THE REASON IT’S HARD TO UNDERSTAND: UNIFYING EXISTING CONCEPTS RATHER THAN EXPLA

THE REASON IT’S HARD TO UNDERSTAND: UNIFYING EXISTING CONCEPTS RATHER THAN EXPLAINING EACH OF THEM TO YOU.

My work in Sovereignty, Testimonialism, Propertarianism, Market Government, Competitive Domestication of Man, and Transcendence, has been one of unifying fields that have, for centuries, been separated by different means of decision making – and often different languages.

If you notice, and you likely will, I use sequences of terms, spectrum diagrams, parallel developments, and evolutionary processes to illustrate that those ideas that seem unrelated are merely subsets of properties of reality that in different fields, we inspect for a specific purpose. But that reality as we can understand it (and it’s pretty accurate it seems), is regular, consistent, and operates by very simple rules.

So, you can think of normal fields, each of which addresses some subset of reality, as someone who, at best is talking to you with limited experience or understanding (a well-intentioned fool); and at worst, is someone who is deceiving you by overloading you by selectively giving you information in order to dishonestly persuade you to assist him in achieving his unstated ends. In other words – telling only part of the story. (defrauding you.).

So then I come along and use terms from pretty much EVERY field. Because each field addresses some subset of the properties of reality. And instead of explaining all these terms from all these fields, I expect that you are at least familiar with them enough, that you can see the similarities that I draw between these ideas and the fields they come from, by using sequences of terms, spectrum diagrams, parallel developments and evolutionary processes.

And then I give a name to the pattern we identified by the similarities across those fields by either more clearly defining a prior term (like truth, ethics and morality and law) or I create a new name (like testimonialism) where I try to capture the ACTIONS rather than the experiences that prior (more mystical) eras relied upon.

Wherever possible I try to clarify existing terms rather than invent new ones. Or if similar terms exist, I choose the one that is the most accurate rather than the most common or popular. And if nothing exists that isn’t either wrong or deceptive, I will construct one out of near terms. And that is the best that I can do.

So that is why it is very hard to come into Sovereignty, Testimonialism, Propertarianism, Market Government, Competitive Domestication of Man, and Transcendence, – what I call Propertarianism (which is itself only the ethics in my work ). Becuase it requires a great deal of knowledge to show RELATIONSHIPS that describe the entirety of reality in a common, amoral, demonstrable and observable, language.

So you find people who have the easiest time, are those with a finance and economics familiarity, but have also some non-trivial experience in the physical sciences.

It’s not easy. But if you want to be able to save western civilization from the Second Great Lie, and to do so by prosecuting the liars and their useful idiots in all walks of life; or if you are a warrior who wants to implement sustainable change to restore our civilization; or if you are simply someone who wants to understand what the prosecutors and warriors are doing, then you are learning a new language: the language of COMPLETE SCIENCE rather than the various languages of incomplete sciences.

And learning languages with new concepts is hard.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine