Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • WESTERN POLYTHEISM AND THE LANGUAGES OF THE CLASSES While truths must exist univ

    WESTERN POLYTHEISM AND THE LANGUAGES OF THE CLASSES

    While truths must exist universally but are invariant (the meaning of a truth), there are also some universal goods (like truth), but many variable and often competing goods (wants and needs).

    And as such we require narratives to explain both the universal truth, the universal good, and the particular goods that are used by each class.

    That said, the strong rule and decide, the burghers organize, produce, distribute, and exchange, and the poor and weak gossip and complain.

    And each tells the story of his class by attributing virtue to his utterances.

    We learn to speak the law of the strong, the philosophy of the utilitarian, and the religion of the weak.

    These are not complicated concepts to master.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 12:10:00 UTC

  • USE THE ARGUMENT TO RECIPROCITY MORE? —“We (the real right) should use the wor

    USE THE ARGUMENT TO RECIPROCITY MORE?

    —“We (the real right) should use the word/concept of reciprocity a lot more in public discourse, because normies intuitively “get” the concept in its most basic form (not the full propertarian use, but the simple idea – e.g. the fact that it is one of Cialdini’s 6 laws of influence, people feel obligated to return good deeds & feel others have an obligation to return good deeds). It is a great way to diffuse the “we are obligated to hand over everything to the brown hordes” assertion. I like to say things like, “I care about 3rd-world immigrants and their children exactly as much as they care about me and my children: not at all.” Or “These people from very different cultures than Western Civ can come colonize our nations as soon as they agree to let us come do the same to their nations.”

    This “bring up the reciprocity principle” exposes the hordes’ strategy for what it really is: nothing but a gimme-dat power-play.

    I know we’re done talking to the left. But tactics like these can demonstrate and reinforce our moral high ground to (not fully red-pilled) righties and normies.”— John Lille

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 12:03:00 UTC

  • CIMMERIANS, SCYTHIANS, AND SLAVS The Cimmerians (also Kimmerians, Greek Κιμμέριο

    CIMMERIANS, SCYTHIANS, AND SLAVS

    The Cimmerians (also Kimmerians, Greek Κιμμέριοι Kimmerioi) are an ancient people, first mentioned in the late 8th century BC in Assyrian records.

    Likely originating in the Pontic steppe and invading by means of the Caucasus, they probably assaulted Urartu, a state in north eastern Anatolia subject to the Neo-Assyrian Empire, in c. 714 BC. They were defeated by Assyrian forces under Sargon II in 705 and turned towards Anatolia, conquering Phrygia in 696/5.

    They reached the height of their power in 652 after taking Sardis, the capital of Lydia; however an invasion of Assyrian controlled Anshan (Persia) was thwarted by the Assyrians. Soon after 619, Alyattes of Lydia defeated them. There are no further mentions of them in historical sources, but it is likely that they settled in Cappadocia.

    They may have been related to either Iranian or Thracian speaking groups which migrated under pressure of the Scythian expansion of the 9th to 8th century BC.

    According to Herodotus, the Cimmerians inhabited the region north of the Caucasus and the Black Sea during the 8th and 7th centuries BC (i.e. what is now Ukraine and Southern Russia), although it isn’t possible to identify the Cimmerians as the bearers of any specific archaeological culture in the region.

    The Scythians were among the earliest peoples to master mounted warfare.

    In the 8th century BC they possibly raided Zhou China. Soon after they expanded westwards and dislodged the Cimmerians from power on the Pontic Steppe. At their peak, Scythians came to dominate the entire steppe zone, stretching from the Carpathian Mountains in the west to central China (Ordos culture) and the south Siberia (Tagar culture) in the east, creating what has been referred to as the first Central Asian nomadic empire.

    They kept herds of horses, cattle, and sheep, lived in tent-covered wagons, and fought with bows and arrows on horseback. They developed a rich culture characterized by opulent tombs, fine metalwork, and a brilliant art style.

    Based in what is modern-day Ukraine, Southern European Russia, and Crimea, the western Scythians were ruled by a wealthy class known as the Royal Scyths.

    The Scythians established and controlled a vast trade network connecting Greece, Persia, India and China, perhaps contributing to the contemporary flourishing of those civilizations.[19] Settled metalworkers made portable decorative objects for the Scythians. These objects survive mainly in metal, forming a distinctive Scythian art.

    In the 7th century BC the Scythians crossed the Caucasus and frequently raided the Middle East along with the Cimmerians, playing an important role in the political developments of the region. Around 650–630 BC, Scythians briefly dominated the Medes of the western Iranian Plateau, stretching their power all the way to the borders of Egypt.

    After losing control over Media the Scythians continued intervening in Middle Eastern affairs, playing a leading role in the destruction of the Assyrian Empire in the Sack of Nineveh in 612 BC. The Scythians subsequently engaged in frequent conflicts with the Achaemenid Empire. The western Scythians suffered a major defeat against Macedonia in the 4th century BC, and were subsequently gradually conquered by the Sarmatians, a related Iranian people from Central Asia.

    The Eastern Scythians of the Asian Steppe (Saka) were attacked by the Yuezhi, Wusun and Xiongnu in the 2nd century BC, prompting many of them to migrate into South Asia, where they became known as Indo-Scythians.

    At some point, perhaps as late as the 3rd century AD after the demise of the Han dynasty and the Xiongnu, Eastern Scythians crossed the Pamir Mountains and settled in the western Tarim Basin, where the Scythian Khotanese and Tumshuqese languages are attested in Brahmi scripture from the 10th and 11th centuries AD.

    In Eastern Europe, by the early Medieval Ages, the Scythians and their closely related Sarmatians were eventually assimilated and absorbed (e.g. Slavicisation) by the Proto-Slavic population of the region.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 11:58:00 UTC

  • ON THE FUTURE OF THE WESTERN “POLYTHEISTIC” SOCIAL ORDER I am trying to find a w

    ON THE FUTURE OF THE WESTERN “POLYTHEISTIC” SOCIAL ORDER

    I am trying to find a way to talk about the fact that we have never had a conflationary system of thought (monotheism) in the west, and have always had separation of church (peasantry) and state (nobility) and burgher/freeman (commerce). And taht the church (religion), the burgher (philosophy), and the state (law) all competed with their own narratives.

    The problem is the BINDING narrative. If christianity fails as teh binding narrative, how do we replace that binding narrative, yet preserve christianity for the underclasses (the weak) who need it?

    Germanicized christianity, even latinized christianity, differs from byzantine christianity, differs from judaism, differs from islamism, differs from egyptian and prior eras’ shamanism.

    Germanized christianity always possessed ALL models of thought, from the aristocratic and martial law, to the philosophy, to the religion of the poor. But we used each in its place. And christianity did serve as the majority doctrine since the vast majority of people were poor and ignorant. When that is true, it’s easy for the martial/legal, and the philosophical/commercial to ‘go along’ with the civic bingding narrative and rituals.

    The question is, now that the majority are not poor and ignorant, what is the binding narrative under which we can still make use of science, law, philosophy and christianity?

    I mean. christianity is fucking ridiculous. Church isn’t. Myth, Festival, Ritual, Discipline aren’t. They’re necessary. The content of jesus’ philosophy is trivial. The magical shit is nonsense. nothing but jewish and syrian and byzantine lies. the natural law that the church inherited from the romans and the stoics, and the science that the modern era inherited from the greeks and the engineering from romans is all there for us to use. History is there for us to use.

    By any measure we have ‘discovered’ that we, and less so the chinese, are ‘right’ and that everyone else is not only wrong but catastrophically and degeneratively wrong.

    So, how do we modernize the church, retain jesus’s (valuable teaching) but achieve in the modern world what Acquinas achieved in the ancient? how do we modernize the teachings of jesus, and the ancient lessons of babylonians so that they are compatible with the ancient lessons of the european peoples in greek, roman, germanic form?

    How do I start with sovereignty, agency, natural law, markets in everything and the transcendence of man of our ancestors, and include jesus’ advice that if we increase the size of our kin, but our understanding that there is a limit of our kin to those who are in fact our genetic kin, that we will be buying options on future cooperation that together make us more competitively powerful than all alternatives?

    There is only one ‘story’ of such a thing.

    IT IS THE STORY OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION FROM THE YAMNA TO TODAY, and the lionization of all those who demonstrated their continuance of it, and the demonization of all those who impeded or harmed it.

    And the semites and iranians (byzantines) seem to have done been those who impeded it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 11:41:00 UTC

  • YOU WILL BECOME WHAT YOU IDOLIZE. BUT WHAT YOU IDOLIZE MAY NOT BE WORTHY, AND MA

    YOU WILL BECOME WHAT YOU IDOLIZE. BUT WHAT YOU IDOLIZE MAY NOT BE WORTHY, AND MAY IN FACT BE DISASTROUS

    —“A man’s idols are a reflection both of what he sees in himself and of what he wishes to become (or wishes he could become). All of my “idols” are known for being renowned leaders of strong nations, men who had a hand in changing the societal order of their times and ultimately men of moral uprightness. Perhaps the most amusing (yet bitter) thing to me is that when I ask the fellow men in my generation who their idols are, the responses range from sports players to spineless politicians to f@66y musicians in boy bands. It is not difficult to see the reflections of their idols in their character. Always be aware of who you are giving reverence and why.”– Grant T Matthews

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 11:20:00 UTC

  • Heroes = External order and personal change vs Anti-heroes = External chaos and

    Heroes = External order and personal change

    vs

    Anti-heroes = External chaos and personal stability.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 11:11:00 UTC

  • I mean, you have how many Alexanders, Caesars, Khans, Tammerlanes, Napoleons, Ro

    I mean, you have how many Alexanders, Caesars, Khans, Tammerlanes, Napoleons, Rommels, MacArthurs, to choose from and you pick some japanese pubescent dick-girls as heroes? WTF is wrong with you? Man up.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 11:02:00 UTC

  • Anime heroes are all dick-girls. Superheroes are all pussies. Conan Rules

    Anime heroes are all dick-girls.

    Superheroes are all pussies.

    Conan Rules.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 10:24:00 UTC

  • Nomocracy = Rule of Law (by Judges). Therefore under nomocracy (judge rule), ‘go

    Nomocracy = Rule of Law (by Judges). Therefore under nomocracy (judge rule), ‘government’ provides laws.

    What we call ‘government’ more correctly provides a method for the construction of commons.

    We have conflated the functions of government and commons production, whenever the functions of judicial and commons production are combined into a monopoly. (a crime against reciprocity – most often because of technological and cultural incompetence at identifying reciprocity, or the intentional violation of reciprocity for the purpose of predation).

    We can construct commons the individual authority, oligarchical choice, representative choice, or market choice.

    (And, yes, I know, I am ‘correcting’ a lot of past colloquial language and that this is hard to learn.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 09:33:00 UTC

  • THE ECONOMICS OF TIME AND MORALITY (important) (profound) (read more than once)

    THE ECONOMICS OF TIME AND MORALITY

    (important) (profound) (read more than once)

    Under Propertarianism’s Rule of Law by Natural Law, Soros could never have come into existence, could never attack western civilization; could never escape justice; and the takeover of the Universities in the 60’s impossible; the prosecution of communists in the 50’s successful; the and the import of the Frankfurt School impossible.

    Why? Truth, Reciprocity, Existential Possibility.

    Free markets are a lie. There exist no scale independent theories, and likewise, there exist no scale independent markets. They are another cosmopolitan invention. A moral pretense by which to engage in immoral actions.

    The requirement that we not impose costs by externality upon the investments of others causing the loss of capital in territorial, physical, institutional, cultural, normative, informational, familial, and genetic assets limits markets.

    Markets allow us to create opportunity through proximity, informational, informal and formal institutions, and physical infrastructure as a common good. Market opportunities are produced as a common good. We can then serve the common good by converting opportunity into exchanges, the performance of which, creates more than it consumes by the service of the coincidence of wants.

    We create opportunities for temporal compression through the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy, and seize them through the identification of a coincidence of wants, thereby converting the potential for temporal compression into the existential compression of time. And it is through this temporal compression that we, collectively, in increasing scales, constantly reduce the cost of existence, and defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity.

    If you understand this you will understand all of human civilization, and the reason we have achieved what no other creatures have achieved.

    We must defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, distance, and scarcity, and we do so through cooperation, and we cooperate through the incremental suppression of the imposition of costs on one another upon life, body, kin, possessions, and interests, in the form of violence, theft, fraud, falsehood, conspiracy, rents and free-riding.

    We accomplish this incremental suppression by the demand for a warranty of due diligence for our products(materials), services(actions), and information(speech) and the prosecution, restitution, punishment, ostracization, or execution, of those who circumvent that Warranty of Reciprocity by production, action, or speech.

    This leaves us with no option but to participate in voluntary markets under which we limit our productions, actions, and speech to that which consists of productive, fully informed (truthful), warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of cost upon the life, kin, possessions, and interests of others by externality.

    This explains the entirety of human existence.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Scripture of Nobility

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 09:23:00 UTC