Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Favorite teacher tactic. Some kid misbehaves. Get the class to turn on him or he

    Favorite teacher tactic. Some kid misbehaves. Get the class to turn on him or her and say they don’t like him or her if they do that kind of thing.

    Completely against current educational protocol.

    Absolutely positively the fastest, most effective means of behavioral modification, with the most durable consequences, and with the most beneficial externalities.

    People don’t know how to teach and we get snowflakes.

    Why?

    Mothers feel guilty.

    Because they deserve to.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 11:18:00 UTC

  • Another of my favorite CEO tactics: “Curt, we should do this…” OK. How would w

    Another of my favorite CEO tactics:

    “Curt, we should do this…”

    OK. How would we do that? What would we not do in order to do that instead? Who will do it and be responsible for doing it? I’m willing to do it if you can make it happen.

    Teaching moment.

    I save up those ideas and sort of auction them off during the next strategy session. 😉

    People make sh-t happen if they commit to it in public.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 11:16:00 UTC

  • CHINA’S FASCISM SHOWS ITS ENDS Chin’s Response to disaster vs America’s: This is

    CHINA’S FASCISM SHOWS ITS ENDS

    Chin’s Response to disaster vs America’s: This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.)

    And people prefer it.

    China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.

    — REGARDING THIS ARTICLE FROM CHINA—-

    Huoshenshan Hospital has been completed in #Wuhan on Sunday. Only 10 days to build. 4,000+ workers. 1000s of equipment. days and nights of work. 34,000-square-meter. 1000 beds available on Monday.

    —-END—

    —“Fascism isn’t state capitalist. it doesn’t take sides on economics, it applies pressure on markets as the situation demands. If you want to read anything about Fascist Economics, I’d recommend, The Economic Foundations of Fascism by Paul Enzig And Hitler’s Revolution by R. Tedor”– A ( Intelligent and Informed) Friend

    Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state:

    (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing);

    (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing;

    (c) overrides market incentives when needed.

    So we can fuss around with terms. But the bias in private capitalism is non interference in markets except by treating the state as just another customer, while state capitalism places higher priority on state as a customer than the market – particularly international market.

    —“A fascist wouldn’t consider the state as anything as reductive as a customer. Or anything of the sort. The state is the arbiter of the people, it IS the people. “All within the state, Nothing outside the State, Nothing against the State” the state comes before all else.”—Hauptgefreitersiege @Hauptgefreiter1

    This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or operational description. I understand the “strange’ continental obsession with restoring the theology of the church with some secular theology – from Rousseau to Kant to Marx to present – Europe is ‘stuck’.

    But this point of view is one of an anglo who descends from the minor aristocracy, and the puritanical, empirical, common law tradition. We can understand the continent but the continent cannot understand us. We escaped even secular theology – I just don’t know if it was good.

    Hugs brother. Thanks for letting me riff on your comment. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 11:14:00 UTC

  • “Where do you stand on imperialism?”— I stand as always on empirical evidence

    —-“Where do you stand on imperialism?”—

    I stand as always on empirical evidence and operational possibility.

    Depends on what we define as imperial. The holy roman empire or the han chinese empire, or the roman empire or the middle eastern empires?

    DIMENSION ONE – HOMOGENEITY VS HETEROGENEITY

    The holy roman (german continental) was homogenous; the chinese made theirs homogenous through slow forcible integration; the roman empire failed when insufficiently homogenous; the greek empire never could consilidate becasue it was heterogeneous; and the middle eastern empires were pretty totalitarian and continuously in termoil because they existed to resist heterogeneity.

    Now what about an empire of rule of law over teh english speaking or germanic speaking peoples? Well that is just a federation with a judge of last resort between that resolves differences between the princes (monarchs) of different poliites.

    What about an empire of rule by degree over a forcibly integrated and relatively homogenous empire of limited mobility like china? Well, that is just a way to manage primitive people by bureaucratic corporatism and corporate accountability(via positiva) rather than european sovereignty and rule of law (via negativa).

    What about the roman empire under roman law? Well, that is a way of suppressing parasitism and facilitating trade so that the upper classes can profit and the lower classes live better than they would otherwise.

    What about the middle eastern empires? Well that is little more than preventing any of the other tribes from rising up and profiting at the expense of the suppressed tribes.

    DIMENSION TWO – RULE VS REPLACEMENT

    Now, let’s ask about conquest and rule (europe); vs conquest, colonization and rule (africa); vs conquest, colonization, and integration; vs conquest, colonization and replacement? (Americas).

    DIMENSION THREE – INCENTIVES

    And whether you’re doing so in defense or for assets or for taxation and plunder.

    ANSWER

    We can make a table of what works and does’t work.

    ………….Homogenous —–Limited—-> Heterogeneous

    Rule

    |…………….Yes…………………..No………………..No

    |…………….Yes…………………..Yes……………….No

    |…………….N/A…………………..Yes……………….Yes

    v

    Replacement

    And we can make a simple statement out of incentives.

    Defense : Yes regardless

    Markets : Yes and integrate

    Assets:….Yes and only if you Rule

    Plunder:…No … only to raid to conquer. malincentives build.

    So that is my answer on Imperialism.

    Homogeneous populations only.

    Rule only in exchange for returns.

    Exploit only to further replacement.

    Conquest and Genocide are the most consequential and successful entrepreneurial ventures in human history.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 10:49:00 UTC

  • YES, RACE IS NOT THE PROBLEM TO SOLVE – IT IS THE ASSET TO MANAGE. (important) i

    YES, RACE IS NOT THE PROBLEM TO SOLVE – IT IS THE ASSET TO MANAGE.

    (important)

    it is very unlikely that race can be overcome for anyone who must live in proximity to blacks and hispanics and sees the consequences. It is true that good people are in every group, and that our tribes (races) can work together to common ends if we do not force one another into continuing the demonstrated failure of integration – particularly in business, schools, and neighborhoods – and let people continue to naturally sort into communities. We have common commercial intersts. We have common defense intersts. But we do not have common social (normative) interests because of the harsh reality of our substantial differences in genetics, temperament, ability, culture, and history.

    Instead, while differences in demand for commons is the cause of our conflict – race is not the cause of our conflict but the political order in which races and mixed peoples cooperate.

    The current organization of the polity by winner takes all, and the possibility of obtaining political power to interfere in one another’s communities that is the problem.

    So, yes, the problem can be overcome. But it can only be overcome by grasping where we have common and uncommon interests.

    You cannot change sexual, social, economic, political, and military differences between the races and subraces, nor can you change the kinship advantage to association, residency, economic and political cooperation with people of those intersets.

    Our military and our markets don’t care about our color.

    every other aspect of life does.

    Hence my solution depriving us of possibility of power over one another – and the ability to determine our futures independent of what others think, by sorting into groups that are heterogeneous or homogenous.

    I want desperately to live in a northern european homogenous polity – and I want others of my people to do inherit that which I have inherited.

    I know what will happen to every other known political order and I am happy if they want to do so – that does not mean it is good or will end up as anything other than a small number of wealthy elites surrounded by urban rings of poverty, favellas and ghettos. It won’t.

    But these are our choices to make.

    They are not others’ choices to make.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 10:24:00 UTC

  • I wish translation software was good enough to create Propertarian fb feeds in A

    I wish translation software was good enough to create Propertarian fb feeds in Arabic, Russian, French, German, Spanish and Italian. God knows we don’t need to convert the eastern europeans – they’re already sensible.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 09:22:00 UTC

  • TESTIMONY —“When I was first exposed to propertarianism my jaw hit the floor.

    TESTIMONY

    —“When I was first exposed to propertarianism my jaw hit the floor. I love history. The context changes everything. It’s like seeing color for the first time. Few things in this world are truly simple, but it all is intuitive once you understand.”—Rick Tavi

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 09:19:00 UTC

  • Updated Feb 2, 2020, 9:14 AM

    Updated Feb 2, 2020, 9:14 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 09:14:00 UTC

  • “unpromising future for economics phd’s”— This is correct of course. It’s one

    —“unpromising future for economics phd’s”—

    This is correct of course. It’s one of Eric Weinstein’s complaints: the university system is organized for unsustainable growth, false-promising careers to researchers that can’t exist, in order to obtain cheap research labor (and cheap immigrant research labor) rather than paying researchers and doing less and better research. This problem is exacerbated by the withdrawal of the military as the primary originator of basic research funds given that military epistemology is competitive, and our failure or inability to direct research funds without military priorities, to competitive advantage.

    I expect this will be corrected rather shortly (and painfully) one way or the other.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 09:02:00 UTC

  • THE LEFT RIGHT DIVIDE IN SIMPLE TERMS I will not let Rome fall twice. ……….

    THE LEFT RIGHT DIVIDE IN SIMPLE TERMS

    I will not let Rome fall twice.

    ……………Right….Left

    …..evidentiary…..experiential

    …..capitalizing….consumptive

    inter-temporal…..temporal

    …….reciprocal…..proportional

    ….meritocratic….equalitarian

    falsificationary…..justificationary

    ………..eugenic….dysgenic

    ……………truth…..approval

    …………….male….female

    ……………trade….seduction

    …..deprivation…..ostracization

    ……………force…..undermining

    …………….pack….herd

    ………..Markets….Monopolies

    …..Nationalism….Globalism

    Cognitively left dysgenic female herd vs cognitively right eugenic male pack. We have no agency. We we are gene machines pursuing our reproductive strategies adapting them only to our class (status).

    And all speech and most importantly, all political speech is either truthful, reciprocal, meritocratic (hierarchical male right) or untruthful, irreciprocal, proportional (equalitarian female left). Right trade and truth and Left Seduction disapproval.

    And all consciousness of the self is just to facilitate the problem of balancing our incentives with the incentives of others.

    The only solutions to the present conflict are :

    1. Markets for Commons,

    2. Separation and Specialization

    3. Civil War and Winner Take All

    I prefer the latter, I will morally compromise on either of the former.

    I will not let Rome fall twice.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 08:44:00 UTC