Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • LIBERTARIAN AND CONSERVATIVE CRITICS OF THE ALT RIGHT AND NEW RIGHT The evidence

    http://www.scifiwright.com/2017/07/doctor-of-common-sense-and-zo/FOR LIBERTARIAN AND CONSERVATIVE CRITICS OF THE ALT RIGHT AND NEW RIGHT

    The evidence of the failure of libertarianism and conservatism is provided by the fact that conservatives have ONLY produced moral literature of moral equivocation and naturalistic fallacy, and NEVER produced a rational, or ratio-scientific literature with which to defend themselves against Abrahamism and Platonism in the ancient world (judaism/christianity/islam), or Abrahamism in the modern world (classical liberal equalitarianism(Middle Class), Feminism(Women), Marxism(Labor), or Postmodern Identitarianism(Slaves)) – or against the methods of argument used in deceitful discourse (Pseudo-Myth(Supernaturalism), Pseudo-Rationalism(Platonic Idealism, Postmodern Lit.), and Pseudo-Science (Boazianism, Marxism, Freudianism,Cantorianism).

    The Alt Right has adopted the techniques of the marxists and postmodernists which is to abandon reason and merely propagandize, rally, shame ridicule, silence by volume, poisoning any discourse it can intrude upon in order to hindre emotional momentum, and directly engaging in opposition violence when possible, and to defeat the left when possible by letting the left demonstrate their character.

    The New Right (Myself) has abandoned the classical liberal project, the presumption of hopefulness that political bias is other than expression of individual and group evolutionary strategy: a proxy for war. And that any further debate is futile, and that only violence to bring about the restoration of the traditional compromises between the genders and classes – and if not possible, return to the subjugation of female genders and under classes. But that the status quo or the left’s further conquest of the west (for the second time) is not tolerable – even less tolerable than civil war.

    Now like any movement there are a tiny number of thought leaders, a small number of ideological leaders, a large number of agitators, communicators, and propagandists, and even larger numbers of sympathizers and advocates, and the main body of interested but uncommitted followers. As one would expect, the right does not consolidate into a single equalitarian body (as do females), but separates into tribes (as do males) using their own sentiments, language, arguments, and leaders. Right and men seek hunting packs with similar but specific agendas designed for rapid change, not a herd (and women and underclasses) with a loose directional agenda of incremental but continuous improvement.

    On the alt right, (although they dislike this analysis intensely), it is fairly clear that the tribes have organized around class lines (and rougnly IQ) and method of argument that *reflects their social competency*. And that evidence appears as the the nat-soc(threats), green-frogs(antagonism), masculinists and rationalists (resistance), classical liberals and traditionalists (active opposition), various scientists HBD, RR, etc (refutation), Rule of Law/philosophers(Solution Definition), Traditionalists (wishful thinkers – historical escapists), literary occultists like evola, nietzsche ( literary escapists / shamers), and techo-libertarians (tech escapists), new-age/pseudoscientists (conspiracy theorists and pseudoscience escapists).

    My opinion, as someone who has seen this transition (cycle) coming, and worked on it for many years, is that for the tribes of men to unite, those men need (a) a moral license, (b) a solution to demand (c) a plan of transition to the new solution (d) a strategy, tactics, and leadership by which to raise the cost of the status quo, until the demanded solution or a compromise is met. In other words, men need an objective to fight for using the methods of conflcit that they know how to employ. And our job is to succeed where the conservatives in ALL THEIR ITERATIONS since Burke first launched his criticism, have FAILED TO PRODUCE.

    We are in a cold civil war. That civil war can turn hot at any moment. I expect it to. The question is, who has that solution?

    Or rather, who ELSE has that solution?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    =====

    IN RESPONSE TO:

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 15:47:00 UTC

  • You aren’t oppressed. You’re under domestication until capable of Sovereignty of

    You aren’t oppressed. You’re under domestication until capable of Sovereignty of Reason, Emotion, and Action in Adult Civilization

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 15:06:00 UTC

  • OPPRESSION LIT. Feminism: The Women Marxism: The Laborers Identitarianism: The S

    OPPRESSION LIT.

    Feminism: The Women

    Marxism: The Laborers

    Identitarianism: The Slaves

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 15:00:00 UTC

  • YOU WANT TO KNOW HOW THE CHURCH LIED? THE CRIMES OF CHRISTIANITY? THE LAST WORD.

    YOU WANT TO KNOW HOW THE CHURCH LIED? THE CRIMES OF CHRISTIANITY? THE LAST WORD.

    (be careful. these words are dangerous.)

    But I’ll make a few technical and unavoidable statements.

    1) Gods exist only as literary characters for the purpose of anthropomorphic communication of phenomenon that cannot be explained due to ignorance, using ideal(symbolic and non causal) or real(existential and causal) terms. In other words, anthropomorphic characters provide decidability through empathy with the unit of measurement requiring the least use of reason available to man.

    2) The organizations and leaders of the churches and temples, or their constituent priests, rabbis, and imams do not, will not, and have not stated this. And instead state exactly the opposite.

    3) The bible is pure myth and wisdom which we can choose to use to but is, was represented, and was intended to be presented as history and law which we must obey or suffer punishment.

    4) Jesus was probably a real figure, but everything attributed to his birth and rising is a restatement of ancient astrology, where the transition between stellar descent (minimum) and ascent requires three days. Everything that jesus said is reducible to “regardless of who rules, do not be divided, and instead, extend kinship love to non kin, and in doing so, exhaust tolerance, because it is by this degree of forgiveness trust is built among our disparate peoples with different customs.” This is a far more scientific explanation of the golden and silver rules.

    5) Christianity was produced from the teachings of Jesus by Paul (Saul) and his adherents, just as the works of Marx in the dogmas of marxism and postmodernism was spread by the Frankfurt School, Alinsky school, and Postmodern school. The ‘oppression’ literature of christianity was evolved and argumentatively transformed and expanded just as the ‘oppression’ literature of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and identitarianism have been evolved and argumentatively transformed in the present era. Just as precisely the same was done with Islam and Judaism.

    4) From the tolerance of christianity to the forcible conversion to christianity and the persecution of pagans, it took only eighty years to destroy the empire. What had been a minority cult of the slaves and women, largely via women, was used to destroy the heroic and temporal civilization of the ancients. The consequence of christianity and the church was the destruction of the aristocracy both in rome and on the continent, the destruction of knowledge, the intentional hoarding of literacy, and the incremental accumulation and misallocation of and freezing of capital that prevented the recovery from the invasions and the plagues, and kept europe in a dark age until it was cast off again by the enlightenment as the scholars in the muslim world fled the spread the cancer of islam to the common people just as the church and byzantines spread the cancer of christianity to the common people. And the church, having transformed the warrior people of europe who desired to be ‘romans’ in adopting roman law and commerce into people who desired to be christians in christian mysticism and deceit, was too weak to resist both the rise of the North Sea Trade (Far from its reach), and the use of re-popularized greek (european) thought as a means of rebelling against the enslavement by poverty and ignorance of the church.

    The church was not only instrumental in the creation of the dark age by the attacks on the aristocracy and the thought of the aristocracy, but the cause of its prolongation.

    5) There is no difference between Judaism + Christianity + Islam, and marxism + postmodernism + feminism. It is precisely the same tactic repeated in the modern era as was used in the ancient era: immigrate, population, convert, resist, undermine, replace, and the successful return of Neolithic Feminine Equalitarianism that the Aristocratic (Aryan) Revolution evolved to resist and transform all mankind out of ignorance.

    The church is anti-western. To the degree that it is western it is only that the west resisted it. (See “Germanization of Christianity”)

    There is no reason that all of the goods of any religion cannot be provided without such institutionalization of lies and the consequential manufacture of ignorance.

    It is painfully obvious from intelligence data that the primary benefit of modernity has been the exchange of superstition and many small functional rules, to science and a few general descriptive rules, and the consequence has been the release of human intellectual capital imprisoned from the origins of abrahamism to its most recent death throws under abrahamic marxism, boazianism, freudianism, cantoranism, feminism, postmodernism, and identitarianism.

    CLOSING

    Abrahamism, in its three ancient, and three modern forms, was, is, and always will be, the source of ignorance, by which human intellectual, experiential, genetic, and material, and territorial capital is frozen dead.

    if there exist any gods, then the jury is in: The god of abraham is most certainly none other than the demon Lucifer – the Morningstar.

    Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 14:56:00 UTC

  • AMERICANS LIVE ON THE BALLS AND BRAWN OF PRIOR GENERATIONS —“Westerners strugg

    AMERICANS LIVE ON THE BALLS AND BRAWN OF PRIOR GENERATIONS

    —“Westerners struggle to define even the most basic forms of deception, let alone the sort of complexity that the Kremlin has been skull fucking you with for the past half-century. America, in particular, is living off the balls and brawn of prior generations while childishly and cowardly believing that appeasement, the NAP, negotiation with extortionists, and cooperation with terrorists (more so domestic than foreign) can end in anything other than a bloodbath.”—Emil Prelic

    (priceless)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 13:28:00 UTC

  • REFORM LIBERTARIANISM ONE BRICK AT A TIME: FROM FEBRUARY 2012 – BY IMITATING LEW

    REFORM LIBERTARIANISM ONE BRICK AT A TIME: FROM FEBRUARY 2012 – BY IMITATING LEW ROCKWELL: VOLUMINOUS CRITICISM

    (snip)

    Languages are necessary in order to articulate political preferences. Political preferences are the result of metaphysical value judgements. Value judgements are social strategies.

    The Libertarians have developed a language for universal political speech. Unfortunately, that language is grounded in a moralistic assumption about the very nature, cause and necessity of ethics.

    One brick at a time, one day at a time, Iā€™m trying to reform the libertarian language into aristocratic language, so that conservative sentiments, values, and social strategy can be articulated in the public debate ā€” so that we may conduct a battle of social models against encroaching totalitarianism brought about by Shumpeterian intellectuals.

    (snip)

    https://propertarianism.com/2012/02/21/what-i-learned-from-lew-rockwell/

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 13:26:00 UTC

  • MISES INSTITUTE BEGINS TO RETURN TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION (thanks for the alert t

    https://mises.org/blog/new-libertarianTHE MISES INSTITUTE BEGINS TO RETURN TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    (thanks for the alert to the post via @Kier Martland)

    Jeff,

    Very Inspiring. Congratulations. Thank you for what you’re doing. It’s profoundly important for lovers of liberty everywhere.

    Thank you for bringing the reformation to the Mises Institute and the restoration of liberty to the western rule of law. You are taking the first steps toward producing a necessary reformation of libertarianism – the one I have been aggressively working to force by criticism, and the one I hoped the Mises Institute would finally – against all institutional memory, embrace.

    I realize that reformation is challenging, and that it has taken time to change from radical individualism advocating separatism and hostility to commons, to radical civil society that preserves individualism by the production of commons. That was a hard transition to make. It restores liberty to the western and specifically anglo-germanic and greco-roman tradition of civil society. It’s important because separatism in the absence of institutions, commons, and territory means one ends up a diasporic people at the mercy of host civilizations, or survivors on a borderland in an age of man where no more borderlands exist.

    And while changing values from individual separatism to community membership is difficult, I also realize that completing that restoration of liberty to the argumentative western tradition is even more challenging, and that it will take time to correct the Institute’s accumulated overinvestment in anti-western philosophy: (a) Rothbardian ethics of volition (allowing blackmail and externalities) instead of the natural law of reciprocity (not provoking retaliation), (b) The test of reciprocity using the NAP against intersubjectively verifiable property instead of non-imposition against demonstrated investment in homesteading or exchange (property-in-toto), (c) praxeology as a conflation of science and logic, instead of a logic within the scientific method by which we test rationality and reciprocity(morality) of transfers:, (d) argument by Rabbinical and Kantian Hermeneutic Justification (law and morality post agreement to cooperate) instead of Darwinian Survival from Scientific Criticism (continuous rational choice between predation, cooperation, and boycott prior to agreement to cooperate).

    And I expect it will be even harder to swallow that western aristocracies profited from the domestication of the animal man by millennia of normative (access to opportunity), reproductive(access to reproduction), manorial (access to property and therefore food), and prosecutorial (legal), suppression of impulsive, immoral, unethical, and criminal behavior, and thereby applying the same aggressive eugenic domestication to man as he had to animal and plant. Ergo, man was not oppressed but domesticated until he could demonstrate equal sovereignty over mind, body, kin and possessions as his domesticators.

    As far as I know, libertarianism remains a form of rebellion against the warriors and soldiers who create sovereignty by the organized application of non-substitutable violence to prevent alternative orders other than sovereignty. And that liberty movements arose as appeals for incremental sovereignty as the protected middle class sought to retain the proceeds of their production, as providing value in the preservation of sovereignty equal in all but risk to the peerage of the warriors.

    Once libertarians are willing to pay the cost of their liberty, rather than rally and shame others for not giving it to them, the libertarian movement will be complete. And the conservative and libertarian movements united in all but demand for behavioral norms and reliance on argument and choice rather than ritual and obedience – which is the only material difference between us: libertarians with higher ambitions for novelty and opportunity, and higher ambitions for predictability and security.

    At that point you will cease needing to struggle for donations, and the aged remains of ‘hopeful’ conservatism, and revel in the position of the central agent of change that restores western civilization.

    Someone will profit from it and achieve it if you don’t. (wink)

    I’m happy you’ve made the journey. I’d be happier if you led that journey, rather than require the institute continue to be dragged, kicking, rallying, ignoring, prevaricating, and shaming into the western tradition: Nomocracy: Incremental suppression of the animal, Evolution through reproduction, Transcendence via reason.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    https://mises.org/blog/new-libertarian

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 13:03:00 UTC

  • MISES INSTITUTE BEGINS TO RETURN TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION (followers: please shar

    https://mises.org/blog/new-libertarianTHE MISES INSTITUTE BEGINS TO RETURN TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    (followers: please share enthusiastically everywhere, and let me know you have.)

    Jeff,

    Very Inspiring. Congratulations. Thank you for what you’re doing. It’s profoundly important for lovers of liberty everywhere.

    Thank you for bringing the reformation to the Mises Institute and the restoration of liberty to the western rule of law. You are taking the first steps toward producing a necessary reformation of libertarianism – the one I have been aggressively working to force by criticism, and the one I hoped the Mises Institute would finally – against all institutional memory, embrace.

    I realize that reformation is challenging, and that it has taken time to change from radical individualism advocating separatism and hostility to commons, to radical civil society that preserves individualism by the production of commons. That was a hard transition to make. It restores liberty to the western and specifically anglo-germanic and greco-roman tradition of civil society. It’s important because separatism in the absence of institutions, commons, and territory means one ends up a diasporic people at the mercy of host civilizations, or survivors on a borderland in an age of man where no more borderlands exist.

    And while changing values from individual separatism to community membership is difficult, I also realize that completing that restoration of liberty to the argumentative western tradition is even more challenging, and that it will take time to correct the Institute’s accumulated overinvestment in anti-western philosophy: (a) Rothbardian ethics of volition (allowing blackmail and externalities) instead of the natural law of reciprocity (not provoking retaliation), (b) The test of reciprocity using the NAP against intersubjectively verifiable property instead of non-imposition against demonstrated investment in homesteading or exchange (property-in-toto), (c) praxeology as a conflation of science and logic, instead of a logic within the scientific method by which we test rationality and reciprocity(morality) of transfers:, (d) argument by Rabbinical and Kantian Hermeneutic Justification (law and morality post agreement to cooperate) instead of Darwinian Survival from Scientific Criticism (continuous rational choice between predation, cooperation, and boycott prior to agreement to cooperate).

    And I expect it will be even harder to swallow that western aristocracies profited from the domestication of the animal man by millennia of normative (access to opportunity), reproductive(access to reproduction), manorial (access to property and therefore food), and prosecutorial (legal), suppression of impulsive, immoral, unethical, and criminal behavior, and thereby applying the same aggressive eugenic domestication to man as he had to animal and plant. Ergo, man was not oppressed but domesticated until he could demonstrate equal sovereignty over mind, body, kin and possessions as his domesticators.

    As far as I know, libertarianism remains a form of rebellion against the warriors and soldiers who create sovereignty by the organized application of non-substitutable violence to prevent alternative orders other than sovereignty. And that liberty movements arose as appeals for incremental sovereignty as the protected middle class sought to retain the proceeds of their production, as providing value in the preservation of sovereignty equal in all but risk to the peerage of the warriors.

    Once libertarians are willing to pay the cost of their liberty, rather than rally and shame others for not giving it to them, the libertarian movement will be complete. And the conservative and libertarian movements united in all but demand for behavioral norms and reliance on argument and choice rather than ritual and obedience – which is the only material difference between us: libertarians with higher ambitions for novelty and opportunity, and higher ambitions for predictability and security.

    At that point you will cease needing to struggle for donations, and the aged remains of ‘hopeful’ conservatism, and revel in the position of the central agent of change that restores western civilization.

    Someone will profit from it and achieve it if you don’t. (wink)

    I’m happy you’ve made the journey. I’d be happier if you led that journey, rather than require the institute continue to be dragged, kicking, rallying, ignoring, prevaricating, and shaming into the western tradition: Nomocracy: Incremental suppression of the animal, Evolution through reproduction, Transcendence via reason.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    https://mises.org/blog/new-libertarian

    (thanks for the alert to the post via @Kier Martland)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 13:02:00 UTC

  • “Our current and recent past elites are “the best” by immoral measures- the best

    “Our current and recent past elites are “the best” by immoral measures- the best liars, tricksters, manipulators. We need to change the standards by which we measure merit.” – Bill Joslin

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 12:07:00 UTC

  • Fortress, Manor, or Church? Germany, Britain, or France? Sparta, Athens or Troy?

    Fortress, Manor, or Church?

    Germany, Britain, or France?

    Sparta, Athens or Troy?

    Rome, Venice, or Constantinople?

    Alexander, Marco Polo, Mohammed?

    Achilles, The Blacksmith, or Jesus?

    Warrior, Producer, or Priest?

    Law, Contract, Norm?

    Truth, Exchange, or Fiction?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 12:05:00 UTC