Of course I advocate the aristocratic rule of law produces a semblance of libert

Of course I advocate the aristocratic rule of law produces a semblance of liberty. (And that a militia and rule off law, natural law, property in toto creates sovereignty.)

I argue, successfully, that the minimum scope of that law is non arbitrary , not voluntary, but necessary given market forces external to the polity, and that the minimum scope of property necessary to form, compete, and survive is not captured in the NAP, and that you like all libertarians avoid that discussion at all costs because it will result in classical liberalism if you try to answer it.

I have shown that libertarians are adopting the jewish diasporic parasitic strategy, AND I have shown ( i think ) that libertarians are, like homosexuals, developmentally limited, AND that developmental limitation is due to pedomorphism (insufficient maturity).

Now, it’s possible to defeat each of these arguments, and Rik Storey has defeated the argument (i think) that libertarians choose the feminine strategy of demanding their approval, because of effeminacy, but not because of insufficient maturity.

In other words, the strategy remains the same.

Like women: free riding.