Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Rule of Law = Non-Discretion. Discretion != Rule of Law. One cannot have rule of

    Rule of Law = Non-Discretion. Discretion != Rule of Law.

    One cannot have rule of law, and at the same time, command, legislation, regulation, and judicial interpretation, because command, legislation, regulation, and judicial interpretation are discretionary.

    Nomocracy: Government by Rule of Law.

    How is a nomocracy possible without command, legislation, regulation and judicial interpretation? Markets in everything: Markets for participation, association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and dispute resolution.

    But how do we provide decidability in all those markets? Reciprocity. Why? Because reciprocity always provides decidability.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-24 09:50:00 UTC

  • IS THE UTILITY OF TRUTHFULNESS WORTH THE COST? I was too optimistic. Enthralled

    IS THE UTILITY OF TRUTHFULNESS WORTH THE COST?

    I was too optimistic. Enthralled by my discovery. Desperate to provide my people with a language of self defense.

    People had used the supernatural frame for more than 1500 years, and the supernormal frame before that. Look at what it took to overthrow the church’s lies. It took the restoration of commercial civilization, so that we could sufficiently practice law that once again our contractualism dominated the thought of the classes that possessed any semblance of literacy and agency; and then it took the restoration of greek knowledge, the restoration of greek heroic literature, the restoration of mathematics, and its use on the heavens (scale) to falsify supernaturalism, and a tidal wave of discoveries from descartes’ rediscovery that the universe was open to our comprehension via instruments both physical and logical through darwin, watson, and crick.

    And there are still those who deny Darwin, advance or follow conspiracy theory, informational pseudoscience, social pseudoscience, physical pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, supernaturalism, and the (nihilistic) occult and (optimistic) new age. And our academy, our public intellectuals, and our politicians are as guilty of pseudo-everything as the most vociferous proletarian adamant about the virtues of communism.

    People can’t imagine a world where people speak truthfully because that is the norm, and the grammar of truthful speech is the norm, any more than they could imagine a world free of supernaturalism, any more than they could imagine a world free of shamanism. But we converted from a world of supernaturalism to a world of reason. Even if we were subsequently converted to pseudoscience.

    We still make use of supernatural context, ratio-moral contexts, pseudoscientific contexts, and rarely, scientific contexts.

    It’s not that a people need to be particularly intelligent in order to prosper, to defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity, and to transform the earth if not the universe into an eden. It’s that the formal, informal, informational, and normative institutions that supply the majority of *calculative* power (positive knowledge and negative reduction of ignorance) through the presence of *context*, and the removal of those who cannot use and therefore competitively survive (calculate) under that context that is the problem.

    Truth is disruptive. Because lies create opportunities for discounts and rents. And man excels and identifying and exploiting opportunities for rents.

    So, is it possible to require truthful speech via formal institutional means and from that requirement evolve contexts both informal, informational, and normative?

    Of course it is. It may not seem so to those who don’t practice the discipline every day but it’s rather obvious to me and those others that do use it. I mean, just as we improve tools to improve precision, and improve logical tools (math, programming, simulations, general theories and laws) we improve various institutional and normative contexts – admittedly at a long lag, and sometimes generations. (Meanwhile others improve upon statements of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit which we must also defeat).

    Is it desirable, preferable, utilitarian to demand truth?

    If it will defeat Semiticism (judaism, islam)

    If it will save your civilization?

    if it will save mankind?

    I think so.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-24 08:41:00 UTC

  • “What I’ve interpreted by reading Curt Doolittle’s posts so far regarding Race a

    —“What I’ve interpreted by reading Curt Doolittle’s posts so far regarding Race and IQ. The average IQ of a certain race represents more of an population make up. What portion of a certain race of people possess agency, thus seeking liberty or sovereignty. Aka how much of them can make into the “aristocratic” class. The West(whites), through their strategy(law and culture) effectively culled the lower tier(less beneficial to a cooperative society)gene pool, enough so that they were able to make enough progress to dominate the entire globe. The other races simply didn’t have the chance to do so, hence the difference in average IQ.”— Liu Gx

    Liu Gx : Well, that’s the idea, yes. In addition:

    1) Any group can cull its lower classes through various means – and transcend their median/average IQ. And nationalism will encourage (force) that to occur, while globalism and ‘tolerance’ creates permanent parasitic classes that can eventually overwhelm the aristocratic classes (the curse of

    agrarianism).

    2) Immigration is a MULTIPLIER ON DAMAGES if we look at average iQ and the consequences of decline in average IQ.

    3) Ashkenazi verbal ability, aggression and clannishness, Han spatial ability and conscientiousness, white balance spatial/verbal and creativity and lack of clannishness, african athleticism, extroversion and verbal weakness will always differentiate the groups because these seem to be material differences evident at the extremes.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-24 07:31:00 UTC

  • Education myth: the headstart program: remove the context, remove the demonstrat

    Education myth: the headstart program: remove the context, remove the demonstrated improvements.

    Education myth: put idiots in with exceptionals and they improve. False. Remove the context and restore the natural differences.

    What does all society (markets) do? Sort people by ability.

    What do smart people do? struggle to separate themselves from lesser (more annoying, untrustworthy, accident prone, error-spreading) people.

    People below 90 iq cannot (its just science) make use of democracy, or markets, anything else for that matter. Middle easterners cannot make use of democracy and markets.

    Social pathology takes place in the lower end of the iq scale. And high intelligence is inversely correlated with social pathologies. It’s a linear progression.

    The G-factor (how you process complexity) is not affected by the flynn effect, our white Iq has gone down by 1 standard deviation (15 points) since 1850 according to Nyborg, and Lynn. (I havent asked Flynn).

    It’s really simple. Educational gains whither when exposed to the light of reality. You can harm a child. But you cannot improve him or her. The market seeks truth. Parenting and education are crutches. Once gone the organism reverts to type.

    You want better and smarter children? Less school. Less prepared food. More mom, and exposure to reality. More reading books.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-23 19:16:00 UTC

  • “Libertarian economics is predicted by two factors: high IQ and low Big 5 Agreea

    —“Libertarian economics is predicted by two factors: high IQ and low Big 5 Agreeableness. The so-called Dark Triad are really just a bunch of ways to be low Agreeableness. Psychopathy is just low Agreeableness/low Conscientiousness. Narcissism is low Agreeableness/high Extraversion. Some people are led to libertarian economic positions by extreme smarts, but others just by not giving a tinker’s damn about other people. C’est la vie.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-23 18:54:00 UTC

  • “Our results showed that overall, the use of Facebook was negatively associated

    —“Our results showed that overall, the use of Facebook was negatively associated with well-being. For example, a 1-standard-deviation increase in “likes clicked” (clicking “like” on someone else’s content), “links clicked” (clicking a link to another site or article), or “status updates” (updating one’s own Facebook status) was associated with a decrease of 5%–8% of a standard deviation in self-reported mental health.”—

    Legit.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-23 18:50:00 UTC

  • ( Based stick man and those who fight, spencer, and the McInnes voices own the m

    ( Based stick man and those who fight, spencer, and the McInnes voices own the movement now. Thats the direction of momentum, and path of escalation. It’s an identity and opposition movement. feed the flames. it’s not an intellectual movement, and doesn’t need to be. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-23 18:46:00 UTC

  • This book corresponds with a number of your concept’s Curt Doolittle

    This book corresponds with a number of your concept’s Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-23 14:56:00 UTC

  • A MILITIA IS THE ANSWER. THE MILITIA IS THE SOURCE OF SOVEREIGNTY —“But how is

    A MILITIA IS THE ANSWER. THE MILITIA IS THE SOURCE OF SOVEREIGNTY

    —“But how is sovereignty produced? What are the necessary substrates (material) and predicaments (relations and incentives) for the emergence and sustainable continuation of sovereignty?”—Simon Ström‎

    A condition of sovereignty, is produced by the *incentives* to produce sovereignty, which consist of a large number of men, in a militia, none of which produce or possess sufficient wealth to coerce others into the coercion of others; living in an environment where there are no capital assets of sufficient value with which to make possible sufficient wealth to coerce others into coercing others. Sovereignty is produced by a significant percentage of men, who deny power to any man or men, for any reason.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-23 10:44:00 UTC

  • took much longer to burst than I thought it would. Something unstated: how much

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-22/retail-bubble-has-now-burst-record-8640-stores-are-closing-2017It took much longer to burst than I thought it would. Something unstated: how much those ‘stores’ affected our culture, and how much they created the ‘perception’ of wealth that did not exist. And conversely, how much perception of decline that their closure will create in the populace as we are left looking for common spaces that evolved from parks, to department stores, to malls – to *gone*. An exceptional parable – the twentieth century expressed by retail.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-23 10:10:00 UTC