LIKE I SAID, THE ERA OF PROTESTS IS OVER
—“I’m curious, any thoughts on the Unite The Right, event?”–
From whose perspective? From mine, in my desire for revolution, it accomplished what I felt the movement needed to accomplish – disassociation with nat-socs, and realization that the era of protests is over, and that direct action is the only choice.
Revolution comes.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 09:20:00 UTC
Retweeted vij (@vijinho):
Sickening how the UK govt allied with the banks to fleece and indebt the public in WW1. Gordon Brown 2008 echoes.
https://t.co/NJMxqz0Ea3 https://t.co/Be4idrd9Sb
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 04:50:00 UTC
NEWBIES: ITS ALL ABOUT A SINGLE QUESTION: TRUTH
—“Why do people follow this bloke?”–Declan Keating
—“Because he uses lots of words”— Philip Maher
‘Cause I say smart things, for smart people, in language for smart people, and openly ridicule not-smart people, for not understanding smart things written in language for smart people. And believe it or not, there are smart people around the world. Conversely, only a simple pleb speaks in the simple language of simple plebs. So I don’t speak in the simple language of plebs, because I am not a simple pleb – and doing so would be pandering to simple plebs.
Seriously though: *I am playing an internet game: How do you do serious philosophy and political theory using the internet as your classroom?* And I am asking one very big question: “Is it possible to legislate the demand for warranty of due diligence for public political and commercial speech just as we demand it for products and services – thereby freeing us from living in a world of lies?” Well, it turns out that there are people who want to do serious philosophy and political theory who can’t or dont want or won’t spend the money to do so full time in universities. And that they are interested in the answer to that question. The price of working as I do, is switching from philosopher, to professor, to troll (animal) controller.
And it’s hard to separate the decent ordinary folk from the dick-weeds who waste my time and effort. So I have learned to Troll-fight with the best. 😉
cheers. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 04:47:00 UTC
Follow this guy. He’s interesting on economics.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 04:41:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 21:39:00 UTC
by Eli Harman
Trump today: “Everyone is created equal. Love Trumps hate. We need to come together. “
All wrong. All lies. We have no friends in high places, only enemies. The official policy of the US government is now openly and *explicitly* that white males have no rights, white male interests are not legitimate, and white male grievances are spurious or safe to ignore.
Some people are seeing white pills in ordinary interactions with ordinary folks, starting to see through the mask, to the hostility behind. If there are white pills to be found, that’s the only place they’ll be found.
Reach out. Connect. Link up. Stand up. Resist, each in your own way.
The asses are braying for blood. And they mean to stomp us out. That’s becoming harder and harder to deny every day. They are openly boasting about it all over the place.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 14:12:00 UTC
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/897151410600587265/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=897151410600587265THIS IS THE REVOLUTION WE ALL WANT – ON BOTH SIDES – AND IT’S BEAUTIFUL!
#Trump #Potus https://t.co/d248Lj058C
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 13:42:00 UTC
—“The fear was always that Trump was just a bone thrown to placate us. But, now, it seems, he’s not even that.”— Eli Harman
He is a bone of our own making. He bought us time.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 13:29:00 UTC
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/897147539157377026/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=897147539157377026REVOLUTION COMES!!!!
@POTUS #Trump https://t.co/57Pv25ZoLo
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 13:26:00 UTC
THE PROBLEM IS NOT SCIENCE PER SE, IT IS LAW
First: I think that if you can’t define the term ‘science’ that you can’t make claims about who understands what. And I am fairly certain that very few people can define science in scientific terms so to speak. So there is a very great difference between the definition of science that one warranties and a definition that one does not.
Second: there is a difference between (a) science that identifies a pattern, or opportunity, and science that defines limits of the pattern or opportunity, (b) science that it is possible to draw deductions from, and science that it is not. (c) science that one warranties, and science one does not.
Third: there is a difference between policy one warranties and policy one does not.
The difference between science and non-science is only testable by warranty.
How would science and policy differ if one’s speech and policy were involuntarily warrantied, just as products(property) and services(actions) are involuntarily warrantied?
Is information(science) not a market goods? Is there some special pleading you think that science is worthy of? (no)
The problem is not the definition of science. the problem is lack of warranty of due diligence, and lack of involuntary warranty against falsehood, immorality, and harm.
The problem is not science – it is law.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 09:59:00 UTC