Source: Facebook

  • THIS IS WHY THE WEST JUST WORKS – NEGATIVA JURIDICAL MATERIAL PRIESTHOOD AND POS

    THIS IS WHY THE WEST JUST WORKS – NEGATIVA JURIDICAL MATERIAL PRIESTHOOD AND POSITIVA SUPERNATURAL PRIESTHOODS.

    Proto-Indo-European society comprised three main groups corresponding to three distinct functions:

    1. Sovereignty, which fell into two distinct and complementary sub-parts:

    … 1.1 one formal, juridical and priestly but worldly;

    … 1.2 the other powerful, unpredictable, and also priestly but rooted in the supernatural world.

    2. Military, connected with force, the military and war.

    3. Productivity, herding, farming and crafts; ruled by the other two.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:03:00 UTC

  • Updated Feb 1, 2020, 7:02 PM

    Updated Feb 1, 2020, 7:02 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:02:00 UTC

  • THE THREE-C,Q METHOD 1. Compliment 2. Comment 3. Connection 4. Question How to a

    THE THREE-C,Q METHOD

    1. Compliment

    2. Comment

    3. Connection

    4. Question

    How to answer questions in text.

    THE E-PRIME METHOD

    1. Eliminate the verb to be, and plan your sentence accordingly.

    THE OPERATIONAL METHOD

    1. Complete sentences

    2. Operational vocabulary

    3. Single POV

    4. Describe a complete change in state.

    PROPERTARIAN METHOD

    1. Using economic terms

    2. To describe changes in property in toto as a consequence of both incentives and changes in state.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 18:58:00 UTC

  • GOVERNMENTS DO HAVE CURRENCY IF NOT MONEY —“Governments don’t have money, citi

    GOVERNMENTS DO HAVE CURRENCY IF NOT MONEY

    —“Governments don’t have money, citizens do. Will the state fund [whatever] through mandatory force derived taxes or will state funding be purely voluntary on the part of interested citizens (non mandatory tithing).”—

    Hmmm… that’s not entirely true. Just as a thought experiment, assume a government over a territory that is fully autarkic and has no need of foreign currency or trade.

    This government can issue a currency (each unit a tradable share in the economy), demand it as legal tender for all debts private and public, and it can equidistribute X amount of this currency to every citizen every day, week, month, quarter, year or whatever directly to a bank account.

    It can then collect some percentage of that in taxes and repeat the process.

    This is what governments already do. They just put the banks in the middle requiring us to borrow it and giving the banks interest, thereby having the banks inflate 9x times the amount.

    We are not fully autarkic so the process limits the state’s powers of monetary distribution.

    Modern monetary theory won’t work, but this will, it will just require collecting and measuring better information than we do now


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 17:40:00 UTC

  • ANF EXPOSURE WAS LIMITED IN THE MIDDLE EAST DESPITE THEIR RELATIVE PROXIMITY —

    ANF EXPOSURE WAS LIMITED IN THE MIDDLE EAST DESPITE THEIR RELATIVE PROXIMITY

    —“Early European Farmers did come from Anatolia originally. But their population, Barcin_N or ANF, was basal to both Europeans and certain Mesopotamians, the latter receiving the gene flow much later than the former. This means that the “Neolithic toolkit” that entered Europe was independent of Mesopotamian influence (Mesos had their own source). Modern Assyrians, who are probably closest to ancient Akkadians, have around 30% ANF, and most North Europeans (North mind you) score even higher than that. It just comes to show how limited the ANF exposure was in the Middle East despite their relative proximity.”—Göran Dahl


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 17:32:00 UTC

  • POST “JOY DAY”: A RANT AGAINST OUR BRITISH KIN’S DECLINE INTO CONTINENTAL MARXIS

    POST “JOY DAY”: A RANT AGAINST OUR BRITISH KIN’S DECLINE INTO CONTINENTAL MARXIST SERFS

    (doh!) (ouch!)

    —“How would P be applied to the current monarch of the UK and her father in not keeping their subjects safe? ei well everything that has happened to the British and or ethnic English man in the last 80years.”—Joseph Williams

    First, P-constitution improves the american written constitution into a formal logic of our ancestral natural law, which is an improvement on the unwritten British constitution.

    Second, This constitution is entirely applicable to the UK as well as the US (or Canada, or Australia, or NZ). The only hard sell is getting Americans back on the monarchy train – although they’re getting closer at the moment. Washington turned it down unfortunately so we built an anti monarchical public mythos thats false. otherwise we would have just duplicated the British system.

    Third, if the monarch abandoned his or her duties to protect the people there is only one solution to that problem and only one solution we want – and that is the militia.

    Third, you British folks really piss me off with what I consider pretty stupid questions on this Monarchy. Why? You take the power away from the monarchy and then ask why it doesn’t protect you? You took away its power to protect you!

    (a) The British were wrong to contain Germany in both wars, (a Germany that stated repeatedly that Europe needed the British empire to survive) and paid the price for it with the loss of pretty much everything – including the status of reserve currency which made financing the empire possible. The people, beaten, turned (whimpering like pussies) to socialism like the germans rather than ‘manning up’ and keeping the empire as have the French and as did the Russians.

    (b) The monarchy was in the position because of this ‘socialism’ of being eradicated so has held on for dear life to survive the postwar period.

    (c) the english constitution(unwritten) is unlike the american (written), and the parliament has the ability (unlike the american) to alter the constitution. The parliament removed the ability of the monarchy to function as a judge of last resort and placed too much power in parliament – ending the long history of rule of law by traditional anglo saxon, germanic, proto germanic, western indo european law.

    (d) It’s not the monarchy’s fault, it’s the people’s fault – for not having the man-balls to protect the monarchy, and being too stupidly susceptible to marxist and french and jewish bullsh-t (false promise of freedom from physical and natural law) and full of their own arrogance that a parliament of the people without the constraint of rule of law, supreme court, and monarchy, could resist the attempt of the french to colonize Britain and drag her down with the rest of Europe.

    (e) so man up, saddle up, rally up, and

    … 1) get your constitution in written form

    … 2) limit the parliament to the constitutional constraints

    … 3) get your monarchy back in place as judge of last resort able to veto legislation, and dismiss parliaments that ever again act against the intersets of the people – people easily sold false promises – and to preserve the sovereignty that they have inherited from thousands of years of better men, and the prohibition on alienating themselves, the parliament, and the monarchy from those rights as a hierarchy of sovereigns.

    Man up. Show up. Fight to make your people great again. Otherwise the few of us Anglos on this side of the pond will have to come over there and teach you what the fuck a man is again. 😉

    We can reverse the catastrophe of the world wars and restore the benefits of the empire to our entire civilization, and all it’s defenses and values for all of us even if it’s only under the commonwealth.

    But we gotta man up like our ancestors to do it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 17:06:00 UTC

  • That feeling when your afternoon consists of a series of short phone calls from

    That feeling when your afternoon consists of a series of short phone calls from real men with real experience who testify that they’re all in on GO-day.

    Fills me with joy.

    Story of 2015->Present:

    Who is this doolittle guy?

    This guy talks word salad.

    This guy is crazy – it’ll never happen!

    The people will never do that!

    We’d never win because “X”.

    We might need to do something.

    I’ve been listening to john mark

    This is what we need, it’s what I”m looking for

    Thank you for all your work!

    I’m ready, Just say go!

    Pretty much as I said.

    The fire burns.

    The wyrm turns.

    And by the prickling

    Of my thumbs

    This way, revolution comes.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 15:44:00 UTC

  • Brachycephalization on the western steppe after the Mesolithic Interesting stuff

    Brachycephalization on the western steppe after the Mesolithic

    Interesting stuff from the ADNABIOARC team at Scientific Reports today:

    Abstract: The Neolithic transition brought about fundamental social, dietary and behavioural changes in human populations, which, in turn, impacted skeletal morphology. Crania are shaped through diverse genetic, ontogenetic and environmental factors, reflecting various elements of an individual’s life. To determine the transition’s effect on cranial morphology, we investigated its potential impact on the face and vault, two elements potentially responding to different influences. Three datasets from geographically distant regions (Ukraine, Iberia, and the Levant plus Anatolia) were analysed. Craniometric measurements were used to compare the morphology of pre-transition populations with that of agricultural populations. The Neolithic transition corresponds to a statistically significant increase only in cranial breadth of the Ukrainian vaults, while facial morphology shows no consistent transformations, despite expected changes related to the modification of masticatory behaviour. The broadening of Ukrainian vaults may be attributable to dietary and/or social changes. However, the lack of change observed in the other geographical regions and the lack of consistent change in facial morphology are surprising. Although the transition from foraging to farming is a process that took place repeatedly across the globe, different characteristics of transitions seem responsible for idiosyncratic responses in cranial morphology.

    Cheronet et al., Morphological change in cranial shape following the transition to agriculture across western Eurasia, Scientific Reports, Published online: 13 September 2016, doi:10.1038/srep33316

    See also..

    Modeling Steppe_EMBA


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 15:02:00 UTC

  • 1) Fascism was a nationalist(european) reaction to counter global (jewish) commu

    1) Fascism was a nationalist(european) reaction to counter global (jewish) communism.

    2) Fascism was conceived as french socialism, and the nazis came closest to implementing it – although today’s france is not far off. The period saw the decline of religion (darwin within memory) and rapid change, so in european tradition, fascism was another attempt at a secular theology of state, given the strange european desire for authority that is alien to anglos.

    3) China is perhaps the best example of a fascist state practicing monopoly authoritarianism, nationalism, insulation from ‘corrupting’ influences, information control, state corporatism, militarism, and extremely tight coupling between state, finance, and industry. (note that the chinese like the germans are very happy with this situation).

    In other words, Fascism won the 20th century. Period.

    4) I use the term “Market Fascism” in the sense that there is zero tolerance for extra market coercion anywhere under P. This was meant as a tongue in cheek response to Islamic Fascism vs “the white law”, and to cue the audience to the severity with which free riding, rent seeking, baiting into hazard, and all the other leftist techniques would be illegal – leaving only exchanges as a means of cooperating.

    5) One of the most contra-jewish-libertarian properties of fascism is that profit at the expense of the commons or people was not permitted. We confuse this with autarky, but it was more that abitrages were not permitted – which is what americans want as well. And if a resource would be short in the country by higher profits out, that sale would be prohibited. The other contra-jewish-libertarian property is that they ended interest for consumers, and that the success of state-private industrial alliances are always beneficial since capital intensive industry is always taking a credit risk that only the state can reduce. This is why I would prefer the USA and UK were investing in battery research and factories and keeping the profits rather than externalizing them to the private sector. This is a principle problem with that is not true elsewhere. We fund all this basic research with public money but it is then privatized. In other words, why is consumer interests and privatization of public research returns handed out to the investment class rather than diminishing tax burdens of the people?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 13:54:00 UTC

  • Feb 1, 2020, 1:18 PM

    https://youtu.be/WXvxXyssP-AUpdated Feb 1, 2020, 1:18 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 13:18:00 UTC