—“Everyone I know who lives in a dual income home uses the woman’s job as collateral to borrow more money for shit they don’t need.”— Jonathan Scheller
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 14:32:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
Question for Men (Thinking) Extending the National Guard/Reserves to the “Local
Question for Men (Thinking)
Extending the National Guard/Reserves to the “Local Regiment” bridging the gap between Police/Fire/Ambulance and National Guard. Basically creating a militia/emergency services group.
1) regiments were self-forming corporations ( meaning you choose your own members with voluntary association and disassociation). Your own uniforms and that nonsense. You must have twenty five members, and pass your physicals, and
2) gym, sport, ‘fitness expeditions’, were managed and supplied to keep you fit, plus fire, maneuver, and first aid.
3) two weekends a month to keep you fit. two fitness tests a year which you must pass.
4) you are ‘on call’ for civic emergencies (all of them).
5) you cannot be called upon for foreign service.
6) you could get $1,000 per month, 10% tax reduction,
7) barracks (room and board) if you so desire it for half pay.
8) Veteran status after 180 days of active service (in emergencies).
9) after service, beginning at 55, half-pay, barracks (room and board).
10) membership and benefits never end.
In other words, what about paying men ‘of character’ to get fit and stay fit?
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 14:29:00 UTC
-
FALSE COMFORTS CREATE IGNORANCE People who feel out of control of their lives wa
FALSE COMFORTS CREATE IGNORANCE
People who feel out of control of their lives want to feel smart and in control so they create narratives that provide them with the false comfort of understanding, when in fact, all they do is manufacture their own ignorance.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 12:53:00 UTC
-
Kashif Vikaas Thank you for your help of late. 😉
Kashif Vikaas Thank you for your help of late. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 12:30:00 UTC
-
Dear Lunatics, All you have discovered is that history is full of a lot of idiot
Dear Lunatics,
All you have discovered is that history is full of a lot of idiots like you.
The job of historians is to discover the few fragments of truth despite the preponderance of idiots who wrote drivel and nonsense for popular consumption the same way that some idiot wrote the voynich manuscript: for money and fun.
The world is a very simple place. All science whether human or physical is very simple. People are simple. It’s their fantasies and lies that are complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 12:28:00 UTC
-
“CURT: HOW DO YOU SELF IDENTIFY?” —“Just out of interest, what do you identify
“CURT: HOW DO YOU SELF IDENTIFY?”
—“Just out of interest, what do you identify as politically if you were pressured into choosing?”— A New Friend
We do not have a meaningful term for my position any longer, but the closest historical term would be a “Tory” – or a nationalist and constitutional monarchist with complete rights to sovereignty including very limited personal behavior of display, word, and deed, in the commons (public).
However, Rather than constitutional monarchy which is open to interpretation, I use a more technical term “Nomocracy” referring to Rule of Law by Natural Law – where the constitution is very rigorously stated in strictly constructed, textual, limited, not open to interpretation, and as such, not an opinion or preference, but a scientific, and natural, immutable, inviolable “law” beyond which no man may tread.
And where we create markets in every aspect of life: association, cooperation, reproduction (family); the production of goods, services, and information; the production of commons; the production of polities; and pursuit of group evolutionary strategy.
And we manage these markets with a monarchy as judge of last resort, an independent judiciary of the natural law under universal standing in matters of the commons; houses of the commons for the production of commons by trade between classes limited to the creation of contracts, and forbidden from all attempts to create legislation that is a peer to or superior to the natural law of sovereignty.
Unless I’m speaking in colloquial language as a convenience, I disavow the terms ‘libertarian’, paleo-libertarian, and paleo-conservative, as marxist inventions, and the term ‘conservative’ as meaning little other than “show me it works first before legislating it”.
Because what one ‘believes’ is very different from what is scientifically moral, and institutionally possible, and produces sovereign, competitive, intellectually transcendent, emotionally correspondent, and biologically evolutionary outcomes.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 12:19:00 UTC
-
Sorry man, but professional athletes do get the best women – assuming they avoid
Sorry man, but professional athletes do get the best women – assuming they avoid the actresses. Avoid actresses at all costs.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 11:22:00 UTC
-
“Now, with an childhood-surviving birthrate even lower than the survival rate a
—“Now, with an childhood-surviving birthrate even lower than the survival rate a century ago, forcing women to get educations and jobs rather than preparing them for motherhood has again become a malinvestment.”— Steve Pender
Put differently, there has been very little value in adding women to the labor pool when it has merely been consumed by taxation and interest, at the expense of genocide.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 11:01:00 UTC
-
SLAVS AND GERMANICS ARE DIFFERENT ‘GENERATIONS’ You can conflate Corded ware (Po
SLAVS AND GERMANICS ARE DIFFERENT ‘GENERATIONS’
You can conflate Corded ware (Polish-Ukrainian territory), with celto-italic-germanic, which is true.
BUT while polish people speak a slavic language, slavs, (slavonic speakers), are (a) a much younger people, with no history and possibly only a proto-language prior to 700.
So while it may be possible to say that we all share black-sea ancestors, it is false to say they were slavs. The population-radiation is out of poland, for the simple reason that it’s the best farmland other than france. And the genome spreads from Poland on the north sea, well into western ukraine.
It is more correct to say that today’s slavs are the youngest and most ‘recent’ white people to evolve, and possibly that they are purest genetic europeans.
What you can’t say is that there is any relationship between the term Slav and any of the successes in the west. There isn’t *any* justification for that.
So use ‘early europeans’ as our common ancestors and you’re ok.
The general evidence is that the people who spoke germanic languages around the north sea evolved physical traits superior to all other european tribes in the modern world, largely through self-domestication. The corded ware culture probably created the waves of european excellence in the ancient world.
More by Simon Ström:
“Corded Ware” is probably too narrow, i.e., accounts only for one out of two important subsets of the sum total of the post 3,000 BC westward Yamnaya movements which together produced a “proto-white” core population.
The other major population being related rather to the Bell Beaker phenomenon, dominated by R1b Steppe clans migrating via the Sub-carpathian/Pannonian route as opposed to the territory of Poland and Ukraine which is associated with early Corded Ware).
Subsets of the Bell Beaker subsequently departed to colonize the British Isles and Scandinavia without significant admixture with the previous inhabitants. (Displacement).
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 10:55:00 UTC
-
“I”m not immoral. I raised four children as a single mother and….”— Yes you
—“I”m not immoral. I raised four children as a single mother and….”—
Yes you are immoral.
We are talking about your ridicule and shaming of others when you have little if any grasp of history, and certainly no grasp of the common law, economics, science, and comparative civilizations, cultures, and institutions. Especially given the luxury that has been the experience of western women by comparison to all other cultures – back to 4000bc.
Only children talk in ideals. the rest of us talk in possibilities and costs.
Property made marriage necessary. Childbearing and strength made separation of duties necessary. An average of 5-6 children only half of whom lived to adulthood made women a malinvestment in education *until* it was no longer a malinvestment. Men freed women of labor *first* before they freed themselves of labor.
The primary beneficiaries of modernity have been women, not men. For men, we are far better off running around in pickup trucks with a dozen of our friends, eating fresh meat, working 12 hours a week – if that – and hunting each other and animals.
Civilization was made by men for the benefit of women. Look around the world. Enjoy it. But don’t buy the marxist bullshit. The aristocracy shrunk the size of hte lower classes through upward redistribution of food, and reproduction, while replacing them with downward migration of the middle class. In other words, the aristocracy domesticated the animal man for profit and women reaped the benefits of it.
We don’t expect you to appreciate what our ancestors have done. On the other hand, we don’t expect you to destroy everything they have made, and we inherited.
Which is what you and women like you do every time you trash talk western civilization.
And what you have done is doom men to poverty and loneliness in old age, predatory taxation, the destruction of thousands of years of civilizational capital, for the sake of virtue-signaling falsehoods sold to you as “useful idiots” in the modern era by marxists and postmodernists, just as women were useful idiots that spread christianity and destroyed romany civilization in the ancient world.
The question isn’t why women don’t have it better. The question is why women have anything at all given their record of destroying western civilization twice now – by acting as infantilized irrational spoiled children.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 10:28:00 UTC