Source: Facebook

  • the point I want to get across is *what are the social consequences of mass prod

    the point I want to get across is *what are the social consequences of mass production of mindfulness by each means?* And the answer will be not ‘kind’ to mysticism.

    each form of government produces order with different externalities. each form of ethics produces behavior with different externalities. each form of training for mindfulness produces behavior with different externalities.

    What are the consequences of obtaining mindfulness by the different methods advocated in each civilization?

    What does that tell you?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 01:18:00 UTC

  • “Would you agree: reciprocity provides the science of reciprocity, and the “reas

    —“Would you agree: reciprocity provides the science of reciprocity, and the “reason” to be moral absent religion is that it’s an effective strategy for group level survival/competition – and effective personally because of the social value of being reciprocal and cost of not being?”—Sean Lester

    Yes. the more moral, the lower friction, the greater risk tolerance, the higher velocity, the greater wealth.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 21:29:00 UTC

  • If Libertarian = “Without Duty” then it’s simply impossible

    If Libertarian = “Without Duty” then it’s simply impossible.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 21:01:00 UTC

  • ( I HAVE A LOT OF TOTALLY HETERO MAN LOVE FOR TRS. ) 😉

    ( I HAVE A LOT OF TOTALLY HETERO MAN LOVE FOR TRS. ) 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 18:44:00 UTC

  • THE EVOLUTIONARY CYCLE OF THE CRITERIA FOR EQUALITY (priceless) by Bill Joslin 1

    THE EVOLUTIONARY CYCLE OF THE CRITERIA FOR EQUALITY

    (priceless)

    by Bill Joslin

    1) LAW: Equality before the law, formed in the wake of costly rebellion where arbitrary, inconsistent, discretionary application of law bred resentment, encouraged retaliation and ultimately rebellion.

    2) OPPORTUNITY: Equality of opportunity – as the welfare state rise and regulation became the staple of the state, upper middle classes pled for the state from interfering in opportunity (via statute and regulation)

    3) OUTCOME: Equality of outcome – romantics, upset about a rising gentry aligned themselves with the underclass causes to “shame” the capitalist gentry. Faced with the reality that no one is equal, they pointed at unequal outcomes as an example of hypocrisy and encourages the state to “level the playing Feild”.

    Leveling the Feild requires the state to develope special rights for the disadvantaged. This results in arbitrary, inconsistent and discretionary application of law….

    Wash rinse repeat.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 18:39:00 UTC

  • THE EVOLUTION OF RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS 1) Equalitarianism > Sovereignty > Law and

    THE EVOLUTION OF RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS

    1) Equalitarianism > Sovereignty > Law and truth

    2) Slavery > Freedom > Abrahamism and deception

    3) Taxation > Liberty > Philosophy and idealism

    4) Democracy > Marxism/Libertarianism/Neoconservatism > Pseudo-science, pseudo-rationalism, pseudo-moralism.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 18:35:00 UTC

  • I FEEL I NEED TO REMIND YOU OF SOMETHING (MEANING VS TRUE) I am trying to end th

    I FEEL I NEED TO REMIND YOU OF SOMETHING (MEANING VS TRUE)

    I am trying to end the ability to lie to my high trust people and to manipulate them into ignorance, stagnation, and genocide by means of suggestion using the invention of abrahamism.

    So while you might find something MEANINGFUL and there fore valuable, I am conducting a FULL ACCOUNTING of the consequences of your producing, communicating, and obtaining MEANING by the various modes of communication.

    So, yes, while I understand you may like heavily loaded emotional expression and the free association that is invoked by taking you close to the dream state, I also know that you are suggestible in that state, and that through suggestion you can obtain meaning at the cost of implanting in you things that seed your destruction.

    This is the secret to abrahamism.

    This is why I am trying to kill abrahamism: because it is a method of deception. And this is why I am trying to destroy platonism: because it is a means of obscuring one’s ignorance.

    So when I say something against christianity, or nietzsche, or evola, or any of the european philosophers and … fuzzy thinkers… it’s because they are more heavily infected with abrahamism and platonism than are the Americans, who are tediously reduced to little other than law: the constitution is a bible.

    In other words THE PRICE OF EASY KNOWLEDGE more readily intuited is far higher than the benefit you obtain by the discounted method of communication.

    You were taught to read, to measure, to do simple mathematics, to do complex mathematics, and to do basic human scale physics, and to at least understand biology and chemistry and micro and macro physics. And if you were very lucky you might have been taught the basics of money, accounting, finance, economics. And rarely the practice and use of law.

    So why is it that you feel you can learn morality by simply literature?

    WHy isn’t morality calculable as is every other field.

    It is. But it’s harder to access. It’s harder to learn. It’s harder to use. It’s far more like understanding how to program computers with a very limited vocabulary and a very limited set of possible operations and only one method of comparison: reciprocity.

    So while I am slaying your sacred cows and the investments you have made in obtaining meaning that is easy and emotionally entangled for you, the purpose is moral and profound

    To save you and our people from deceit and extermination.

    And the cost is merely learning how to ‘read’, write, listen and speak in very simple language. A language that makes it very hard to lie.

    And if you are unwilling to pay that cost, then you are part of the reason we have been defeated by abrahamists in the ancient world, and more recently in the modern.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 18:30:00 UTC

  • I can’t afford to give time and space to trolling, memes, occult, or pseudoscien

    I can’t afford to give time and space to trolling, memes, occult, or pseudoscience. Sorry. Ride some other tails.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 17:22:00 UTC

  • SURE. LET ME HELP YOU: EVOLUTION OF ARGUMENTATION —“So I’ll ask the big guy: I

    SURE. LET ME HELP YOU: EVOLUTION OF ARGUMENTATION

    —“So I’ll ask the big guy: Is libertarianism just economic determinism for the middle-class? Doesn’t it act as protectionist platform keep the welfare whores from both ends of the spectrum off backs of the productive middle class?”— A Friend

    Sure.

    THE EVOLUTION OF RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS

    Sovereignty arose in our earliest eras as a resistance against equalitarianism (free riding)

    Slavery arose in the era of farming, and liberty as a resistance against slavery. (free riding)

    Liberty arose in the era of cities, as a rebellion against over taxation. (free riding)

    Libertarianism in both european puritan and jewish anarchist forms, arose as a rebellion against *misuse of taxation* in the classical liberal and social democratic era.

    1) Equalitarianism > Sovereignty > Law and truth

    2) Slavery > Freedom > Abrahamism and deception

    3) Taxation > Liberty > Philosophy and idealism

    4) Classical Liberalism/Social Democracy > Libertarianism > Pseudo-science, pseudo-rationalism, pseudo-moralism.

    These are all means of resistance, which is why libertarianism is argued using moral language and shaming rather than the language of violence and law (aristocracy). Just as marxism and socialism and abrahamism (christianity/judaism) are argued using shaming using false narrative of oppression, superstition, idealism, and fictionalism (fictionalism is a technical term).

    The underclass was not oppressed, it was domesticated against it’s will into meritocracy and the pastoralists (lowest classes) resisted (ie:judaism and christianity and islam).

    The middle classes claimed overtaxation, as did the american colonists, in order to free ride on the aristocracy.

    Libertarianism is just restating jewish separatism and false narrative of oppression, when the jews were parasites upon the land holding classes.

    American libertarianism was just an attempt to obtain the benefits of seizing the opportunity of the new continent without paying for its (expensive) conquest and defense.

    Libertarianism is valid in the sense that it is a resistance movement that prevents downward redistribution. It is invalid in the sense that it opens borders, resists taxation, and seeks not to fight to hold the territory upon which the institutions of law and order make commerce possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 14:11:00 UTC

  • NIETZSCHE AND EVOLA Nietzsche and evola were trying to free us from christianity

    NIETZSCHE AND EVOLA

    Nietzsche and evola were trying to free us from christianity, but failed to escape abrahamism: the occult.

    Nietzche used personal emotional suffering as the person’s trial, rather than demonstrated competition in reality as did homer’s achilles.

    In this sense, Nietzche only managed to transition from abrahamic slave morality to platonist morality : the morality of the dream state – the imagination.

    So Nietzche and Evola are still supernatural (Occult) fantasies that seek only psychological achievement, not demonstrable achievement. Nietzche and evola create a heaven of the mind, not a heaven on this earth – created by and owned by and rule by men.

    If you come to understand this you will understand why I seek demonstration in reality not belief. And why I ridicule the occultists for hallucinations rather than demonstrations.

    There is no higher aristocracy than one that is made by action. And that is homer’s Achilles Ordeal, Odysseus’s Ordeal before the bronze age collapse, Alexander’s Ordeal and Fall after the bronze age restoration, and Aeneas ordeal in rome.

    The future will treat Napoleon, Stalin, and Hitler the same.

    And in the present it is our time. Our era. Our life times during which the next set of myths will be created – or a dark age will follow.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 09:59:00 UTC