—“Curt, Patriarchy has a long and sordid history”—
Sordid? Um. Have you seen the history of the alternatives? lol
THEY’RE GONE.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-30 09:02:00 UTC
—“Curt, Patriarchy has a long and sordid history”—
Sordid? Um. Have you seen the history of the alternatives? lol
THEY’RE GONE.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-30 09:02:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-30 08:41:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 21:39:00 UTC
Jimmy Wales: No, access to information cannot be a right. And wikipedia has become politicized under the false cover of a monopoly under citation and NPoV, which merely deterministically justifies universalism, globalism, consumerism, and cultural marxism. An honest wikipedia would provide multiple points of view, and test them by investment, reciprocity or parasitism. wikipedia is immoral.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 20:16:00 UTC
RELIGION VIA NEGATIVA
So, when you say ‘religion’, we all need the services provided by ‘religion’ whether or not we consume them directly or indirectly through others.
The question is whether we need supernaturalism, fictionalism, and outright falsehood. The answer is demonstrably no.
On the other hand – more precisely – it means those of us with a great deal of agency do not need it, but desire it’s consequences.
It means that those with the pretense of agency – the ‘atheists’ need a substitute for it, and have chosen pseudo-rationalism and pseudoscience.
It means that some of us mouth pretense to it because we understand the value of religion but find the superstition, supernaturalism, fictionalism, and outright falsehood merely an absurd cost of obtaining the good produced by the rituals and discipline.
And it means that those without the ability to trust those with more agency than they, need the superstition to sate their emotions, the supernaturalism to grant authority to the fictionalism, and the outright falsehood as a means of insulating themselves from suggestion by those who would sway them from the strategies embodied in all of the above.
There is no reason we cannot cause the production of truthful religion by the suppression of fictional religion. History replaces myth. Fiction fictionalism. Science superstition. And the natural law of men, resistance against suggestion, deception, and predation.
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 18:51:00 UTC
—“All your statuses make you seem like you are drunk whenever i read them i hear a drunk man rambling”—
I understand. Comprehension can only exist as a contract requiring specific performance by both parties. You cannot provide specific performance required of you. This merely means you are too stupid to understand. But do not feel bad. You are not special. There are a lot of stupid people.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 14:47:00 UTC
YEAH. GROW UP. THERE IS ONLY ONE TRUTHFUL LANGUAGE.
Yeah, I understand that religion and occult, and psychologism, and this kind of literary version of ‘numerology’ is helpful to some people but it’s all nonsense.
All words are excuses. People act according to costs, assets, opportunities, and incentives. Whatever words they make up to make excuses for choosing among them is just more Egyptian/babylonian/semitic/hindu drivel.
If you can’t say it from the chinese philosophers, you can’t say it reasonably. If you can’t say it from the western philosophers and lawyers you can’t say it rationally, and If you can’t say it from the western scientists you can’t say it truthfully.
The ‘middle earth’ f-ckers have been a cancer on humanity forever. They still are. The cancer survives. It survives in fictionalism in its occult, religious, psychological, pseudo-rational, and pseudo-scientific forms.
All conflation may provide meaning at the cost of deception and the manufacture of further ignorance. Deflation is more costly but provides truth and it is with truth we defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, distance, and sarcity.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 14:16:00 UTC
THE NAMES OF ARYANISM : THE CAUSE OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION
Aryanism: (19th Century)
Associating the name of set of tribes with their strategy, telling us nothing about the constitution of their strategy.
The Faustian Spirit: (German Legend ~1400?)
A literary allusion to the western predilection for experiment, change, and achievement. Again, this tells us almost nothing about causality, only the description of a few values.
Aristocratic Egalitarianism: (Duchesne)
A descriptive title of a military and political strategy that states that distributed rule of peers can scale by opening the franchise for participation in rule, and its benefits (property and commissions/taxes) is open to all who will pay for it by demonstrating merit in family, industry, and war. (compare to the chinese method of entering the bureaucracy through examination and the consequences thereof)
Aryanism as Markets for Rule: (Duchesne)
A descriptive insight expanding upon Aristocratic Egalitarianism, by adding that aryanism spread through the construction of markets for polities.
Sovereignty. (Doolittle)
A causal description. Since by the demand for sovereignty one can only scale through aristocratic egalitarianism, and one is limited to the resolution of conflicts by natural law of reciprocity, meaning that all association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons, and production of polities must be achieved through sovereign, productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality. And By the combination of sovereignty, natural law, markets in everything, the need to scale, the provision of scale through the selection for agency, and thereby the incremental domestication of man, transcends man through imitation of sovereignty, reward for agency and sovereignty, and the deprivation and diminution of those who lack agency, cannot act in sovereign fashion, and therefore cannot cooperate via markets, and therefore cannot participate in rule.
And that is the CAUSE of western civilization.
For a militia of voluntary warriors, desirous of preservation of their sovereignty, Sovereignty is the only political solution, leading to natural law and markets in everything.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 13:02:00 UTC
DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET? ARYANISM: MARKETS IN EVERYTHING?
Abrahamism imposes artificial equality where we are only equal if we are slaves. Western religion was originally pagan, meaning a hierarchical family, infinitely extensible, where individuals could find both virtues to imitate, sins to avoid, and advocates for their roles in society at every single level.
Abrahamism is not a market strategy for a division of knowledge, labor and advocacy among many small extended clans organized into nation states, but an authoritarian and monopolistic one for the production and maintenance of a despotic empire.
Aryanism *IS* a market strategy, and our original religion provided us with a both a unifying narrative of an extended family with virtues, sins, roles, and interests, custom tailored gods, demi gods, heroes, and great men to appeal to.
Our god was not demanding, or commanding, or even engaged, but provided wisdom, justice, and decisions in exchange for offerings – *a trade*.
Do you understand the difference between Aryanism and Semitism yet? Markets and families, vs Monopoly and Empire.
No excuses. No more lies.
End the pollution of the west. Imitate the only other superior people on this earth, the east asians, and insulate ourselves from the ‘people of the center’ who failed to transcend from beast to man.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 12:45:00 UTC
ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ART, LITERATURE AND MYTH.
(My formal training is in art criticism, and my first philosophical work was on aesthetics – and I can criticize all art from all cultures at every single period in human history in detail that is so painful you can’t imagine. If you think I’m annoyingly precise about economics, law, and logic do you think I am less so about Aesthetics?
To say one cannot obtain value from something, or one can obtain value from something, is very different from saying that all values one obtains are good, or that objectively better art and literature objectively contain better collections of objects, relations, and values. And that is to say that the consumption of inferior art, literature, and myth, represents a loss of opportunity to consume superior art, literature, and myth, and therefore superior objects, relations, and values.
Chinese art demonstrates a hatred of man and the human form. Japanese are attempts to circumvent the effeminacy of asian forms. All thier costuming is an attempt to make excuses for their lack and depth of masculine maturity. I mean their is a reason we use half naked super warriors and they use giant robot armor, or dolled-up clothing to make themselves look more substantive.
Compare it to German art where everyone has a bloody wound in him, or greek, roman, and european art that lionize the human form, the human mind, and human achievements.
The fact that we no longer produce a Howard (who was gay), a Heinlein, Johnny Quest or the first year of Star Trek, or even very good science fiction, is in fact because of the Jewish censorship in hollywood. Sure. (Whether Intentional or cultural or genetic).
We still seem to be able to get away with horror although the jewish cultural mafia is working against that also.
But the answer is what it is. I do not err. I am not ignorant. And I consider all but the certain portions of Akira and GITM unwatchable. )
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 12:35:00 UTC