Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • ( Overheard. Jean. A stoic. I mean a natural stoic in that she chose self-author

    ( Overheard. Jean. A stoic. I mean a natural stoic in that she chose self-authoring on her own. Describing to someone else how ‘Self Help’ discourses make her uncomfortable. I would use the word ‘creepy’ because that is what she means. That’s how they make me feel. She recommends that ‘kind of teaching’ for ‘touchy feely women’. But as far as I can tell, it’s touchy feely women who need stoic training the most. Rather than giving them means of only making the problem worse by satisfying market demand for experiential fantasy. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-12 08:18:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY IS A GIFT OF THE WARRIOR CLASS by Rakesh Sahgal Liberty flows from s

    SOVEREIGNTY IS A GIFT OF THE WARRIOR CLASS

    by Rakesh Sahgal

    Liberty flows from sovereignty .

    Sovereignty is a gift of the warrior class imposing rule of law, under natural law, universal standing, and universal application, producing markets for reproduction(marriage), production(goods, services, and information), commons, and polities, wherein each man fully insures each other man and his property in toto from imposition of costs.

    Libertarians need to comprehend this reality and either support the warrior class or stay out of it’s way, because they i.e. libertarians exist BECAUSE of the sovereignty the warrior class creates.

    (curt: ‘flawless’)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-12 08:02:00 UTC

  • “Universal and equal suffrage is a demonic price control regime.”—Simon Ström

    —“Universal and equal suffrage is a demonic price control regime.”—Simon Ström

    (first chuckle-of-brutal-honesty of the day award)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-12 07:59:00 UTC

  • TEACHING RATIONAL VS SCIENTIFIC? Oh. It’s bad. But… It gets a *lot* worse… –

    TEACHING RATIONAL VS SCIENTIFIC?

    Oh. It’s bad. But… It gets a *lot* worse…

    —“AAAAhhhh And therein’ lay the problem. People confuse rational and scientific.”— Nick Heywood

    Yeah, they do. But lets look at the full epistemic Series:

    Series: Experienceable, Imaginable, Reasonable(Rational), Rational(Logical), Empirical(factual), Ratio-Empirical(weak-scientific), Operational(Algorithmic/Recipe), Ratio-Empirical-Operational(strong-scientific), Moral(Reciprocal), Reasonable-Ratio-Empirical-Operational-Moral, Complete(Scope), Testimonial.

    So yeah. If we taught everyone that series and what it means, then they might stop conflating terms and appealing to authority via use of terms, when they have no idea what they mean.

    We can deflate existence into testable dimensions, and by testing each learn something. But rarely can we say anything about any single dimension exportable to more dimensions without accumulating successful tests of dimensions.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-12 07:56:00 UTC

  • “There are some choices it’s not worth letting you make. “– Ely Harman

    —“There are some choices it’s not worth letting you make. “– Ely Harman

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-12 07:43:00 UTC

  • “All anarchism involves accepting costs (e.g. the cost of rampant immorality or

    —“All anarchism involves accepting costs (e.g. the cost of rampant immorality or non-contributing to commons) in the hopes that there will be benefits to compensate. Ancaps sometimes posit that increased productivity from economic liberty will help offset difficulties from collective action problems in providing defense or the cost of defending free riders, etc… But this is nonsense because ancaps can’t even generate economic productivity because they can’t maintain trust or control transaction costs because they don’t even attempt to constrain parasitism, fraud, or freeriding. So you end up paying costs to get, more costs…”—Ely Harman

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-12 07:40:00 UTC

  • Every libertarian wants to say ‘its my body, and I choose’ like a woman does. Ex

    Every libertarian wants to say ‘its my body, and I choose’ like a woman does. Except that unlike a woman he doesn’t have a vagina, and lacks her intrinsic value. Ergo, extra males are dead weight.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-11 17:41:00 UTC

  • Of course I advocate the aristocratic rule of law produces a semblance of libert

    Of course I advocate the aristocratic rule of law produces a semblance of liberty. (And that a militia and rule off law, natural law, property in toto creates sovereignty.)

    I argue, successfully, that the minimum scope of that law is non arbitrary , not voluntary, but necessary given market forces external to the polity, and that the minimum scope of property necessary to form, compete, and survive is not captured in the NAP, and that you like all libertarians avoid that discussion at all costs because it will result in classical liberalism if you try to answer it.

    I have shown that libertarians are adopting the jewish diasporic parasitic strategy, AND I have shown ( i think ) that libertarians are, like homosexuals, developmentally limited, AND that developmental limitation is due to pedomorphism (insufficient maturity).

    Now, it’s possible to defeat each of these arguments, and Rik Storey has defeated the argument (i think) that libertarians choose the feminine strategy of demanding their approval, because of effeminacy, but not because of insufficient maturity.

    In other words, the strategy remains the same.

    Like women: free riding.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-11 17:37:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-11 16:18:00 UTC

  • (In response to trash talking white boys and trash talking black girls: …There

    (In response to trash talking white boys and trash talking black girls: …There is a general perception that black women are stupid, easier to seduce, and more consistently sexually accessible, with less inter-gender compromise. In other words, it’s demonstration of a general disdain for black people. Or put differently, it’s compensating for inadequacy among fellow white people by disrespecting black people who they deem of lower status. In other words, you just ignore white people’s nonsense just as white people ignore black people’s nonsense. It’s all status signaling to compensate for the reality of our relative market value in sexual, social, economic, and political markets. People are ridiculous in every group. We all want to feel better about ourselves than the markets demonstrate our real value to be: near-zero. we all seek to comfort in imagining there is someone below us in the layer cake.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-11 14:15:00 UTC