https://twitter.com/BrittPettibone/status/848364343661953024/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=849850930082324481Retweeted Brittany Pettiboneš¹ (@BrittPettibone):
Perception vs reality. https://t.co/sqKHckrA1X
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-06 01:07:00 UTC
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-beyer/a-safe-space-for-white-pe_b_13227466.html?ncid=engmodushpmg00000003
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-06 01:00:00 UTC
—“Pure individualism fails because individuals die, it’s a short-term strategy.
Civilizations survive much longer.
A short-term (immature) thinker will seek a strategy by which they may benefit as an individual (socialism/libertarianism). (Muh Rights)
A long-term (mature) thinker will seek a strategy by which their group may benefit as Kin.
Hence why the mature thinkers can’t allow the immature to control society, for they will parasitically consume it for their own individual benefit at cost to our Kin.
And this is why so many of us seem to have developed such bloodlust for the commies and the underclasses, for if we don’t defend our civilization, no one will.”—Joel Davis
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-06 00:37:00 UTC
—“I am beginning to see the other side of the argument more clearly, though. It’s not ‘lying’. If a value system survives the Darwinian test, then it is useful or ‘true enough’. So far as I can tell, p13m isn’t able to provide us with the top level values, unless maybe that value is agency/sovereignty.”— William Butchman
Is agency (transcendence). Sovereignty, natural law, and markets in everything are the way to get there. REALLY. In reality. not as a lie.
And I do understand why you want to make exceptions for lies of convenience, but when you do, you open the door for lies of parasitism and destruction. The west has been destroyed twice now through (a) judeo-christianity, and (b) jewish pseudoscience.
I just don’t think it’s necessary to claim that which is GOOD is TRUE. It is not. Just as what is preferable is not GOOD. It is just preferable.
I think that it is possible to find binding narratives as did the ancients in our literature. Homer, Arthur, Neibelungelied. Alexander, Caesar, … the lot of them. The scientists. The saints. Why is it we need lies when we have truths with which to say the same things?
Will people visit a church (school, academy, property registry, insurer of last resort) if they are taught the semitic lies? Or will they if they are taught our law, and our narratives, and our literature to support them.
There is no reason that the books that make up the west, are not just as possible to select (and eliminate) as were the books of the bible, or the verses of any other religion.
The counter is to say that the west has no worthy literature of its own.
Paganism survived until the 1500’s in northern europe.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-06 00:30:00 UTC
Any system of decidability that is not explicitly right will, by increment, evolve into explicitly left, fully discretionary, and fully incalculable.
Natural law is explicitly right, and non-discretionary, and fully calculable.
In this sense I see religion as having the permission of the Sovereignty and the Court, but that is all. Religion does not get a pass on lying.
Via-negativa removes falsehoods that allow us to more cost effectively discover a value system – especially by avoiding those that will fail, and those that are predatory.
In other words, once you have surpassed human scale it is more beneficial to use via-negativa and markets than via-positiva and concentration of capital.
Just as we need multiple languages to talk to multiple layers of ability (classes), and just as we need multiple states to serve the interests of multiple layers of tribes; and just as we need multiple sciences to break the world into parts that we can disassemble; and just as we need multiple economies (military (slave), commons (serf), union(unskilled labor), market (producers), and finance (gamblers), we need multiple NARRATIVES just as we always have: the religious for the weak, the philosophical for the able, and the heroic for the superior.
Those narratives already exist. The problem is thinking Your’re everyone (democracy and equality) rather than the member of a class.
The universe may be beyond human scale, but the scope of action available to humans of different ability varies dramatically from those who can barely care for themselves, to those that can care for others, to those that can manage others, to those that can organize others, to those that can organize many, to those that can advocate for as many as they can serve.
Choose the tool that serves the scale that is possible for you.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-06 00:16:00 UTC
Um. we are supposed to be smart people. There is no law of war. there are on the other hand agreements. And there are international agreements. And almost without exception international agreements rely upon natural law (non-provocation). Spain is violating the principle of non-provocation, and violating the principle of natural law, where natural law is the method of decidabilty we use in international agreements, the purpose of which is to ensure non-provocation, and therefore a reduction of war. Spain is attempting to reclaim Gibraltar but it is (as most weak nations do) a bit of theatre for the voters and nothing more. The people of Gibraltar are british citizens, they desire to be (who wouldn’t), the territory is British by long tradition and mutual agreement, and britan could eradicate the entirety of the spanish navy, airforce and army as a training exercise.
So lets be the smart people. Spain violated britan’s territorial waters in an effort to defend the pride of the voters.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-05 22:33:00 UTC
( bad humor )
—“a photo of Rachael Maddow is the image the emergency room shows you when your erection lasts more than four hours.”—
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-05 22:25:00 UTC
I told ya we’d kill libertarianism. We got every intellectually honest libertarian. We sent the left-libertarians home where they belong. We restored violence to the discourse. And left the douchebag pussies in the cold where they belong – whining for mommy while chanting nap nap nap.
There are still weak men everywhere. But they are intellectually, morally, spiritually, and physically weak. They will have to find another lie to comfort them
Libertinism (rothbardian libertarianism), is dead.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-05 21:42:00 UTC
Kant has a special place in hell for restoring plato and ensuring that the scientific revolution was given an alternative.
Aristotle, and the victors – description: history, and science.
Plato and the germans – imaginary fiction
Aquinas and the Rest – supernatural fiction
As far as I can tell,
if you are not very bright you choose religion.
If you are able to at least read well you choose platonism (idealism)
If you are able to calculate you choose science.
Why? because the difficulty in the employment of reason to obtain decidability increases as you increase the form of communication.
There is nothing to be found in philosophy worth finding. And kant and the cancers of thought that he gave rise to both german, jewish , russian, and french are the source of the pseudorationalism that has destroyed philosophy and relegated it to western religion.
And worse, it gave technology of argument to the jews, who, just as Kant preserved christianity in transforming it into pseudorational verse, the jews transformed pilpul into jewish law, and jewish law into pseudosciences: boazian anthropology, marxist sociology and economics, freudian psychology, Frankfurt anti-aesthetics, cantorian mathematics, and the anglo crime built upon it, keynesian economics.
Time travel literature: Kill zoroaster if not, Kill abraham if not, kill plato, if not, Kill Justinian and Constantine, if not Kill Aquinas, if not kill Rousseu, if not Kill Kant, if not Kill marx, frued, boaz, weil and all the frankfurt school.
READ THE SCIENCE
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-05 21:32:00 UTC
CAN YOU FIND THE LANGUAGE YOU NEED?
At number of people that I am close to, and who understand propertarianism well enough, have intuited, suggested, complained, or passionately argued, that a negative philosophy is not sufficient for them, because they intuit, want, and need ‘more’ than via-negativa on the one hand, and transcendence on the other. These people feel the need for a narrative that they can use to visualize, empathize with, some intuition or ideal.
I’ve seen others attempt to appropriate propertarianism to justify their priors only to realize that it helps explain but does not justify, and may ultimately falsify good portions of those priors. (Libertarians).
I’ve seen others who understand that natural law gives license for us to use violence to overthrow the current order, and restore our aristocratic order – whether or not the understand the epistemology, ethics, or anything else I’ve written.
I’ve seen others with religious conviction thrilled at the possibility of restoring our ancient order, only to be horrified that in restoring the church I would eradicate all semitic fictionalism (lying), and return to hero worship, of not only saints (submissives-reactors), but innovators (thinkers), and Warriors and Statesmen (dominants-actors). In other words, I would complete the reformation of christianity into a restoration of our native religion (Aryanism) that the Germans had tried to make.
A very small number of us just wish to understand, and to take power, and if necessary, to rule. I have produced what I want: a method of reforming the government. I
I’ve tried for the past two years, mostly at Josh’s insistence to solve this problem. And I have remained fairly constant in my intuition that we must supply narratives in multiple languages on top of natural law. And I think this is the challenge for those who understand but must either compose or select which narratives do that for them.
I believe that the only monopoly is the laws: the laws of nature, the laws of the limits of man, the laws of cooperation, and the law of testimony (truth). And that the only form of social order compatible with those laws is sovereignty, natural law, and markets in everything, as I have stated many times before.
I believe that we require a division of narrative as much as we have a division of comprehension. I believe that our ancestors were correct and it was their failure to discover natural law that made them vulnerable to the great lies.
I believe I can suggest a method of reforming the church both financially, institutionally, in doctrine, and in narratives.
I believe the restoration of that church will require the return to poly-heroism instead of a monopoly on submissiveness by the prophets and saints.
I believe it is necessary to restore poly-‘literature’ rather than monotheism, or any kind of theism. Although I can understand the need for theistic (supernatural) fiction, just as I myself understand and appreciate moral supernatural fiction (horror stories, scary legends, and myths).
I believe it is possible (although not by me alone) to select readings that advance narrative solutions that are, aside from their fiction, or fictionalism, compatible with natural law.
And I believe the simple need authoritarian supernatural, the ordinary need moral narrative, the average need philosophical narrative, and those of us above average need scientific narratives provided by the laws.
And I believe that these narratives are compatible if compatible by natural law.
And I believe that I cannot select those narratives by myself. I believe I cannot write them. I believe that in our history others have written all that need be written.
And I believe it is those who seek those narratives and who understand natural law sufficiently to judge those narratives moral or not, ‘coherently true’ or not, and not false by natural law, that must provide those readings.
Because I cannot possibly cover those literatures. In no small part because they fall on deaf ears, deaf empathy, deaf joys, and deaf fears. I have none of them
I will have done my duty to my people by writing the laws in the language that I need and understand. I will have done my duty to my class in providing the rules and method of rule. But I am not able to do serve my people in the survey of occult, supernatural, supernormal, heroic, martial, political, historic, poetic, verse – although I can, and in my age, assuming I live – manage the artistic.
The literature of our restoration exists. I have made the law. If you want to restore your civilization, and you want to provide those like you with a narrative, a via-positiva, then perhaps it is your duty, and your service, to your ambitions and your people, that you provide those parables.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-05 21:20:00 UTC