DIFFERENT ABILITIES

    PEOPLE DON’T WANT TO PAY THE COST OF TRUTH – BECAUSE WE HAVE DIFFERENT ABILITIES – AND INCREASES IN TRUTH ARE INCREASINGLY EXPENSIVE

    *Want > Justification > Critical Rationalism > Testimonialism*

    I have found that outside of people with university training in the physical sciences, that converting people from justificationism (particularly moral) to critical rationalism, is almost impossible.

    Yet I understand completely why: CR is a far more ‘expensive’ cognitive strategy – it’s almost a ‘privilege of those with ability’.

    The purpose of knowledge is action. And we all differ in the actions that we need to want to make, prefer to make, and joyously make.

    So the fact that we want, prefer, and take joy from, the action of seeking increasingly challenging methods of decision making, is in itself a privilege of ability, education, and rank.

    Now, try to take a Critical Rationalist and convert him to a Testimonialist, and you’ll encounter the same problem.

    Why? Because just as the cost of Critical Rationalist knowledge imposes a cost on the fulfillment of satisfaction by those seeking ends by justificationary means, the cost of Testimonialist Knowledge imposes a cost on the fulfillment of satisfaction by those seeking ends by Critical Rationalist means.

    Because the Critical Rationalist wants to preserve his discounts on the consequences of his speech, just like the justificationist wants to preserve the discounts on the consequences of his actions.

    METHODS OF MORAL DECIDABILITY

    To Act: Justificationism (disputes over actions)

    To Know: Critical Rationalism (disputes over persuasion)

    To Judge: Testimonialism (disputes over consequences)

    JUSTIFICATIONISM

    Justification isn’t true either logically or empirically – it’s a selection bias for action within normative limits.

    CRITICAL RATIONALISM

    Critical Preference isn’t empirically true – it’s a selection bias.

    Critical Rationalism isn’t complete – it’s a selection bias for action within cost-less (scientific) limits.

    TESTIMONIALISM

    Testimonialism is, as far as I know, empirically true, and informationally complete. It’s a selection bias for action within the scope of what is actionable by man.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 09:21:00 UTC

  • OUR GENERATION’S MISSION: PREVENT ANOTHER DARK AGE The left (Jewish Cosmopolitan

    OUR GENERATION’S MISSION: PREVENT ANOTHER DARK AGE

    The left (Jewish Cosmopolitanism and Puritan Feminism) has failed in every generation to succeed by persuasion, revolution, demonstration, moral narrative. And almost succeeded – since 1965 – by creating more clients for the state, and using the state to impose their pseudoscientific religion upon us, through massive immigration of the underclasses that we have worked for millennia to rid ourselves of.

    Make no mistake: this is how the destroyed western civilization the first time: through Jewish monotheistic mysticism, and the forcible takeover of the rational state by Justinian’s eastern (non-european) church. And the last time they gave us a dark age.

    It is up to the men of our current generations to restore truth and science and reason, and rule of natural law, and to outlaw this new pseudoscientific religion, or we may lose all of europe to it again. And if we do, another dark age as bad or worse than the last may truncate our ambitions to transcend the animal man to the stars, and the gods we seek to be.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 08:23:00 UTC

  • “The NYT died a long time ago. It’s been a propaganda organ for forces of displa

    —“The NYT died a long time ago. It’s been a propaganda organ for forces of displacement by immigration ever since. …. Its persistence depends upon the calculation-gap that the Left’s anti-social parasites rely on: they still have accumulated western genetic, cultural, institutional, and territorial capital they’re burning through before this American project finally fails and they can’t mathematically or economically support propaganda anymore”— Josh Jeppson

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 08:17:00 UTC

  • (note to self) FRENCH MATERNAL LINES (Farmers) — France>NovaScotia>Quebec>Maine

    (note to self)

    FRENCH MATERNAL LINES (Farmers)

    — France>NovaScotia>Quebec>Maine>Connecticut

    — Sirois : Sih-ROY, or SEER-oh-way in the states.

    — Theriault, Theery-o, or Tair-ee-oh in the states

    — Ouellette, (her line English Wells origin) Well-ET.

    — Blanchette, Blann-SHET

    Emma Sirois married Eugene Theriault 1900.

    Delia Blanchette married Joseph Ouellette.

    Maternal line Family history is all written but it is in french and i cannot read it – and the author (a great uncle) is too aged to translate it.

    The only English I’ve been able to read is about these people Theriault and his sons, and these were good ‘Gaulish’ men that were diligent in helping others in the community (village so to speak) with one story (newspaper) that they would check on town families after deep snow and help dig them out or bring them supplies.

    Although my Grandmother was a font of stories about growing up in an era of horses and wagons, where we still lived ‘the old way’. Including scarlett fever, and the spanish flu. Houses burning down from lamps and candles. Large families in small houses. Sleeping three in a bed to keep warm.

    My mother’s side is ‘very french’ and very ‘farmer-class’ – so much so that for the WASP side of the family – including me – other than my grandmother, most of that side of the family was ‘alien’. The women would get together, cook, and I would sit under the kitchen table listening to them. (My mother has a Master’s Degree. But I doubt there are many degrees, entrepreneurs, authors, preachers, lawyers, soldiers, and generals before her generation like there are on my paternal side.

    My English Upper Middle-Class Martial Class Puritan Protestant father was threatened with disinheritance if he married my French earth-working Class Near-Serfdom Class Catholic mother.

    My Maternal grandfather was a big strong man with a Gaul’s nose. His English was passable, but his hearing was damaged by one of the illnesses early in the century, so he was incomprehensible to me.

    When young looked far more like my English and Scandinavian heritage but as I age I realize that I increasingly look like one of the (severe, judgmental) Sirois – who my mother has no kind words for.

    My Sister Ellen and I have more Scandinavian, and my other sister Jean more French. And I find this whole gene expression thing fascinating. I wish that the Jewish pseudoscientists had been less effective selling Boaz, Freud, and Cultural Marxism to the unwashed and generations of women newly liberated from housework by electricity and machines.

    Fascinating that in a century we have made such a great change.

    interesting that the cause of it is petroleum products. And that the resource is not infinite or sustainable.

    We forget that oil is equivalent to our discovery of Mastodon’s – and that while we can survive on either, they both can run out.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 08:08:00 UTC

  • REASON TO LOVE RUSSIANS

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3898104/Russian-vet-kills-cheating-wife-castrates-best-friend-catching-bed-her.htmlANOTHER REASON TO LOVE RUSSIANS

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 01:15:00 UTC

  • AWESOME!!!! —“NYT reports 95.7% fall in quarterly profit…”

    AWESOME!!!!

    —“NYT reports 95.7% fall in quarterly profit…”—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 20:51:00 UTC