Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • MALE AND FEMALE LIFETIME STRATEGIES Except for the upper 1/2 of 1% of men, women

    MALE AND FEMALE LIFETIME STRATEGIES

    Except for the upper 1/2 of 1% of men, women are far more scarce for men than men are for women.

    And 1/3 of men have little or little or no market value at all.

    More than half of women are not insignificantly crazy.

    For men, children and women are an investment, and without them your life will be shorter and the later parts of it far less pleasant if not sad. If you have to choose, have as many children as you can pay attention to. You can trade women. But you cannot trade children.

    It is easier for women to find work in the easy and clean jobs, and easier for men to find work in the hard and dirty jobs.

    It is easier for women to integrate into new social groups as they get older.

    It is far harder for men to integrate into social groups as they get older.

    It is hard for women to ‘get things done’ as they get older.

    It is hard for men to take care of themselves as they get older.

    We are desperately short of men’s monasteries, secular monasteries, and regimental barracks (monasteries) than we need to be. And those changes can only occur if we are able to employ right of disassociation (requiring very specific kinship ties for membership)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:58:00 UTC

  • WE DO IT TOGETHER You see, the more value I add, the better people and comments

    WE DO IT TOGETHER

    You see, the more value I add, the better people and comments I attract, then together the better people and comments we attract, and the more skill we develop in articulating ideas – it’s a self fulfilling strategy.

    And now it is not uncommon at all to quote and promote others many times a day.

    Most people wanna share articles, ridicule, images, and memes.

    We create and distribute arguments and ideas.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:46:00 UTC

  • THE LOGIC OF THE SH-T TEST: CONTINUOUS COMPOSURE AND USEFULNESS –“Women shit te

    THE LOGIC OF THE SH-T TEST: CONTINUOUS COMPOSURE AND USEFULNESS

    –“Women shit test to make sure they are holding themselves in high enough company – company that can take care of her in case sh-t hits the fan, or to sort out the snakes. The genetic urge to constantly test your companion for composure can be very beneficial but it can also unravel unfit mates. As long as the man can maintain his frame of mind during a shit test he will pass, but if he can spread his composure to the woman he can “win”. The shit tests never stop and as you spread your composure to the woman through constant interaction her feminine energies will incorporate your composure and move to a higher level, I believe this is the case with a guy who “saves a girl” while not investing in himself enough ultimately being passed and outliving his usefulness. To maintain your attractiveness to your mate you must always be useful and always maintain a higher level of composure than your mate, through self discipline and self improvement of the mind and body. Shit tests can destroy you but if you understand them they can lead you to being the best man possible.”— George Carvlin

    I say this a bit differently as: our job is to make women feel safe in whatever way they need to feel safe. Unfortunately we have not been raised to make women feel safe and women have been raised to pretend they do not need to feel safe. So women are crazy and men are frustrated.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:45:00 UTC

  • “Wishful thinking is just intellectual free riding”—Ryan Williams (brilliant)

    —“Wishful thinking is just intellectual free riding”—Ryan Williams

    (brilliant)

    I suppose now I have to go thru and express ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion and obscurantism, fictionalism , and deceit in the same terms…… Thanks Ryan. As if I didn’t have enough work to do. 😉 (great insight)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:41:00 UTC

  • THE DIFFERENCES IN LEFT AND RIGHT ARGUMENTS? “In order to obscure or justify or

    THE DIFFERENCES IN LEFT AND RIGHT ARGUMENTS?

    “In order to obscure or justify or force an involuntary transfer, or prohibit the imposition of an involuntary behavioral cost, the LEFT uses…” (argumentative tactic)

    — vs.–

    “In order to prevent an involuntary transfer and impose an involuntary behavioral cost, the RIGHT uses…” (argumentative tactic)

    The left lacks agency physical, emotional, and intellectual. The right possesses agency: physical, emotional, intellectual.

    (thanks to Skye Stewart)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:32:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY AND DUTY Since today’s little spat with a libertarian was another ex

    SOVEREIGNTY AND DUTY

    Since today’s little spat with a libertarian was another example of how libertarians are using abrahamic pilpul to make excuses for their attempts to circumvent costs of commons I thought I would point out the obvious: that sovereignty cannot exist without duty of reciprocity.

    In other words, no rights are possible without corresponding obligations: reciprocity.

    In other words, you cannot possess sovereignty unless you are willing to fight for your own and that of others.

    Anarchists of any kind, seek precisely that escape.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:14:00 UTC

  • GOAL: EMPOWERING YOU Just to hammer home the point, my original intention was to

    GOAL: EMPOWERING YOU

    Just to hammer home the point, my original intention was to create a value neutral language for the articulation and comparison of group, political, moral and ethical differences.

    So that I try to do by *defining series* – to articulate causal relations that are not possible with using terminological *ideal types*.

    So I hope to be able to arm you and the many like you with terms, series, and their relations (concepts), so that those ideas you ‘intuit but have difficulty expressing’ can be expressed with greater ease.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:07:00 UTC

  • ROUGH ESTIMATION OF IMMIGRATION MAXIMUMS For a high trust population: Total mino

    ROUGH ESTIMATION OF IMMIGRATION MAXIMUMS

    For a high trust population:

    Total minority(non kin) population in single digits. No minority greater than three percent.

    I’m trying to falsify it and I can’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:01:00 UTC

  • LIBERTY, SOVEREIGNTY, AGENCY LIBERTY(given by permission – body, action, and pro

    LIBERTY, SOVEREIGNTY, AGENCY

    LIBERTY(given by permission – body, action, and property),

    SOVEREIGNTY(in fact – property and body),

    AGENCY(in fact – action and thought)

    To posses LIBERTY (of life and property) you must be given it by someone with the power to take it from you.

    To posses SOVEREIGNTY (over your property) you have the ability to deny others the power to take it from you.

    To possess AGENCY (action) you must have the ability to deny others the power to take it from you. and you must have sufficient mastery of self, and knowledge to do so.

    LIBERTARIANS SEEK LIBERTY, WHILE SOVEREIGNS SEEK AGENCY

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 15:49:00 UTC

  • “Curt Doolittle you basically are human version of spambot with quality content.

    —“Curt Doolittle you basically are human version of spambot with quality content.”— Dariusz Fit

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 15:10:00 UTC