Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • AN ARTICULATE PROGRESSIVE SO AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ARTICULATE COMPARISONS —“Progr

    AN ARTICULATE PROGRESSIVE SO AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ARTICULATE COMPARISONS

    —“Progresiveness errs on the side of openness in face of the uncertainty. Conservativeness errs on the side of “known good or reasonable” arrangements. … None are in principle superior in all cases. … We must use a third axis, rationality, to bridge our differences constructively.”—@flancian

    Progressives (consumptives) err on the side of consumption in the face of uncertainty. Conservatives(capitalizers) err on the side of saving in the face of uncertainty.

    The female consumptive herd (her children) the male capitalizing pack (their tribe).

    We must use TRADE to bridge our differences.

    (Are you starting to see yet?)

    I’m using male concrete (scientific) terms.

    You’re using female seductive (deceptive) terms.

    Once you see it you can’t un-see it. The question is adaptation possible?

    No. Hence institutions of trade.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 08:24:00 UTC

  • THE ONLY POLITICAL ARGUMENT —“Leftists care more about an assertion being offe

    THE ONLY POLITICAL ARGUMENT

    —“Leftists care more about an assertion being offensive than it being true.”— Χρόνος @HliosX

    Yes.

    —“Hi! I am a leftist, yet I don’t think this assertion applies to me. Would you like to discuss/debate?”—Flancia @flancian

    Sure. 😉

    Assertion: all differences are reducible to right evidentiary capitalizing, inter-temporal, reciprocal, falsificationary eugenic vs left experiential, consumptive, temporal, proportional, justificationary, dysgenic – and as such, decidable. As such all left propositions will be reducible to approval/disapproval, and right truth/falsehood.

    Cognitively left dysgenic female herd vs cognitively right eugenic male pack. We have no agency. We we are gene machines pursuing our reproductive strategies adapting them only to our class (status).

    And all speech and most importantly, all political speech is either truthful, reciprocal, meritocratic (hierarchical male right) or untruthful, irreciprocal, proportional (equalitarian female left). Right trade and truth and Left Seduction disapproval.

    The only solution is exchange. The condensation of the three classes of monarchy(judge of last resort), nobility(lords, senate), and family-business(house of commons), into a single parliamentary council, instead of adding a house of labor and a house for women eliminated the traditional european market between the classes, thereby creating a race to the majoritarian bottom, political conflict, and the incentive to immigrate vast underclasses to circumvent the western civilizational strategy of sovereignty.

    If we had added houses women (who are the only defectors driving leftward movement) would have learned how to use their access to political power in exchange, rather than using the traditional female method of undermining.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 07:45:00 UTC

  • The Jewish century is over. Like the Russian century was over. Like like the Ger

    The Jewish century is over. Like the Russian century was over. Like like the German century was over. Like the french century was over. Each of the ‘enlightenments’ were costly rebellions against Anglos for dragging humanity into science, medicine, rule of law, and markets.

    Every civilization has resisted modernity.

    We have paid the cost of dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and early morality.

    But we are bad for ‘colonizing’ them and policing their ability to conduct predation on each other.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 21:26:00 UTC

  • NO, SERVICE ISN’T ENOUGH. —“Curt, I’m sure you’d agree, some of our most galla

    NO, SERVICE ISN’T ENOUGH.

    —“Curt, I’m sure you’d agree, some of our most gallant, extraordinary soldiers, black & brown, native American, come from the worst of ghettos, in every state, every large or small city, maybe, speaking of history, even the war fighter in the tomb of the unknown came from there?”—

    Sure. Although the majority come from intergenerational military families. And sure, you can try to spin my work as other than ‘If you can’t fit into anglo rule-of-law middle class civilization, and you vote the left in to undermine it, then your military service is irrelevant.”

    All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.

    So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way.

    And the Left is desperately chasing the false promise that they can be free of genetic, sexual, social, economic and political market value in a world where the european civilizational windfall has been spent on dragging the world out of communism, socialism, and now islamism.

    We have the most ignorant generation in almost two centuries for a reason: by design of the left to manufacture useful idiots under the postwar false promise that their evolutionary condition was a product of oppression rather than market value to others.

    And since evidence has falsified marxism, socialism, and science has falsified feminism, postmodernism, and denial of our substantial differences in gender, class, and race, other than invasive immigration the west would have survived the 20th century of social pseudoscience.

    So we can’t let you take the rest of us down with us.

    It’s over. The century of false promise is over. You killed democracy. And it will die with your names on it for eternity.

    There will be no second fall of the Roman Empire – this time by pseudoscience instead of theology.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 21:23:00 UTC

  • THREAT PERCEPTION IN INTERNET AGE by Bill Joslin I think the threat detection is

    THREAT PERCEPTION IN INTERNET AGE

    by Bill Joslin

    I think the threat detection issue spans the entire political, soci-economic bell curve. i think think this stems from “threat signal saturation”.

    I suspect threat saturation disrupts friend foe identification.

    friend foe identification expresses differently across the bell curves –

    The left has an inverted identification – where in-group competitive drives supersede predator proximity drives.

    And the right has an amplified “err on the side of false positives” where proximity sensitivity becomes applied to friends.

    In both cases this results in a positive feedback loop which exacerbates the problem.

    We live with a nightmarish degree of anomie – social instability resulting from a breakdown of standards and values.

    In rat utopia, normie rats in proximity to the beautiful ones display this behavior – obsessive territorial marking – because they lose the ability to tell the difference from fellow colony marking from adversarial markings.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 20:43:00 UTC

  • REMINDER – NO MEMES. Please don’t post memes. I don’t tolerate memes. I teach ar

    REMINDER – NO MEMES.

    Please don’t post memes. I don’t tolerate memes. I teach argument. There are plenty of places to demonstrate you can’t. This isn’t one of them

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:47:00 UTC

  • TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS TO INVITE US TO WAR See, you don’t get it. The onl

    TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS TO INVITE US TO WAR

    See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity.

    You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be.

    That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy.

    We are the men of Europa.

    We are sovereigns – all.

    And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:45:00 UTC

  • INALIENABLE RIGHTS Inalienable means not only that it can’t be taken from you bu

    INALIENABLE RIGHTS

    Inalienable means not only that it can’t be taken from you but you can’t let it be taken from you and you can’t give it away.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:39:00 UTC

  • WHAT IT SAYS RIGHT THERE IN TEXT… by Jerry Odom —“We hold these truths to be

    WHAT IT SAYS RIGHT THERE IN TEXT…

    by Jerry Odom

    —“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,

    deriving their just powers from the “consent” of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, ….”—

    So what it says here is our rights don’t come from government or from words on paper. Let’s be real here the only reason that we actually create government is to protect the rights of the people.

    So, what are inalienable rights? Among the natural rights of the people, are life, liberty, and property together with the right to protect and defend them with the best possible means possible.

    So if you don’t have the right to life you’re dead, if you don’t have liberty in your servant of the government you created, if you don’t have a right to property and that you don’t have a right to life and your subject to whoever owns the property, if you don’t have a right to defend these things than you are slave you are not a free man, if you have to ask permission of the government protect my life my and my property then you are not a free man, inalienable rights are not subject to laws of man especially when we gave them the ability to govern based on the consent of the people.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:38:00 UTC

  • THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING

    THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING TRANSACTIONAL CHANGES, AND THE PEOPLE NEED JURIDICAL DEFENSE AND THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS JURIDICAL ACCOUNTABILITY

    by Reece Haynes

    5 years in British politics (observing, theorizing, debating, practicing), proves everything you’ve said. The supremacy of Parliament is for nought when that Parliament is filled with the wrong people.

    And our unwritten constitution, plus the common law, is routinely disobeyed – with no sanctions applied by the judiciary.

    Not codifying the constitution, not maintaining the Empire, and not preserving the Aristotelian mixed model (hereditary monarchy and nobility, plus limited democracy) were all big mistakes.

    And then there’s the historical geopolitical mistakes which you also mention.

    —

    CD:

    The judicial novelties I’ve found are:

    1. The hereditary monarchy as a judge of last resort in defense against the fashions of the people, the malice of a minority, and the failure of the political process, is indispensable.

    2. The commonwealth model is to be embraced by any future american political order, with the monarchy representing the english speaking peoples.

    3. The British parliamentary and debate model is superior to the american.

    4. The British two (or more) Tiered legal system is superior to the american.

    5. The German Proportional Party System is superior to the British and american — allowing superior policy and superior adaptation.

    6. The requirement for strict construction from the first principle of reciprocity, specific statement of the scope(limit), and reference of any prior legislation , legislation, or finding of the court, upon which it depends.

    7. the requirement that the judiciary return the undecidable to the legislature thereby preventing legislation from the bench – and the mechanism for judiciary to require the legislature settle the matter in reasonable time

    8. The liability of legislators, regulators, and judges to warranty (hold involuntary liability) for their actions in so much that they do not violate the constitution of natural law.

    9. The vulnerability of legislators, regulators, judges and their agents to judicial prosecution for violations of the constitution.

    10. The vulnerability of the public to prosecution for advocation in public to the public in matters public, of violation of the constitution.

    11. The addition of involuntary warranty and therefor liability, for the entire scope of baiting into hazard upon which the 20th century deceits were constructed.

    12. The reversal of borrower beware to lender beware.

    13. Universal standing in matters of the commons

    14. Restoration of every man (citizen) a sheriff (deputy), defense of self, property and commons, restoration of extrajudicial punishment; the judicially sanctioned duel; and the sovereignty of men and as such their requirement to bear arms.

    15. The jewish-french cosmopolitan sponsored invasion of western civlization has destroyed our experiment in democracy – and universal democracy must and will end and we have proposed a set of options for polities to choose from, the easiest of which is multiple houses to maintain numbers, or fewer voters by much higher criteria, or lastly, kinship(ethnic) voters only.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:06:00 UTC