Source: Facebook

  • ON INTELLIGENCE AND CHARACTER IN POPULATIONS (it’s all domestication) IQ = Intel

    ON INTELLIGENCE AND CHARACTER IN POPULATIONS

    (it’s all domestication)

    IQ = Intelligence Quotient. Meaning the weighted test of demonstrated velocity of problem solving and knowledge accumulation, in both the spatial-temporal and verbal articulation abilities – which while a subset of the (large, perhaps 80-ish) number of various capabilities of the human brain, appears to provide a marginally indifferent measure – apparently because all other abilities seem to scale roughly with those two.

    Moreover, for reasons we are beginning to understand, the distribution of sexual dimorphism (androgens), and the degree of paedomorphic domestication, seems to influence the distribution of these talents in each population with feminine verbal skill and greater number of tasks and male greater spatial skill and greater specialization being general trends both of which are visible in prevalence of female solipsism and male autism. So if we control for sexual dimorphism, we control for depth and rate of sexual maturity, and we control for the success and shrinking the underclasses through agrarianism and climate, we seem to provide a sufficient explanation of the differences in all races and tribes and classes and genders by fairly simple selection processes whereby our cultural habits have greater and more rapid evolutionary dynamics than random mutation or (minimal if at all) epigenetic mutation.

    In other words, we’ve been domesticating each other for a couple million years, thereby incrementally delaying or limiting maturity, and then selecting for male or female(Slavic and northern European and Chinese) and male (African and middle eastern, and steppe) biases based largely upon climate, disease gradient, and means of agrarian production.

    And it seems that through selection and eugenics (aggressive hanging in the west, and aggressive killing in the east) plus the softer eugenics of diligence required for both rice farming and farming through 50th latitude winters, plus the western delay of reproduction until able to obtain access to land under manorialism – allowing women to work – at least since the 700’s if not 1500bc, that some groups have just been superior at limiting their underclasses, while redistributing reproduction upward to their middle (genetic, not economic) classes.

    The universe operates by very simple rules. We just make excuses for what’s necessary in the circumstance and call it ‘moral’.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 08:56:00 UTC

  • CLASS HIERARCHY IN WESTERN POLYTHEISM 1 – WARFARE – limitation on external chang

    CLASS HIERARCHY IN WESTERN POLYTHEISM

    1 – WARFARE – limitation on external change to the status quo (highly intolerant of error) an authoritarian organization of mandatory allies against other organizations of allies.

    2 – NATURAL COMMON LAW – limitation on internal change in the status quo (social science) (intolerant of error) and taking advantage of institutional allies.

    3 – PHYSICAL SCIENCE – Upper Middle-class investigation of truth for use in changing the status quo (pragmatic with error) and authoritative accumulation of allies.

    4 – ECONOMIC SCIENCE – Middle class (partly) pseudoscience, (partly) science, and (partly) philosophy for use in changing the status quo – arguably for the worse.

    5 – PHILOSOPHY – Middle-Class Appeal for change or affirmation of the status quo. (largely error, signaling, and deceit – persuasive accumulation of allies)

    6 – LITERATURE – Clerical Class visions of alternatives to the status quo (conciliatory romantic appeal to allies)

    7 – PSEUDOSCIENCE-PSEUDORATIONALISM – working class rebellion against the status quo – seeking other similar allies.

    8 – RELIGION – underclass escape from the material status quo by alliance with those below it.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 08:31:00 UTC

  • THE SMARTEST PARAGRAPH I’VE READ IN A LONG TIME —“War/out-group competition —

    THE SMARTEST PARAGRAPH I’VE READ IN A LONG TIME

    —“War/out-group competition –> the evolution of cooperation as a means of being better competitors –> coevolution: the more we domesticated the better we cooperated the better we were at competition –> group strategies –> language as justification for group strategies –> Postmodernism: industrial production of lies –> Propertarianism: Truth Sovereignty, Transcendence (tying it all together)” — James Augustus Berens

    Thank you James. You just contributed to Propertarianism.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 06:54:00 UTC

  • THE PURPOSE OF COOPERATION IS WAR The evolutionary benefit of cooperation was to

    THE PURPOSE OF COOPERATION IS WAR

    The evolutionary benefit of cooperation was to improve our ability to make war. Against alphas. Against other groups of humans. Against prey. War accelerates evolution.

    It was only after we had succeeded at war for a very long time, that we developed cooperation in the division of labor. The division of labor is the result of war.

    (thx to @Ryan Montague for putting this at the top of my thoughts)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 06:42:00 UTC

  • Why? Because the people who fight are the people who matter

    Why? Because the people who fight are the people who matter.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 06:30:00 UTC

  • THE FIRST QUESTIONS OF SENTIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, ETHICS, POLITICS: BUYING OPTIONS (

    THE FIRST QUESTIONS OF SENTIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, ETHICS, POLITICS: BUYING OPTIONS

    (important)

    —“I agree with Camus that suicide is the pre-eminent philosophical question. On a macro scale, the question is whether or not you realize the paradox of the unproductive needing the productive, the productive not needing the unproductive, yet the unproductive seeking the demise of the productive, and ultimately themselves. The left has chosen suicide. For both themselves, and us, if we allow it.”—Ryan Montague

    Excellent way of positioning it. I need to play with this a bit. Because I’ve used the first two, and talked about the third, but not taken your jump and merged it with Camus’.

    THE FIRST QUESTION OF SENTIENCE

    why and how do we think? – we select the option that produces the most options, meaning the largest number of associations. And at each moment we repeat. then we remember our option buying as planning. so we save memory. and we can repeat the process.

    THE FIRST QUESTION OF PHILOSOPHY

    why do I not commit suicide? – we are buying more options on reproduction, and that of our kin.

    THE FIRST QUESTION OF ETHICS

    why do we not kill you and take your stuff? – we are buying more options on survival from the discounts of cooperation.

    THE FIRST QUESTION OF POLITICS

    Why do we let the parasitic reproduce? – they are buying options on survival in some form with greater numbers, and we are buying discounts on current expenditures of effort. And in turn buying more options.

    Religion and philosophy start with an optimistic bias out of the in-group assumption of the benefits of cooperation. But that optimistic benefit of cooperation is in service of the unforgiving process of reproduction and evolution.

    Evolution (Kinship) isn’t an optimistic bias. It’s as physical an accounting system as is entropy in physics.

    Curt Doolittle,

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy,

    The Propertarian Institute.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 06:29:00 UTC

  • “Is this group mostly male? Why?”—Whitney (in another academic philosophy grou

    —“Is this group mostly male? Why?”—Whitney

    (in another academic philosophy group)

    Answer

    1) at this level of discourse (iq) there are at least 2 men for every woman.

    2) philosophy (argument) is competitive and analytic and women and men differ in self-selection for competitive/cooperative, experiential/analytic preferences.

    3) men and women signal and practice-signal by different means for different purposes, and men and women self-select to pursue them.

    4) men and women differ in the number of interests they pursue where women choose more and specialize less and men the opposite.

    That’s why.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 23:27:00 UTC

  • Just stop taking people at face value. We are all gene machines. In order to coo

    Just stop taking people at face value. We are all gene machines. In order to cooperate we seek an optimistic engagement with others lest we miss an opportunity for gain in present or future. But that isn’t what the left is trying to do. They’re trying to create a debt without giving you anything in the first place. They’re just parasites. Their genes are just talking to you from a position of unfitness.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 22:07:00 UTC

  • Communism: the dreams of sheep herders forced from their land, unable to obtain

    Communism: the dreams of sheep herders forced from their land, unable to obtain and hold new land, trying to pretend they can have land by doing more of the same.

    The definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over again despite the fact that it doesn’t work.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 21:38:00 UTC

  • (I got a couple of relatives where he was handsome and she was beautiful when th

    (I got a couple of relatives where he was handsome and she was beautiful when they were young. But today they look rode hard and put away wet’. …. Often. I’ve had three major illnesses. And sure I’ve got good genes, but no cigarettes, no alcohol, no recreational drugs, and cutting down dramatically on the ‘rushing’ make a big difference. If it wasn’t for my ex’s lawyer and the government trying to kill me off I’d look a lot better. I see it everywhere. Cigarettes, Alcohol, Sunshine, too much sugar, and insufficient sleep. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 21:24:00 UTC