Source: Facebook

MY WORK: TWO THEORIES, ONE QUESTION, ONE OBJECTIVE

My work, and this book, is predicated upon two theories, one question, and one objective:

1) The First Theory: Western Civilization, in prehistory, invented deflationary truth, and this is the single cause of all consequent western developments.

I work with incentives, and assume we merely justify what works. This explains all human behavior I am able to decompose, right down to variations in personality traits as variations in reward systems that produce the stages of the prey drive.

Pastoralism (highly distributed property ownership) > no concentration of capital that makes armies possible.

……|> Family/Clan(cost of weapons) > Independently funded ‘pirates/vikings/raiders’ practice pirate ethics (liberty). > Militia not army.

……………….|>………Maneuver (Tactics using horse, bronze, wheel) > Requires unbreakable oaths even in the face of death.

………………………………..| > Deflationary Testimonial Truth(Contract) > The centrality of truth and oath as greatest cultural asset.

……………………………………………….| > Tolerance for reordering the status hierarchy by merit.

…………………………………………………………….| > Heroism (Risk Taking) (Entrepreneurship)

………………………………………………………………………|> Sovereignty (ownership)

…………………………………………………………………………………|> Common law of property (Tort), Independent judges, jury, thang, senate

…………………………………………………………………………………………………..|> Markets in everything

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………|> Classes imitate status signals of aristocracy.

The application of maneuver (today’s “ooda loop”) to the organization of civilization.

The west never needs to be first, but it is always fastest.

Westerners do demonstrate higher degrees of anxiety, lower clannishness, higher trust.

2) The second theory: that what we call abrahamism was a profound innovation in the art of deception by the techniquos of conflation and suggestion and ficationalism, and that it was through this means of deception in the ancient world, under judaism, christianity, and islam using writing and pulpit, and in the modern under marxism, postmodernism, and islamism using media and academy.

3) The question: is it possible to define a test of what we call scientific, deflationary, truthfulness regardless of subject matter, such that we can extend the warranty of due diligence on products and services to that of information: meaning: speech?

4) The ambition: to produce teach people the technique – constituting an additional logic, to create a movement if not institution to teach this technique, and produce a constitutional amendments with sufficient incentives for a population to voluntarily vote for this requirement in law – or to provoke a revolution and secession and implement it regardless.